← Buckinghamshire (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Buckinghamshire 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

49 ward races
147 seats
45 unfairly awarded seats
30.6% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 49 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 147 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party210,00947.5%11376.9%7349.7%+40
Liberal Democrats89,09420.1%1510.2%3020.4%-15
Labour Party62,84714.2%42.7%2114.3%-17
Green Party36,3318.2%10.7%128.2%-11
Independent21,5774.9%64.1%74.8%-1
WYC IND10,2082.3%64.1%32.0%+3
RES3,9520.9%00.0%10.7%-1
INDNET2,8260.6%21.4%00.0%+2
FREE2,2870.5%00.0%00.0%0
ND1,8870.4%00.0%00.0%0
BUCKS4600.1%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK3860.1%00.0%00.0%0
WEP2230.1%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2090.0%00.0%00.0%0
Heritage Party970.0%00.0%00.0%0
UK Independence Party (UKIP)580.0%00.0%00.0%0
Social Democratic Party370.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total442,488100.0%147100.0%147100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

West Wycombe · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 31.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,769

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hayday D.J.INDNET1,21114.6%43.7%+18.7 ptsElected
2Angell M.Conservative Party88210.6%31.9%+6.9 ptsElected
3Hayday O.INDNET87610.5%31.6%+6.6 ptsElected
4Ahmed Z.Conservative Party8229.9%29.7%
5Pike T.Conservative Party7589.1%27.4%
6Watson N.N.INDNET7398.9%26.7%
7China A.E.Labour Party7018.4%25.3%
8Iqbal M.Labour Party6848.2%24.7%
9Rabani G.Labour Party6688.0%24.1%
10Hodder N.Liberal Democrats3414.1%12.3%
11Titchen Moorcroft L.J.Liberal Democrats2893.5%10.4%
12Timberlake N.C.Liberal Democrats2763.3%10.0%
13Ing-Simmons S.FREE600.7%2.2%

Electorate 7,704 · EC ward code E05013166 · Back to ward index

Totteridge and Bowerdean · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 32.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,111

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wassell J.D.WYC IND1,25513.4%40.3%+15.3 ptsElected
2Hussain I.WYC IND1,12912.1%36.3%+11.3 ptsElected
3Guy S.WYC IND1,00910.8%32.4%+7.4 ptsElected
4Rashid A.Liberal Democrats95710.3%30.8%
5Mahmood C.A.Liberal Democrats9159.8%29.4%
6Holkham B.J.Liberal Democrats9019.7%29.0%
7Raja R.M.Labour Party7147.6%22.9%
8Bates I.S.Labour Party5936.4%19.1%
9Young P.E.Labour Party5415.8%17.4%
10Plested M.O.Conservative Party4905.2%15.7%
11Cobb A.S.Conservative Party4264.6%13.7%
12Arif H.A.Conservative Party4044.3%13.0%

Electorate 8,311 · EC ward code E05013163 · Back to ward index

Ryemead and Micklefield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,593

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Knight M.WYC IND1,05113.5%40.5%+15.5 ptsElected
2Baughan A.C.WYC IND97612.5%37.6%+12.6 ptsElected
3Rana N.N.WYC IND87011.2%33.5%+8.5 ptsElected
4Morton I.D.Liberal Democrats7319.4%28.2%
5McEnnis I.Conservative Party5877.5%22.6%
6Sharma X.Liberal Democrats5627.2%21.7%
7Yasin M.F.Liberal Democrats5577.2%21.5%
8Craddock I.M.Labour Party5396.9%20.8%
9Miller C.Conservative Party5296.8%20.4%
10Ahmed R.Labour Party5006.4%19.3%
11Hashmi M.M.Labour Party4465.7%17.2%
12Walia H.S.Conservative Party3744.8%14.4%
13Ansell J.A.FREE580.7%2.2%

Electorate 8,086 · EC ward code E05013157 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury North West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,637

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hussain T.Liberal Democrats1,17414.8%44.5%+19.5 ptsElected
2Christensen A.C.Liberal Democrats1,15614.6%43.8%+18.8 ptsElected
3Wadhwa G.Liberal Democrats88811.2%33.7%+8.7 ptsElected
4Moore G.Conservative Party7088.9%26.8%
5Watson J.M.Conservative Party6718.5%25.4%
6Awosika J.Conservative Party6448.1%24.4%
7Blackaby-Iles A.Labour Party4786.0%18.1%
8Huxley A.RES4525.7%17.1%
9Pointer M.Labour Party4425.6%16.8%
10Axe N.S.RES3764.8%14.3%
11Todd C.Labour Party3494.4%13.2%
12Bright G.RES3484.4%13.2%
13Meyer-Bejol J.H.K.Green Party2252.8%8.5%

Electorate 9,396 · EC ward code E05013125 · Back to ward index

Terriers and Amersham Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,710

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Green T.Conservative Party1,13313.9%41.8%+16.8 ptsElected
2Hussain A.Conservative Party1,00512.4%37.1%+12.1 ptsElected
3Raja S.K.Conservative Party95811.8%35.4%+10.4 ptsElected
4Wilson R.J.Liberal Democrats7909.7%29.2%
5Holkham T.N.Liberal Democrats7319.0%27.0%
6Down A.Labour Party6728.3%24.8%
7Walden C.D.Liberal Democrats6558.1%24.2%
8Hart A.J.Labour Party6538.0%24.1%
9Newton K.A.Labour Party6177.6%22.8%
10Bennett R.WYC IND3724.6%13.7%
11Arshad H.WYC IND2342.9%8.6%
12Khan I.U.WYC IND2002.5%7.4%
13Phoenix R.N.Reform UK720.9%2.7%
14Snagg S.O.M.FREE380.5%1.4%

Electorate 8,169 · EC ward code E05013160 · Back to ward index

Chess Valley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,576

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Baum J.L.M.Conservative Party1,55814.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
2Culverhouse E.A.L.Conservative Party1,46113.6%40.9%+15.9 ptsElected
3Williams G.D.Conservative Party1,31112.2%36.7%+11.7 ptsElected
4Abraham R.Liberal Democrats9128.5%25.5%
5Aslam P.Liberal Democrats9068.4%25.3%
6Fulford J.C.M.Green Party8818.2%24.6%
7Juett R.H.Liberal Democrats8097.5%22.6%
8Walker G.Green Party7497.0%20.9%
9Kelso R.Green Party5375.0%15.0%
10Wilbee D.BUCKS4604.3%12.9%
11Whitney A.L.Labour Party3913.6%10.9%
12Berry D.J.Labour Party3813.6%10.7%
13Doyle N.Labour Party3713.5%10.4%

Electorate 8,150 · EC ward code E05013137 · Back to ward index

Buckingham East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,559

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Whyte W.M.Conservative Party1,38518.0%54.1%+29.1 ptsElected
2Mordue H.J.Conservative Party1,22616.0%47.9%+22.9 ptsElected
3Osibogun A.Conservative Party95312.4%37.2%+12.2 ptsElected
4Harvey J.S.Independent5647.3%22.0%
5Ahmed R.Labour Party4946.4%19.3%
6O'Mahony M.J.Labour Party4115.4%16.1%
7Loftus G.P.Liberal Democrats3704.8%14.5%
8Brignall R.L.F.Liberal Democrats3644.7%14.2%
9Smith N.Green Party3524.6%13.8%
10Schaefer A.Liberal Democrats3384.4%13.2%
11Peratopoullos C.Independent3274.3%12.8%
12Robinson K.B.Green Party3134.1%12.2%
13Price A.Green Party3013.9%11.8%
14Rashid A.U.Labour Party2783.6%10.9%

Electorate 7,375 · EC ward code E05013132 · Back to ward index

Bernwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,057

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Smith G.M.Green Party1,88015.4%46.3%+21.3 ptsElected
2Branston C.Conservative Party1,66513.7%41.0%+16.0 ptsElected
3Brown N.Conservative Party1,54112.7%38.0%+13.0 ptsElected
4Foster B.Conservative Party1,53312.6%37.8%
5Torpey R.W.Green Party1,27410.5%31.4%
6Wheeler J.Green Party1,1529.5%28.4%
7Brown J.Liberal Democrats8456.9%20.8%
8Garrett H.Liberal Democrats6175.1%15.2%
9Brown M.D.Labour Party5174.2%12.7%
10Smith M.Labour Party5034.1%12.4%
11Terry S.J.Liberal Democrats3242.7%8.0%
12Fenner A.Labour Party3202.6%7.9%

Electorate 8,494 · EC ward code E05013130 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,949

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Winn M.E.Conservative Party1,54717.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
2Gaster R.P.J.Conservative Party1,23213.9%41.8%+16.8 ptsElected
3Hunter-Watts T.Liberal Democrats1,12112.7%38.0%+13.0 ptsElected
4Willis M.F.Liberal Democrats1,10212.5%37.4%
5Khan K.Conservative Party1,01611.5%34.4%
6Hodge J.Liberal Democrats8109.2%27.5%
7Hobbs P.A.RES7218.1%24.4%
8Bloxham C.N.Green Party5245.9%17.8%
9Jacques J.Labour Party4224.8%14.3%
10Warshaw L.Labour Party3534.0%12.0%

Electorate 8,476 · EC ward code E05013123 · Back to ward index

Amersham and Chesham Bois · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,604

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Walsh L.Conservative Party1,52114.1%42.2%+17.2 ptsElected
2Harris G.K.Conservative Party1,47313.6%40.9%+15.9 ptsElected
3King D.W.Conservative Party1,43413.3%39.8%+14.8 ptsElected
4Keeler J.R.Liberal Democrats1,29011.9%35.8%
5Pinkney D.J.Liberal Democrats1,19511.1%33.2%
6Roberts M.A.Liberal Democrats1,13110.5%31.4%
7Baldwin C.Green Party6596.1%18.3%
8Buckingham D.Independent6476.0%18.0%
9Harding F.J.Green Party4824.5%13.4%
10Jepson A.P.Green Party4253.9%11.8%
11Andrews J.R.Labour Party3032.8%8.4%
12Easton P.K.Labour Party2532.3%7.0%

Electorate 8,081 · EC ward code E05013121 · Back to ward index

Wendover/ Halton and Stoke Mandeville · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,007

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bowles S.Conservative Party1,57217.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
2Strachan P.D.Conservative Party1,42615.8%47.4%+22.4 ptsElected
3Newcombe R.A.Conservative Party1,20013.3%39.9%+14.9 ptsElected
4Walsh T.Independent98911.0%32.9%
5Hodge T.P.Green Party6767.5%22.5%
6Gallagher C.E.J.Liberal Democrats6056.7%20.1%
7Hodge J.Green Party5806.4%19.3%
8Lander D.J.Labour Party5396.0%17.9%
9Dixon F.Liberal Democrats4164.6%13.8%
10Pyper J.N.Labour Party3604.0%12.0%
11Smith G.Green Party3563.9%11.8%
12Kerley K.RES1872.1%6.2%
13Williams J.J.FREE1151.3%3.8%

Electorate 8,645 · EC ward code E05013165 · Back to ward index

Chesham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,347

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Southworth N.Conservative Party1,49714.9%44.7%+19.7 ptsElected
2Chaudhry Q.Conservative Party1,38313.8%41.3%+16.3 ptsElected
3Stannard M.J.Conservative Party1,34313.4%40.1%+15.1 ptsElected
4Bhatti M.Z.Labour Party9899.8%29.5%
5Kneller F.Liberal Democrats8838.8%26.4%
6Ochedowski K.Liberal Democrats6796.8%20.3%
7Easton P.Labour Party5825.8%17.4%
8Booth A.J.G.Green Party5705.7%17.0%
9Cooper J.Green Party5685.7%17.0%
10Titterington M.Liberal Democrats5565.5%16.6%
11Procter S.Labour Party5465.4%16.3%
12Cooper D.Green Party4454.4%13.3%

Electorate 7,714 · EC ward code E05013136 · Back to ward index

Chiltern Ridges · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,032

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1MacBean J.E.Conservative Party1,86115.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
2Birchley P.M.Conservative Party1,70514.1%42.3%+17.3 ptsElected
3Fayyaz M.Liberal Democrats1,64213.6%40.7%+15.7 ptsElected
4Bacon A.K.Liberal Democrats1,60413.3%39.8%
5Martin V.D.Conservative Party1,45312.0%36.0%
6Harding P.J.F.Liberal Democrats1,28110.6%31.8%
7Walder-Davis S.Green Party6425.3%15.9%
8Davenport S.C.Green Party5724.7%14.2%
9Holloway J.Green Party5104.2%12.6%
10Primus K.M.Labour Party3002.5%7.4%
11Moseley N.Labour Party2862.4%7.1%
12Shabab S.B.Labour Party2402.0%6.0%

Electorate 8,557 · EC ward code E05013138 · Back to ward index

Winslow · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,102

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chilver J.R.Conservative Party1,64517.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
2Goss D.P.Conservative Party1,59517.1%51.4%+26.4 ptsElected
3Stanier B.D.Conservative Party1,31114.1%42.3%+17.3 ptsElected
4Monger L.Liberal Democrats1,30914.1%42.2%
5Cawte T.Liberal Democrats1,14312.3%36.8%
6Slevin R.Liberal Democrats8989.6%28.9%
7Hunt M.Green Party6547.0%21.1%
8Pain T.R.Labour Party3673.9%11.8%
9Lang R.S.Labour Party2873.1%9.3%
10Kinnaird D.Heritage Party971.0%3.1%

Electorate 7,989 · EC ward code E05013168 · Back to ward index

Tylers Green and Loudwater · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,421

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wood K.S.A.Conservative Party1,31618.1%54.4%+29.4 ptsElected
2Barrett S.Conservative Party1,26117.4%52.1%+27.1 ptsElected
3Thomas N.A.Conservative Party1,03514.3%42.8%+17.8 ptsElected
4Cartwright P.J.Independent88512.2%36.6%
5Forbes I.Liberal Democrats6408.8%26.4%
6Lee P.L.Liberal Democrats5627.7%23.2%
7Croft R.WYC IND4786.6%19.7%
8Khan R.Labour Party4075.6%16.8%
9Rasheed W.Labour Party3394.7%14.0%
10Collinao Pizarro A.WYC IND2643.6%10.9%
11Lawrynowicz A.FREE751.0%3.1%

Electorate 8,476 · EC ward code E05013164 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,911

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dixon T.Liberal Democrats1,30915.0%45.0%+20.0 ptsElected
2Khan R.W.Liberal Democrats1,29114.8%44.3%+19.3 ptsElected
3Morgan S.A.Liberal Democrats1,26214.5%43.4%+18.4 ptsElected
4Neale-Sheppard G.A.Conservative Party8139.3%27.9%
5Hind L.Labour Party7598.7%26.1%
6Roberts M.C.Conservative Party7188.2%24.7%
7Raheel A.Conservative Party7098.1%24.4%
8Jacques P.Labour Party5656.5%19.4%
9Rothwell D.J.Labour Party4134.7%14.2%
10Nuttall Z.Green Party3724.3%12.8%
11Howitt A.L.RES3133.6%10.8%
12Bell S.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1091.2%3.7%
13Tovey P.J.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1001.1%3.4%

Electorate 9,379 · EC ward code E05013124 · Back to ward index

Downley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,191

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Turner P.R.Conservative Party1,60216.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
2Hussain M.Conservative Party1,52015.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
3Smith M.R.Labour Party1,39014.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
4Ahmed K.Labour Party1,36214.2%42.7%
5Smith D.R.Conservative Party1,28313.4%40.2%
6Snaith T.Labour Party1,12711.8%35.3%
7Brown M.S.Liberal Democrats2502.6%7.8%
8Harmsworth A.M.Liberal Democrats2262.4%7.1%
9Reid V.WYC IND1902.0%6.0%
10Mealing T.WYC IND1491.6%4.7%
11Harmsworth G.Liberal Democrats1411.5%4.4%
12Uddin M.F.WYC IND991.0%3.1%
13Oliver A.J.FREE971.0%3.0%
14Blaszczyk M.FREE790.8%2.5%
15Srao V.S.UK Independence Party (UKIP)580.6%1.8%

Electorate 8,648 · EC ward code E05013142 · Back to ward index

Chalfont St Giles · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,284

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Butcher T.R.Conservative Party1,67817.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
2Jackson C.J.Conservative Party1,58016.0%48.1%+23.1 ptsElected
3Rouse S.P.Conservative Party1,43114.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
4Bray D.Independent7918.0%24.1%
5Morrison B.Green Party6957.1%21.2%
6Waters P.A.Green Party6416.5%19.5%
7Price T.S.Liberal Democrats5946.0%18.1%
8Mistry V.Green Party4945.0%15.0%
9Asher J.Liberal Democrats4114.2%12.5%
10Eymery O.Liberal Democrats3713.8%11.3%
11Collins M.F.Labour Party3353.4%10.2%
12Meacock D.G.Independent3133.2%9.5%
13McCarthy D.P.R.Labour Party2412.4%7.3%
14Child C.J.WEP2232.3%6.8%
15Wren S.FREE550.6%1.7%

Electorate 8,640 · EC ward code E05013134 · Back to ward index

Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,803

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clarke L.M.Conservative Party1,49417.8%53.3%+28.3 ptsElected
2Alam A.Conservative Party1,29515.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
3Bhatti M.Conservative Party1,22214.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
4Iqbal R.W.Labour Party95911.4%34.2%
5McAdam S.D.Labour Party87710.4%31.3%
6Whyte A.J.Labour Party85410.2%30.5%
7Hill A.E.WYC IND4064.8%14.5%
8Howe M.WYC IND2893.4%10.3%
9Smith A.P.WYC IND2382.8%8.5%
10Bellamy D.J.Liberal Democrats2352.8%8.4%
11Symington R.Liberal Democrats1872.2%6.7%
12Edgar A.Liberal Democrats1421.7%5.1%
13Keen R.J.FREE1061.3%3.8%
14Bearfox J.FREE610.7%2.2%
15Paul Bullock S.E.M.FREE430.5%1.5%

Electorate 8,918 · EC ward code E05013120 · Back to ward index

Wing · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,301

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bond A.G.Conservative Party1,63716.5%49.6%+24.6 ptsElected
2Blamires D.Conservative Party1,46514.8%44.4%+19.4 ptsElected
3Cooper P.A.Liberal Democrats1,44514.6%43.8%+18.8 ptsElected
4Farrington-Smith J.Conservative Party1,27412.9%38.6%
5Davidson S.Liberal Democrats1,17011.8%35.4%
6Gupta P.K.Liberal Democrats1,11511.3%33.8%
7Pentony J.M.Green Party6226.3%18.8%
8Rakowska A.J.Labour Party4334.4%13.1%
9Wells I.A.Labour Party3783.8%11.5%
10Howitt L.M.RES2732.8%8.3%
11Heyburn G.L.FREE900.9%2.7%

Electorate 9,177 · EC ward code E05013167 · Back to ward index

Booker/ Cressex and Castlefield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,526

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hussain M.Labour Party1,86217.6%52.8%+27.8 ptsElected
2Bates K.J.Labour Party1,58815.0%45.0%+20.0 ptsElected
3Ayub M.Conservative Party1,55214.7%44.0%+19.0 ptsElected
4Dluzewska N.C.Labour Party1,47513.9%41.8%
5Iqbal Z.Conservative Party1,31012.4%37.2%
6Wood L.Conservative Party1,10910.5%31.5%
7Pearce B.WYC IND4364.1%12.4%
8Pearson N.WYC IND2982.8%8.5%
9Pearce L.P.WYC IND2652.5%7.5%
10Woodrow K.Liberal Democrats1551.5%4.4%
11Joseph J.Liberal Democrats1431.4%4.1%
12Strutt C.A.Liberal Democrats1181.1%3.3%
13Ansell R.K.FREE990.9%2.8%
14Mohammed I.FREE850.8%2.4%
15Bullock D.M.FREE820.8%2.3%

Electorate 8,953 · EC ward code E05013131 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury South West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,341

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Raja W.K.Liberal Democrats1,14216.3%48.8%+23.8 ptsElected
2Baldwin M.A.Liberal Democrats1,06315.1%45.4%+20.4 ptsElected
3Hussain N.Liberal Democrats1,03214.7%44.1%+19.1 ptsElected
4Sproat S.Conservative Party6228.9%26.6%
5Adomah-Boadi C.A.Conservative Party5978.5%25.5%
6Arif A.Labour Party5948.5%25.4%
7Warshaw T.Labour Party5818.3%24.8%
8Hodgetts L.C.Labour Party5337.6%22.8%
9Khan A.Conservative Party5167.3%22.0%
10Wise J.A.RES3444.9%14.7%

Electorate 8,178 · EC ward code E05013127 · Back to ward index

Marlow · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,588

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Collingwood A.Conservative Party2,06319.2%57.5%+32.5 ptsElected
2Heap C.F.Conservative Party1,79516.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
3Marshall N.B.Conservative Party1,62415.1%45.3%+20.3 ptsElected
4Burden P.M.A.Liberal Democrats1,13610.6%31.7%
5Crabtree A.V.Liberal Democrats1,0409.7%29.0%
6Skoyles M.A.Independent8788.2%24.5%
7Owen L.Green Party5975.5%16.6%
8Hartley M.R.Green Party4834.5%13.5%
9Carlisle A.L.Green Party4253.9%11.8%
10Woods F.C.Labour Party3072.9%8.6%
11Wishart K.A.Labour Party2452.3%6.8%
12Weavers S.E.FREE910.8%2.5%
13Harries B.J.Reform UK810.8%2.3%

Electorate 8,631 · EC ward code E05013153 · Back to ward index

Great Brickhill · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,657

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gomm P.Conservative Party1,88917.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
2Jordan J.Conservative Party1,78616.3%48.8%+23.8 ptsElected
3MacPherson I.H.Conservative Party1,66415.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
4Jones A.S.Liberal Democrats1,38412.6%37.8%
5Newing M.C.Liberal Democrats1,28011.7%35.0%
6Smith N.Liberal Democrats1,17210.7%32.0%
7Eastoe B.Green Party8127.4%22.2%
8Myatt M.Labour Party5515.0%15.1%
9Copas H.Labour Party4333.9%11.8%

Electorate 9,480 · EC ward code E05013146 · Back to ward index

Stone and Waddesdon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,309

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Irwin P.Conservative Party1,82618.4%55.2%+30.2 ptsElected
2Waite A.Conservative Party1,69217.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
3Caffrey M.Conservative Party1,51515.3%45.8%+20.8 ptsElected
4Beatty C.Labour Party6536.6%19.7%
5Conway E.M.Labour Party6516.6%19.7%
6Owens K.Labour Party6136.2%18.5%
7Kennedy D.Green Party4774.8%14.4%
8Williams M.J.Green Party4574.6%13.8%
9Williams L.Liberal Democrats3523.5%10.6%
10Rhoades P.G.Green Party3473.5%10.5%
11Bingley J.S.Liberal Democrats3443.5%10.4%
12Brindle K.R.Independent3393.4%10.2%
13Good G.R.RES3213.2%9.7%
14Morgan A.R.Liberal Democrats3023.0%9.1%
15Tinay P.D.Social Democratic Party370.4%1.1%

Electorate 10,776 · EC ward code E05013159 · Back to ward index

Buckingham West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,127

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stuchbury R.Labour Party1,71618.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
2Cornell C.L.Conservative Party1,54516.5%49.4%+24.4 ptsElected
3Fealey P.J.Conservative Party1,43915.3%46.0%+21.0 ptsElected
4Strutt S.J.Conservative Party1,34414.3%43.0%
5Davies F.Labour Party7508.0%24.0%
6Willett R.J.W.Labour Party6647.1%21.2%
7Pegg A.P.Liberal Democrats5606.0%17.9%
8Garland C.Green Party5295.6%16.9%
9Potts S.Liberal Democrats4434.7%14.2%
10Osborne H.C.Liberal Democrats3914.2%12.5%

Electorate 8,741 · EC ward code E05013133 · Back to ward index

Little Chalfont and Amersham Common · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,212

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tett M.A.Conservative Party1,84519.1%57.4%+32.4 ptsElected
2Jones C.M.Conservative Party1,71917.8%53.5%+28.5 ptsElected
3Matthews R.S.Conservative Party1,47815.3%46.0%+21.0 ptsElected
4Maitland-Jones H.Liberal Democrats9549.9%29.7%
5Losse A.R.Liberal Democrats8008.3%24.9%
6Marzouk P.H.Liberal Democrats6606.9%20.6%
7Adams T.J.Green Party4955.1%15.4%
8Kyrke-Smith L.E.Labour Party4484.6%13.9%
9Dodsworth P.J.Green Party4384.5%13.6%
10Mirji R.Labour Party4134.3%12.9%
11Silverstone D.I.Green Party3854.0%12.0%

Electorate 8,050 · EC ward code E05013152 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,413

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lambert S.M.Liberal Democrats1,39519.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
2James S.J.Liberal Democrats1,35318.7%56.1%+31.1 ptsElected
3Poland A.M.Liberal Democrats1,12415.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
4Cole A.J.Conservative Party86011.9%35.6%
5North S.Conservative Party6058.4%25.1%
6Redding L.Conservative Party5397.4%22.3%
7Bajina J.Labour Party3845.3%15.9%
8Newton C.Labour Party3725.1%15.4%
9Cooper A.Green Party3605.0%14.9%
10Clarke J.RES2483.4%10.3%

Electorate 8,163 · EC ward code E05013128 · Back to ward index

Iver · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,213

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Griffin P.J.Independent1,43721.6%64.9%+39.9 ptsElected
2Matthews W.A.Conservative Party1,22518.5%55.4%+30.4 ptsElected
3Sullivan L.K.Conservative Party1,05215.8%47.5%+22.5 ptsElected
4Bradford M.J.Conservative Party1,05115.8%47.5%
5Tugwood L.M.Green Party87113.1%39.4%
6Watt A.D.Labour Party5398.1%24.4%
7Chohan A.I.Labour Party4647.0%21.0%

Electorate 8,391 · EC ward code E05013150 · Back to ward index

Aston Clinton and Bierton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,544

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Collins M.Conservative Party1,93918.2%54.7%+29.7 ptsElected
2Chapple B.Conservative Party1,86017.5%52.5%+27.5 ptsElected
3Ward J.E.Conservative Party1,68615.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
4Yerby P.Independent1,41013.3%39.8%
5Abel M.I.Labour Party5725.4%16.1%
6Neighbour A.J.Independent5695.4%16.1%
7Howell G.P.Liberal Democrats5625.3%15.9%
8Simpson C.R.K.Green Party5315.0%15.0%
9Ramsay N.Labour Party4173.9%11.8%
10Sullivan D.Green Party3813.6%10.8%
11Sherwell A.N.Liberal Democrats3523.3%9.9%
12Caglayan H.Green Party3523.3%9.9%

Electorate 10,166 · EC ward code E05013122 · Back to ward index

Aylesbury South East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,870

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chapple S.Conservative Party1,51117.5%52.6%+27.6 ptsElected
2Summers D.A.Conservative Party1,40816.4%49.1%+24.1 ptsElected
3Thompson D.B.Conservative Party1,38916.1%48.4%+23.4 ptsElected
4Lloyd R.G.Liberal Democrats91710.7%32.0%
5Bateman S.A.Liberal Democrats88410.3%30.8%
6Hendren C.Liberal Democrats7308.5%25.4%
7Breavington K.Green Party5115.9%17.8%
8Jacques D.F.Labour Party4765.5%16.6%
9McGoldrick P.Labour Party4154.8%14.5%
10Harvey N.RES3694.3%12.9%

Electorate 8,648 · EC ward code E05013126 · Back to ward index

The Risboroughs · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,914

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hall G.Conservative Party1,66319.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
2Turner A.H.Conservative Party1,54817.7%53.1%+28.1 ptsElected
3Walsh M.Conservative Party1,41816.2%48.7%+23.7 ptsElected
4Ball A.Independent1,23314.1%42.3%
5Parkinson I.M.Independent7758.9%26.6%
6Hudson M.C.Liberal Democrats5216.0%17.9%
7Frost A.J.ND5105.8%17.5%
8Hulme Hunter H.Labour Party5095.8%17.5%
9Gammage B.H.Labour Party4174.8%14.3%
10Blake D.A.FREE861.0%3.0%
11Wood J.FREE630.7%2.2%

Electorate 8,062 · EC ward code E05013161 · Back to ward index

Denham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,203

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hollis G.F.Conservative Party1,35420.5%61.5%+36.5 ptsElected
2Bass P.W.Conservative Party1,30819.8%59.4%+34.4 ptsElected
3Chhokar S.S.Conservative Party1,12517.0%51.1%+26.1 ptsElected
4Reed R.W.Independent5868.9%26.6%
5Harding B.J.Independent5518.3%25.0%
6Smith R.Green Party5157.8%23.4%
7Bosshardt C.Green Party4697.1%21.3%
8Eveleigh A.R.Labour Party3705.6%16.8%
9Thornton A.Labour Party3315.0%15.0%

Electorate 7,639 · EC ward code E05013141 · Back to ward index

The Wooburns/ Bourne End and Hedsor · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,260

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Drayton P.Independent1,88019.2%57.7%+32.7 ptsElected
2Wilson S.P.Independent1,72317.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
3Kayani S.A.Independent1,68217.2%51.6%+26.6 ptsElected
4Adey J.A.Conservative Party1,24012.7%38.0%
5Langley J.D.Conservative Party1,12411.5%34.5%
6Peart G.F.Conservative Party8548.7%26.2%
7Harris L.C.Green Party3643.7%11.2%
8Valentine A.Green Party2842.9%8.7%
9Collins-Staig S.M.Labour Party2742.8%8.4%
10Tiwana H.K.Labour Party2332.4%7.1%
11Cobden A.ND770.8%2.4%
12Parker J.FREE440.4%1.3%

Electorate 8,630 · EC ward code E05013162 · Back to ward index

Ivinghoe · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,306

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brazier P.C.Conservative Party1,83418.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Poll C.Conservative Party1,80518.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
3Town D.Conservative Party1,72717.4%52.2%+27.2 ptsElected
4Owen T.Labour Party9039.1%27.3%
5Wheeler M.Green Party7938.0%24.0%
6Hayden C.T.Labour Party7107.2%21.5%
7Cohen C.Labour Party6476.5%19.6%
8Clark D.E.Liberal Democrats5095.1%15.4%
9Herath D.C.Liberal Democrats5065.1%15.3%
10Josefsberg A.Liberal Democrats4854.9%14.7%

Electorate 8,621 · EC ward code E05013151 · Back to ward index

Stoke Poges and Wexham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,516

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bagge R.Conservative Party1,71222.7%68.1%+43.1 ptsElected
2Egleton T.F.Conservative Party1,65621.9%65.8%+40.8 ptsElected
3Hogg T.N.Conservative Party1,31717.5%52.4%+27.4 ptsElected
4Flower S.K.ND6238.3%24.8%
5McCarthy M.C.Green Party5757.6%22.9%
6Poole L.A.Labour Party4696.2%18.6%
7Norris D.A.Labour Party4686.2%18.6%
8Herschel D.A.Liberal Democrats4035.3%16.0%
9Woolley C.F.Liberal Democrats3244.3%12.9%

Electorate 7,996 · EC ward code E05013158 · Back to ward index

Grendon Underwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,302

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1MacPherson A.R.J.Conservative Party2,15221.7%65.2%+40.2 ptsElected
2Mahon F.Conservative Party1,88219.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
3Rand M.J.Conservative Party1,76717.8%53.5%+28.5 ptsElected
4Butler C.E.Green Party8648.7%26.2%
5Gibbs P.Labour Party6496.6%19.7%
6Ambrose R.A.Independent5946.0%18.0%
7Jeffreys S.R.Liberal Democrats4694.7%14.2%
8Rakowska K.S.Labour Party4634.7%14.0%
9Haest I.J.Liberal Democrats4084.1%12.4%
10Dilly D.J.Independent4044.1%12.2%
11Parker J.S.M.Liberal Democrats2532.6%7.7%

Electorate 8,689 · EC ward code E05013148 · Back to ward index

Beaconsfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,024

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ng J.Conservative Party1,77119.5%58.6%+33.6 ptsElected
2Cranmer A.M.Conservative Party1,72619.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
3Wheelhouse A.J.Independent1,62017.9%53.6%+28.6 ptsElected
4Pike A.J.Conservative Party1,25413.8%41.5%
5Henry P.C.Liberal Democrats7137.9%23.6%
6Horton-Kitchlew R.C.Green Party5766.3%19.0%
7Rollinson P.W.Green Party4565.0%15.1%
8Kavanagh L.A.Labour Party3684.1%12.2%
9Herschel J.Liberal Democrats3463.8%11.4%
10Tunnacliffe I.F.Labour Party2412.7%8.0%

Electorate 8,333 · EC ward code E05013129 · Back to ward index

Great Missenden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,109

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harker M.Conservative Party1,86019.9%59.8%+34.8 ptsElected
2Martin P.E.C.Conservative Party1,74518.7%56.1%+31.1 ptsElected
3Wallace H.M.Conservative Party1,70718.3%54.9%+29.9 ptsElected
4Bunting C.Green Party1,03811.1%33.4%
5Mullen D.A.Liberal Democrats93110.0%29.9%
6Spruytenburg C.H.Liberal Democrats6146.6%19.8%
7Woodhead S.J.M.Liberal Democrats5455.8%17.5%
8Howells S.Labour Party4214.5%13.5%
9Westerling J.Labour Party3593.8%11.5%
10Moy C.D.FREE1061.1%3.4%

Electorate 8,017 · EC ward code E05013147 · Back to ward index

Penn Wood and Old Amersham · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,326

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dormer M.C.Conservative Party2,21222.2%66.5%+41.5 ptsElected
2Flys M.Conservative Party2,11221.2%63.5%+38.5 ptsElected
3Waters J.D.H.Conservative Party1,88218.9%56.6%+31.6 ptsElected
4Barnes J.L.Liberal Democrats9389.4%28.2%
5Gocher J.Green Party8348.4%25.1%
6Juett K.W.Liberal Democrats7207.2%21.6%
7O'Kelly E.M.Liberal Democrats6026.0%18.1%
8Pomroy H.F.Labour Party3483.5%10.5%
9Simons K.P.Labour Party2422.4%7.3%
10Coombes D.L.FREE890.9%2.7%

Electorate 8,617 · EC ward code E05013154 · Back to ward index

Hazlemere · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,417

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Oliver C.J.Conservative Party1,62422.4%67.2%+42.2 ptsElected
2Gemmell E.Independent1,38019.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
3Gaffney R.Conservative Party1,37318.9%56.8%+31.8 ptsElected
4Tichbon P.A.Conservative Party1,15615.9%47.8%
5Hazelgreen F.M.Liberal Democrats3715.1%15.4%
6Coulthard A.J.Labour Party3544.9%14.6%
7Mooney C.J.Labour Party3144.3%13.0%
8Shah F.B.Labour Party2984.1%12.3%
9Clarke D.Liberal Democrats2563.5%10.6%
10Charlton D.M.FREE1241.7%5.1%

Electorate 7,520 · EC ward code E05013149 · Back to ward index

Farnham Common and Burnham Beeches · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,404

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Anthony D.G.Conservative Party1,42119.7%59.1%+34.1 ptsElected
2Dhillon D.Conservative Party1,38419.2%57.6%+32.6 ptsElected
3Naylor N.Conservative Party1,37219.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
4Banks D.H.D.Liberal Democrats88512.3%36.8%
5Linton C.L.Liberal Democrats81911.4%34.1%
6Kirkby D.J.Liberal Democrats5547.7%23.0%
7Collins A.A.Labour Party3865.4%16.1%
8Ford A.M.Labour Party2924.0%12.1%
9Gray-Fisk D.Reform UK991.4%4.1%

Electorate 7,318 · EC ward code E05013143 · Back to ward index

Chiltern Villages · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,080

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barnes D.H.G.Conservative Party2,28724.7%74.2%+49.2 ptsElected
2Turner M.L.Conservative Party2,06122.3%66.9%+41.9 ptsElected
3Mohammed Z.Conservative Party1,79019.4%58.1%+33.1 ptsElected
4Hill T.Liberal Democrats8639.3%28.0%
5Riddington D.F.Labour Party5485.9%17.8%
6Azam M.Labour Party5415.9%17.6%
7Taylor R.M.Liberal Democrats5365.8%17.4%
8Helweg-Larsen N.Labour Party4855.2%15.7%
9Buckfield P.S.FREE1301.4%4.2%

Electorate 8,879 · EC ward code E05013139 · Back to ward index

Flackwell Heath/ Little Marlow and Marlow South East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,619

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Johncock D.A.Conservative Party1,76422.5%67.4%+42.4 ptsElected
2Towns J.Conservative Party1,54319.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
3Watson D.M.Conservative Party1,53019.5%58.4%+33.4 ptsElected
4Fielding J.E.Green Party7099.0%27.1%
5Kingston J.Green Party5477.0%20.9%
6McGarel-Groves A.R.Liberal Democrats4265.4%16.3%
7Murphy K.Labour Party3965.0%15.1%
8Tolmie C.Liberal Democrats3844.9%14.7%
9Southern T.S.Labour Party2062.6%7.9%
10Stone A.P.Reform UK1341.7%5.1%
11Mills K.C.FREE1131.4%4.3%
12Pleass J.S.FREE1051.3%4.0%

Electorate 8,482 · EC ward code E05013144 · Back to ward index

Ridgeway West · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,033

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carington R.P.F.Conservative Party2,01722.2%66.5%+41.5 ptsElected
2Etholen C.A.Conservative Party1,88720.7%62.2%+37.2 ptsElected
3Adoh S.Conservative Party1,82820.1%60.3%+35.3 ptsElected
4Rowlands E.M.Liberal Democrats8999.9%29.6%
5Rampin J.G.Liberal Democrats8909.8%29.3%
6Piercy C.Liberal Democrats8319.1%27.4%
7Douglas A.S.Labour Party3423.8%11.3%
8Greiff S.Labour Party3043.3%10.0%
9Kirby C.FREE1021.1%3.4%

Electorate 8,077 · EC ward code E05013156 · Back to ward index

Cliveden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,179

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ashman K.Conservative Party1,48022.6%67.9%+42.9 ptsElected
2Kelly P.J.Conservative Party1,35220.7%62.1%+37.1 ptsElected
3Sandy G.E.S.Conservative Party1,31720.1%60.4%+35.4 ptsElected
4Hatch Z.Green Party1,09916.8%50.4%
5Ferguson C.L.Labour Party67810.4%31.1%
6Tucker C.Labour Party6109.3%28.0%

Electorate 7,913 · EC ward code E05013140 · Back to ward index

Chalfont St Peter · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,321

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Darby I.A.Conservative Party2,28622.9%68.8%+43.8 ptsElected
2Smith L.M.Conservative Party2,01720.2%60.7%+35.7 ptsElected
3Rush J.J.S.Conservative Party2,01320.2%60.6%+35.6 ptsElected
4Kerr S.M.Liberal Democrats9099.1%27.4%
5Melling B.Liberal Democrats8568.6%25.8%
6Haworth H.R.Liberal Democrats6776.8%20.4%
7Light D.E.Green Party6066.1%18.2%
8Garrett E.Labour Party3293.3%9.9%
9Gibbs H.F.R.Labour Party2702.7%8.1%

Electorate 8,731 · EC ward code E05013135 · Back to ward index

Ridgeway East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,200

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carroll D.J.Conservative Party2,37624.7%74.2%+49.2 ptsElected
2Broadbent S.Conservative Party2,36924.7%74.0%+49.0 ptsElected
3Harriss C.B.Conservative Party2,01321.0%62.9%+37.9 ptsElected
4Kennell S.Liberal Democrats1,02610.7%32.1%
5Derrick L.M.R.ND6777.1%21.2%
6Lyon N.Labour Party5766.0%18.0%
7Pollatos A.G.Labour Party4734.9%14.8%
8Dentici I.FREE910.9%2.8%

Electorate 8,519 · EC ward code E05013155 · Back to ward index

Gerrards Cross · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,520

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wood A.A.Conservative Party1,84424.4%73.2%+48.2 ptsElected
2Broom T.E.D.Conservative Party1,79723.8%71.3%+46.3 ptsElected
3Bracken M.W.R.Conservative Party1,72722.8%68.5%+43.5 ptsElected
4Ingram J.A.Liberal Democrats7259.6%28.8%
5Holden D.M.Liberal Democrats6889.1%27.3%
6Fowler M.E.Labour Party4606.1%18.3%
7Kavanagh M.A.Labour Party3184.2%12.6%

Electorate 7,029 · EC ward code E05013145 · Back to ward index