← Basingstoke & Deane (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Basingstoke & Deane 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

18 ward races
54 seats
8 unfairly awarded seats
14.8% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 54 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party61,99248.8%3361.1%2750.0%+6
Labour Party24,67719.4%1018.5%1120.4%-1
Liberal Democrats22,92518.1%59.3%1018.5%-5
B&D IND7,8006.1%59.3%35.6%+2
HANTS IND4,6813.7%00.0%23.7%-2
Independent2,9032.3%11.9%11.9%0
Green Party1,4611.2%00.0%00.0%0
WEP4220.3%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1290.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total126,990100.0%54100.0%54100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)
Previous (2020)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Brighton Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,104

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Konieczko A.Liberal Democrats86813.7%41.2%+16.2 ptsElected
2McCormich A.Labour Party82413.1%39.2%+14.2 ptsElected
3Bowes A.K.Liberal Democrats72511.5%34.5%+9.5 ptsElected
4Carr S.L.Conservative Party66510.5%31.6%
5Taylor K.R.Labour Party64710.2%30.7%
6Whitaker P.R.H.Liberal Democrats6149.7%29.2%
7Rolfe S.J.Labour Party5899.3%28.0%
8Rouse W.D.S.Conservative Party5699.0%27.0%
9Singh P.Conservative Party5098.1%24.2%
10Stone A.H.HANTS IND2373.8%11.3%
11McDonnell B.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition661.0%3.1%

Electorate 7,902 · EC ward code E05013080 · Back to ward index

Brookvale and Kings Furlong · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,228

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mummalaneni A.Conservative Party94514.1%42.4%+17.4 ptsElected
2Jeans S.Conservative Party86012.9%38.6%+13.6 ptsElected
3Howard-Sorrell M.Labour Party80612.1%36.2%+11.2 ptsElected
4Martin S.J.Labour Party77411.6%34.7%
5Pierce J.K.Labour Party72710.9%32.6%
6Norman E.M.Conservative Party66610.0%29.9%
7Hickling R.J.Liberal Democrats6319.4%28.3%
8Maritan F.D.Liberal Democrats5127.7%23.0%
9Lawrence S.R.Liberal Democrats4616.9%20.7%
10Tennison S.HANTS IND3014.5%13.5%

Electorate 7,528 · EC ward code E05013081 · Back to ward index

Norden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,994

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1James L.B&D IND1,05217.6%52.7%+27.7 ptsElected
2Harvey P.D.B&D IND1,00516.8%50.4%+25.4 ptsElected
3Wooldridge C.M.Labour Party81513.6%40.9%+15.9 ptsElected
4Murphy J.Labour Party66911.2%33.5%
5Drake S.W.Labour Party63410.6%31.8%
6Archer M.R.Conservative Party5078.5%25.4%
7Clarke A.P.J.Conservative Party3976.6%19.9%
8Holder J.Conservative Party3405.7%17.0%
9Heath P.HANTS IND2834.7%14.2%
10Barrington-Cook J.I.Liberal Democrats2183.6%10.9%
11Demmenie M.E.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition631.1%3.2%

Electorate 7,304 · EC ward code E05013087 · Back to ward index

Popley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,712

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tom S.Labour Party85716.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
2Tustain J.Labour Party77515.1%45.3%+20.3 ptsElected
3Donohoe G.Labour Party75414.7%44.0%+19.0 ptsElected
4Potter D.A.B&D IND63812.4%37.3%
5Sookhun S.Conservative Party51210.0%29.9%
6Budden M.G.Conservative Party4879.5%28.4%
7Moss D.E.Conservative Party3997.8%23.3%
8James-Bailey S.HANTS IND2755.4%16.1%
9Berwick-Gooding L.A.Liberal Democrats2204.3%12.8%
10Benjamin L.A.Liberal Democrats2204.3%12.8%

Electorate 7,824 · EC ward code E05013089 · Back to ward index

South Ham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,967

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Grant S.J.Labour Party1,07418.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
2Watts G.J.Labour Party99016.8%50.3%+25.3 ptsElected
3Jones T.Labour Party89115.1%45.3%+20.3 ptsElected
4Turner L.P.Conservative Party79913.5%40.6%
5Davis N.M.Conservative Party79513.5%40.4%
6O'Donnell D.P.Conservative Party72212.2%36.7%
7Stone D.P.HANTS IND2474.2%12.6%
8Hussey M.Liberal Democrats2053.5%10.4%
9McKay M.G.Liberal Democrats1783.0%9.0%

Electorate 7,654 · EC ward code E05013091 · Back to ward index

Hatch Warren and Beggarwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,977

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bean R.L.Conservative Party1,29921.9%65.7%+40.7 ptsElected
2Putty D.Conservative Party1,26121.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
3Kotecha S.S.Conservative Party91815.5%46.4%+21.4 ptsElected
4Case T.Labour Party68211.5%34.5%
5Cusack T.Labour Party64810.9%32.8%
6Blackmore-Squires T.Liberal Democrats5869.9%29.6%
7Cleary S.HANTS IND5389.1%27.2%

Electorate 7,615 · EC ward code E05013085 · Back to ward index

Tadley North, Kingsclere and Baughurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,933

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Rhatigan K.Conservative Party1,75920.0%60.0%+35.0 ptsElected
2Frost S.M.Conservative Party1,59118.1%54.2%+29.2 ptsElected
3Poland G.Conservative Party1,40416.0%47.9%+22.9 ptsElected
4Lovegrove W.G.Liberal Democrats1,10612.6%37.7%
5Morrow K.Liberal Democrats8439.6%28.7%
6Meiszner R.Liberal Democrats8319.4%28.3%
7Peach R.Independent4815.5%16.4%
8Morgan L.Labour Party4214.8%14.4%
9Rothman S.D.Labour Party3644.1%12.4%

Electorate 8,476 · EC ward code E05013093 · Back to ward index

Winklebury and Manydown · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,661

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Compton-Burnett A.Conservative Party90218.1%54.3%+29.3 ptsElected
2Freeman A.Labour Party85217.1%51.3%+26.3 ptsElected
3Dillow S.P.Conservative Party79916.0%48.1%+23.1 ptsElected
4Patchett M.Conservative Party76615.4%46.1%
5Lee A.Labour Party66713.4%40.2%
6Embley D.H.Labour Party65213.1%39.3%
7McKay W.E.Liberal Democrats1863.7%11.2%
8Neville S.HANTS IND1583.2%9.5%

Electorate 5,423 · EC ward code E05013095 · Back to ward index

Kempshott and Buckskin · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,653

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Court R.Conservative Party1,66821.0%62.9%+37.9 ptsElected
2Peter A.Conservative Party1,38717.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
3Eachus H.K.Conservative Party1,35217.0%51.0%+26.0 ptsElected
4McCormick W.B.Labour Party7299.2%27.5%
5Bell D.F.Labour Party7159.0%27.0%
6Stewart K.J.Labour Party5536.9%20.8%
7Farrington B.Green Party4746.0%17.9%
8Wolstencroft M.R.Liberal Democrats4525.7%17.0%
9O'Doherty S.Liberal Democrats3874.9%14.6%
10White D.J.HANTS IND2413.0%9.1%

Electorate 8,319 · EC ward code E05013086 · Back to ward index

Tadley and Pamber · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,860

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Leeks D.A.Conservative Party1,67819.6%58.7%+33.7 ptsElected
2Carruthers K.E.Conservative Party1,58318.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
3Mellor D.P.Conservative Party1,48017.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
4Slimin J.Liberal Democrats1,00411.7%35.1%
5Bound M.Liberal Democrats8199.5%28.6%
6Gibbons S.Liberal Democrats6387.4%22.3%
7Gardiner E.O.Labour Party3964.6%13.8%
8Reeves S.D.Labour Party3744.4%13.1%
9Russell M.Labour Party3564.1%12.4%
10Bennett C.B.M.HANTS IND2532.9%8.8%

Electorate 8,751 · EC ward code E05013092 · Back to ward index

Eastrop and Grove · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,320

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hussey R.J.Liberal Democrats1,45921.0%62.9%+37.9 ptsElected
2James G.Liberal Democrats1,31218.8%56.5%+31.5 ptsElected
3McKay J.G.N.Liberal Democrats1,21117.4%52.2%+27.2 ptsElected
4Grant E.Conservative Party5658.1%24.3%
5Courtois S.Conservative Party5628.1%24.2%
6Vaux S.Conservative Party5267.6%22.7%
7Kerswell K.J.Labour Party4436.4%19.1%
8Brown P.I.WEP4226.1%18.2%
9Wilson A.R.Labour Party3134.5%13.5%
10Alsasa S.HANTS IND1482.1%6.4%

Electorate 7,289 · EC ward code E05013083 · Back to ward index

Bramley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,159

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Robinson N.Conservative Party1,42622.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
2Tomblin C.B&D IND1,25919.4%58.3%+33.3 ptsElected
3Mahaffey S.H.Conservative Party1,14217.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
4Jayawardena N.M.Conservative Party1,09817.0%50.9%
5Scott M.E.Liberal Democrats64910.0%30.1%
6Masey L.Labour Party4757.3%22.0%
7Heath C.HANTS IND4286.6%19.8%

Electorate 6,663 · EC ward code E05013079 · Back to ward index

Chineham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,426

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Edwards L.J.Conservative Party1,71123.5%70.5%+45.5 ptsElected
2Miller P.E.Conservative Party1,47820.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Vaux J.Conservative Party1,33518.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
4Jenkin J.E.Green Party5517.6%22.7%
5Walke J.Independent5327.3%21.9%
6French M.I.Labour Party4325.9%17.8%
7Whitechurch S.D.Liberal Democrats3044.2%12.5%
8Wooldridge N.Labour Party3034.2%12.5%
9Musson R.J.Green Party2303.2%9.5%
10Philpotts S.M.Green Party2062.8%8.5%
11Watson D.HANTS IND1972.7%8.1%

Electorate 8,058 · EC ward code E05013082 · Back to ward index

Whitchurch, Overton and Laverstoke · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,303

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Phillimore C.J.W.B&D IND1,93519.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
2Tilbury I.B&D IND1,91119.3%57.9%+32.9 ptsElected
3Follett Maitland L.Independent1,89019.1%57.2%+32.2 ptsElected
4Aris J.W.Conservative Party9219.3%27.9%
5Sloane Williams L.Liberal Democrats6546.6%19.8%
6Perry J.E.Conservative Party6486.5%19.6%
7Richards J.Conservative Party5946.0%18.0%
8Hands A.Liberal Democrats5135.2%15.5%
9Connor M.Labour Party4384.4%13.3%
10Harris A.Liberal Democrats2052.1%6.2%
11Holliday R.J.HANTS IND2012.0%6.1%

Electorate 8,171 · EC ward code E05013094 · Back to ward index

Sherborne St John and Rooksdown · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,972

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bound S.E.Conservative Party1,40323.7%71.1%+46.1 ptsElected
2Ganesh J.Conservative Party1,18520.0%60.1%+35.1 ptsElected
3Robinson T.W.Conservative Party1,16019.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
4Chekini S.Labour Party67911.5%34.4%
5Connor C.Labour Party65311.0%33.1%
6Baker M.J.Liberal Democrats5719.7%29.0%
7King P.HANTS IND2664.5%13.5%

Electorate 7,812 · EC ward code E05013090 · Back to ward index

Oakley and the Candovers · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,605

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor D.M.Conservative Party1,90624.4%73.2%+48.2 ptsElected
2Golding H.E.Conservative Party1,90024.3%72.9%+47.9 ptsElected
3Gaskell P.Conservative Party1,53219.6%58.8%+33.8 ptsElected
4Baker P.Liberal Democrats80010.2%30.7%
5Cooper R.C.Liberal Democrats6968.9%26.7%
6Edney I.P.Labour Party5396.9%20.7%
7Dean L.HANTS IND4415.6%16.9%

Electorate 7,240 · EC ward code E05013088 · Back to ward index

Evingar · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,563

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Falconer G.Conservative Party2,00726.1%78.3%+53.3 ptsElected
2Izett J.R.Conservative Party1,95425.4%76.2%+51.2 ptsElected
3Carr S.D.Conservative Party1,63521.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
4Malone P.Liberal Democrats89711.7%35.0%
5Stepney L.R.Liberal Democrats6518.5%25.4%
6Thomas R.G.Labour Party5447.1%21.2%

Electorate 7,403 · EC ward code E05013084 · Back to ward index

Basing and Upton Grey · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,891

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Godesen S.H.Conservative Party2,20725.4%76.3%+51.3 ptsElected
2Cubitt O.V.Conservative Party2,11824.4%73.3%+48.3 ptsElected
3Ruffell M.B.Conservative Party1,96022.6%67.8%+42.8 ptsElected
4Lilleker R.M.Liberal Democrats6757.8%23.3%
5Kennan J.A.Liberal Democrats6247.2%21.6%
6Lowe B.Labour Party6237.2%21.5%
7Moynihan A.HANTS IND4675.4%16.2%

Electorate 8,097 · EC ward code E05013078 · Back to ward index