← Basildon (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Basildon 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 14 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 42 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 34,614 | 38.7% | 13 | 31.0% | 17 | 40.5% | -4 |
| Labour Party | 22,783 | 25.5% | 18 | 42.9% | 11 | 26.2% | +7 |
| Independent | 10,476 | 11.7% | 6 | 14.3% | 5 | 11.9% | +1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 9,122 | 10.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 9.5% | -4 |
| Green Party | 5,819 | 6.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 7.1% | -3 |
| WICK IND | 4,839 | 5.4% | 5 | 11.9% | 2 | 4.8% | +3 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 909 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| British Democratic Party | 475 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 447 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 26 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 89,510 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Wickford North · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Laindon Park · 3 seats · won at 41.5% · above quota
- Pitsea South East · 3 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Castledon and Crouch · 3 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Wickford Park · 3 seats · won at 49.8% · above quota
- St Martin's · 3 seats · won at 50.4% · above quota
- Billericay East · 3 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Burstead · 3 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- Pitsea North West · 3 seats · won at 55.6% · above quota
- Billericay West · 3 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Lee Chapel North · 3 seats · won at 59.8% · above quota
- Nethermayne · 3 seats · won at 63.3% · above quota
- Langdon Hills · 3 seats · won at 65.4% · above quota
- Fryerns · 3 seats · won at 71.3% · above quota
Race results
Wickford North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,342
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brockman, E. | WICK IND | 1,228 | 17.5% | 52.4% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Aldridge, D. | WICK IND | 963 | 13.7% | 41.1% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hammond, T. | WICK IND | 936 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holliman, P. | Conservative Party | 872 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Morris, C. | Conservative Party | 794 | 11.3% | 33.9% | — | |
| 6 | Morris, D. | Conservative Party | 720 | 10.2% | 30.7% | — | |
| 7 | Nemeth, J. | Labour Party | 493 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 8 | Collins, D. | Reform UK | 447 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 9 | Wright, P. | Green Party | 337 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 10 | Manterfield, K. | Liberal Democrats | 235 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — |
Laindon Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,120
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joseph, V. | Labour Party | 1,013 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Power, J. | Labour Party | 972 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webb, T. | Labour Party | 880 | 13.8% | 41.5% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Henry, J. | Conservative Party | 863 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Wingfield, K. | Conservative Party | 845 | 13.3% | 39.9% | — | |
| 6 | Gascoyne, S. | Conservative Party | 761 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 7 | Cojocaru, I. | Independent | 358 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 8 | McCarthy, E. | Green Party | 312 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 9 | McCarthy, S. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 10 | Murray, D. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 137 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — |
Pitsea South East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,227
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hilleard, C. | Labour Party | 1,093 | 16.4% | 49.1% | +24.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Palmer, G. | Labour Party | 1,082 | 16.2% | 48.6% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Westwick, B. | Labour Party | 1,001 | 15.0% | 44.9% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rimmer, C. | Conservative Party | 938 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 5 | Canham, G. | Conservative Party | 907 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Adeshile, Y. | Conservative Party | 895 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 7 | Harrison, L. | Independent | 301 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 8 | Willis, S. | Green Party | 272 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Spowart, S. | Liberal Democrats | 193 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Castledon and Crouch · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,191
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Myers, A. | Conservative Party | 1,084 | 16.5% | 49.5% | +24.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sargent, T. | Conservative Party | 992 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allen, S. | Conservative Party | 987 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mott, S. | Liberal Democrats | 869 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hoad, N. | Liberal Democrats | 793 | 12.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 6 | Stanbrook, A. | Labour Party | 498 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 7 | Woods, M. | Liberal Democrats | 477 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — | |
| 8 | Bateman, C. | British Democratic Party | 475 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 9 | Gurney, G. | Green Party | 399 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — |
Wickford Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,667
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball, A. | WICK IND | 881 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeffery, G. | Conservative Party | 853 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, D. | WICK IND | 831 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Child, Y. | Conservative Party | 747 | 14.9% | 44.8% | — | |
| 5 | Tagg, G. | Conservative Party | 666 | 13.3% | 39.9% | — | |
| 6 | Bunyan, P. | Labour Party | 629 | 12.6% | 37.7% | — | |
| 7 | Blake, S. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — |
St Martin's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,626
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Callaghan, G. | Labour Party | 990 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ferguson, J. | Labour Party | 965 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yaqub, M. | Labour Party | 820 | 16.8% | 50.4% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Adenuyiwa, D. | Conservative Party | 532 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Roy, D. | Conservative Party | 514 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 6 | Matthewman, E. | Green Party | 319 | 6.5% | 19.6% | — | |
| 7 | Breedon, S. | Independent | 305 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 8 | Jenkins, P. | Liberal Democrats | 243 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 9 | Buxton, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 190 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — |
Billericay East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,854
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schrader, A. | Conservative Party | 1,713 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnes, A. | Conservative Party | 1,680 | 19.6% | 58.9% | +33.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mordecai, M. | Conservative Party | 1,523 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brennan, A. | Green Party | 922 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 5 | Goshawk, S. | Green Party | 784 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — | |
| 6 | Tatman, A. | Green Party | 737 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 7 | Clark, L. | Liberal Democrats | 447 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 8 | Bunyan, S. | Labour Party | 424 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 9 | Smith, P. | Liberal Democrats | 333 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — |
Burstead · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,729
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baggott, A. | Conservative Party | 1,785 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moore, R. | Conservative Party | 1,716 | 21.0% | 62.9% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blake, K. | Conservative Party | 1,515 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Banks, L. | Labour Party | 933 | 11.4% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Daffin, C. | Liberal Democrats | 786 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | McGarry, D. | Green Party | 485 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 7 | Chraibi, I. | Green Party | 485 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Fryd, A. | Liberal Democrats | 481 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — |
Pitsea North West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,736
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker, M. | Labour Party | 1,026 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Callaghan, E. | Labour Party | 1,012 | 19.4% | 58.3% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reid, P. | Labour Party | 965 | 18.5% | 55.6% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Burke Terson, S. | Conservative Party | 706 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Smith, L. | Conservative Party | 605 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — | |
| 6 | Cottrell, M. | Conservative Party | 558 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 7 | Howard, M. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 8 | Huggins, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 137 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
Billericay West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,701
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hedley, A. | Conservative Party | 1,712 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Turner, P. | Conservative Party | 1,667 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lawrence, D. | Conservative Party | 1,609 | 19.9% | 59.6% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | May, C. | Liberal Democrats | 964 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lancaster, P. | Liberal Democrats | 691 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 6 | Nicklin, T. | Liberal Democrats | 627 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 7 | Button, B. | Labour Party | 420 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | Butler, S. | Green Party | 412 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — |
Lee Chapel North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,505
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harrison, A. | Labour Party | 1,148 | 25.4% | 76.3% | +51.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McGeorge, M. | Labour Party | 1,005 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGurran, A. | Labour Party | 900 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Shukla, D. | Conservative Party | 474 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wingfield, J. | Conservative Party | 472 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 6 | Chandler, M. | Liberal Democrats | 289 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | McDonald, E. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 227 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — |
Nethermayne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,845
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, K. | Independent | 1,490 | 26.9% | 80.8% | +55.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Larkin, M. | Independent | 1,307 | 23.6% | 70.9% | +45.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murphy, E. | Independent | 1,168 | 21.1% | 63.3% | +38.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Moyet, Y. | Labour Party | 576 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — | |
| 5 | Blake, A. | Conservative Party | 313 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 6 | Chambers, L. | Liberal Democrats | 266 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 7 | Martin, D. | Conservative Party | 251 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Uluhan, M. | Conservative Party | 163 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — |
Langdon Hills · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,817
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green, H. | Independent | 1,855 | 22.0% | 65.9% | +40.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Robbins, V. | Independent | 1,850 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown, W. | Independent | 1,842 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Allen, C. | Conservative Party | 718 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 5 | Sharpe, D. | Labour Party | 583 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 6 | Sandhu, S. | Conservative Party | 496 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 7 | Edemakhiota, S. | Conservative Party | 439 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | Grant, E. | Green Party | 355 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 9 | Nice, S. | Liberal Democrats | 286 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 10 | X, N. | ND | 26 | 0.3% | 0.9% | — |
Fryerns · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,477
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, A. | Labour Party | 1,160 | 26.2% | 78.5% | +53.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ansell, A. | Labour Party | 1,142 | 25.8% | 77.3% | +52.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davies, A. | Labour Party | 1,053 | 23.8% | 71.3% | +46.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dawodu, O. | Conservative Party | 529 | 11.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 5 | Howard, V. | Liberal Democrats | 329 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 6 | Donne, E. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 218 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — |