← Blaby (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Blaby 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 34 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 16,830 | 42.0% | 19 | 55.9% | 15 | 44.1% | +4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 12,891 | 32.2% | 9 | 26.5% | 11 | 32.4% | -2 |
| Labour Party | 4,928 | 12.3% | 4 | 11.8% | 4 | 11.8% | 0 |
| Green Party | 4,819 | 12.0% | 2 | 5.9% | 4 | 11.8% | -2 |
| Independent | 493 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 63 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 40,024 | 100.0% | 34 | 100.0% | 34 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Enderby · 2 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- North Whetstone · 2 seats · won at 41.5% · above quota
- Fosse Normanton · 1 seat · won at 60.3% · above quota
- Fosse Stoney Cove · 2 seats · won at 44.8% · above quota
- Thorpe Astley and St Mary’s · 2 seats · won at 49.6% · above quota
- Glenfield Ellis · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Leicester Forest and Lubbesthorpe · 3 seats · won at 44.8% · above quota
- Glenfield Faire · 2 seats · won at 53.5% · above quota
- Cosby and South Whetstone · 2 seats · won at 54.0% · above quota
- Countesthorpe · 3 seats · won at 48.1% · above quota
- Kirby Muxloe · 2 seats · won at 59.1% · above quota
- Narborough and Littlethorpe · 3 seats · won at 52.6% · above quota
- Fosse Highcross · 2 seats · won at 61.6% · above quota
- Blaby · 2 seats · won at 68.8% · above quota
- Glen Parva · 2 seats · won at 69.9% · above quota
- Braunstone Millfield · 2 seats · won at 78.2% · above quota
Race results
Enderby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,250
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gill, H. | Liberal Democrats | 522 | 20.9% | 41.8% | +8.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cashmore, C. | Conservative Party | 487 | 19.5% | 39.0% | +5.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holt, N. | Liberal Democrats | 482 | 19.3% | 38.6% | — | |
| 4 | Richardson, H. | Conservative Party | 407 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Malthouse, A. | Labour Party | 287 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 6 | Uddin, I. | Labour Party | 173 | 6.9% | 13.8% | — | |
| 7 | Gray, D. | Green Party | 141 | 5.6% | 11.3% | — |
North Whetstone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 929
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson, M. | Conservative Party | 390 | 21.0% | 42.0% | +8.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Findlay, S. | Conservative Party | 385 | 20.7% | 41.5% | +8.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Savage, A. | Liberal Democrats | 278 | 15.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 4 | Bounds, M. | Labour Party | 267 | 14.4% | 28.8% | — | |
| 5 | Pendery-Hunt, L. | Labour Party | 241 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 6 | Smith, G. | Liberal Democrats | 233 | 12.5% | 25.1% | — | |
| 7 | Jeeves, D. | Reform UK | 63 | 3.4% | 6.8% | — |
Fosse Normanton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 629
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, M. | Conservative Party | 379 | 60.3% | +10.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crane, S. | Labour Party | 170 | 27.0% | — | |
| 3 | Turner, F. | Green Party | 80 | 12.7% | — |
Fosse Stoney Cove · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,162
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cousin, L. | Liberal Democrats | 616 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wright, N. | Conservative Party | 521 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Larkin, E. | Liberal Democrats | 503 | 21.6% | 43.3% | — | |
| 4 | Matthews, T. | Conservative Party | 498 | 21.4% | 42.9% | — | |
| 5 | Parker-Cox, X. | Green Party | 186 | 8.0% | 16.0% | — |
Thorpe Astley and St Mary’s · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 948
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dewinter, A. | Labour Party | 531 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lunn, B. | Labour Party | 470 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Forrest, R. | Conservative Party | 398 | 21.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, S. | Green Party | 200 | 10.5% | 21.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gill, K. | Liberal Democrats | 160 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — | |
| 6 | Fonjong, C. | Liberal Democrats | 137 | 7.2% | 14.5% | — |
Glenfield Ellis · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,053
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chapman, N. | Conservative Party | 586 | 27.8% | 55.7% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gambardella, H. | Liberal Democrats | 536 | 25.5% | 50.9% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, I. | Liberal Democrats | 496 | 23.6% | 47.1% | — | |
| 4 | Huss, G. | Conservative Party | 487 | 23.1% | 46.3% | — |
Leicester Forest and Lubbesthorpe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,204
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coar, S. | Conservative Party | 623 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tomeo, M. | Conservative Party | 545 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shikotra, D. | Conservative Party | 540 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mortel, M. | Liberal Democrats | 498 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 5 | Jordan, S. | Liberal Democrats | 493 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 6 | Jordan, K. | Liberal Democrats | 418 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 7 | Travis, S. | Green Party | 267 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 8 | O'Hare, M. | Independent | 229 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — |
Glenfield Faire · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,006
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Breckon, L. | Conservative Party | 606 | 30.1% | 60.2% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Denney, R. | Conservative Party | 538 | 26.7% | 53.5% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cox, N. | Green Party | 461 | 22.9% | 45.8% | — | |
| 4 | Kapadia, M. | Green Party | 407 | 20.2% | 40.5% | — |
Cosby and South Whetstone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,128
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillimore, L. | Conservative Party | 710 | 31.5% | 62.9% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wolfe, J. | Conservative Party | 609 | 27.0% | 54.0% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Toole, L. | Liberal Democrats | 367 | 16.3% | 32.5% | — | |
| 4 | Jelfs, M. | Green Party | 308 | 13.7% | 27.3% | — | |
| 5 | Norman, G. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 11.6% | 23.2% | — |
Countesthorpe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,768
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clifford, A. | Conservative Party | 966 | 18.2% | 54.6% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bayliss, R. | Liberal Democrats | 866 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holdridge, J. | Liberal Democrats | 850 | 16.0% | 48.1% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Findlay, D. | Conservative Party | 793 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Storey, B. | Liberal Democrats | 769 | 14.5% | 43.5% | — | |
| 6 | Blackwell, S. | Conservative Party | 746 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 7 | Lee, L. | Labour Party | 314 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Kirby Muxloe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,372
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deakin, T. | Green Party | 859 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stead, R. | Green Party | 811 | 29.6% | 59.1% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Frost, C. | Conservative Party | 539 | 19.7% | 39.3% | — | |
| 4 | Nakas, A. | Conservative Party | 387 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ojo, A. | Liberal Democrats | 147 | 5.4% | 10.7% | — |
Narborough and Littlethorpe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,520
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forey, J. | Conservative Party | 853 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Richardson, T. | Conservative Party | 851 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grundy, N. | Conservative Party | 799 | 17.5% | 52.6% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Turner, E. | Green Party | 559 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Waterton, M. | Labour Party | 513 | 11.3% | 33.8% | — | |
| 6 | Anrep, C. | Liberal Democrats | 493 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 7 | Mattinson, A. | Liberal Democrats | 492 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — |
Fosse Highcross · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,161
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, B. | Conservative Party | 735 | 31.7% | 63.3% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shirley, M. | Conservative Party | 715 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Badland, L. | Labour Party | 351 | 15.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 4 | Greenwood, T. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 11.6% | 23.2% | — | |
| 5 | Deakin, J. | Green Party | 251 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — |
Blaby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,190
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartshorn, P. | Liberal Democrats | 847 | 35.6% | 71.2% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moseley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 818 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Broomhead, M. | Conservative Party | 458 | 19.3% | 38.5% | — | |
| 4 | Palmer, B. | Labour Party | 256 | 10.8% | 21.5% | — |
Glen Parva · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 941
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welsh, G. | Liberal Democrats | 681 | 36.2% | 72.4% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Welsh, B. | Liberal Democrats | 658 | 35.0% | 69.9% | +36.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Denton, C. | Conservative Party | 279 | 14.8% | 29.6% | — | |
| 4 | Woolley, R. | Independent | 264 | 14.0% | 28.1% | — |
Braunstone Millfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 78.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 822
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, N. | Labour Party | 712 | 43.3% | 86.6% | +53.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shepherd, T. | Labour Party | 643 | 39.1% | 78.2% | +44.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Deakin, E. | Green Party | 289 | 17.6% | 35.2% | — |