← Broxtowe (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Broxtowe 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 44 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 31,430 | 43.9% | 26 | 59.1% | 20 | 45.5% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 20,092 | 28.1% | 10 | 22.7% | 12 | 27.3% | -2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 13,055 | 18.2% | 5 | 11.4% | 8 | 18.2% | -3 |
| Green Party | 3,531 | 4.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 4.5% | -2 |
| Independent | 3,348 | 4.7% | 3 | 6.8% | 2 | 4.5% | +1 |
| Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 100 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 71,556 | 100.0% | 44 | 100.0% | 44 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Stapleford South East · 2 seats · won at 26.7% · −6.6 pts below quota
- Eastwood Hall · 1 seat · won at 47.5% · −2.5 pts below quota
- Brinsley · 1 seat · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Stapleford North · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Toton and Chilwell Meadows · 3 seats · won at 35.5% · above quota
- Nuthall East and Strelley · 2 seats · won at 47.5% · above quota
- Eastwood St Mary's · 2 seats · won at 47.9% · above quota
- Watnall and Nuthall West · 2 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Greasley · 3 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Beeston North · 2 seats · won at 53.2% · above quota
- Chilwell West · 3 seats · won at 46.8% · above quota
- Attenborough and Chilwell East · 3 seats · won at 49.3% · above quota
- Bramcote · 3 seats · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Awsworth, Cossall and Trowell · 2 seats · won at 60.6% · above quota
- Beeston Rylands · 2 seats · won at 61.0% · above quota
- Eastwood Hilltop · 2 seats · won at 63.6% · above quota
- Beeston West · 2 seats · won at 64.6% · above quota
- Beeston Central · 2 seats · won at 66.2% · above quota
- Kimberley · 3 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Stapleford South West · 2 seats · won at 76.0% · above quota
Race results
Stapleford South East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 26.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −6.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,432
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bofinger, R. | Labour Party | 449 | 15.7% | 31.4% | −2.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harlow, K. | Labour Party | 382 | 13.3% | 26.7% | −6.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hallam, T. | Liberal Democrats | 370 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 4 | Browne, B. | Liberal Democrats | 341 | 11.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 5 | Bell, B. | Conservative Party | 329 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 6 | Purewal, K. | Conservative Party | 299 | 10.4% | 20.9% | — | |
| 7 | Longford, L. | Independent | 227 | 7.9% | 15.9% | — | |
| 8 | Needham, T. | Green Party | 172 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 9 | Kelly, S. | Independent | 172 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 10 | Frost, S. | Green Party | 122 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — |
Eastwood Hall · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 47.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 631
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bullock, B. | Labour Party | 300 | 47.5% | −2.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hagan, G. | Independent | 173 | 27.4% | — | |
| 3 | Parker, J. | Conservative Party | 158 | 25.0% | — |
Brinsley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 725
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williamson, E. | Independent | 366 | 50.5% | +0.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Enever, B. | Independent | 273 | 37.7% | — | |
| 3 | Doherty, G. | Labour Party | 86 | 11.9% | — |
Stapleford North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,126
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MacRae, R. | Independent | 673 | 29.9% | 59.8% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | MacRae, D. | Independent | 483 | 21.4% | 42.9% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Doddy, J. | Conservative Party | 440 | 19.5% | 39.1% | — | |
| 4 | Beckett, P. | Labour Party | 360 | 16.0% | 32.0% | — | |
| 5 | Moss, D. | Labour Party | 296 | 13.1% | 26.3% | — |
Toton and Chilwell Meadows · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,351
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cullen, T. | Labour Party | 912 | 12.9% | 38.8% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kerry, S. | Conservative Party | 862 | 12.2% | 36.7% | +11.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khaled, H. | Conservative Party | 834 | 11.8% | 35.5% | +10.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jackson, R. | Conservative Party | 833 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 5 | Falvey, P. | Labour Party | 753 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 6 | Harris, C. | Labour Party | 750 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 7 | Roche, S. | Liberal Democrats | 682 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 8 | Rich, M. | Liberal Democrats | 569 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 9 | Tyler, I. | Liberal Democrats | 525 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 10 | Oldham, L. | Green Party | 333 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — |
Nuthall East and Strelley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,457
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen, P. | Conservative Party | 736 | 25.3% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hills, G. | Conservative Party | 692 | 23.8% | 47.5% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Assab, S. | Labour Party | 609 | 20.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 4 | Tantum, D. | Labour Party | 589 | 20.2% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Gravett, R. | Green Party | 190 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — | |
| 6 | Morris-Buck, R. | Liberal Democrats | 97 | 3.3% | 6.7% | — |
Eastwood St Mary's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,022
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bagshaw, D. | Labour Party | 491 | 24.0% | 48.1% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Woodhead, K. | Labour Party | 489 | 23.9% | 47.9% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oliver, K. | Independent | 395 | 19.3% | 38.7% | — | |
| 4 | Newing, J. | Independent | 353 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Wiltshire, J. | Conservative Party | 196 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Woods, R. | Green Party | 119 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — |
Watnall and Nuthall West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,237
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen, J. | Conservative Party | 652 | 26.4% | 52.7% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bales, P. | Labour Party | 618 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Willimott, R. | Conservative Party | 605 | 24.5% | 48.9% | — | |
| 4 | Lambert, G. | Labour Party | 599 | 24.2% | 48.4% | — |
Greasley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,584
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, M. | Conservative Party | 900 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crosby, H. | Conservative Party | 706 | 14.9% | 44.6% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stockwell, A. | Conservative Party | 701 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Levett, N. | Labour Party | 590 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Hall, D. | Labour Party | 525 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 6 | Ryan, A. | Labour Party | 478 | 10.1% | 30.2% | — | |
| 7 | Lewis, C. | Liberal Democrats | 277 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 8 | Cooke, J. | Liberal Democrats | 242 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — | |
| 9 | Morton, P. | Green Party | 220 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 10 | Trussell, A. | Liberal Democrats | 114 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — |
Beeston North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,726
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carr, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,075 | 31.1% | 62.3% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carr, B. | Liberal Democrats | 918 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bieler, A. | Labour Party | 689 | 20.0% | 39.9% | — | |
| 4 | Stoner, G. | Green Party | 385 | 11.2% | 22.3% | — | |
| 5 | Bailey, R. | Conservative Party | 203 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, N. | Conservative Party | 182 | 5.3% | 10.5% | — |
Chilwell West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,893
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skinner, H. | Labour Party | 1,156 | 20.4% | 61.1% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeremiah, S. | Labour Party | 1,044 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tideswell, C. | Labour Party | 886 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kerry, C. | Conservative Party | 727 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Askham, A. | Conservative Party | 711 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — | |
| 6 | Eddleston, R. | Green Party | 527 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 7 | Slater, G. | Liberal Democrats | 287 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 8 | Fyfe, D. | Liberal Democrats | 187 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 9 | Oliver, R. | Liberal Democrats | 154 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — |
Attenborough and Chilwell East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,717
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faccio, H. | Labour Party | 1,491 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, P. | Labour Party | 1,392 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Falvey, R. | Labour Party | 1,340 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kerry, E. | Conservative Party | 956 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 5 | Roberts-Thomson, T. | Conservative Party | 944 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hall, T. | Conservative Party | 810 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 7 | Venning, M. | Green Party | 486 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 8 | Archer, C. | Liberal Democrats | 304 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 9 | Rule, J. | Liberal Democrats | 254 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 10 | Salter, C. | Liberal Democrats | 175 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — |
Bramcote · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,783
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Land, H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,512 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kingdon, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,454 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Watts, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,446 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Doddy, J. | Conservative Party | 754 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Limbachia, S. | Conservative Party | 698 | 8.4% | 25.1% | — | |
| 6 | Breheny, J. | Conservative Party | 690 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 7 | Leyland, V. | Labour Party | 629 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 8 | Lawrence, C. | Labour Party | 540 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 9 | Perry, V. | Labour Party | 472 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 10 | Maurotto, A. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 100 | 1.2% | 3.6% | — | |
| 11 | Longdon, W. | Independent | 54 | 0.6% | 1.9% | — |
Awsworth, Cossall and Trowell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,329
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pringle, D. | Conservative Party | 818 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ball, L. | Conservative Party | 805 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Marsh, T. | Labour Party | 561 | 21.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 4 | Oliver, K. | Liberal Democrats | 266 | 10.0% | 20.0% | — | |
| 5 | Hughes-Riley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 207 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — |
Beeston Rylands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,441
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Webb, S. | Labour Party | 912 | 31.7% | 63.3% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dannheimer, S. | Labour Party | 879 | 30.5% | 61.0% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burton, K. | Conservative Party | 398 | 13.8% | 27.6% | — | |
| 4 | Fell, H. | Green Party | 303 | 10.5% | 21.0% | — | |
| 5 | Todd, B. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 7.3% | 14.5% | — | |
| 6 | Angseesing, H. | Liberal Democrats | 180 | 6.2% | 12.5% | — |
Eastwood Hilltop · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 922
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radulovic, M. | Labour Party | 645 | 35.0% | 70.0% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bagshaw, S. | Labour Party | 586 | 31.8% | 63.6% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hartshorn, L. | Conservative Party | 229 | 12.4% | 24.9% | — | |
| 4 | Marker, A. | Conservative Party | 204 | 11.1% | 22.1% | — | |
| 5 | Ensor, L. | Independent | 179 | 9.7% | 19.4% | — |
Beeston West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,012
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marshall, G. | Labour Party | 1,509 | 37.5% | 75.0% | +41.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Winfield, E. | Labour Party | 1,299 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hunneyball, J. | Green Party | 386 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — | |
| 4 | Portwood, J. | Conservative Party | 308 | 7.7% | 15.3% | — | |
| 5 | Bassford, D. | Liberal Democrats | 264 | 6.6% | 13.1% | — | |
| 6 | Flores, C. | Liberal Democrats | 258 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — |
Beeston Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,379
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, V. | Labour Party | 968 | 35.1% | 70.2% | +36.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bunn, G. | Labour Party | 912 | 33.1% | 66.2% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stanton, T. | Green Party | 288 | 10.4% | 20.9% | — | |
| 4 | He, J. | Conservative Party | 282 | 10.2% | 20.5% | — | |
| 5 | Taylor, B. | Liberal Democrats | 166 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, P. | Liberal Democrats | 141 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — |
Kimberley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,371
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper, A. | Labour Party | 936 | 22.8% | 68.3% | +43.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carr, C. | Labour Party | 902 | 21.9% | 65.8% | +40.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mee, W. | Labour Party | 846 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Easom, S. | Conservative Party | 778 | 18.9% | 56.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lawlor, H. | Conservative Party | 652 | 15.8% | 47.5% | — |
Stapleford South West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 76.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 971
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGrath, M. | Labour Party | 822 | 42.3% | 84.7% | +51.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Paterson, S. | Labour Party | 738 | 38.0% | 76.0% | +42.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oliver, T. | Liberal Democrats | 202 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 4 | Patrick, J. | Liberal Democrats | 179 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — |