← Blackpool (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Blackpool 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 42 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 25,380 | 48.3% | 28 | 66.7% | 21 | 50.0% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 22,263 | 42.4% | 14 | 33.3% | 19 | 45.2% | -5 |
| Independent | 2,880 | 5.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 4.8% | -2 |
| Green Party | 796 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 647 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 601 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 52,567 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 42 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Waterloo · 2 seats · won at 37.6% · above quota
- Norbreck · 2 seats · won at 39.7% · above quota
- Warbreck · 2 seats · won at 45.4% · above quota
- Bloomfield · 2 seats · won at 47.4% · above quota
- Greenlands · 2 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Tyldesley · 2 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- Highfield · 2 seats · won at 49.2% · above quota
- Layton · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Bispham · 2 seats · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Victoria · 2 seats · won at 53.3% · above quota
- Squires Gate · 2 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Marton · 2 seats · won at 53.5% · above quota
- Ingthorpe · 2 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Hawes Side · 2 seats · won at 57.3% · above quota
- Talbot · 2 seats · won at 57.7% · above quota
- Park · 2 seats · won at 58.3% · above quota
- Claremont · 2 seats · won at 58.9% · above quota
- Anchorsholme · 2 seats · won at 59.8% · above quota
- Clifton · 2 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Stanley · 2 seats · won at 64.4% · above quota
- Brunswick · 2 seats · won at 65.5% · above quota
Race results
Waterloo · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,353
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cartmell, S. | Labour Party | 564 | 20.9% | 41.7% | +8.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mitchell, D. | Conservative Party | 509 | 18.8% | 37.6% | +4.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bodenham, L. | Labour Party | 493 | 18.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 4 | Higgitt, C. | Conservative Party | 458 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 5 | O'Neill, J. | Independent | 345 | 12.8% | 25.5% | — | |
| 6 | Rothery, T. | Green Party | 170 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — | |
| 7 | Robertson, D. | Reform UK | 166 | 6.1% | 12.3% | — |
Norbreck · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,644
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ellison, E. | Conservative Party | 714 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sloman, J. | Conservative Party | 652 | 19.8% | 39.7% | +6.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Callow, M. | Independent | 562 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 4 | Williams, T. | Independent | 501 | 15.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Harrison, R. | Labour Party | 440 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 6 | O'Hara, D. | Labour Party | 418 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — |
Warbreck · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,297
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott, D. | Conservative Party | 600 | 23.1% | 46.3% | +12.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Scott, M. | Conservative Party | 589 | 22.7% | 45.4% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Haynes, M. | Labour Party | 574 | 22.1% | 44.3% | — | |
| 4 | Kirkwood, T. | Labour Party | 525 | 20.2% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Benfold, K. | Liberal Democrats | 158 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 6 | Hindley, P. | Liberal Democrats | 147 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — |
Bloomfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 784
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fenlon, M. | Labour Party | 374 | 23.9% | 47.7% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hobson, J. | Labour Party | 371 | 23.7% | 47.4% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Butcher, M. | Independent | 261 | 16.7% | 33.3% | — | |
| 4 | Cain, G. | Independent | 237 | 15.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 5 | Milnes, C. | Conservative Party | 195 | 12.4% | 24.9% | — | |
| 6 | Nayak, M. | Conservative Party | 129 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — |
Greenlands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,606
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, J. | Labour Party | 785 | 24.4% | 48.9% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Flanagan, D. | Labour Party | 771 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Warne, J. | Conservative Party | 701 | 21.8% | 43.7% | — | |
| 4 | Scott, R. | Conservative Party | 680 | 21.2% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Thomas, B. | Green Party | 167 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 6 | Fogg, L. | Reform UK | 107 | 3.3% | 6.7% | — |
Tyldesley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,226
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roe, L. | Labour Party | 640 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Webb, P. | Labour Party | 599 | 24.4% | 48.9% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Binns, A. | Conservative Party | 473 | 19.3% | 38.6% | — | |
| 4 | Ormston, J. | Conservative Party | 421 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Eastwood, G. | Green Party | 148 | 6.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 6 | Nield, P. | Reform UK | 88 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 7 | Gee, W. | Independent | 83 | 3.4% | 6.8% | — |
Highfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,690
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunter, P. | Labour Party | 880 | 26.0% | 52.1% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mitchell, B. | Conservative Party | 831 | 24.6% | 49.2% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson, J. | Conservative Party | 763 | 22.6% | 45.1% | — | |
| 4 | Hoyle, S. | Labour Party | 734 | 21.7% | 43.4% | — | |
| 5 | Greene, B. | Liberal Democrats | 172 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — |
Layton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,355
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benson, K. | Labour Party | 733 | 27.1% | 54.1% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boughton, J. | Labour Party | 678 | 25.0% | 50.1% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bates, C. | Conservative Party | 381 | 14.1% | 28.1% | — | |
| 4 | Mitchell, M. | Independent | 378 | 14.0% | 27.9% | — | |
| 5 | Haskett, R. | Conservative Party | 352 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor-Jack, L. | Independent | 187 | 6.9% | 13.8% | — |
Bispham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,287
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilshaw, P. | Conservative Party | 671 | 26.1% | 52.1% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Warne, T. | Conservative Party | 666 | 25.9% | 51.7% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Elmes, J. | Labour Party | 621 | 24.1% | 48.3% | — | |
| 4 | Walshaw, J. | Labour Party | 616 | 23.9% | 47.9% | — |
Victoria · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 879
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookes, P. | Labour Party | 490 | 27.9% | 55.8% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jackson, F. | Labour Party | 468 | 26.6% | 53.3% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harvey, N. | Conservative Party | 337 | 19.2% | 38.4% | — | |
| 4 | Frost, J. | Conservative Party | 329 | 18.7% | 37.5% | — | |
| 5 | Booker, T. | Green Party | 133 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — |
Squires Gate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,466
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell, C. | Conservative Party | 854 | 29.1% | 58.3% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walsh, G. | Conservative Party | 782 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kelly, M. | Labour Party | 527 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 4 | Rossie, D. | Labour Party | 454 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Daniels, J. | Green Party | 178 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — | |
| 6 | Knight, K. | Reform UK | 136 | 4.6% | 9.3% | — |
Marton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,494
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, S. | Labour Party | 814 | 27.2% | 54.5% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brookes, S. | Labour Party | 799 | 26.7% | 53.5% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stansfield, A. | Conservative Party | 630 | 21.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 4 | Priestley, G. | Conservative Party | 595 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Anderson-Riley, K. | Reform UK | 150 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Ingthorpe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,277
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bamborough, J. | Labour Party | 743 | 29.1% | 58.2% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farrell, J. | Labour Party | 697 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Higgs, A. | Conservative Party | 575 | 22.5% | 45.0% | — | |
| 4 | Murphy, J. | Conservative Party | 538 | 21.1% | 42.1% | — |
Hawes Side · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,146
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Critchley, K. | Labour Party | 672 | 29.3% | 58.6% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brookes, N. | Labour Party | 657 | 28.7% | 57.3% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Higgitt, K. | Conservative Party | 485 | 21.2% | 42.3% | — | |
| 4 | Downing, F. | Conservative Party | 478 | 20.9% | 41.7% | — |
Talbot · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 991
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 595 | 30.0% | 60.0% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hugo, J. | Labour Party | 572 | 28.9% | 57.7% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Banks, W. | Conservative Party | 321 | 16.2% | 32.4% | — | |
| 4 | White, I. | Conservative Party | 312 | 15.7% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gee, D. | Independent | 182 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — |
Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 945
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell, G. | Labour Party | 616 | 32.6% | 65.2% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hoyle, A. | Labour Party | 551 | 29.2% | 58.3% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rogers, F. | Conservative Party | 365 | 19.3% | 38.6% | — | |
| 4 | Carter, P. | Conservative Party | 358 | 18.9% | 37.9% | — |
Claremont · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 856
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, I. | Labour Party | 538 | 31.4% | 62.9% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, L. | Labour Party | 504 | 29.5% | 58.9% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gordon, H. | Conservative Party | 222 | 13.0% | 25.9% | — | |
| 4 | Sloman, L. | Conservative Party | 179 | 10.5% | 20.9% | — | |
| 5 | Richardson, G. | Independent | 144 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — | |
| 6 | Close, S. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 7.2% | 14.5% | — |
Anchorsholme · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,611
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Galley, P. | Conservative Party | 1,106 | 34.3% | 68.7% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooper, A. | Conservative Party | 963 | 29.9% | 59.8% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boughton, J. | Labour Party | 584 | 18.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 4 | Clark, T. | Labour Party | 568 | 17.6% | 35.3% | — |
Clifton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,089
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burdess, P. | Labour Party | 713 | 32.8% | 65.5% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Humphreys, A. | Labour Party | 694 | 31.9% | 63.8% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, R. | Conservative Party | 424 | 19.5% | 39.0% | — | |
| 4 | Potts, O. | Conservative Party | 346 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — |
Stanley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,199
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker, G. | Conservative Party | 796 | 33.2% | 66.4% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roberts, J. | Conservative Party | 772 | 32.2% | 64.4% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | White, L. | Labour Party | 418 | 17.4% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | Lovatt-Staines, D. | Labour Party | 412 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — |
Brunswick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,095
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas, M. | Labour Party | 761 | 34.8% | 69.5% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marshall, L. | Labour Party | 717 | 32.8% | 65.5% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clark, P. | Conservative Party | 368 | 16.8% | 33.6% | — | |
| 4 | Thomson, J. | Conservative Party | 343 | 15.7% | 31.3% | — |