← Canterbury (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort

Canterbury 2023

Local elections held 4 May 2023.

21 ward races
39 seats
4 elected below the proportional quota
10.3% of seats below quota
3 unfairly awarded seats
7.7% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party29,82536.6%1846.2%1538.5%+3
Conservative Party19,86724.4%820.5%923.1%-1
Liberal Democrats17,93522.0%923.1%923.1%0
Green Party11,35013.9%410.3%512.8%-1
Independent2,2592.8%00.0%12.6%-1
Reform UK2960.4%00.0%00.0%0
Total81,532100.0%39100.0%39100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2023)
Previous (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Greenhill · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 901

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Watkins, D.Conservative Party42146.7%−3.3 ptsElected
2Davidson, A.Labour Party35038.8%
3Ainscough, V.Liberal Democrats13014.4%

Electorate 3,346 · Back to ward index

Tankerton · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,460

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Warley, S.Labour Party71348.8%−1.2 ptsElected
2Baker, N.Conservative Party56038.4%
3Parry, N.Liberal Democrats18712.8%

Electorate 2,857 · Back to ward index

Reculver · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,087

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carnac, R.Conservative Party53449.1%−0.9 ptsElected
2Ayling, B.Labour Party32129.5%
3Peckham, S.Green Party13512.4%
4Bowley, J.Liberal Democrats978.9%

Electorate 3,237 · Back to ward index

Sturry · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 32.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,009

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1McKenzie, H.Labour Party78319.5%39.0%+5.6 ptsElected
2Moses, K.Labour Party65816.4%32.8%−0.6 ptsElected
3Harvey-Quirke, L.Conservative Party65616.3%32.7%
4Glover, G.Conservative Party62315.5%31.0%
5Campbell, P.Green Party41810.4%20.8%
6David, N.Green Party2706.7%13.4%
7Dekker, K.Independent1734.3%8.6%
8Taylor, H.Independent1694.2%8.4%
9Berceanu, E.Liberal Democrats1363.4%6.8%
10Sole, H.Liberal Democrats1323.3%6.6%

Electorate 6,271 · Back to ward index

Seasalter · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 33.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,463

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Smith, N.Labour Party92718.8%37.6%+4.3 ptsElected
2Cornell, C.Labour Party82616.8%33.5%+0.2 ptsElected
3Clark, A.Independent82516.7%33.5%
4Spooner, C.Independent78916.0%32.0%
5Spencer, S.Conservative Party67513.7%27.4%
6Wells, G.Conservative Party65713.3%26.7%
7Mackechnie, M.Liberal Democrats1142.3%4.6%
8Dowling, M.Liberal Democrats1132.3%4.6%

Electorate 6,156 · Back to ward index

Swalecliffe · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 55.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,390

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bothwell, K.Green Party76955.3%+5.3 ptsElected
2Dance, M.Conservative Party37026.6%
3Wescomb, A.Labour Party17812.8%
4Wallace, E.Reform UK735.3%

Electorate 3,206 · Back to ward index

West Bay · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,069

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harvey, A.Green Party59956.0%+6.0 ptsElected
2Paget, G.Conservative Party33931.7%
3Little, B.Labour Party13112.3%

Electorate 3,170 · Back to ward index

Herne and Broomfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,797

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jones, R.Conservative Party81222.6%45.2%+11.9 ptsElected
2Howes, J.Conservative Party72220.1%40.2%+6.8 ptsElected
3Maslin, D.Liberal Democrats44612.4%24.8%
4Gibson, C.Labour Party42111.7%23.4%
5Douglas, K.Labour Party41911.7%23.3%
6McHenry, B.Liberal Democrats2918.1%16.2%
7Decker, A.Independent1975.5%11.0%
8Stevens, A.Green Party1694.7%9.4%
9Williams, T.Green Party1173.3%6.5%

Electorate 6,751 · Back to ward index

Wincheap · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,381

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Buckman, D.Labour Party1,02721.6%43.1%+9.8 ptsElected
2Franklin, R.Liberal Democrats97120.4%40.8%+7.4 ptsElected
3Inua, A.Liberal Democrats94619.9%39.7%
4Todd, P.Labour Party89118.7%37.4%
5Ellis, J.Green Party4038.5%16.9%
6Collins, P.Conservative Party2765.8%11.6%
7McWilliams, R.Conservative Party2485.2%10.4%

Electorate 6,266 · Back to ward index

Westgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,015

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hazelton, P.Labour Party97524.2%48.4%+15.1 ptsElected
2Dixey, M.Liberal Democrats93623.2%46.5%+13.1 ptsElected
3Jackson, R.Labour Party80219.9%39.8%
4Parkinson, R.Liberal Democrats63615.8%31.6%
5Grillet, B.Green Party3218.0%15.9%
6Doyle, R.Conservative Party1964.9%9.7%
7Hippisley, J.Conservative Party1634.0%8.1%

Electorate 5,565 · Back to ward index

Heron · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,660

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mellish, T.Labour Party1,07913.5%40.6%+15.6 ptsElected
2Harvey, L.Conservative Party1,03713.0%39.0%+14.0 ptsElected
3Thomas, D.Conservative Party1,03012.9%38.7%+13.7 ptsElected
4Wright, E.Labour Party1,02312.8%38.5%
5Pearce, F.Labour Party1,01912.8%38.3%
6Thomas, J.Conservative Party97812.3%36.8%
7Vince, M.Green Party6568.2%24.7%
8Flaherty, M.Liberal Democrats6007.5%22.6%
9Ashton, M.Liberal Democrats3294.1%12.4%
10Old, L.Liberal Democrats2292.9%8.6%

Electorate 9,655 · Back to ward index

Chartham and Stone Street · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,356

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brady, A.Labour Party1,16924.8%49.6%+16.3 ptsElected
2Bland, M.Labour Party1,15324.5%48.9%+15.6 ptsElected
3Hobbs, L.Conservative Party59312.6%25.2%
4Curryer, E.Conservative Party56712.0%24.1%
5Hawkins, Y.Liberal Democrats48510.3%20.6%
6Galloway, J.Liberal Democrats4078.6%17.3%
7Lawrence, G.Green Party3387.2%14.3%

Electorate 5,667 · Back to ward index

Beltinge · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,895

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stockley, I.Conservative Party94424.9%49.8%+16.5 ptsElected
2Stockley, J.Conservative Party94024.8%49.6%+16.3 ptsElected
3Pearce, T.Labour Party45412.0%24.0%
4Wheeldon, C.Labour Party42511.2%22.4%
5Gadsby, N.Green Party41711.0%22.0%
6Everatt, R.Green Party2536.7%13.4%
7Anderson, A.Liberal Democrats2005.3%10.6%
8Smith, P.Liberal Democrats1564.1%8.2%

Electorate 5,913 · Back to ward index

Gorrell · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,448

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Turnbull, C.Green Party2,04519.8%59.3%+34.3 ptsElected
2Cornell, C.Labour Party1,64315.9%47.6%+22.6 ptsElected
3Wheeler, S.Green Party1,49214.4%43.3%+18.3 ptsElected
4Kenny, V.Labour Party1,39213.5%40.4%
5Allen, D.Labour Party1,29312.5%37.5%
6Sharp, T.Green Party1,21511.7%35.2%
7Bills, G.Conservative Party4344.2%12.6%
8Newcombe, J.Conservative Party4264.1%12.4%
9Wilson, P.Conservative Party4053.9%11.7%

Electorate 8,357 · Back to ward index

Little Stour and Adisham · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 72.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,613

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Castle, L.Liberal Democrats1,16172.0%+22.0 ptsElected
2Scott, H.Conservative Party31019.2%
3O'Neill, P.Labour Party1428.8%

Electorate 3,274 · Back to ward index

Barton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,659

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Nolan, C.Labour Party1,47618.5%55.5%+30.5 ptsElected
2Edwards, P.Labour Party1,40517.6%52.8%+27.8 ptsElected
3Prentice, P.Labour Party1,25715.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
4Arch, M.Conservative Party7189.0%27.0%
5Collins, S.Conservative Party6057.6%22.8%
6Streater, M.Conservative Party5557.0%20.9%
7Duplock, G.Liberal Democrats3975.0%14.9%
8Metcalfe, G.Liberal Democrats3744.7%14.1%
9Zoettl, J.Liberal Democrats3454.3%13.0%
10Hazraty, D.Green Party3204.0%12.0%
11Smith, M.Green Party2973.7%11.2%
12Tough, N.Green Party2272.8%8.5%

Electorate 7,555 · Back to ward index

Chestfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,406

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Old, P.Liberal Democrats1,38128.7%57.4%+24.1 ptsElected
2Flanagan, J.Liberal Democrats1,35828.2%56.5%+23.1 ptsElected
3Bailey, S.Conservative Party64913.5%27.0%
4Fitter-Harding, B.Conservative Party48910.2%20.3%
5Langton, P.Labour Party3497.3%14.5%
6Roberts, S.Labour Party2565.3%10.6%
7Kibble, A.Reform UK1222.5%5.1%
8Egerton, J.Independent1062.2%4.4%
9Lilley, L.Reform UK1012.1%4.2%

Electorate 5,664 · Back to ward index

St Stephen's · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,866

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dawkins, M.Labour Party1,16731.3%62.6%+29.2 ptsElected
2Carr-Ellis, E.Labour Party1,05728.3%56.7%+23.3 ptsElected
3Palmer, C.Liberal Democrats3669.8%19.6%
4Everatt, G.Green Party3148.4%16.8%
5Capper, J.Liberal Democrats2887.7%15.4%
6McNamara, L.Conservative Party2737.3%14.6%
7Sweetman, O.Conservative Party2667.1%14.3%

Electorate 4,975 · Back to ward index

Blean Forest · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,898

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ricketts, A.Liberal Democrats1,21421.3%64.0%+39.0 ptsElected
2Jupe, S.Liberal Democrats1,03518.2%54.5%+29.5 ptsElected
3Smith, D.Liberal Democrats94416.6%49.7%+24.7 ptsElected
4May, N.Labour Party4447.8%23.4%
5Hilton, A.Green Party3987.0%21.0%
6Needham, H.Labour Party3836.7%20.2%
7Newman, S.Labour Party3676.4%19.3%
8Somerville-Meikle, J.Conservative Party3295.8%17.3%
9Ovenden, G.Conservative Party2995.3%15.8%
10Streater, T.Conservative Party2814.9%14.8%

Electorate 4,155 · Back to ward index

Northgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,024

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Butcher, J.Labour Party68233.3%66.6%+33.3 ptsElected
2Baldock, A.Labour Party68233.3%66.6%+33.3 ptsElected
3Baker, M.Green Party1778.6%17.3%
4O'Reilly, E.Conservative Party1617.9%15.7%
5Ralph, L.Conservative Party1567.6%15.2%
6Leggatt, M.Liberal Democrats974.7%9.5%
7Pope, L.Liberal Democrats934.5%9.1%

Electorate 3,787 · Back to ward index

Nailbourne · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 84.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,597

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Sole, M.Liberal Democrats1,34184.0%+34.0 ptsElected
2Harriss, C.Conservative Party17010.6%
3Homan, M.Labour Party865.4%

Electorate 3,130 · Back to ward index