← Brent (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Brent 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

22 ward races
57 seats
15 unfairly awarded seats
26.3% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 57 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party103,17657.6%4986.0%3459.6%+15
Conservative Party43,39024.2%58.8%1424.6%-9
Liberal Democrats24,21313.5%35.3%712.3%-4
Green Party7,4294.1%00.0%23.5%-2
Independent9250.5%00.0%00.0%0
Total179,133100.0%57100.0%57100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)
Previous (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Sudbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,239

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lorber P.Liberal Democrats1,51423.4%46.8%+13.4 ptsElected
2Benea T.Labour Party1,49223.0%46.1%+12.7 ptsElected
3Stephens T.Labour Party1,42422.0%44.0%
4Rawal K.Liberal Democrats1,32020.4%40.8%
5Raval P.Conservative Party4096.3%12.6%
6Zaveri C.Conservative Party3184.9%9.8%

Electorate 9,240 · EC ward code E05013511 · Back to ward index

Alperton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,034

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Georgiou A.Liberal Democrats2,10817.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
2Chohan B.Labour Party1,87115.5%46.4%+21.4 ptsElected
3Matin H.Liberal Democrats1,70314.1%42.2%+17.2 ptsElected
4Sangani T.Labour Party1,68813.9%41.8%
5Terrelonge S.Liberal Democrats1,63113.5%40.4%
6Ishola-Jimoh M.Labour Party1,56612.9%38.8%
7Patel Y.Conservative Party5534.6%13.7%
8Dashandi R.Conservative Party5324.4%13.2%
9Soni U.Conservative Party4503.7%11.2%

Electorate 9,988 · EC ward code E05013496 · Back to ward index

Brondesbury Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,825

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gbajumo E.Labour Party1,65829.4%58.7%+25.4 ptsElected
2Hack R.Labour Party1,46425.9%51.8%+18.5 ptsElected
3Chadha S.Conservative Party79014.0%28.0%
4Joseph B.Conservative Party71312.6%25.2%
5Woodward N.Green Party4818.5%17.0%
6Cummins M.Liberal Democrats3055.4%10.8%
7Singh J.Liberal Democrats2384.2%8.4%

Electorate 9,556 · EC ward code E05013498 · Back to ward index

Preston · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,636

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kennelly D.Labour Party1,53229.1%58.1%+24.8 ptsElected
2Hylton O.Labour Party1,41726.9%53.8%+20.4 ptsElected
3Mistry H.Conservative Party94117.9%35.7%
4Rapatwar S.Conservative Party80815.3%30.7%
5Pearson D.Green Party1913.6%7.2%
6O'Sullivan D.Liberal Democrats1432.7%5.4%
7Goodsell R.Liberal Democrats1282.4%4.9%
8Stincanu C.Independent1112.1%4.2%

Electorate 7,929 · EC ward code E05013506 · Back to ward index

Wembley Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,049

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Afzal I.Labour Party1,52616.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
2Ajmal A.Labour Party1,51016.5%49.5%+24.5 ptsElected
3Moeen I.Labour Party1,39015.2%45.6%+20.6 ptsElected
4Do Rosario F.Conservative Party1,29914.2%42.6%
5De Cruz R.Conservative Party1,28914.1%42.3%
6Dokwal S.Conservative Party1,11612.2%36.6%
7Barker E.Liberal Democrats2883.1%9.4%
8Harris J.Green Party2743.0%9.0%
9Lee D.Liberal Democrats2502.7%8.2%
10Lee G.Liberal Democrats2062.3%6.8%

Electorate 10,909 · EC ward code E05013515 · Back to ward index

Queensbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,925

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mistry K.Conservative Party1,97216.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
2Patel J.Conservative Party1,88616.0%48.1%+23.1 ptsElected
3Kabir S.Labour Party1,79715.3%45.8%+20.8 ptsElected
4Mishra M.Conservative Party1,78215.1%45.4%
5Thakkar A.Labour Party1,76115.0%44.9%
6Naheerathan K.Labour Party1,66214.1%42.3%
7Brown V.Liberal Democrats3302.8%8.4%
8Cruickshank J.Liberal Democrats2552.2%6.5%
9Tomsone I.Liberal Democrats2121.8%5.4%
10Yauner B.Independent1171.0%3.0%

Electorate 12,069 · EC ward code E05013508 · Back to ward index

Northwick Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,816

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bajwa N.Labour Party1,63829.1%58.2%+24.8 ptsElected
2Collymore D.Labour Party1,54327.4%54.8%+21.5 ptsElected
3Vyas H.Conservative Party98417.5%34.9%
4Balogun M.Conservative Party96317.1%34.2%
5Corcoran P.Liberal Democrats2544.5%9.0%
6Grasso A.Liberal Democrats2504.4%8.9%

Electorate 8,763 · EC ward code E05013505 · Back to ward index

Cricklewood and Mapesbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,657

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dar T.Labour Party1,66931.4%62.8%+29.5 ptsElected
2Grahl G.Labour Party1,47027.7%55.3%+22.0 ptsElected
3Kohut J.Green Party4378.2%16.4%
4Fulton F.Conservative Party4318.1%16.2%
5Geldart R.Conservative Party4057.6%15.2%
6Gilbert A.Liberal Democrats3777.1%14.2%
7Dunn A.Liberal Democrats3376.3%12.7%
8Bartle S.Independent1883.5%7.1%

Electorate 9,269 · EC ward code E05013499 · Back to ward index

Kingsbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,342

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Butt S.Labour Party1,32828.4%56.7%+23.4 ptsElected
2Tatler S.Labour Party1,31228.0%56.0%+22.7 ptsElected
3Karnani S.Conservative Party78216.7%33.4%
4Khan S.Conservative Party64913.9%27.7%
5Gold M.Green Party2415.1%10.3%
6Brooke M.Liberal Democrats2355.0%10.0%
7Ngan L.Liberal Democrats1362.9%5.8%

Electorate 7,921 · EC ward code E05013504 · Back to ward index

Kenton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,242

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hirani S.Conservative Party2,28718.0%53.9%+28.9 ptsElected
2Kansagra S.Conservative Party2,16517.0%51.0%+26.0 ptsElected
3Maurice M.Conservative Party2,04716.1%48.3%+23.3 ptsElected
4Akram M.Labour Party1,71813.5%40.5%
5Mulaisho F.Labour Party1,66213.1%39.2%
6Mahmoodi J.Labour Party1,56512.3%36.9%
7Clinton C.Liberal Democrats3973.1%9.4%
8Jaguar B.Green Party3843.0%9.1%
9Thiessen U.Liberal Democrats2502.0%5.9%
10Dimitrov Y.Liberal Democrats2502.0%5.9%

Electorate 12,774 · EC ward code E05013502 · Back to ward index

Barnhill · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,200

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Fraser K.Labour Party1,41032.1%64.1%+30.8 ptsElected
2Johnson R.Labour Party1,27028.9%57.7%+24.4 ptsElected
3Patel P.Conservative Party73216.6%33.3%
4Madabhushi S.Conservative Party70516.0%32.1%
5Porter R.Green Party2826.4%12.8%

Electorate 7,993 · EC ward code E05013497 · Back to ward index

Tokyngton · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,323

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Butt M.Labour Party1,44731.2%62.3%+29.0 ptsElected
2Sheth K.Labour Party1,40830.3%60.6%+27.3 ptsElected
3Patel K.Conservative Party64914.0%27.9%
4Chowdhury S.Conservative Party53711.6%23.1%
5Francis M.Green Party3066.6%13.2%
6McAuliffe I.Liberal Democrats1603.4%6.9%
7Khalid M.Liberal Democrats1383.0%5.9%

Electorate 7,270 · EC ward code E05013512 · Back to ward index

Wembley Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 949

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Smith T.Labour Party60732.0%64.0%+30.7 ptsElected
2Moghaddam I.Labour Party59231.2%62.4%+29.1 ptsElected
3Phillips C.Conservative Party18910.0%19.9%
4Jeyakumar S.Conservative Party1859.8%19.5%
5Jarman T.Liberal Democrats1749.2%18.3%
6Powell E.Liberal Democrats1507.9%15.8%

Electorate 4,753 · EC ward code E05013516 · Back to ward index

Welsh Harp · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,133

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mitchell M.Labour Party1,84919.7%59.0%+34.0 ptsElected
2Agha A.Labour Party1,77418.9%56.6%+31.6 ptsElected
3Farah H.Labour Party1,70018.1%54.3%+29.3 ptsElected
4Patel K.Conservative Party9339.9%29.8%
5Sharma A.Conservative Party8709.3%27.8%
6Bahadur I.Conservative Party7828.3%25.0%
7Stevens D.Green Party4054.3%12.9%
8Ayres D.Liberal Democrats3834.1%12.2%
9Raingold F.Liberal Democrats3503.7%11.2%
10Sisson R.Liberal Democrats2612.8%8.3%
11Jeffers E.Independent921.0%2.9%

Electorate 12,417 · EC ward code E05013513 · Back to ward index

Wembley Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,206

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shah S.Labour Party2,65821.1%63.2%+38.2 ptsElected
2Seelan R.Labour Party2,56020.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Sheth K.Labour Party2,38818.9%56.8%+31.8 ptsElected
4Negi M.Conservative Party1,0798.6%25.7%
5Mitchell-Murray W.Conservative Party1,0408.2%24.7%
6Johnson D.Liberal Democrats8967.1%21.3%
7Shaik R.Conservative Party7536.0%17.9%
8Majid A.Liberal Democrats6585.2%15.6%
9Wharton R.Liberal Democrats5854.6%13.9%

Electorate 12,486 · EC ward code E05013514 · Back to ward index

Willesden Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,646

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Long J.Labour Party2,45522.4%67.3%+42.3 ptsElected
2Choudry S.Labour Party2,32221.2%63.7%+38.7 ptsElected
3Miller T.Labour Party2,11419.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
4Relton W.Green Party8387.7%23.0%
5Alexander P.Liberal Democrats6075.5%16.6%
6Fulton R.Conservative Party5545.1%15.2%
7Phillips H.Conservative Party5465.0%15.0%
8Thomas I.Liberal Democrats5344.9%14.6%
9Sharma B.Conservative Party4874.5%13.4%
10Fuller M.Liberal Democrats4804.4%13.2%

Electorate 12,784 · EC ward code E05013517 · Back to ward index

Dollis Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,571

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ahmed P.Labour Party2,31021.6%64.7%+39.7 ptsElected
2Dixon L.Labour Party2,30721.5%64.6%+39.6 ptsElected
3Mahmood A.Labour Party2,18320.4%61.1%+36.1 ptsElected
4Hopkins A.Liberal Democrats8427.9%23.6%
5Lacey R.Conservative Party6145.7%17.2%
6Patel A.Conservative Party5995.6%16.8%
7Roy A.Conservative Party5415.0%15.1%
8Brown D.Liberal Democrats4714.4%13.2%
9Murry P.Green Party4374.1%12.2%
10Williamson V.Liberal Democrats4103.8%11.5%

Electorate 14,034 · EC ward code E05013500 · Back to ward index

Queens Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,791

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Crabb S.Labour Party2,38220.9%62.8%+37.8 ptsElected
2Nerva N.Labour Party2,38020.9%62.8%+37.8 ptsElected
3Southwood E.Labour Party2,34720.6%61.9%+36.9 ptsElected
4Simpson S.Green Party8327.3%21.9%
5Brand V.Liberal Democrats7376.5%19.4%
6Unger D.Liberal Democrats6475.7%17.1%
7Sharp R.Liberal Democrats5454.8%14.4%
8Roberts M.Conservative Party5114.5%13.5%
9Anwar S.Conservative Party5044.4%13.3%
10Gillow H.Conservative Party4874.3%12.8%

Electorate 12,620 · EC ward code E05013507 · Back to ward index

Kilburn · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,981

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Begum R.Labour Party2,11523.6%70.9%+45.9 ptsElected
2Conneely R.Labour Party2,10823.6%70.7%+45.7 ptsElected
3Molloy A.Labour Party1,86120.8%62.4%+37.4 ptsElected
4Williams N.Green Party6797.6%22.8%
5Sharp A.Liberal Democrats3954.4%13.2%
6Doyle K.Conservative Party3644.1%12.2%
7Brand C.Liberal Democrats3453.9%11.6%
8Roberts M.Conservative Party3283.7%11.0%
9Rethans D.Liberal Democrats3213.6%10.8%
10Widuri R.Conservative Party3053.4%10.2%
11Bell S.Independent1231.4%4.1%

Electorate 12,248 · EC ward code E05013503 · Back to ward index

Harlesden and Kensal Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,258

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chan J.Labour Party2,35624.1%72.3%+47.3 ptsElected
2Kelcher M.Labour Party2,17422.2%66.7%+41.7 ptsElected
3Patel M.Labour Party2,11521.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
4Barnett E.Green Party7077.2%21.7%
5Patel B.Conservative Party3964.1%12.2%
6Walker K.Conservative Party3743.8%11.5%
7Roy A.Conservative Party3503.6%10.7%
8Guest A.Liberal Democrats3393.5%10.4%
9McAuliffe T.Liberal Democrats3363.4%10.3%
10Sutherland D.Liberal Democrats3323.4%10.2%
11Badru W.Independent2943.0%9.0%

Electorate 13,663 · EC ward code E05013501 · Back to ward index

Roundwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,516

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chappell E.Labour Party2,06027.3%81.9%+56.9 ptsElected
2Donnelly-Jackson F.Labour Party2,03426.9%80.8%+55.8 ptsElected
3Naden Rubin J.Labour Party1,87324.8%74.4%+49.4 ptsElected
4Dunmore M.Green Party4666.2%18.5%
5Inglis E.Conservative Party4005.3%15.9%
6Appiah-Fordjour G.Conservative Party3965.2%15.7%
7Soames G.Conservative Party3194.2%12.7%

Electorate 10,791 · EC ward code E05013509 · Back to ward index

Stonebridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,704

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Aden A.Labour Party2,26627.9%83.8%+58.8 ptsElected
2Knight P.Labour Party2,06025.4%76.2%+51.2 ptsElected
3Ethapemi T.Labour Party2,02825.0%75.0%+50.0 ptsElected
4Erskine S.Green Party4695.8%17.3%
5Deria S.Conservative Party4635.7%17.1%
6Quainoo H.Conservative Party4215.2%15.6%
7Roy A.Conservative Party4065.0%15.0%

Electorate 13,593 · EC ward code E05013510 · Back to ward index