← Hillingdon (all cycles) · 7 May 2026 cohort

Hillingdon 2026

Local elections held 7 May 2026.

1 ward races
3 seats
3 elected below the proportional quota
100.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 1 ward in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 3 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party8,21654.4%3100.0%266.7%+1
Reform UK2,87119.0%00.0%133.3%-1
Labour Party2,43216.1%00.0%00.0%0
Liberal Democrats8115.4%00.0%00.0%0
Green Party7835.2%00.0%00.0%0
Total15,113100.0%3100.0%3100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2026 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2026 election (current) and on the eve of it (2025), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2026)
Previous (2025)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

South Ruislip · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner 16.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota −8.2 pts Valid ballots 15,113

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareBelow quotaElected
1Steve TuckwellConservative Party3,02120.0%−5.0 ptsElected
2Richard MillsConservative Party2,66317.6%−7.4 ptsElected
3John GarnerConservative Party2,53216.8%−8.2 ptsElected
4Richard SellarsReform UK1,0026.6%
5Teji BarnesReform UK9696.4%
6Sandeep AndhrutkarReform UK9006.0%
7Sarah RyderLabour Party8805.8%
8Katrinah PhenyoLabour Party7905.2%
9Svavar SvavarssonGreen Party7835.2%
10Joseph KirraneLabour Party7625.0%
11Karen Lesley BanksLiberal Democrats3332.2%
12Andrew John BellLiberal Democrats2831.9%
13Gavin Douglas ColemanLiberal Democrats1951.3%

Electorate 11,904 · Ballots cast 15,118 · Invalid 5 · EC ward code local.hillingdon.south-ruislip.2026-05-07 · Back to ward index