← Redbridge (all cycles) · 3 May 2018 cohort

Redbridge 2018

Local elections held 3 May 2018.

22 ward races
63 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 63 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party127,48458.4%5181.0%3860.3%+13
Conservative Party77,05535.3%1219.0%2234.9%-10
Liberal Democrats8,1103.7%00.0%23.2%-2
Green Party3,4551.6%00.0%11.6%-1
Independent1,6360.7%00.0%00.0%0
RedbrTU6230.3%00.0%00.0%0
Total218,363100.0%63100.0%63100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2018 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2018 election (current) and on the eve of it (2017), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2018)
Previous (2017)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

South Woodford · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,933

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Suzanne NolanConservative Party1,55413.2%39.5%+14.5 ptsElected
2Michael DuffellConservative Party1,53313.0%39.0%+14.0 ptsElected
3Beverley BrewerLabour Party1,53213.0%39.0%+14.0 ptsElected
4Joel HergaConservative Party1,50812.8%38.3%
5Gregor EglinLabour Party1,43912.2%36.6%
6Mark WalkerLabour Party1,38211.7%35.1%
7Natalie DarbyLiberal Democrats7096.0%18.0%
8Paul EmsleyLiberal Democrats6135.2%15.6%
9Nat PablaLiberal Democrats5794.9%14.7%
10Lee BurkwoodGreen Party3553.0%9.0%
11Ashley GunstockGreen Party3392.9%8.6%
12Barry CooperGreen Party2552.2%6.5%

EC ward code E05011252 · Back to ward index

Churchfields · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,503

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stephen AdamsConservative Party1,83213.6%40.7%+15.7 ptsElected
2Clark VaseyConservative Party1,81713.5%40.4%+15.4 ptsElected
3Rosa GomezLabour Party1,76613.1%39.2%+14.2 ptsElected
4Alexander WilsonConservative Party1,75613.0%39.0%
5Wendy TaylorLabour Party1,59211.8%35.4%
6Chowdury RahmanLabour Party1,52011.3%33.8%
7Gwyneth DeakinsLiberal Democrats1,1638.6%25.8%
8Geoffrey SeeffLiberal Democrats1,1028.2%24.5%
9Mike DaykinLiberal Democrats9607.1%21.3%

EC ward code E05011238 · Back to ward index

Wanstead Village · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,222

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jo BlackmanLabour Party2,00915.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
2Paul DonovanLabour Party1,93515.3%45.8%+20.8 ptsElected
3Daniel Morgan-ThomasLabour Party1,76413.9%41.8%+16.8 ptsElected
4Scott WildingConservative Party1,75413.8%41.5%
5Michelle DunnConservative Party1,70713.5%40.4%
6Steve WilksConservative Party1,68313.3%39.9%
7Elisabeth WilliamsGreen Party4773.8%11.3%
8Crispin ActonLiberal Democrats3933.1%9.3%
9David BruckLiberal Democrats3492.8%8.3%
10Tony CsokaGreen Party3012.4%7.1%
11Cedric KnightGreen Party2932.3%6.9%

EC ward code E05011255 · Back to ward index

Bridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,375

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Paul CanalConservative Party1,73517.1%51.4%+26.4 ptsElected
2Anita BoatengConservative Party1,71416.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
3Robin TurbefieldConservative Party1,60515.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
4Lloyd DuddridgeLabour Party1,59315.7%47.2%
5Guy WilliamsLabour Party1,55215.3%46.0%
6Ellie TaylorLabour Party1,47014.5%43.6%
7David ReynoldsGreen Party4564.5%13.5%

EC ward code E05011236 · Back to ward index

Wanstead Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,812

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sheila BainLabour Party1,76631.4%62.8%+29.5 ptsElected
2Paul MerryLabour Party1,64129.2%58.4%+25.0 ptsElected
3Patrick BennettConservative Party97617.4%34.7%
4Richard KaysConservative Party91916.3%32.7%
5Christopher PalletLiberal Democrats3225.7%11.5%

EC ward code E05011254 · Back to ward index

Barkingside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,400

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Judith GarfieldLabour Party2,45718.6%55.8%+30.8 ptsElected
2Martin SachsLabour Party2,36517.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
3Mohammed Khaled NoorLabour Party2,25517.1%51.2%+26.2 ptsElected
4Ashley KissinConservative Party1,98415.0%45.1%
5Melvyn MarksConservative Party1,87914.2%42.7%
6Karen PackerConservative Party1,87614.2%42.6%
7Deborah FinkGreen Party3852.9%8.7%

EC ward code E05011235 · Back to ward index

Fullwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,023

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Vanisha Bharti SolankiLabour Party2,43220.1%60.4%+35.4 ptsElected
2Sham IslamLabour Party2,21218.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
3Sadiq KothiaLabour Party2,12917.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
4Sanjib BhattacharjeeConservative Party1,68213.9%41.8%
5Jeevah HaranConservative Party1,67313.9%41.6%
6Wesley MantaConservative Party1,49912.4%37.3%
7Dominic BlackLiberal Democrats4433.7%11.0%

EC ward code E05011243 · Back to ward index

Hainault · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,288

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Roy EmmettLabour Party1,90519.3%57.9%+32.9 ptsElected
2Mark SantosLabour Party1,81518.4%55.2%+30.2 ptsElected
3Joe HehirLabour Party1,74417.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
4Sam ChapmanConservative Party1,59316.2%48.5%
5John KissaneConservative Party1,41214.3%42.9%
6James PepeConservative Party1,39414.1%42.4%

EC ward code E05011245 · Back to ward index

Clayhall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,494

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gurdial Singh BhamraLabour Party2,70020.0%60.1%+35.1 ptsElected
2Sunita Kaur BhamraLabour Party2,58819.2%57.6%+32.6 ptsElected
3Mohammed Jamal UddinLabour Party2,48518.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
4Pranav BhanotConservative Party2,02015.0%44.9%
5Robert ColeConservative Party1,78213.2%39.6%
6Alan WeinbergConservative Party1,70412.6%37.9%
7Ash HolderLiberal Democrats2041.5%4.5%

EC ward code E05011239 · Back to ward index

Fairlop · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,419

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Howard BerlinConservative Party2,04419.9%59.8%+34.8 ptsElected
2Joyce RyanConservative Party2,01119.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
3Ruth ClarkConservative Party1,94819.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
4Bob ChattawayLabour Party1,46214.3%42.8%
5Nirojan RaveendralingamLabour Party1,30312.7%38.1%
6Kris SanganiLabour Party1,23212.0%36.0%
7Joel WinstonLiberal Democrats2562.5%7.5%

EC ward code E05011242 · Back to ward index

Cranbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,654

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chaudhary AhmedLabour Party2,35021.4%64.3%+39.3 ptsElected
2Syeda AliLabour Party2,21820.2%60.7%+35.7 ptsElected
3Varinder Singh BolaLabour Party2,08919.1%57.2%+32.2 ptsElected
4Mahboob ChaudharyConservative Party1,71115.6%46.8%
5David RomeConservative Party1,29811.8%35.5%
6Richard FirmstoneConservative Party1,29711.8%35.5%

EC ward code E05011241 · Back to ward index

Aldborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,649

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1John HowardLabour Party2,50522.9%68.6%+43.6 ptsElected
2Debbie Kaur-ThiaraLabour Party2,40822.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
3Jyotsna IslamLabour Party2,14619.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
4Alicja BorkowskaConservative Party1,14510.5%31.4%
5Kash AkramConservative Party1,13010.3%31.0%
6Garry SukhijaConservative Party9909.0%27.1%
7Andy WalkerRedbrTU6235.7%17.1%

EC ward code E05011234 · Back to ward index

Monkhams · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,999

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Linda HuggettConservative Party2,14035.7%71.4%+38.0 ptsElected
2Michael StarkConservative Party2,05034.2%68.4%+35.0 ptsElected
3Catherine RowanLabour Party5799.7%19.3%
4Tareq ChowdhuryLabour Party5619.4%18.7%
5Claire HuntLiberal Democrats3616.0%12.0%
6Mike TeahanLiberal Democrats3065.1%10.2%

EC ward code E05011249 · Back to ward index

Chadwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,326

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bert JonesLabour Party2,27922.8%68.5%+43.5 ptsElected
2Hannah ChaudhryLabour Party2,18321.9%65.6%+40.6 ptsElected
3Anne SachsLabour Party2,05720.6%61.9%+36.9 ptsElected
4Simon HearnConservative Party99710.0%30.0%
5Mohammed Nazim UddinConservative Party8878.9%26.7%
6Diana DanescuConservative Party8748.8%26.3%
7Gary StaightLiberal Democrats3503.5%10.5%
8John TyneGreen Party3503.5%10.5%

EC ward code E05011237 · Back to ward index

Newbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,530

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Thavathuray JeyaranjanLabour Party2,28021.5%64.6%+39.6 ptsElected
2Dev SharmaLabour Party2,24621.2%63.6%+38.6 ptsElected
3Elaine NormanLabour Party2,23021.1%63.2%+38.2 ptsElected
4Afsor HussainConservative Party1,23511.7%35.0%
5Greta ReneConservative Party9739.2%27.6%
6Baldev Singh BainsConservative Party8878.4%25.1%
7David StephensIndependent4844.6%13.7%
8Amritpal Singh GillIndependent2542.4%7.2%

EC ward code E05011250 · Back to ward index

Ilford Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 78.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,940

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Syeda AhmedLabour Party1,54639.9%79.7%+46.4 ptsElected
2Shoaib PatelLabour Party1,51839.1%78.3%+44.9 ptsElected
3Meenakshi SharmaIndependent42911.1%22.1%
4Mona AhsanConservative Party2245.8%11.5%
5Olakunle OlaifaConservative Party1624.2%8.4%

EC ward code E05011246 · Back to ward index

Valentines · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,988

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ross HatfullLabour Party2,31725.9%77.6%+52.6 ptsElected
2Khayer ChowdhuryLabour Party2,26725.3%75.9%+50.9 ptsElected
3Farah HussainLabour Party2,10523.5%70.5%+45.5 ptsElected
4Andrew FrancisConservative Party7398.2%24.7%
5George DunkleyConservative Party6457.2%21.6%
6Undinti ShubhakerConservative Party4214.7%14.1%
7Barrymore ScotlandIndependent2582.9%8.6%
8Max ReidIndependent2112.4%7.1%

EC ward code E05011253 · Back to ward index

Goodmayes · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,005

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Namreen ChaudhryLabour Party2,42226.9%80.6%+55.6 ptsElected
2Kam RaiLabour Party2,32925.8%77.5%+52.5 ptsElected
3Neil ZammettLabour Party2,26025.1%75.2%+50.2 ptsElected
4Maureen AshleyConservative Party6967.7%23.2%
5Alice PastidesConservative Party6587.3%21.9%
6Rash MahalConservative Party6507.2%21.6%

EC ward code E05011244 · Back to ward index

Mayfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,332

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jas AthwalLabour Party2,71727.2%81.5%+56.5 ptsElected
2Kay FlintLabour Party2,60226.0%78.1%+53.1 ptsElected
3Ayodhiya ParkashLabour Party2,52325.2%75.7%+50.7 ptsElected
4Wilson ChowdhryConservative Party7747.7%23.2%
5Stuart HalsteadConservative Party7617.6%22.8%
6Zeb QuddosConservative Party6196.2%18.6%

EC ward code E05011248 · Back to ward index

Loxford · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 77.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +52.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,585

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chaudhary IqbalLabour Party2,12827.4%82.3%+57.3 ptsElected
2Saira JamilLabour Party2,10127.1%81.3%+56.3 ptsElected
3Taifur RashidLabour Party1,99325.7%77.1%+52.1 ptsElected
4Lucy BostickConservative Party4345.6%16.8%
5Hasnain AhmedConservative Party4315.6%16.7%
6Michael SpeakmanConservative Party4255.5%16.4%
7Syed AliGreen Party2443.1%9.4%

EC ward code E05011247 · Back to ward index

Seven Kings · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 77.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +52.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,149

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harold BellwoodLabour Party2,63027.8%83.5%+58.5 ptsElected
2Bob LittlewoodLabour Party2,50826.6%79.7%+54.7 ptsElected
3Sareena SangerLabour Party2,44125.8%77.5%+52.5 ptsElected
4Mosheraf AshrafConservative Party7067.5%22.4%
5Thor HallandConservative Party5866.2%18.6%
6Shirley MensahConservative Party5756.1%18.3%

EC ward code E05011251 · Back to ward index

Clementswood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 81.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +56.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,747

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Helen CoombLabour Party2,37828.9%86.6%+61.6 ptsElected
2Muhammed JavedLabour Party2,27827.6%82.9%+57.9 ptsElected
3Zulfiqar HussainLabour Party2,24527.2%81.7%+56.7 ptsElected
4Matthew ColeConservative Party4715.7%17.1%
5Christopher CumminsConservative Party4435.4%16.1%
6Christopher HolmesConservative Party4275.2%15.5%

EC ward code E05011240 · Back to ward index