← Bexley (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Bexley 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

17 ward races
45 seats
9 unfairly awarded seats
20.0% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 17 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 45 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party74,25450.8%3373.3%2453.3%+9
Labour Party64,29444.0%1226.7%2044.4%-8
Liberal Democrats5,0053.4%00.0%12.2%-1
Green Party1,0710.7%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK9570.7%00.0%00.0%0
Independent2610.2%00.0%00.0%0
BR DEM2530.2%00.0%00.0%0
Social Democratic Party1000.1%00.0%00.0%0
Christian Peoples Alliance640.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total146,259100.0%45100.0%45100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)
Previous (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Northumberland Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,629

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gill B.Labour Party1,36125.9%51.8%+18.4 ptsElected
2Perfect W.Labour Party1,34525.6%51.2%+17.8 ptsElected
3Newbury A.Conservative Party1,15722.0%44.0%
4Brooks D.Conservative Party1,14621.8%43.6%
5Bargery P.Liberal Democrats2484.7%9.4%

Electorate 7,747 · EC ward code E05011228 · Back to ward index

Longlands · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,620

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jane Moore L.Conservative Party1,50428.7%57.4%+24.1 ptsElected
2Dourmoush A.Conservative Party1,34725.7%51.4%+18.1 ptsElected
3Gray T.Labour Party1,02919.6%39.3%
4Davies A.Labour Party1,01419.4%38.7%
5Brooks O.Liberal Democrats3466.6%13.2%

Electorate 7,677 · EC ward code E05011227 · Back to ward index

St Mary's and St James · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,728

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Christoforides K.Conservative Party1,59129.2%58.3%+25.0 ptsElected
2Smith C.Conservative Party1,50627.6%55.2%+21.9 ptsElected
3Malt S.Labour Party93917.2%34.4%
4Husband J.Labour Party88416.2%32.4%
5McBride D.Liberal Democrats3476.4%12.7%
6Purcell L.Reform UK1252.3%4.6%
7Valinejad C.Christian Peoples Alliance641.2%2.3%

Electorate 11,397 · EC ward code E05011229 · Back to ward index

East Wickham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,701

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hall S.Conservative Party1,96717.7%53.1%+28.1 ptsElected
2Newton C.Conservative Party1,79416.2%48.5%+23.5 ptsElected
3Catterall C.Conservative Party1,77416.0%47.9%+22.9 ptsElected
4Briant D.Labour Party1,73315.6%46.8%
5Hedderman C.Labour Party1,60914.5%43.5%
6Tingle D.Labour Party1,46713.2%39.6%
7Ash S.Liberal Democrats5064.6%13.7%
8Jones M.BR DEM2532.3%6.8%

Electorate 11,746 · EC ward code E05011224 · Back to ward index

Barnehurst · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,758

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bishop B.Conservative Party1,63729.7%59.4%+26.0 ptsElected
2Jackson H.Conservative Party1,59929.0%58.0%+24.7 ptsElected
3Folarin E.Labour Party1,17321.3%42.5%
4Smith A.Labour Party1,10620.1%40.1%

Electorate 8,454 · EC ward code E05011217 · Back to ward index

Crayford · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,403

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Seymour M.Conservative Party1,89018.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Lucia-Hennis G.Conservative Party1,87218.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
3Di Netimah F.Conservative Party1,71716.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
4Johnson A.Labour Party1,62815.9%47.8%
5Riches A.Labour Party1,55415.2%45.7%
6Hair N.Labour Party1,54915.2%45.5%

Electorate 11,244 · EC ward code E05011222 · Back to ward index

Falconwood and Welling · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,549

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Betts N.Conservative Party2,04719.2%57.7%+32.7 ptsElected
2Curtois A.Conservative Party1,89417.8%53.4%+28.4 ptsElected
3Brooks F.Conservative Party1,79516.9%50.6%+25.6 ptsElected
4Miller S.Labour Party1,49414.0%42.1%
5Fosten J.Labour Party1,36012.8%38.3%
6Perfect S.Labour Party1,27312.0%35.9%
7Radbon E.Green Party5385.1%15.2%
8Newton M.Reform UK2452.3%6.9%

Electorate 11,980 · EC ward code E05011226 · Back to ward index

Sidcup · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,561

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Slaughter J.Conservative Party1,82817.1%51.3%+26.3 ptsElected
2Bacon C.Conservative Party1,81817.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
3Diment R.Conservative Party1,81517.0%51.0%+26.0 ptsElected
4Hinkley P.Labour Party1,21111.3%34.0%
5Kelsey T.Labour Party1,20411.3%33.8%
6Nottle B.Labour Party1,08210.1%30.4%
7Hurren P.Liberal Democrats4844.5%13.6%
8Reynolds S.Liberal Democrats4724.4%13.3%
9Sexton D.Liberal Democrats4073.8%11.4%
10Shvorob D.Independent2612.4%7.3%
11Williams L.Social Democratic Party1000.9%2.8%

Electorate 8,450 · EC ward code E05011230 · Back to ward index

Bexleyheath · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,879

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gower S.Conservative Party2,36420.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
2Carew B.Conservative Party2,15418.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
3Sandhu R.Conservative Party1,98317.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
4Davies E.Labour Party1,59913.7%41.2%
5Murphy M.Labour Party1,56813.5%40.4%
6Ball P.Labour Party1,53213.2%39.5%
7Albakri J.Liberal Democrats4363.7%11.2%

Electorate 12,011 · EC ward code E05011219 · Back to ward index

Blackfen and Lamorbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,708

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hunt J.Conservative Party2,19919.8%59.3%+34.3 ptsElected
2Craske P.Conservative Party2,18519.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
3Munur C.Conservative Party1,92417.3%51.9%+26.9 ptsElected
4Choda J.Labour Party1,34912.1%36.4%
5Cove J.Labour Party1,31011.8%35.3%
6Jenkins D.Labour Party1,29511.6%34.9%
7Kelly R.Liberal Democrats5384.8%14.5%
8Pastor M.Reform UK3252.9%8.8%

Electorate 12,097 · EC ward code E05011220 · Back to ward index

Crook Log · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,921

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1O'Neill T.Conservative Party2,31719.7%59.1%+34.1 ptsElected
2Ward-Wilson J.Conservative Party2,15418.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
3Taylor C.Conservative Party2,07717.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
4Davies L.Labour Party1,68414.3%43.0%
5White J.Labour Party1,49112.7%38.0%
6Nicholls T.Labour Party1,41812.1%36.2%
7Brooks Z.Liberal Democrats6215.3%15.8%

Electorate 11,680 · EC ward code E05011223 · Back to ward index

Slade Green and Northend · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,949

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Borella S.Labour Party1,22031.3%62.6%+29.3 ptsElected
2Day A.Labour Party1,21331.1%62.3%+28.9 ptsElected
3Gillespie M.Conservative Party76419.6%39.2%
4Brinkhurst M.Conservative Party70018.0%35.9%

Electorate 8,192 · EC ward code E05011231 · Back to ward index

West Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,026

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Reader P.Conservative Party2,38919.8%59.3%+34.3 ptsElected
2Davey J.Conservative Party2,32819.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
3Read P.Conservative Party2,28318.9%56.7%+31.7 ptsElected
4Marchant S.Labour Party1,73014.3%43.0%
5Dominy J.Labour Party1,67813.9%41.7%
6Akintomide-Akinwamide V.Labour Party1,66913.8%41.5%

Electorate 11,860 · EC ward code E05011233 · Back to ward index

Blendon and Penhill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,499

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Adams P.Conservative Party2,26721.6%64.8%+39.8 ptsElected
2O'Hare N.Conservative Party2,04019.4%58.3%+33.3 ptsElected
3Leaf D.Conservative Party2,01219.2%57.5%+32.5 ptsElected
4Francis E.Labour Party1,32212.6%37.8%
5Brooke A.Labour Party1,09910.5%31.4%
6Millen F.Labour Party1,09210.4%31.2%
7Meredeen B.Liberal Democrats4023.8%11.5%
8Mason M.Reform UK2622.5%7.5%

Electorate 11,642 · EC ward code E05011221 · Back to ward index

Belvedere · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,332

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hinkley S.Labour Party2,03320.3%61.0%+36.0 ptsElected
2Amaning E.Labour Party1,99820.0%60.0%+35.0 ptsElected
3Francis D.Labour Party1,95619.6%58.7%+33.7 ptsElected
4Bishop C.Conservative Party1,27812.8%38.4%
5Dorgu W.Conservative Party1,12611.3%33.8%
6Poon V.Conservative Party1,07210.7%32.2%
7Barry S.Green Party5335.3%16.0%

Electorate 11,686 · EC ward code E05011218 · Back to ward index

Erith · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,158

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ball C.Labour Party1,51235.0%70.1%+36.7 ptsElected
2Taylor N.Labour Party1,46934.0%68.1%+34.8 ptsElected
3Li D.Conservative Party67015.5%31.1%
4Khan M.Conservative Party66415.4%30.8%

Electorate 8,128 · EC ward code E05011225 · Back to ward index

Thamesmead East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,282

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ferguson L.Labour Party1,70324.9%74.6%+49.6 ptsElected
2Asunramu Z.Labour Party1,67824.5%73.5%+48.5 ptsElected
3Ogundayo M.Labour Party1,66124.3%72.8%+47.8 ptsElected
4Moon G.Conservative Party5868.6%25.7%
5Price N.Conservative Party5588.2%24.5%
6Tumber R.Conservative Party4626.7%20.2%
7Oddiri D.Liberal Democrats1982.9%8.7%

Electorate 10,077 · EC ward code E05011232 · Back to ward index