← Kirklees (all cycles) · 7 May 2026 cohort

Kirklees 2026

Local elections held 7 May 2026.

1 ward races
3 seats
3 elected below the proportional quota
100.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 1 ward in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 3 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Liberal Democrats6,94039.8%266.7%266.7%0
Reform UK6,90139.6%133.3%133.3%0
Green Party1,4648.4%00.0%00.0%0
Conservative Party1,1716.7%00.0%00.0%0
Labour Party9655.5%00.0%00.0%0
Total17,441100.0%3100.0%3100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2026 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2026 election (current) and on the eve of it (2025), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2026)
Previous (2025)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Cleckheaton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner 13.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota −11.7 pts Valid ballots 17,441

RankCandidatePartyVotesShareBelow quotaElected
1Kathryn Mary PinnockLiberal Democrats2,46614.1%−10.9 ptsElected
2Michael Robert HowardReform UK2,38613.7%−11.3 ptsElected
3Andrew Charles PinnockLiberal Democrats2,31913.3%−11.7 ptsElected
4Michael LockwoodReform UK2,31213.3%
5Richard YeomanReform UK2,20312.6%
6John Craig LawsonLiberal Democrats2,15512.4%
7Isabelle Frances Cranfield MaddoxGreen Party5373.1%
8Piers John BriggsConservative Party4982.9%
9Zac WilliamsonGreen Party4812.8%
10Mohammed BabarGreen Party4462.6%
11Erica Susan AmendeLabour Party3832.2%
12Tony VeverkaConservative Party3381.9%
13Andrew Lyndon GrayConservative Party3351.9%
14Kay Belinda QuantrillLabour Party3111.8%
15Adeel FerozLabour Party2711.6%

Electorate 13,793 · Ballots cast 17,451 · Invalid 10 · EC ward code local.kirklees.cleckheaton.2026-05-07 · Back to ward index