← South Lakeland (all cycles) · 3 May 2018 cohort

South Lakeland 2018

Local elections held 3 May 2018.

18 ward races
51 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 51 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Liberal Democrats43,86041.0%2956.9%2141.2%+8
Conservative Party43,77740.9%1937.3%2141.2%-2
Labour Party10,81810.1%35.9%59.8%-2
Green Party8,1817.7%00.0%47.8%-4
Independent2860.3%00.0%00.0%0
Total106,922100.0%51100.0%51100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2018 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2018 election (current) and on the eve of it (2017), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2018)
Previous (2017)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Kendal North · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,533

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stephen ColemanLiberal Democrats66721.8%43.5%+10.2 ptsElected
2Jon OwenLiberal Democrats54317.7%35.4%+2.1 ptsElected
3Carole WoodGreen Party46815.3%30.5%
4Harry TaylorConservative Party37212.1%24.3%
5Thomas ScottConservative Party32410.6%21.1%
6Laura MillerGreen Party2708.8%17.6%
7Jo MagneLabour Party2387.8%15.5%
8Jim RingLabour Party1836.0%11.9%

EC ward code E05011499 · Back to ward index

Cartmel · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,487

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gill GardnerLiberal Democrats78426.4%52.7%+19.4 ptsElected
2Michael CornahConservative Party68723.1%46.2%+12.9 ptsElected
3Dave RawcliffeLiberal Democrats65722.1%44.2%
4Joanne MooreConservative Party61120.5%41.1%
5Kate Random LoveLabour Party983.3%6.6%
6Robin le MareGreen Party933.1%6.3%
7Gwen HarrisonGreen Party441.5%3.0%

EC ward code E05011495 · Back to ward index

Kendal Rural · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,222

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pat BellConservative Party1,04415.7%47.0%+22.0 ptsElected
2Anne HuttonLiberal Democrats96914.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
3Hazel HodgsonLiberal Democrats90713.6%40.8%+15.8 ptsElected
4Mike NicholsonConservative Party84812.7%38.2%
5Cheryl TearleLiberal Democrats83012.5%37.4%
6Nigel ByromConservative Party81812.3%36.8%
7Fran RichardsonGreen Party3385.1%15.2%
8Adrian PorterGreen Party2804.2%12.6%
9Daniel RaysonGreen Party2744.1%12.3%
10Mike HallsallLabour Party1812.7%8.1%
11Hanna BurkeLabour Party1762.6%7.9%

EC ward code E05011500 · Back to ward index

Kendal East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,129

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Rachael HoggLiberal Democrats1,09317.1%51.3%+26.3 ptsElected
2Eamonn HennessyLiberal Democrats95815.0%45.0%+20.0 ptsElected
3Helen LadhamsLiberal Democrats88513.9%41.6%+16.6 ptsElected
4James AlexanderConservative Party80612.6%37.9%
5Lyndsay SlaterConservative Party71911.3%33.8%
6Pam FlitcroftConservative Party69310.9%32.6%
7Phil AthertonLabour Party2794.4%13.1%
8Helen StaffordLabour Party2283.6%10.7%
9Maggie MasonLabour Party2213.5%10.4%
10Janet AntrobusGreen Party2053.2%9.6%
11Paul WoodsGreen Party1542.4%7.2%
12Andy MasonGreen Party1462.3%6.9%

EC ward code E05011498 · Back to ward index

Broughton and Coniston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,299

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Anne HallConservative Party1,08115.7%47.0%+22.0 ptsElected
2Tracy CowardLiberal Democrats1,02914.9%44.8%+19.8 ptsElected
3Matt BreretonConservative Party97214.1%42.3%+17.3 ptsElected
4David FletcherLiberal Democrats94013.6%40.9%
5Anna EllwoodConservative Party91813.3%39.9%
6Ian WhartonLiberal Democrats87612.7%38.1%
7Joss CurwenIndependent2864.1%12.4%
8Lynette GilliganGreen Party2343.4%10.2%
9Geraldine ScottLabour Party2323.4%10.1%
10Paul MartinLabour Party1652.4%7.2%
11Kevin ParkerLabour Party1652.4%7.2%

EC ward code E05011493 · Back to ward index

Kendal West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,938

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brian FinchLiberal Democrats99917.2%51.5%+26.5 ptsElected
2Matt SevernLiberal Democrats84214.5%43.4%+18.4 ptsElected
3Graham VincentLiberal Democrats84114.5%43.4%+18.4 ptsElected
4Hannah LaneConservative Party67011.5%34.6%
5Melvin MackieConservative Party5589.6%28.8%
6Bill WearingConservative Party5329.2%27.5%
7Tony RothwellLabour Party3556.1%18.3%
8Trevor BatchelorLabour Party3265.6%16.8%
9Kate TordoffLabour Party2314.0%11.9%
10Sue CoxGreen Party2053.5%10.6%
11Rosie WhitingGreen Party1362.3%7.0%
12Phil WhitingGreen Party1192.0%6.1%

EC ward code E05011503 · Back to ward index

Kendal South and Natland · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,313

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jonathan BrookLiberal Democrats1,18117.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
2Chris HoggLiberal Democrats1,13016.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
3Doug RathboneLiberal Democrats1,01714.7%44.0%+19.0 ptsElected
4John WaddingtonConservative Party94413.6%40.8%
5Aron TaylorConservative Party90613.1%39.2%
6Margaret BondConservative Party87212.6%37.7%
7Henry AdamsGreen Party1782.6%7.7%
8Lois SparlingLabour Party1742.5%7.5%
9Meg HillGreen Party1602.3%6.9%
10Alison GilchristLabour Party1422.0%6.1%
11Elsa Fuster-MearsGreen Party1201.7%5.2%
12Ian LawLabour Party1141.6%4.9%

EC ward code E05011501 · Back to ward index

Furness Peninsula · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,937

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1James AireyConservative Party1,01417.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
2Caroline AireyConservative Party98617.0%50.9%+25.9 ptsElected
3Andrew ButcherConservative Party87815.1%45.3%+20.3 ptsElected
4Janet WillisLiberal Democrats81214.0%41.9%
5Loraine BirchallLiberal Democrats67311.6%34.7%
6Alan CookLiberal Democrats62010.7%32.0%
7Joan CassonLabour Party2454.2%12.6%
8Philip CooperLabour Party2093.6%10.8%
9Eirik HuntLabour Party2023.5%10.4%
10Peter HowlettGreen Party1723.0%8.9%

EC ward code E05011496 · Back to ward index

Sedbergh and Kirkby Lonsdale · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,563

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kevin LancasterConservative Party1,29816.9%50.7%+25.7 ptsElected
2Ian MitchellLiberal Democrats1,21315.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
3Sheila CapstickConservative Party1,18015.3%46.0%+21.0 ptsElected
4Suzie PyeLiberal Democrats1,17615.3%45.9%
5Christine BestLiberal Democrats1,15815.1%45.2%
6Sheena PringConservative Party1,07614.0%42.0%
7Andrew ChappleGreen Party2022.6%7.9%
8Nick CrossLabour Party1642.1%6.4%
9Daphne JacksonGreen Party1411.8%5.5%
10Adam RubinsteinGreen Party801.0%3.1%

EC ward code E05011504 · Back to ward index

Kendal Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,177

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Giles ArchibaldLiberal Democrats1,21918.7%56.0%+31.0 ptsElected
2Peter ThorntonLiberal Democrats1,04015.9%47.8%+22.8 ptsElected
3Phil DixonLiberal Democrats1,00615.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
4Paul BraithwaiteLabour Party4336.6%19.9%
5Fraser LyallConservative Party4256.5%19.5%
6Claire ShuttleworthConservative Party4236.5%19.4%
7Daniel EgglestoneConservative Party4196.4%19.2%
8Mick DownesLabour Party3966.1%18.2%
9Alison IrelandLabour Party3655.6%16.8%
10Robin BaileyGreen Party3014.6%13.8%
11Andrew HerbertGreen Party2774.2%12.7%
12Ian RodhamGreen Party2273.5%10.4%

EC ward code E05011502 · Back to ward index

Ambleside and Grasmere · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,423

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Vicky HughesLiberal Democrats86330.3%60.7%+27.3 ptsElected
2Vivienne ReesLiberal Democrats78027.4%54.8%+21.5 ptsElected
3Martin HallConservative Party39914.0%28.0%
4Sandra LilleyConservative Party37513.2%26.4%
5Christina BirchGreen Party1475.2%10.3%
6Josh GilroyLabour Party1083.8%7.6%
7Mark HarrisonLabour Party973.4%6.8%
8Arthur KincaidGreen Party762.7%5.3%

EC ward code E05011490 · Back to ward index

Windermere · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,224

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ben BerryConservative Party1,23418.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Andrew JarvisLiberal Democrats1,06716.0%48.0%+23.0 ptsElected
3Dyan JonesLiberal Democrats1,03515.5%46.5%+21.5 ptsElected
4Jane HoyleConservative Party97514.6%43.8%
5Magda KhanLiberal Democrats93414.0%42.0%
6Ian KeelingConservative Party89913.5%40.4%
7Penny HendersonLabour Party2313.5%10.4%
8Kate ThreadgoldGreen Party1312.0%5.9%
9Georgie BrasherGreen Party851.3%3.8%
10Eve MorganGreen Party811.2%3.6%

EC ward code E05011507 · Back to ward index

Grange · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,392

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eric MorrellLiberal Democrats1,21516.9%50.8%+25.8 ptsElected
2Robin AshcroftLiberal Democrats1,13915.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
3Dave KhanLiberal Democrats1,12115.6%46.9%+21.9 ptsElected
4Steve ChambersConservative Party1,05814.7%44.2%
5Nathan BushellConservative Party1,01614.2%42.5%
6Daniel AsplinConservative Party97513.6%40.8%
7Rachel WhiteleyGreen Party2723.8%11.4%
8Nicola KennedyLabour Party1892.6%7.9%
9Chris RowleyGreen Party1151.6%4.8%
10Clive WickhamGreen Party751.0%3.1%

EC ward code E05011497 · Back to ward index

Burton and Crooklands · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,442

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Roger BinghamConservative Party1,53420.9%62.8%+37.8 ptsElected
2Brian CooperConservative Party1,21816.6%49.9%+24.9 ptsElected
3Tom HarveyConservative Party1,20516.4%49.3%+24.3 ptsElected
4Sheila EcclesLiberal Democrats98413.4%40.3%
5Christine HerbertLiberal Democrats89812.3%36.8%
6Karl SingletonLiberal Democrats88112.0%36.1%
7Paul CassonLabour Party1742.4%7.1%
8Claire WickhamGreen Party1542.1%6.3%
9Wendi LethbridgeGreen Party1452.0%5.9%
10Simon BlundenGreen Party1341.8%5.5%

EC ward code E05011494 · Back to ward index

Ulverston West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,930

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Helen IrvingConservative Party1,03217.8%53.5%+28.5 ptsElected
2Janette JenkinsonConservative Party1,02817.8%53.3%+28.3 ptsElected
3Amanda RiggConservative Party95516.5%49.5%+24.5 ptsElected
4Bharath RajanLabour Party64011.1%33.2%
5Sharon WebsterLabour Party62510.8%32.4%
6Derek Willison-ParryLabour Party5699.8%29.5%
7Judy FilmoreGreen Party5008.6%25.9%
8Ray BeechamLiberal Democrats2474.3%12.8%
9Maureen NicholsonLiberal Democrats1943.4%10.1%

EC ward code E05011506 · Back to ward index

Ulverston East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,508

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mark WilsonLabour Party81818.1%54.3%+29.3 ptsElected
2David WebsterLabour Party80617.8%53.5%+28.5 ptsElected
3Shirley-Anne WilsonLabour Party74716.5%49.5%+24.5 ptsElected
4Norman Bishop-RoweConservative Party58112.8%38.5%
5Sarah ArcherConservative Party56112.4%37.2%
6Ben CooperConservative Party51411.4%34.1%
7Chris LoynesGreen Party2726.0%18.0%
8Andrew HudsonLiberal Democrats2245.0%14.9%

EC ward code E05011505 · Back to ward index

Bowness and Levens · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,059

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1John HolmesConservative Party1,27120.6%61.7%+36.7 ptsElected
2Kevin HolmesConservative Party1,20419.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
3David WilliamsConservative Party1,14618.5%55.6%+30.6 ptsElected
4Lynda BondLiberal Democrats64210.4%31.2%
5William RookeLiberal Democrats5859.5%28.4%
6Carl SmithLiberal Democrats5849.5%28.4%
7Helen BentleyGreen Party2964.8%14.4%
8Jenny Holden-WildeGreen Party1622.6%7.9%
9Charlie WhinneyLabour Party1522.5%7.4%
10Chris WildeGreen Party1362.2%6.6%

EC ward code E05011492 · Back to ward index

Arnside and Milnthorpe · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,547

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ian StewartLiberal Democrats1,51319.8%59.4%+34.4 ptsElected
2Rupert AudlandLiberal Democrats1,44919.0%56.9%+31.9 ptsElected
3Pete McSweeneyLiberal Democrats1,44018.8%56.5%+31.5 ptsElected
4Steven HurstConservative Party93012.2%36.5%
5Rachel AshburnerConservative Party91612.0%36.0%
6Katy ShuttleworthConservative Party6778.9%26.6%
7Jill AbelGreen Party3534.6%13.9%
8Barry MorganLabour Party1401.8%5.5%
9Hilary PickupGreen Party1231.6%4.8%
10Mark PooleGreen Party1001.3%3.9%

EC ward code E05011491 · Back to ward index