← Cherwell (all cycles) · 5 May 2016 cohort

Cherwell 2016

Local elections held 5 May 2016.

16 ward races
48 seats
1 elected below the proportional quota
2.1% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party47,57949.1%3879.2%2552.1%+13
Labour Party28,89329.8%816.7%1531.3%-7
Green Party7,4737.7%00.0%36.3%-3
Liberal Democrats5,2475.4%00.0%24.2%-2
UK Independence Party (UKIP)4,2664.4%00.0%24.2%-2
Independent3,3883.5%24.2%12.1%+1
Total96,846100.0%48100.0%48100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2016 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2016 election (current) and on the eve of it (2015), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2016)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Bicester West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 25.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. 0.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,039

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Les SibleyIndependent1,61226.4%79.1%+54.1 ptsElected
2Debbie PickfordConservative Party66210.8%32.5%+7.5 ptsElected
3Jolanta LisConservative Party5098.3%25.0%0.0 ptsElected
4Harry KnightIndependent4958.1%24.3%
5Matt SnapeConservative Party4847.9%23.7%
6Stuart MossLabour Party4647.6%22.8%
7Alan HastedIndependent4637.6%22.7%
8Bob MassinghamUK Independence Party (UKIP)4537.4%22.2%
9Sylvia HowellsLabour Party4507.4%22.1%
10Steven UttleyLabour Party3315.4%16.2%
11Fiona MawsonGreen Party1943.2%9.5%

EC ward code E05010928 · Back to ward index

Kidlington West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,536

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sandra RhodesConservative Party1,07114.1%42.2%+17.2 ptsElected
2Alan Mackenzie-WintleConservative Party1,01113.3%39.9%+14.9 ptsElected
3Nigel SimpsonConservative Party94812.5%37.4%+12.4 ptsElected
4Doug WilliamsonLiberal Democrats85711.3%33.8%
5Dawn GlatzLiberal Democrats83210.9%32.8%
6Joe ClaxtonLiberal Democrats82010.8%32.3%
7Chris RobinsLabour Party5176.8%20.4%
8John StansbyLabour Party4425.8%17.4%
9Michael TaylorLabour Party4115.4%16.2%
10Heather FirkinUK Independence Party (UKIP)3895.1%15.3%
11Rita WhiteGreen Party3114.1%12.3%

EC ward code E05010933 · Back to ward index

Banbury Grimsbury and Hightown · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,889

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Andrew BeereLabour Party96617.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
2Claire BellLabour Party93016.4%49.2%+24.2 ptsElected
3Shaida HussainLabour Party80114.1%42.4%+17.4 ptsElected
4Tony MephamConservative Party74013.1%39.2%
5Nick HarrisonConservative Party62111.0%32.9%
6Gary WillsConservative Party61110.8%32.4%
7Jason WilliamsUK Independence Party (UKIP)3446.1%18.2%
8Jack BartonGreen Party2845.0%15.0%
9Kenneth AshworthLiberal Democrats2133.8%11.3%
10Dave WilesLiberal Democrats1562.8%8.3%

EC ward code E05010922 · Back to ward index

Banbury Cross and Neithrop · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,031

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Surinder DhesiLabour Party1,24720.5%61.4%+36.4 ptsElected
2Hannah BanfieldLabour Party1,18819.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
3Alastair Milne-HomeConservative Party88014.4%43.3%+18.3 ptsElected
4Sonny SidhuLabour Party83213.7%41.0%
5Andrew McHughConservative Party73112.0%36.0%
6Nick PooleConservative Party72912.0%35.9%
7Bernard DodGreen Party4858.0%23.9%

EC ward code E05010921 · Back to ward index

Banbury Hardwick · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,427

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1John DonaldsonConservative Party68916.1%48.3%+23.3 ptsElected
2Nicholas TurnerConservative Party63814.9%44.7%+19.7 ptsElected
3Tony IlottConservative Party63314.8%44.3%+19.3 ptsElected
4Mary Evans YoungLabour Party53212.4%37.3%
5Anne DavisLabour Party50411.8%35.3%
6Henry GoodmanLabour Party44710.4%31.3%
7Ian HackfordUK Independence Party (UKIP)3688.6%25.8%
8Andrew ArisGreen Party2465.7%17.2%
9Anthony BurnsLiberal Democrats2255.3%15.8%

EC ward code E05010923 · Back to ward index

Bicester East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,773

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sean GaulConservative Party1,00218.8%56.5%+31.5 ptsElected
2Richard MouldConservative Party91317.2%51.5%+26.5 ptsElected
3Tom WallisConservative Party83015.6%46.8%+21.8 ptsElected
4Sarah HaydonLabour Party80315.1%45.3%
5Marcus EnglishLabour Party72813.7%41.1%
6Steven SargeantLabour Party66512.5%37.5%
7Nicholas RoesenGreen Party3797.1%21.4%

EC ward code E05010925 · Back to ward index

Bicester South and Ambrosden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,747

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dan SamesConservative Party88917.0%50.9%+25.9 ptsElected
2David AndersonConservative Party87716.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
3Nick CotterIndependent81815.6%46.8%+21.8 ptsElected
4Norman BolsterConservative Party69313.2%39.7%
5Christopher HowellsLabour Party4498.6%25.7%
6Glyn AustinLabour Party4458.5%25.5%
7Roger NixonGreen Party3817.3%21.8%
8Dickie BirdUK Independence Party (UKIP)3667.0%21.0%
9Michael NixonLabour Party3236.2%18.5%

EC ward code E05012968 · Back to ward index

Kidlington East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,462

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Maurice BillingtonConservative Party1,60621.7%65.2%+40.2 ptsElected
2Neil PrestidgeConservative Party1,23216.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
3Carmen GriffithsConservative Party1,18816.1%48.3%+23.3 ptsElected
4Catharine ArakelianLabour Party6428.7%26.1%
5Andrew Hornsby-SmithLabour Party6148.3%24.9%
6Janet WarrenLabour Party5547.5%22.5%
7Alison StreetLiberal Democrats4576.2%18.6%
8David ThurlingLiberal Democrats3314.5%13.4%
9Tracey WyseLiberal Democrats3314.5%13.4%
10Michael JonesGreen Party2243.0%9.1%
11Paul MackilliginGreen Party2062.8%8.4%

EC ward code E05010932 · Back to ward index

Launton and Otmoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,900

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Simon HollandConservative Party1,00617.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
2Tim HallchurchConservative Party94716.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
3David HughesConservative Party93616.4%49.3%+24.3 ptsElected
4Catherine ChesterLabour Party61010.7%32.1%
5Graham CareyLabour Party5249.2%27.6%
6Mike HobbsLabour Party4598.1%24.2%
7Paul GengeGreen Party4507.9%23.7%
8Alan HarrisUK Independence Party (UKIP)3946.9%20.7%
9Tim EmptageLiberal Democrats3756.6%19.7%

EC ward code E05010934 · Back to ward index

Bicester North and Caversfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,459

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lynn PrattConservative Party80418.4%55.1%+30.1 ptsElected
2Jason SlaymakerConservative Party79718.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
3Nicholas MawerConservative Party79018.1%54.2%+29.2 ptsElected
4Margaret LyonLabour Party51811.8%35.5%
5Peter LyonLabour Party44710.2%30.6%
6Derek ColdenUK Independence Party (UKIP)3648.3%25.0%
7Marc RufusLabour Party3608.2%24.7%
8Ian MiddletonGreen Party2966.8%20.3%

EC ward code E05010926 · Back to ward index

Banbury Calthorpe and Easington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,274

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kieron MallonConservative Party1,35919.9%59.8%+34.8 ptsElected
2Colin ClarkeConservative Party1,33219.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
3Nigel MorrisConservative Party1,24818.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
4Mike BealLabour Party78611.5%34.6%
5Jane RogersLabour Party70010.3%30.8%
6Derek EvansLabour Party68610.1%30.2%
7Dawn GoslingGreen Party4256.2%18.7%
8Janice JohnsonLiberal Democrats2864.2%12.6%

EC ward code E05011349 · Back to ward index

Adderbury, Bloxham and Bodicote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,352

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chris HeathConservative Party1,32118.7%56.2%+31.2 ptsElected
2Mike BishopConservative Party1,31218.6%55.8%+30.8 ptsElected
3Nigel RandallConservative Party1,29418.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
4Naomi KanetsukaGreen Party5738.1%24.4%
5John HaywoodGreen Party4846.9%20.6%
6Shaun Greenslade-HibbertGreen Party4516.4%19.2%
7Susan ChristieLabour Party4446.3%18.9%
8John ChristieLabour Party4226.0%17.9%
9Matt JohnsonLabour Party3905.5%16.6%
10Peter DaviesLiberal Democrats3645.2%15.5%

EC ward code E05011348 · Back to ward index

Banbury Ruscote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,632

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mark CherryLabour Party1,10522.6%67.7%+42.7 ptsElected
2Sean WoodcockLabour Party92418.9%56.6%+31.6 ptsElected
3Barry RichardsLabour Party90518.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
4Stuart RobbinsConservative Party50010.2%30.6%
5Linda WrenUK Independence Party (UKIP)4368.9%26.7%
6Pat TompsonConservative Party4048.3%24.8%
7Nicola SmithConservative Party4008.2%24.5%
8Christopher ManleyGreen Party2214.5%13.5%

EC ward code E05010924 · Back to ward index

Deddington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,528

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bryn WilliamsConservative Party1,72522.7%68.2%+43.2 ptsElected
2Hugo BrownConservative Party1,57320.7%62.2%+37.2 ptsElected
3Mike Kerford-ByrnesConservative Party1,46019.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
4Aaron BlissGreen Party6849.0%27.1%
5Alasdair BrownLabour Party6548.6%25.9%
6Annette MurphyLabour Party6188.1%24.4%
7Polly FosterLabour Party4626.1%18.3%
8Aubrey EllisUK Independence Party (UKIP)4085.4%16.1%

EC ward code E05010930 · Back to ward index

Cropredy, Sibfords and Wroxton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,323

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1George ReynoldsConservative Party1,62323.3%69.9%+44.9 ptsElected
2Ken AtackConservative Party1,51321.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
3Douglas WebbConservative Party1,38919.9%59.8%+34.8 ptsElected
4Anne CullenLabour Party5818.3%25.0%
5Susan MoonLabour Party5257.5%22.6%
6Perran MoonLabour Party4786.9%20.6%
7Non Kinchin-SmithGreen Party4776.8%20.5%
8Markus WiseUK Independence Party (UKIP)3845.5%16.5%

EC ward code E05010929 · Back to ward index

Fringford and Heyfords · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,910

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1James MacnamaraConservative Party1,24921.8%65.4%+40.4 ptsElected
2Ian CorkinConservative Party1,22021.3%63.9%+38.9 ptsElected
3Barry WoodConservative Party1,19020.8%62.3%+37.3 ptsElected
4Jenny TamblynGreen Party4127.2%21.6%
5Sheila HaydonLabour Party4007.0%20.9%
6Sara CorrUK Independence Party (UKIP)3606.3%18.8%
7Lee IsaacsLabour Party3145.5%16.4%
8Gareth RichardLabour Party2965.2%15.5%
9Graham WilsonGreen Party2905.1%15.2%

EC ward code E05012969 · Back to ward index