← Cheltenham (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Cheltenham 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 40 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 31,202 | 51.9% | 36 | 90.0% | 22 | 55.0% | +14 |
| Conservative Party | 15,280 | 25.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 10 | 25.0% | -10 |
| Green Party | 9,431 | 15.7% | 3 | 7.5% | 6 | 15.0% | -3 |
| Labour Party | 2,798 | 4.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 5.0% | -2 |
| PABAG | 928 | 1.5% | 1 | 2.5% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Independent | 385 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 109 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 60,133 | 100.0% | 40 | 100.0% | 40 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Hesters Way · 2 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Lansdown · 2 seats · won at 40.1% · above quota
- Prestbury · 2 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- St Paul's · 2 seats · won at 42.1% · above quota
- Battledown · 2 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Charlton Kings · 2 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Pittville · 2 seats · won at 47.9% · above quota
- Park · 2 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Leckhampton · 2 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Oakley · 2 seats · won at 51.3% · above quota
- College · 2 seats · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Swindon Village · 2 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Benhall, the Reddings and Fiddler's Green · 2 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Up Hatherley · 2 seats · won at 55.1% · above quota
- Charlton Park · 2 seats · won at 55.7% · above quota
- All Saints · 2 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- St. Marks · 2 seats · won at 56.6% · above quota
- Warden Hill · 2 seats · won at 57.7% · above quota
- St Peter's · 2 seats · won at 58.0% · above quota
- Springbank · 2 seats · won at 69.4% · above quota
Race results
Hesters Way · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 870
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheeler, S. | Liberal Democrats | 396 | 22.8% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lynch, C. | Liberal Democrats | 348 | 20.0% | 40.0% | +6.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Flynn, W. | Green Party | 280 | 16.1% | 32.2% | — | |
| 4 | Clarke, G. | Green Party | 237 | 13.6% | 27.3% | — | |
| 5 | Harriss, C. | Labour Party | 149 | 8.6% | 17.1% | — | |
| 6 | Baillie, R. | Conservative Party | 147 | 8.5% | 16.9% | — | |
| 7 | Landau, H. | Conservative Party | 125 | 7.2% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Waters, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 30 | 1.7% | 3.5% | — | |
| 9 | Coxson, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 27 | 1.6% | 3.1% | — |
Lansdown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,460
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrews, G. | Liberal Democrats | 713 | 24.4% | 48.9% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Orme, B. | Liberal Democrats | 585 | 20.0% | 40.1% | +6.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Godwin, S. | Conservative Party | 520 | 17.8% | 35.6% | — | |
| 4 | Olajide, O. | Conservative Party | 391 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 5 | Milner, D. | Green Party | 204 | 7.0% | 14.0% | — | |
| 6 | Bell, S. | Green Party | 190 | 6.5% | 13.0% | — | |
| 7 | Cockfield, D. | Labour Party | 169 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 8 | Parsons, G. | Independent | 147 | 5.0% | 10.1% | — |
Prestbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,799
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, S. | PABAG | 928 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Foster, J. | Green Party | 744 | 20.7% | 41.4% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cameron, I. | Green Party | 644 | 17.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 4 | Fifield, S. | Conservative Party | 621 | 17.3% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Martin, J. | Liberal Democrats | 247 | 6.9% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hopkins, H. | Conservative Party | 244 | 6.8% | 13.6% | — | |
| 7 | March, J. | Liberal Democrats | 169 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
St Paul's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,081
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joy, T. | Green Party | 501 | 23.2% | 46.4% | +13.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies, A. | Green Party | 455 | 21.1% | 42.1% | +8.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nancekivell, R. | Liberal Democrats | 318 | 14.7% | 29.4% | — | |
| 4 | Potter-Peachey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 286 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Johnstone, B. | Labour Party | 228 | 10.6% | 21.1% | — | |
| 6 | Mason, C. | Conservative Party | 124 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — | |
| 7 | McDonald, D. | Independent | 106 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Prothero, L. | Conservative Party | 91 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — | |
| 9 | Davis, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 27 | 1.2% | 2.5% | — | |
| 10 | Dwyer, C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 25 | 1.2% | 2.3% | — |
Battledown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,626
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pemberton, H. | Liberal Democrats | 811 | 24.9% | 49.9% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Day, C. | Liberal Democrats | 773 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Babbage, M. | Conservative Party | 690 | 21.2% | 42.4% | — | |
| 4 | Bunner, D. | Conservative Party | 530 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Wilson, K. | Green Party | 189 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 6 | Auker-Howlett, C. | Green Party | 133 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — | |
| 7 | Gavin, C. | Labour Party | 125 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — |
Charlton Kings · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,765
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boyes, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,099 | 31.1% | 62.3% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mutton, A. | Liberal Democrats | 840 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Saywell, N. | Conservative Party | 542 | 15.4% | 30.7% | — | |
| 4 | Hewlett, R. | Conservative Party | 460 | 13.0% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Willey, D. | Green Party | 242 | 6.9% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Woodland, M. | Green Party | 178 | 5.0% | 10.1% | — | |
| 7 | Rees, E. | Labour Party | 168 | 4.8% | 9.5% | — |
Pittville · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,661
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tooke, J. | Liberal Democrats | 982 | 29.6% | 59.1% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Garcia Clamp, J. | Liberal Democrats | 796 | 24.0% | 47.9% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kennedy, L. | Conservative Party | 463 | 13.9% | 27.9% | — | |
| 4 | Christensen, P. | Conservative Party | 446 | 13.4% | 26.9% | — | |
| 5 | Quekett, S. | Green Party | 247 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Wilson, D. | Green Party | 227 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — | |
| 7 | Glozier, M. | Labour Party | 160 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — |
Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,871
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chelin, J. | Liberal Democrats | 942 | 25.2% | 50.3% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barrell, D. | Liberal Democrats | 935 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harman, T. | Conservative Party | 772 | 20.6% | 41.3% | — | |
| 4 | Pollock, D. | Conservative Party | 580 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Godfrey, P. | Green Party | 196 | 5.2% | 10.5% | — | |
| 6 | Boyle, K. | Labour Party | 160 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 7 | Myerson, T. | Green Party | 157 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — |
Leckhampton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,992
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horwood, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,169 | 29.3% | 58.7% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chandler, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,007 | 25.3% | 50.6% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mason, P. | Conservative Party | 655 | 16.4% | 32.9% | — | |
| 4 | Prothero, W. | Conservative Party | 520 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Frings, P. | Green Party | 235 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 6 | Johnson, E. | Green Party | 215 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — | |
| 7 | Goring, B. | Labour Party | 125 | 3.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 8 | Wijesinghe, S. | Independent | 58 | 1.5% | 2.9% | — |
Oakley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 959
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hay, R. | Liberal Democrats | 626 | 32.6% | 65.3% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lewis, A. | Liberal Democrats | 492 | 25.7% | 51.3% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nelson, M. | Conservative Party | 237 | 12.4% | 24.7% | — | |
| 4 | Wall, A. | Conservative Party | 196 | 10.2% | 20.4% | — | |
| 5 | Laing, I. | Labour Party | 150 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 6 | Spanner, C. | Green Party | 133 | 6.9% | 13.9% | — | |
| 7 | Weller, N. | Green Party | 84 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — |
College · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,607
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dobie, I. | Liberal Democrats | 882 | 27.4% | 54.9% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barnes, G. | Liberal Democrats | 831 | 25.9% | 51.7% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Vitkovitch, S. | Green Party | 410 | 12.8% | 25.5% | — | |
| 4 | Evans, B. | Conservative Party | 319 | 9.9% | 19.9% | — | |
| 5 | Prothero, T. | Conservative Party | 312 | 9.7% | 19.4% | — | |
| 6 | Irvine, L. | Green Party | 277 | 8.6% | 17.2% | — | |
| 7 | Moliver, A. | Labour Party | 183 | 5.7% | 11.4% | — |
Swindon Village · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,126
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clucas, F. | Liberal Democrats | 723 | 32.1% | 64.2% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Allen, F. | Liberal Democrats | 613 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barber, M. | Green Party | 303 | 13.5% | 26.9% | — | |
| 4 | Saul, E. | Green Party | 257 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 5 | Chaplin, B. | Conservative Party | 191 | 8.5% | 17.0% | — | |
| 6 | Picknell, J. | Conservative Party | 165 | 7.3% | 14.7% | — |
Benhall, the Reddings and Fiddler's Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,888
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,072 | 28.4% | 56.8% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Steinhardt, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,030 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collins, D. | Conservative Party | 659 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | Davis, A. | Conservative Party | 470 | 12.4% | 24.9% | — | |
| 5 | Field, S. | Green Party | 253 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — | |
| 6 | Jarvis, J. | Green Party | 149 | 3.9% | 7.9% | — | |
| 7 | Lugg, J. | Labour Party | 143 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Up Hatherley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,817
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bamford, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,170 | 32.2% | 64.4% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sankey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,001 | 27.6% | 55.1% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Parsons, C. | Conservative Party | 488 | 13.4% | 26.9% | — | |
| 4 | Parsons, S. | Conservative Party | 454 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 5 | Hodges, S. | Green Party | 222 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 6 | Cole, P. | Labour Party | 156 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 7 | Goodwin, C. | Green Party | 142 | 3.9% | 7.8% | — |
Charlton Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,856
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,218 | 32.8% | 65.6% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harvey, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,033 | 27.8% | 55.7% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bass, G. | Conservative Party | 526 | 14.2% | 28.3% | — | |
| 4 | Shill, H. | Conservative Party | 457 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | Costelloe, M. | Green Party | 151 | 4.1% | 8.1% | — | |
| 6 | Wallington, S. | Green Party | 142 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — | |
| 7 | Bride, M. | Labour Party | 110 | 3.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 8 | Kadwell, J. | Independent | 74 | 2.0% | 4.0% | — |
All Saints · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,497
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clark, B. | Liberal Democrats | 888 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tailford, I. | Liberal Democrats | 839 | 28.0% | 56.1% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tracey, M. | Conservative Party | 361 | 12.1% | 24.1% | — | |
| 4 | Wilce, P. | Conservative Party | 262 | 8.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gill-Lang, A. | Green Party | 228 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — | |
| 6 | Hale, D. | Labour Party | 219 | 7.3% | 14.6% | — | |
| 7 | West, S. | Green Party | 196 | 6.5% | 13.1% | — |
St. Marks · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,231
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holliday, S. | Liberal Democrats | 720 | 29.2% | 58.5% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pineger, R. | Liberal Democrats | 697 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collins, L. | Conservative Party | 268 | 10.9% | 21.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hyams, P. | Conservative Party | 223 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 5 | Farmer, J. | Labour Party | 222 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 6 | Seadon, N. | Green Party | 173 | 7.0% | 14.1% | — | |
| 7 | Becker, A. | Green Party | 159 | 6.5% | 12.9% | — |
Warden Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,626
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beale, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,009 | 31.0% | 62.1% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Oliver, T. | Liberal Democrats | 939 | 28.9% | 57.7% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dunleavy, P. | Conservative Party | 517 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hewlett, G. | Conservative Party | 432 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 5 | Godfrey, M. | Green Party | 139 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — | |
| 6 | Bonsor, T. | Green Party | 109 | 3.4% | 6.7% | — | |
| 7 | Meehan, C. | Labour Party | 107 | 3.3% | 6.6% | — |
St Peter's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,283
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atherstone, V. | Liberal Democrats | 781 | 30.4% | 60.9% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Willingham, D. | Liberal Democrats | 744 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Forrest, J. | Conservative Party | 226 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — | |
| 4 | Farmer, M. | Labour Party | 224 | 8.7% | 17.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hodges, D. | Green Party | 217 | 8.5% | 16.9% | — | |
| 6 | Ellis, G. | Green Party | 191 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — | |
| 7 | Hazzan, E. | Conservative Party | 182 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — |
Springbank · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,057
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, S. | Liberal Democrats | 744 | 35.2% | 70.4% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeffries, P. | Liberal Democrats | 734 | 34.7% | 69.4% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bass, J. | Conservative Party | 217 | 10.3% | 20.5% | — | |
| 4 | Fox, R. | Conservative Party | 197 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bear, S. | Green Party | 118 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 6 | Munday, I. | Green Party | 104 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — |