← Chesterfield (all cycles) · 2 May 2019 cohort

Chesterfield 2019

Local elections held 2 May 2019.

19 ward races
48 seats
0 elected below the proportional quota
0.0% of seats below quota

How to read this page

Each race below shows the share of valid ballots the marginal elected candidate actually won, and compares it to the proportional quota: the share they'd need to clinch the seat under any proportional voting method (1 seats + 1). For a 1-seat ward the quota is 50%; for 2 seats, 33.3%; for 3 seats, 25%.

Where the actual winning share fell below the quota, we show the signed gap as points below quota (a negative number) — the editorial indictment. Above-quota results clear the bar and pass without comment. The voting method is the subject of every observation here. Named candidates appear as the public election record requires; the cause being audited is the voting method, not the individuals. See the methodology page for derivations.

If votes were counted by party

Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party25,53843.5%2858.3%2245.8%+6
Liberal Democrats22,79338.9%1735.4%2041.7%-3
Conservative Party5,3609.1%00.0%48.3%-4
Independent3,3585.7%36.3%24.2%+1
Green Party6411.1%00.0%00.0%0
UK Independence Party (UKIP)6341.1%00.0%00.0%0
Chesterfield And North Derbyshire Independents (CANDI)3350.6%00.0%00.0%0
Total58,659100.0%48100.0%48100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2019 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2019 election (current) and on the eve of it (2018), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2019)
Previous (2018)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Old Whittington · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 816

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jean InnesLabour Party35321.6%43.3%+9.9 ptsElected
2Peter InnesLabour Party33720.6%41.3%+8.0 ptsElected
3June BinghamLiberal Democrats28117.2%34.4%
4Andrew JakinsLiberal Democrats21613.2%26.5%
5Paul StoneChesterfield And North Derbyshire Independents (CANDI)20412.5%25.0%
6Philip WoodChesterfield And North Derbyshire Independents (CANDI)1318.0%16.1%
7Norman AndrewsConservative Party1106.7%13.5%

EC ward code E05003336 · Back to ward index

Moor · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 938

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Anthony RogersLiberal Democrats51027.2%54.4%+21.1 ptsElected
2Kathryn CaulfieldLabour Party40321.5%43.0%+9.7 ptsElected
3Pamela MillwardLiberal Democrats40221.4%42.9%
4Paul KnaggsLabour Party30516.3%32.5%
5Barry ThompsonUK Independence Party (UKIP)1769.4%18.8%
6Irene WilkinsonConservative Party794.2%8.4%

EC ward code E05003335 · Back to ward index

Middlecroft and Poolsbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 799

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barry DykeLabour Party41425.9%51.8%+18.5 ptsElected
2Christine LudlowLabour Party37723.6%47.2%+13.9 ptsElected
3Dale DentonIndependent30218.9%37.8%
4Cheryl JacksonIndependent29818.7%37.3%
5Margaret AndrewsConservative Party925.8%11.5%
6Harry HollowayLiberal Democrats593.7%7.4%
7Kevin MaherLiberal Democrats553.4%6.9%

EC ward code E05003334 · Back to ward index

Lowgates and Woodthorpe · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 856

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lisa CollinsLabour Party41824.4%48.9%+15.5 ptsElected
2Dean CollinsLabour Party41424.2%48.4%+15.1 ptsElected
3Paul JacobsLiberal Democrats18911.0%22.1%
4Stephen HartleyLiberal Democrats18510.8%21.6%
5Joseph MannIndependent1418.2%16.5%
6Rhodri HutchinsonConservative Party1378.0%16.0%
7Michelle MannIndependent1237.2%14.4%
8Malcom RowleyConservative Party1046.1%12.2%

EC ward code E05003333 · Back to ward index

Holmebrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,014

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Keith FalconerLiberal Democrats55427.3%54.6%+21.3 ptsElected
2Glenys FalconerLiberal Democrats52525.9%51.8%+18.4 ptsElected
3Ronald MihalyLabour Party47223.3%46.5%
4Gordon McLarenLabour Party39919.7%39.3%
5Richard WoodheadConservative Party783.8%7.7%

EC ward code E05003330 · Back to ward index

St Leonard's · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,467

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sharon BlankLabour Party92921.1%63.3%+38.3 ptsElected
2Kathryn SarventLabour Party85119.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
3Daniel KellyLabour Party76317.3%52.0%+27.0 ptsElected
4Adrian MatherLiberal Democrats57313.0%39.1%
5Margaret CannonLiberal Democrats56012.7%38.2%
6Michael HarrisonLiberal Democrats3999.1%27.2%
7Anne SterlandConservative Party3277.4%22.3%

EC ward code E05003339 · Back to ward index

Hollingwood and Inkersall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,471

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Michael BagshawIndependent89220.2%60.7%+35.7 ptsElected
2Paul MannIndependent82818.8%56.3%+31.3 ptsElected
3Ruth PerryIndependent77417.5%52.6%+27.6 ptsElected
4Joanne BarnettLabour Party56112.7%38.1%
5Helen ElliottLabour Party54512.4%37.1%
6Anthony HillLabour Party46210.5%31.4%
7Frank WilkinsonConservative Party1443.3%9.8%
8William NightingaleLiberal Democrats872.0%5.9%
9Arron ShutlerLiberal Democrats651.5%4.4%
10Keith ShutlerLiberal Democrats541.2%3.7%

EC ward code E05003329 · Back to ward index

Barrow Hill and New Whittington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,276

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barry BinghamLiberal Democrats91423.9%71.6%+46.6 ptsElected
2Kelly ThorntonLiberal Democrats68517.9%53.7%+28.7 ptsElected
3Paul HolmesLiberal Democrats67517.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
4Lisa-Marie DerbyshireLabour Party2737.1%21.4%
5Susan BeanLabour Party2566.7%20.1%
6John FlintLabour Party2496.5%19.5%
7John DaramyUK Independence Party (UKIP)2326.1%18.2%
8Robert WarwickUK Independence Party (UKIP)2265.9%17.7%
9Oliver ScheidtConservative Party1193.1%9.3%
10Linda RowleyConservative Party1072.8%8.4%
11Adam ParrishConservative Party922.4%7.2%

EC ward code E05003323 · Back to ward index

West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,084

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shirley NiblockLiberal Democrats1,15718.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Howard BorrellLiberal Democrats1,15418.5%55.4%+30.4 ptsElected
3Paul NiblockLiberal Democrats1,12918.1%54.2%+29.2 ptsElected
4Stephen HibbertLabour Party5128.2%24.6%
5Stephen MarriottLabour Party4977.9%23.8%
6James DaleConservative Party4727.5%22.6%
7Marcus LinseyConservative Party4597.3%22.0%
8Nigel SterlandConservative Party4487.2%21.5%
9Stephen LismoreLabour Party4246.8%20.3%

EC ward code E05003341 · Back to ward index

Loundsley Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 753

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Raymond CattLabour Party48432.1%64.3%+30.9 ptsElected
2Avis MurphyLabour Party47131.3%62.5%+29.2 ptsElected
3Simon CoyLiberal Democrats22514.9%29.9%
4Matthew GennLiberal Democrats20213.4%26.8%
5Sandra FurnissConservative Party1248.2%16.5%

EC ward code E05003332 · Back to ward index

Walton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,787

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Margaret KellmanLiberal Democrats1,13121.1%63.3%+38.3 ptsElected
2Thomas SnowdonLiberal Democrats1,01518.9%56.8%+31.8 ptsElected
3Nicholas RedihoughLiberal Democrats98418.4%55.1%+30.1 ptsElected
4Rachel RushLabour Party3646.8%20.4%
5John BoultConservative Party3416.4%19.1%
6Ian JerramConservative Party3196.0%17.9%
7Graham BarnettLabour Party3185.9%17.8%
8David WadsworthGreen Party3085.7%17.2%
9Mark StirlandLabour Party2985.6%16.7%
10John ScottingConservative Party2825.3%15.8%

EC ward code E05003340 · Back to ward index

Linacre · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,148

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Emily CoyLiberal Democrats77833.9%67.8%+34.5 ptsElected
2Peter BarrLiberal Democrats73331.9%63.9%+30.5 ptsElected
3David CulleyLabour Party31813.9%27.7%
4Marion ThorpeLabour Party29212.7%25.4%
5Roderick HarrisonConservative Party1747.6%15.2%

EC ward code E05003331 · Back to ward index

Hasland · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,315

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mick BradyLabour Party89222.6%67.8%+42.8 ptsElected
2Amanda SerjeantLabour Party78019.8%59.3%+34.3 ptsElected
3Stuart BrittainLabour Party75519.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
4Bridget DunksLiberal Democrats3689.3%28.0%
5Paul GibbonsConservative Party3549.0%26.9%
6Darren YatesGreen Party3338.4%25.3%
7Elizabeth FrearLiberal Democrats2757.0%20.9%
8Dorothy HerringLiberal Democrats1894.8%14.4%

EC ward code E05003328 · Back to ward index

Brimington North · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 591

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Terence GilbyLabour Party43036.4%72.8%+39.4 ptsElected
2Susan PerkinsLabour Party39533.4%66.8%+33.5 ptsElected
3Claire LewisLiberal Democrats14212.0%24.0%
4Jon CayzerLiberal Democrats12210.3%20.6%
5Simon TempertonConservative Party937.9%15.7%

EC ward code E05003324 · Back to ward index

Brockwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,953

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Maureen DavenportLiberal Democrats1,27021.7%65.0%+40.0 ptsElected
2Edward FordhamLiberal Democrats1,20620.6%61.8%+36.8 ptsElected
3Katherine HollingworthLiberal Democrats1,14919.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
4Stephen BruntLabour Party76913.1%39.4%
5Lesley WhettonLabour Party66311.3%33.9%
6Jarrad KeyesLabour Party63110.8%32.3%
7Annetta WoodheadConservative Party1712.9%8.8%

EC ward code E05003326 · Back to ward index

St Helen's · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 815

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jill Mannion-BruntLabour Party59736.6%73.3%+40.0 ptsElected
2Thomas MurphyLabour Party57935.5%71.1%+37.8 ptsElected
3Oliver FishLiberal Democrats18911.6%23.2%
4Yvette MarsdenLiberal Democrats16910.4%20.7%
5Michael SterlandConservative Party955.8%11.7%

EC ward code E05003338 · Back to ward index

Dunston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 949

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gordon SimmonsLabour Party62622.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
2Mark RaynerLabour Party62021.8%65.3%+40.3 ptsElected
3Janice MarriottLabour Party61621.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
4Joanne FavreauLiberal Democrats2709.5%28.5%
5Jolyon FavreauLiberal Democrats2589.1%27.2%
6Ronald SatterfittLiberal Democrats2538.9%26.7%
7Margaret MossConservative Party2047.2%21.5%

EC ward code E05003327 · Back to ward index

Rother · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 930

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jennifer FloodLabour Party65123.3%70.0%+45.0 ptsElected
2Lisa BlakemoreLabour Party64523.1%69.4%+44.4 ptsElected
3Keith MilesLabour Party63022.6%67.7%+42.7 ptsElected
4Dawn NicksonLiberal Democrats2709.7%29.0%
5Harry AtkinsLiberal Democrats2097.5%22.5%
6Trevor MillwardLiberal Democrats2097.5%22.5%
7Sara ScottingConservative Party1766.3%18.9%

EC ward code E05003337 · Back to ward index

Brimington South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,169

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Patricia GilbyLabour Party86424.6%73.9%+48.9 ptsElected
2Ian CallanLabour Party82823.6%70.8%+45.8 ptsElected
3Anthony BellamyLabour Party80823.0%69.1%+44.1 ptsElected
4Jane CollinsLiberal Democrats2787.9%23.8%
5Craig HoylandConservative Party2597.4%22.1%
6Ian OpenshawLiberal Democrats2487.1%21.2%
7Russell EaglingLiberal Democrats2236.4%19.1%

EC ward code E05003325 · Back to ward index