← Bracknell Forest (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Bracknell Forest 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 15 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 41 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 30,019 | 45.2% | 10 | 24.4% | 19 | 46.3% | -9 |
| Labour Party | 21,429 | 32.2% | 22 | 53.7% | 14 | 34.1% | +8 |
| Liberal Democrats | 10,534 | 15.8% | 7 | 17.1% | 6 | 14.6% | +1 |
| Green Party | 3,991 | 6.0% | 2 | 4.9% | 2 | 4.9% | 0 |
| Independent | 221 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Heritage Party | 155 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 122 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 66,471 | 100.0% | 41 | 100.0% | 41 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Whitegrove · 2 seats · won at 49.9% · above quota
- Bullbrook · 2 seats · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Town Centre and the Parks · 2 seats · won at 55.0% · above quota
- Swinley Forest · 2 seats · won at 55.2% · above quota
- Sandhurst · 3 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Owlsmoor and College Town · 3 seats · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Crowthorne · 3 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Hanworth · 3 seats · won at 53.0% · above quota
- Winkfield and Warfield East · 3 seats · won at 53.3% · above quota
- Binfield South and Jennett’s Park · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Harmans Water and Crown Wood · 3 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Priestwood and Garth · 3 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Easthampstead and Wildridings · 3 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Binfield North and Warfield West · 3 seats · won at 58.4% · above quota
- Great Hollands · 3 seats · won at 66.2% · above quota
Race results
Whitegrove · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,582
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnard, G. | Conservative Party | 913 | 28.9% | 57.7% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McLean, R. | Conservative Party | 789 | 24.9% | 49.9% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Strudley, G. | Labour Party | 459 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — | |
| 4 | Firth, G. | Labour Party | 389 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | Donnan, R. | Green Party | 274 | 8.7% | 17.3% | — | |
| 6 | Pitt, P. | Green Party | 211 | 6.7% | 13.3% | — | |
| 7 | Dulieu, C. | Independent | 128 | 4.0% | 8.1% | — |
Bullbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,010
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Egglestone, C. | Labour Party | 574 | 28.4% | 56.9% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jefferies, K. | Labour Party | 510 | 25.3% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ricketts, H. | Conservative Party | 474 | 23.5% | 47.0% | — | |
| 4 | Prasad, S. | Conservative Party | 461 | 22.8% | 45.7% | — |
Town Centre and the Parks · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 978
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, M. | Labour Party | 551 | 28.2% | 56.3% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bailey, R. | Labour Party | 538 | 27.5% | 55.0% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hayes, S. | Conservative Party | 397 | 20.3% | 40.6% | — | |
| 4 | Heydon, P. | Conservative Party | 377 | 19.3% | 38.5% | — | |
| 5 | Barreto, O. | Independent | 93 | 4.8% | 9.5% | — |
Swinley Forest · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,265
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forster, S. | Liberal Democrats | 748 | 29.6% | 59.1% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, P. | Liberal Democrats | 698 | 27.6% | 55.2% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dudley, C. | Conservative Party | 544 | 21.5% | 43.0% | — | |
| 4 | Merry, A. | Conservative Party | 540 | 21.3% | 42.7% | — |
Sandhurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,155
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forster, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,325 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eberle, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,109 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Zahurddin, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,030 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Panesar, P. | Conservative Party | 1,024 | 15.8% | 47.5% | — | |
| 5 | Birch, D. | Conservative Party | 1,008 | 15.6% | 46.8% | — | |
| 6 | Bettison, P. | Conservative Party | 969 | 15.0% | 45.0% | — |
Owlsmoor and College Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,855
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen, N. | Conservative Party | 1,093 | 19.6% | 58.9% | +33.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mossom, R. | Conservative Party | 1,023 | 18.4% | 55.1% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson, P. | Liberal Democrats | 937 | 16.8% | 50.5% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Edwards, J. | Conservative Party | 899 | 16.2% | 48.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hutchinson, B. | Liberal Democrats | 811 | 14.6% | 43.7% | — | |
| 6 | Quigg, L. | Liberal Democrats | 803 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — |
Crowthorne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,628
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boyle, T. | Conservative Party | 907 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eberle, T. | Liberal Democrats | 829 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robertson, N. | Conservative Party | 828 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wade, B. | Conservative Party | 799 | 16.4% | 49.1% | — | |
| 5 | Beaumont, R. | Liberal Democrats | 792 | 16.2% | 48.7% | — | |
| 6 | Enga, T. | Liberal Democrats | 728 | 14.9% | 44.7% | — |
Hanworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,767
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penfold, J. | Labour Party | 1,037 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cochrane, J. | Labour Party | 967 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson, C. | Labour Party | 936 | 17.7% | 53.0% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Birch, G. | Conservative Party | 821 | 15.5% | 46.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gibson, M. | Conservative Party | 803 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 6 | Skinner, M. | Conservative Party | 736 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — |
Winkfield and Warfield East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,677
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gaw, M. | Conservative Party | 1,048 | 20.8% | 62.5% | +37.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hayes, D. | Conservative Party | 1,026 | 20.4% | 61.2% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Virgo, T. | Conservative Party | 894 | 17.8% | 53.3% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Banks, S. | Liberal Democrats | 724 | 14.4% | 43.2% | — | |
| 5 | Gibbins, S. | Green Party | 719 | 14.3% | 42.9% | — | |
| 6 | Harvey, M. | Green Party | 621 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — |
Binfield South and Jennett’s Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,875
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neil, K. | Labour Party | 1,111 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pickering, G. | Labour Party | 1,025 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Regan, S. | Labour Party | 1,007 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Byron, P. | Conservative Party | 910 | 16.2% | 48.5% | — | |
| 5 | Meka, K. | Conservative Party | 804 | 14.3% | 42.9% | — | |
| 6 | Bhandari, R. | Conservative Party | 768 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — |
Harmans Water and Crown Wood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,624
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Welch, C. | Labour Party | 887 | 18.2% | 54.6% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Frewer, P. | Labour Party | 885 | 18.2% | 54.5% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Watts, J. | Labour Party | 882 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Franklin, C. | Conservative Party | 671 | 13.8% | 41.3% | — | |
| 5 | Gibson, L. | Conservative Party | 637 | 13.1% | 39.2% | — | |
| 6 | Turrell, C. | Conservative Party | 634 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 7 | Reardon, J. | Heritage Party | 155 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 8 | Gallacher, J. | Reform UK | 122 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — |
Priestwood and Garth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,525
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, T. | Labour Party | 980 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Frost, R. | Labour Party | 914 | 20.0% | 59.9% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Karim, M. | Labour Party | 829 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Green, J. | Conservative Party | 656 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 5 | Finch, A. | Conservative Party | 621 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hill, H. | Conservative Party | 574 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — |
Easthampstead and Wildridings · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,482
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bidwell, P. | Labour Party | 908 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gillbe, G. | Labour Party | 906 | 20.4% | 61.1% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Purnell, H. | Labour Party | 844 | 19.0% | 56.9% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hamilton, D. | Conservative Party | 535 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 5 | McCracken, I. | Conservative Party | 512 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 6 | Chattaraj, S. | Conservative Party | 481 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 7 | Rones, V. | Green Party | 261 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — |
Binfield North and Warfield West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,382
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collings, S. | Green Party | 1,004 | 24.2% | 72.7% | +47.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Haffegee, A. | Green Party | 901 | 21.7% | 65.2% | +40.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, J. | Conservative Party | 807 | 19.5% | 58.4% | +33.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Leake, I. | Conservative Party | 790 | 19.1% | 57.2% | — | |
| 5 | Bhandari, A. | Conservative Party | 643 | 15.5% | 46.5% | — |
Great Hollands · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,964
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperton, M. | Labour Party | 1,666 | 28.3% | 84.8% | +59.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Webb, G. | Labour Party | 1,323 | 22.5% | 67.4% | +42.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ejaz, N. | Labour Party | 1,301 | 22.1% | 66.2% | +41.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gbadebo, M. | Conservative Party | 588 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 5 | Buchler, K. | Conservative Party | 545 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 6 | Widdowson, K. | Conservative Party | 470 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — |