← Barking and Dagenham (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Barking and Dagenham 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 51 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 64,034 | 79.7% | 51 | 100.0% | 42 | 82.4% | +9 |
| Conservative Party | 13,980 | 17.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 17.6% | -9 |
| Green Party | 1,030 | 1.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 462 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 398 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 373 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Christian Peoples Alliance | 91 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 80,368 | 100.0% | 51 | 100.0% | 51 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Eastbrook and Rush Green · 2 seats · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Abbey · 2 seats · won at 68.8% · above quota
- Thames View · 2 seats · won at 71.8% · above quota
- Beam · 3 seats · won at 64.1% · above quota
- Heath · 2 seats · won at 72.7% · above quota
- Barking Riverside · 3 seats · won at 68.4% · above quota
- Alibon · 2 seats · won at 77.4% · above quota
- Longbridge · 3 seats · won at 70.1% · above quota
- Eastbury · 3 seats · won at 70.2% · above quota
- Goresbrook · 3 seats · won at 71.9% · above quota
- Becontree · 2 seats · won at 81.6% · above quota
- Mayesbrook · 3 seats · won at 75.6% · above quota
- Northbury · 3 seats · won at 76.2% · above quota
- Whalebone · 3 seats · won at 78.1% · above quota
- Parsloes · 3 seats · won at 78.8% · above quota
- Chadwell Heath · 3 seats · won at 80.0% · above quota
- Village · 3 seats · won at 83.5% · above quota
- Valence · 3 seats · won at 84.1% · above quota
- Gascoigne · 3 seats · won at 84.6% · above quota
Race results
Eastbrook and Rush Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,595
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright P. | Labour Party | 859 | 26.9% | 53.9% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ramsay T. | Labour Party | 816 | 25.6% | 51.2% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Connelly S. | Conservative Party | 591 | 18.5% | 37.1% | — | |
| 4 | Lynch E. | Conservative Party | 525 | 16.5% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Emin R. | Independent | 238 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hillyard D. | Independent | 160 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Abbey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 683
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahman R. | Labour Party | 503 | 36.8% | 73.6% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain M. | Labour Party | 470 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allam A. | Green Party | 148 | 10.8% | 21.7% | — | |
| 4 | Gold M. | Green Party | 135 | 9.9% | 19.8% | — | |
| 5 | Echedom A. | Conservative Party | 110 | 8.1% | 16.1% | — |
Thames View · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 882
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nalule F. | Labour Party | 701 | 39.8% | 79.5% | +46.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Zamee S. | Labour Party | 633 | 35.9% | 71.8% | +38.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boff A. | Conservative Party | 263 | 14.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 4 | Baiye-Garman L. | Christian Peoples Alliance | 91 | 5.2% | 10.3% | — | |
| 5 | Khan A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 75 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — |
Beam · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,286
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lumsden D. | Labour Party | 904 | 23.4% | 70.3% | +45.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chowdhury M. | Labour Party | 854 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sandhu M. | Labour Party | 825 | 21.4% | 64.1% | +39.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Whittaker K. | Conservative Party | 433 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 5 | Smith M. | Conservative Party | 426 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 6 | Jaiya M. | Conservative Party | 417 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — |
Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,279
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martins O. | Labour Party | 952 | 37.2% | 74.4% | +41.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robinson I. | Labour Party | 930 | 36.4% | 72.7% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Olawepo A. | Conservative Party | 338 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — | |
| 4 | Cekavicius M. | Conservative Party | 338 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — |
Barking Riverside · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,301
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Channer J. | Labour Party | 923 | 23.6% | 70.9% | +45.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Geddes C. | Labour Party | 893 | 22.9% | 68.6% | +43.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hornby V. | Labour Party | 890 | 22.8% | 68.4% | +43.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rahman M. | Conservative Party | 381 | 9.8% | 29.3% | — | |
| 5 | Bhuyan M. | Conservative Party | 292 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 6 | Oladimeji A. | Conservative Party | 291 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 7 | Mason P. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 233 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — |
Alibon · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 77.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,204
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dulwich J. | Labour Party | 1,060 | 44.0% | 88.1% | +54.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Akwaboah D. | Labour Party | 932 | 38.7% | 77.4% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jaiya A. | Conservative Party | 415 | 17.2% | 34.5% | — |
Longbridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,490
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gill R. | Labour Party | 2,164 | 29.0% | 86.9% | +61.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Choudhury F. | Labour Party | 2,038 | 27.3% | 81.8% | +56.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rice L. | Labour Party | 1,746 | 23.4% | 70.1% | +45.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rahman S. | Conservative Party | 1,150 | 15.4% | 46.2% | — | |
| 5 | Adomavicius Z. | Liberal Democrats | 373 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Eastbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,883
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodwell E. | Labour Party | 1,494 | 26.5% | 79.4% | +54.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan M. | Labour Party | 1,381 | 24.5% | 73.4% | +48.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shaukat F. | Labour Party | 1,321 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Acheampomaa E. | Conservative Party | 500 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 5 | Begum P. | Conservative Party | 483 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 6 | Filipescu C. | Conservative Party | 469 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — |
Goresbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,556
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robinson P. | Labour Party | 1,292 | 27.7% | 83.0% | +58.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Freeborn I. | Labour Party | 1,233 | 26.4% | 79.2% | +54.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Quadri M. | Labour Party | 1,119 | 24.0% | 71.9% | +46.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Raj S. | Conservative Party | 535 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Iqbal M. | Conservative Party | 489 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — |
Becontree · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 81.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,229
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fergus E. | Labour Party | 1,121 | 45.6% | 91.2% | +57.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Saleem M. | Labour Party | 1,002 | 40.8% | 81.6% | +48.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Egbuhzor A. | Conservative Party | 334 | 13.6% | 27.2% | — |
Mayesbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,642
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choudhury N. | Labour Party | 1,301 | 26.4% | 79.2% | +54.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Haroon K. | Labour Party | 1,259 | 25.6% | 76.7% | +51.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oluwole A. | Labour Party | 1,242 | 25.2% | 75.6% | +50.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McNab A. | Conservative Party | 565 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Lazar F. | Conservative Party | 559 | 11.3% | 34.0% | — |
Northbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 76.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +51.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,791
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashraf S. | Labour Party | 1,500 | 27.9% | 83.8% | +58.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rodwell D. | Labour Party | 1,398 | 26.0% | 78.1% | +53.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Miah G. | Labour Party | 1,364 | 25.4% | 76.2% | +51.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Saeed T. | Conservative Party | 363 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 5 | Anthony S. | Green Party | 317 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hollis A. | Green Party | 221 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 7 | Wright J. | Green Party | 209 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — |
Whalebone · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 78.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +53.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,845
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paddle G. | Labour Party | 1,698 | 30.7% | 92.0% | +67.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Achilleos A. | Labour Party | 1,687 | 30.5% | 91.4% | +66.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yusuf M. | Labour Party | 1,441 | 26.0% | 78.1% | +53.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nair S. | Conservative Party | 709 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — |
Parsloes · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 78.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +53.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,646
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rice C. | Labour Party | 1,558 | 31.6% | 94.7% | +69.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kangethe E. | Labour Party | 1,506 | 30.5% | 91.5% | +66.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rai H. | Labour Party | 1,296 | 26.3% | 78.8% | +53.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wijesuriya T. | Conservative Party | 577 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — |
Chadwell Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 80.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +55.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,858
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bright S. | Labour Party | 1,723 | 30.9% | 92.7% | +67.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Perry S. | Labour Party | 1,693 | 30.4% | 91.1% | +66.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pongo M. | Labour Party | 1,486 | 26.7% | 80.0% | +55.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lynch M. | Conservative Party | 672 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — |
Village · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 83.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +58.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,971
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mullane M. | Labour Party | 1,690 | 28.6% | 85.7% | +60.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Waker L. | Labour Party | 1,675 | 28.3% | 85.0% | +60.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Waker P. | Labour Party | 1,647 | 27.8% | 83.5% | +58.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | James B. | Conservative Party | 471 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Williams V. | Conservative Party | 431 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — |
Valence · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 84.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +59.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,615
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones J. | Labour Party | 1,514 | 31.2% | 93.7% | +68.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Worby M. | Labour Party | 1,403 | 29.0% | 86.9% | +61.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ghani S. | Labour Party | 1,358 | 28.0% | 84.1% | +59.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Londeno K. | Conservative Party | 570 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — |
Gascoigne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 84.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +59.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,325
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cormack A. | Labour Party | 1,272 | 32.0% | 96.0% | +71.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shaw J. | Labour Party | 1,146 | 28.8% | 86.5% | +61.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Twomey D. | Labour Party | 1,121 | 28.2% | 84.6% | +59.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tahir R. | Conservative Party | 283 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 5 | Mason R. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 154 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |