← Barnet (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Barnet 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 63 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 118,195 | 46.7% | 41 | 65.1% | 30 | 47.6% | +11 |
| Conservative Party | 96,908 | 38.3% | 22 | 34.9% | 25 | 39.7% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 24,563 | 9.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 9.5% | -6 |
| Green Party | 10,570 | 4.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.2% | -2 |
| Independent | 1,213 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| WEP | 1,159 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| REJEU | 329 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| REU | 136 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 253,073 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Edgwarebury · 2 seats · won at 48.6% · above quota
- Whetstone · 2 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Mill Hill · 3 seats · won at 41.5% · above quota
- Garden Suburb · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Barnet Vale · 3 seats · won at 41.8% · above quota
- Finchley Church End · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Childs Hill · 3 seats · won at 42.6% · above quota
- High Barnet · 2 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- East Barnet · 3 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Underhill · 2 seats · won at 54.5% · above quota
- Brunswick Park · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Woodhouse · 2 seats · won at 56.6% · above quota
- Totteridge and Woodside · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- West Finchley · 3 seats · won at 49.9% · above quota
- Cricklewood · 2 seats · won at 61.2% · above quota
- Colindale North · 2 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Hendon · 3 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- West Hendon · 3 seats · won at 56.4% · above quota
- Edgware · 3 seats · won at 57.4% · above quota
- Golders Green · 2 seats · won at 68.7% · above quota
- Friern Barnet · 3 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- East Finchley · 3 seats · won at 62.1% · above quota
- Burnt Oak · 3 seats · won at 62.5% · above quota
- Colindale South · 3 seats · won at 64.4% · above quota
Race results
Edgwarebury · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,478
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wardle S. | Conservative Party | 1,749 | 25.1% | 50.3% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gurung L. | Conservative Party | 1,691 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tapper J. | Labour Party | 1,649 | 23.7% | 47.4% | — | |
| 4 | Patel N. | Labour Party | 1,582 | 22.7% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Murray S. | Green Party | 284 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — |
Whetstone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,312
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rose E. | Labour Party | 1,898 | 28.7% | 57.3% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Velleman L. | Labour Party | 1,625 | 24.5% | 49.1% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith T. | Conservative Party | 1,336 | 20.2% | 40.3% | — | |
| 4 | Rajput S. | Conservative Party | 1,308 | 19.7% | 39.5% | — | |
| 5 | Newby A. | Green Party | 456 | 6.9% | 13.8% | — |
Mill Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,298
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duschinsky V. | Conservative Party | 2,010 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Simberg E. | Conservative Party | 1,909 | 14.8% | 44.4% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jajeh L. | Conservative Party | 1,783 | 13.8% | 41.5% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barker R. | Labour Party | 1,565 | 12.1% | 36.4% | — | |
| 5 | Grant F. | Labour Party | 1,413 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 6 | Fanning-Tichborne P. | Labour Party | 1,390 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 7 | Tichborne R. | Liberal Democrats | 735 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 8 | Logue R. | Liberal Democrats | 713 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 9 | Pickup D. | Liberal Democrats | 672 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 10 | Wardle E. | Green Party | 441 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 11 | Lauer K. | WEP | 262 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Garden Suburb · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,751
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grover R. | Conservative Party | 1,895 | 25.3% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mire M. | Conservative Party | 1,878 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Levine K. | Labour Party | 1,052 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 4 | Kayani A. | Labour Party | 878 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — | |
| 5 | Mermelstein D. | Liberal Democrats | 622 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 6 | Akbiyik A. | Liberal Democrats | 496 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 7 | Caesar N. | Green Party | 369 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ingram B. | Independent | 311 | 4.1% | 8.3% | — |
Barnet Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,912
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haylett M. | Labour Party | 2,192 | 14.9% | 44.6% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Longstaff D. | Conservative Party | 2,080 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barnes R. | Labour Party | 2,054 | 13.9% | 41.8% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Teare R. | Conservative Party | 2,016 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 5 | Kumar W. | Conservative Party | 1,972 | 13.4% | 40.1% | — | |
| 6 | Persad R. | Labour Party | 1,834 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 7 | Cohen S. | Liberal Democrats | 747 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 8 | Wicksteed C. | Green Party | 732 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 9 | Barber S. | Liberal Democrats | 693 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 10 | Papworth B. | Liberal Democrats | 416 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Finchley Church End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,096
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenspan E. | Conservative Party | 2,357 | 15.4% | 46.3% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Grocock J. | Conservative Party | 2,155 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thomas D. | Conservative Party | 2,140 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hoyle S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,465 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 5 | Baker S. | Labour Party | 1,464 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 6 | Aubrey-Jones D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,387 | 9.1% | 27.2% | — | |
| 7 | Burrage H. | Labour Party | 1,339 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 8 | Fenesan D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,291 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 9 | McGuirk M. | Labour Party | 1,226 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 10 | Jacoby Owen N. | Green Party | 464 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
Childs Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,334
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innocenti G. | Labour Party | 2,061 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Perlberg M. | Labour Party | 1,936 | 14.9% | 44.7% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Young N. | Labour Party | 1,844 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Zinkin P. | Conservative Party | 1,746 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Fluss R. | Conservative Party | 1,740 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 6 | Gheasuddin A. | Conservative Party | 1,497 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 7 | Cohen S. | Liberal Democrats | 627 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 8 | Rozenberg E. | Liberal Democrats | 597 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 9 | Davis T. | Liberal Democrats | 502 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 10 | Dolby K. | Green Party | 451 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — |
High Barnet · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,964
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whysall E. | Labour Party | 2,051 | 25.9% | 51.7% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Edwards P. | Labour Party | 2,044 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ayodeji-Akindiji L. | Conservative Party | 1,504 | 19.0% | 37.9% | — | |
| 4 | King D. | Conservative Party | 1,459 | 18.4% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Waterson J. | Green Party | 359 | 4.5% | 9.1% | — | |
| 6 | Lusher P. | Liberal Democrats | 212 | 2.7% | 5.3% | — | |
| 7 | West M. | Liberal Democrats | 182 | 2.3% | 4.6% | — | |
| 8 | Hewison R. | REJEU | 116 | 1.5% | 2.9% | — |
East Barnet · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,078
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cohen P. | Labour Party | 2,547 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | David E. | Labour Party | 2,514 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Radford S. | Labour Party | 2,342 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Byers F. | Conservative Party | 2,229 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 5 | Pavanakumar P. | Conservative Party | 2,055 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 6 | Roberts P. | Conservative Party | 2,023 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 7 | Echlin J. | Green Party | 628 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hooker S. | Liberal Democrats | 374 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 9 | Nowell D. | Liberal Democrats | 280 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — | |
| 10 | Keech D. | Liberal Democrats | 243 | 1.6% | 4.8% | — |
Underhill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,656
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beg Z. | Labour Party | 2,082 | 28.5% | 56.9% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roberts T. | Labour Party | 1,991 | 27.2% | 54.5% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompstone R. | Conservative Party | 1,173 | 16.0% | 32.1% | — | |
| 4 | Garrick T. | Conservative Party | 1,165 | 15.9% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Dolby A. | Green Party | 332 | 4.5% | 9.1% | — | |
| 6 | Corney V. | Liberal Democrats | 224 | 3.1% | 6.1% | — | |
| 7 | Daly P. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 2.9% | 5.7% | — | |
| 8 | Rend B. | REU | 136 | 1.9% | 3.7% | — |
Brunswick Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,611
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monasterio G. | Labour Party | 2,381 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lemon P. | Labour Party | 2,353 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Vourou T. | Labour Party | 2,193 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rutter L. | Conservative Party | 1,918 | 13.9% | 41.6% | — | |
| 5 | Richer N. | Conservative Party | 1,829 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 6 | Mastin-Lee J. | Conservative Party | 1,805 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 7 | Farbey D. | Green Party | 524 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — | |
| 8 | Bille L. | Liberal Democrats | 321 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Williams G. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — | |
| 10 | Stern J. | Liberal Democrats | 247 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Woodhouse · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,358
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooke G. | Labour Party | 1,917 | 28.5% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hutton A. | Labour Party | 1,900 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bokaei G. | Conservative Party | 980 | 14.6% | 29.2% | — | |
| 4 | Owusu Afriyie S. | Conservative Party | 891 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Burns D. | Green Party | 395 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Fitzgerald G. | Liberal Democrats | 318 | 4.7% | 9.5% | — | |
| 7 | Goldman J. | Liberal Democrats | 314 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Totteridge and Woodside · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,033
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cornelius A. | Conservative Party | 2,041 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stock C. | Conservative Party | 1,986 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cornelius R. | Conservative Party | 1,975 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | David V. | Labour Party | 1,435 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Sharma P. | Labour Party | 1,310 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 6 | Williams L. | Labour Party | 1,283 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — | |
| 7 | Cohen J. | Liberal Democrats | 555 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 8 | Vollono F. | Green Party | 455 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 9 | Spensley T. | Liberal Democrats | 443 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 10 | Rodwell O. | Liberal Democrats | 403 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 11 | Donnelly B. | REJEU | 213 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — |
West Finchley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,464
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGuirk K. | Labour Party | 2,952 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Houston R. | Labour Party | 2,916 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rich D. | Labour Party | 2,724 | 16.6% | 49.9% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rozenberg G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,289 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 5 | Enderby C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,203 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 6 | Savin L. | Conservative Party | 1,160 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 7 | Fucilla R. | Conservative Party | 1,106 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 8 | Sheppard T. | Conservative Party | 1,081 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 9 | Ruback G. | Liberal Democrats | 992 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 10 | Colmans J. | Green Party | 637 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 11 | Vincenti R. | WEP | 331 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Cricklewood · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,812
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke A. | Labour Party | 1,314 | 36.3% | 72.5% | +39.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Schneiderman A. | Labour Party | 1,109 | 30.6% | 61.2% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | David Y. | Conservative Party | 415 | 11.5% | 22.9% | — | |
| 4 | Tennakoon A. | Conservative Party | 356 | 9.8% | 19.7% | — | |
| 5 | Pollastri D. | Green Party | 192 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 6 | Leighton S. | Liberal Democrats | 131 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 7 | Lawton C. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 2.9% | 5.9% | — |
Colindale North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,729
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ionnidis A. | Labour Party | 1,156 | 33.4% | 66.9% | +33.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Zubairi Z. | Labour Party | 1,102 | 31.9% | 63.8% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Marguiles B. | Conservative Party | 360 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 4 | Prager J. | Conservative Party | 333 | 9.6% | 19.3% | — | |
| 5 | Nocek M. | Independent | 243 | 7.0% | 14.1% | — | |
| 6 | Curati M. | Green Party | 172 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — | |
| 7 | Warsame S. | Independent | 91 | 2.6% | 5.3% | — |
Hendon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,392
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conway J. | Conservative Party | 2,632 | 20.0% | 59.9% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Prager A. | Conservative Party | 2,545 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shooter M. | Conservative Party | 2,436 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Daus C. | Labour Party | 1,427 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Dunitz D. | Labour Party | 1,329 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wilding B. | Labour Party | 1,018 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 7 | Oliffe F. | Independent | 568 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 8 | Fordyce C. | Green Party | 429 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 9 | Hughes M. | Liberal Democrats | 277 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 10 | Turner J. | Liberal Democrats | 276 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 11 | Phillips E. | Liberal Democrats | 240 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — |
West Hendon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,122
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bilbow A. | Labour Party | 1,901 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ambe E. | Labour Party | 1,791 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chakraborty R. | Labour Party | 1,761 | 18.8% | 56.4% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lewis P. | Conservative Party | 1,027 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Ross J. | Conservative Party | 931 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 6 | Odze H. | Conservative Party | 870 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 7 | Richman H. | Liberal Democrats | 650 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 8 | Hunter T. | Green Party | 436 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — |
Edgware · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,782
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wakeley L. | Conservative Party | 3,110 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mearing-Smith N. | Conservative Party | 3,007 | 21.0% | 62.9% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gordon S. | Conservative Party | 2,746 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chakraborty N. | Labour Party | 1,671 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Jackson R. | Labour Party | 1,478 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Gluck S. | Labour Party | 1,372 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 7 | Miles D. | Green Party | 510 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Bard L. | WEP | 453 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — |
Golders Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,122
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cohen D. | Conservative Party | 2,171 | 34.8% | 69.5% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cohen M. | Conservative Party | 2,146 | 34.4% | 68.7% | +35.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walkden K. | Labour Party | 650 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 4 | Waller S. | Labour Party | 613 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ward G. | Green Party | 205 | 3.3% | 6.6% | — | |
| 6 | Gostyn P. | Liberal Democrats | 190 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — | |
| 7 | Shaer S. | Liberal Democrats | 156 | 2.5% | 5.0% | — | |
| 8 | Brazil D. | WEP | 113 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — |
Friern Barnet · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,487
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coakley Webb P. | Labour Party | 3,030 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Luisingu L. | Labour Party | 2,880 | 21.4% | 64.2% | +39.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rawlings B. | Labour Party | 2,779 | 20.6% | 61.9% | +36.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Salinger K. | Conservative Party | 1,137 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 5 | Ghateh K. | Conservative Party | 1,026 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 6 | Skeja A. | Conservative Party | 991 | 7.4% | 22.1% | — | |
| 7 | Tytherleigh E. | Green Party | 550 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 8 | Craig G. | Liberal Democrats | 367 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 9 | Myerson Z. | Liberal Democrats | 350 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 10 | Jessup L. | Liberal Democrats | 350 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — |
East Finchley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,662
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mittra A. | Labour Party | 3,122 | 22.3% | 67.0% | +42.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moore A. | Labour Party | 3,001 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Farrier C. | Labour Party | 2,895 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hines J. | Liberal Democrats | 924 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 5 | Noble D. | Liberal Democrats | 783 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 6 | Patel S. | Liberal Democrats | 729 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 7 | Buckwell R. | Conservative Party | 671 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | McIlmoyle L. | Conservative Party | 643 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 9 | Tucker M. | Conservative Party | 627 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 10 | Parsons S. | Green Party | 592 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — |
Burnt Oak · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,369
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conway S. | Labour Party | 2,545 | 25.2% | 75.5% | +50.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gurung K. | Labour Party | 2,377 | 23.5% | 70.6% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Naqvi A. | Labour Party | 2,105 | 20.8% | 62.5% | +37.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hart R. | Conservative Party | 962 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | McGeever T. | Conservative Party | 861 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 6 | Shupac S. | Conservative Party | 736 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — | |
| 7 | Shah R. | Green Party | 520 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — |
Colindale South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,932
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sergeant G. | Labour Party | 2,008 | 22.8% | 68.5% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Narenthira N. | Labour Party | 1,936 | 22.0% | 66.0% | +41.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khalick H. | Labour Party | 1,888 | 21.5% | 64.4% | +39.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Collins A. | Conservative Party | 945 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ghosh S. | Conservative Party | 807 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — | |
| 6 | Saidler N. | Conservative Party | 775 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 7 | Shah R. | Green Party | 437 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — |