← Brentwood (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Brentwood 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 13 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 21,952 | 39.9% | 17 | 43.6% | 16 | 41.0% | +1 |
| Conservative Party | 21,647 | 39.4% | 19 | 48.7% | 15 | 38.5% | +4 |
| Labour Party | 9,528 | 17.3% | 3 | 7.7% | 7 | 17.9% | -4 |
| Green Party | 1,382 | 2.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.6% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 464 | 0.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 54,973 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Shenfield · 3 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Brentwood South · 3 seats · won at 41.6% · above quota
- Brizes, Stondon Massey and South Weald · 3 seats · won at 43.2% · above quota
- Hutton East · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Hutton North · 3 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Hutton South · 3 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Ingatestone Fryerning and Mountnessing · 3 seats · won at 47.2% · above quota
- Brentwood West · 3 seats · won at 48.7% · above quota
- Warley · 3 seats · won at 56.8% · above quota
- Brentwood North · 3 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon · 3 seats · won at 63.0% · above quota
- Pilgrims Hatch · 3 seats · won at 65.5% · above quota
- Blackmore and Doddinghurst · 3 seats · won at 65.7% · above quota
Race results
Shenfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,671
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Worsfold, D. | Liberal Democrats | 835 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cuthbert, N. | Liberal Democrats | 801 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gordon, T. | Conservative Party | 692 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Singh, J. | Liberal Democrats | 676 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Heard, T. | Conservative Party | 652 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 6 | Brown, S. | Conservative Party | 621 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 7 | Briggs, R. | Reform UK | 227 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Goode, J. | Green Party | 148 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 9 | Cadzow, A. | Labour Party | 141 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — | |
| 10 | Maddock, D. | Labour Party | 111 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 11 | Carter, D. | Labour Party | 110 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
Brentwood South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,560
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barrett, G. | Labour Party | 770 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barrett, T. | Labour Party | 758 | 16.2% | 48.6% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jerrard, E. | Labour Party | 649 | 13.9% | 41.6% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clarke, N. | Liberal Democrats | 573 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Leathley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 526 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 6 | Green, T. | Liberal Democrats | 497 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 7 | Coolbergen, A. | Conservative Party | 314 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 8 | Jakobsson, P. | Conservative Party | 301 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 9 | Parrish, J. | Conservative Party | 292 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — |
Brizes, Stondon Massey and South Weald · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,400
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gelderbloem, C. | Conservative Party | 730 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Russell, W. | Conservative Party | 727 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sunger, S. | Conservative Party | 604 | 14.4% | 43.2% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Munden, B. | Liberal Democrats | 566 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Smith, B. | Liberal Democrats | 518 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 6 | Munden, N. | Liberal Democrats | 512 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 7 | Jobbins, D. | Labour Party | 179 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — | |
| 8 | Enifer, R. | Green Party | 142 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 9 | Watts, P. | Labour Party | 114 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — | |
| 10 | Watts, E. | Labour Party | 107 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Hutton East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,378
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chinnery, A. | Conservative Party | 672 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rigby, B. | Liberal Democrats | 636 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibson, J. | Conservative Party | 597 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ward, S. | Liberal Democrats | 534 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 5 | Caves, F. | Liberal Democrats | 515 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 6 | Lal, S. | Conservative Party | 510 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 7 | Godfrey, P. | Reform UK | 237 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 8 | Booker, B. | Labour Party | 154 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 9 | Burgess, M. | Labour Party | 145 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 10 | Nyiro, J. | Labour Party | 133 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — |
Hutton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,431
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barber, K. | Conservative Party | 861 | 20.1% | 60.2% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pound, J. | Conservative Party | 714 | 16.6% | 49.9% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel, J. | Conservative Party | 674 | 15.7% | 47.1% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holland, P. | Labour Party | 444 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Hussain, N. | Labour Party | 386 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 6 | McAree, N. | Labour Party | 383 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 7 | MacDonnell, H. | Liberal Democrats | 278 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 8 | Constanda, F. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Flood, M. | Green Party | 181 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 10 | Mayer, E. | Liberal Democrats | 164 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — |
Hutton South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,482
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hirst, R. | Conservative Party | 757 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reed, M. | Conservative Party | 752 | 16.9% | 50.7% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Slade, M. | Conservative Party | 698 | 15.7% | 47.1% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Winter, J. | Labour Party | 464 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 5 | Saunders, J. | Labour Party | 461 | 10.4% | 31.1% | — | |
| 6 | Sumner, R. | Labour Party | 428 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 7 | Carey, L. | Liberal Democrats | 263 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 8 | Chapple, J. | Liberal Democrats | 260 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 9 | Hamilton, J. | Green Party | 183 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 10 | Lourenco, V. | Liberal Democrats | 180 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — |
Ingatestone Fryerning and Mountnessing · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,714
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sankey, D. | Liberal Democrats | 999 | 19.4% | 58.3% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gorton, H. | Liberal Democrats | 818 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wagland, L. | Conservative Party | 809 | 15.7% | 47.2% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hyde, S. | Liberal Democrats | 781 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bridge, T. | Conservative Party | 743 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wylie, D. | Conservative Party | 607 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 7 | Dedman, P. | Labour Party | 136 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 8 | Russell, C. | Labour Party | 130 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — | |
| 9 | Enever, R. | Labour Party | 120 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — |
Brentwood West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,354
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cloke, S. | Liberal Democrats | 713 | 17.5% | 52.6% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kendall, D. | Liberal Democrats | 702 | 17.3% | 51.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Naylor, D. | Liberal Democrats | 660 | 16.2% | 48.7% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gelderbloem, L. | Conservative Party | 425 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Russell, E. | Conservative Party | 418 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Tanner, S. | Conservative Party | 376 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 7 | Brailey, K. | Labour Party | 252 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 8 | Moncrieff, J. | Labour Party | 211 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 9 | Millwood, R. | Labour Party | 176 | 4.3% | 13.0% | — | |
| 10 | Sardinha, M. | Green Party | 130 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
Warley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,064
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuthbert, M. | Liberal Democrats | 630 | 19.7% | 59.2% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Haigh, M. | Liberal Democrats | 617 | 19.3% | 58.0% | +33.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Laplain, J. | Liberal Democrats | 605 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McGinley, J. | Conservative Party | 243 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 5 | Faragher, P. | Conservative Party | 241 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 6 | Gibson, J. | Conservative Party | 239 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 7 | Bernstein, M. | Labour Party | 171 | 5.4% | 16.1% | — | |
| 8 | Gilbey, J. | Labour Party | 167 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 9 | Ritson, O. | Green Party | 140 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 10 | Kortlandt, S. | Labour Party | 140 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — |
Brentwood North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,452
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fulcher, A. | Liberal Democrats | 879 | 20.2% | 60.6% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mynott, P. | Liberal Democrats | 868 | 19.9% | 59.8% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mayo, S. | Liberal Democrats | 840 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nelson, H. | Conservative Party | 326 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Slade, B. | Conservative Party | 279 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Allen, C. | Labour Party | 279 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Slade, H. | Conservative Party | 241 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 8 | Andersen, N. | Labour Party | 233 | 5.4% | 16.1% | — | |
| 9 | Marshall, R. | Labour Party | 229 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 10 | Jeater, P. | Green Party | 181 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — |
Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,014
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murphy, S. | Conservative Party | 701 | 23.1% | 69.2% | +44.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Baldock, A. | Conservative Party | 660 | 21.7% | 65.1% | +40.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Marsh, F. | Conservative Party | 639 | 21.0% | 63.0% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Maxius, G. | Liberal Democrats | 246 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Long, A. | Liberal Democrats | 233 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 6 | Worsfold, B. | Liberal Democrats | 196 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 7 | Barrett, J. | Labour Party | 131 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 8 | Barrett, P. | Labour Party | 121 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 9 | Earle, G. | Labour Party | 114 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — |
Pilgrims Hatch · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,363
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aspinell, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,015 | 24.8% | 74.5% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies, V. | Liberal Democrats | 996 | 24.4% | 73.1% | +48.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lewis, M. | Liberal Democrats | 892 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cowley, G. | Conservative Party | 223 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 5 | Jakobsson, G. | Conservative Party | 215 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 6 | Rowlands, L. | Conservative Party | 205 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 7 | Ball, S. | Labour Party | 162 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 8 | Hutton, K. | Labour Party | 150 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 9 | Dapp, F. | Labour Party | 133 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 10 | Hale, D. | Green Party | 97 | 2.4% | 7.1% | — |
Blackmore and Doddinghurst · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,441
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCheyne, R. | Conservative Party | 982 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, K. | Conservative Party | 960 | 22.2% | 66.6% | +41.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Poppy, C. | Conservative Party | 947 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Spiers, M. | Liberal Democrats | 291 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 5 | Laplain, V. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 6 | Leathley, H. | Liberal Democrats | 210 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 7 | Kelly, N. | Green Party | 180 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 8 | Dedman, P. | Labour Party | 180 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 9 | Acton, T. | Labour Party | 179 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 10 | Marshall, W. | Labour Party | 177 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — |