← Cheshire West & Chester (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort

Cheshire West & Chester 2023

Local elections held 4 May 2023.

45 ward races
70 seats
12 elected below the proportional quota
17.1% of seats below quota
10 unfairly awarded seats
14.3% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 45 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 70 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party69,84142.6%3955.7%3042.9%+9
Conservative Party51,96931.7%2332.9%2332.9%0
Liberal Democrats21,09212.9%11.4%912.9%-8
Independent11,1406.8%57.1%45.7%+1
Green Party9,1925.6%22.9%45.7%-2
Alliance for Democracy and Freedom3080.2%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK2660.2%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1800.1%00.0%00.0%0
FFS-FA1340.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total164,122100.0%70100.0%70100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2023)
Previous (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Winsford Swanlow · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 37.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,283

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Boone, S.Independent48537.8%−12.2 ptsElected
2Barwell, L.Labour Party32725.5%
3Gaskill, M.Liberal Democrats30023.4%
4Morgan, A.Conservative Party17113.3%

Electorate 3,463 · Back to ward index

Christleton and Huntington · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 26.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −7.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,418

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Williams, M.Conservative Party97614.3%28.6%−4.8 ptsElected
2Parker, S.Conservative Party90013.2%26.3%−7.0 ptsElected
3Davies, S.Green Party87612.8%25.6%
4Hudson, M.Labour Party79411.6%23.2%
5Brown, N.Green Party74911.0%21.9%
6Whitehead, D.Independent68410.0%20.0%
7Ward, C.Liberal Democrats6679.8%19.5%
8Williams, T.Labour Party6659.7%19.5%
9Thompson, B.Liberal Democrats5247.7%15.3%

Electorate 8,346 · Back to ward index

Whitby Groves · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 44.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −6.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,540

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shannon, J.Labour Party67844.0%−6.0 ptsElected
2Grannell, K.Green Party64942.1%
3Anderson, B.Conservative Party21313.8%

Electorate 3,622 · Back to ward index

Winsford Gravel · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −5.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 979

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Beveridge, M.Independent44145.0%−5.0 ptsElected
2Moorcroft, J.Labour Party38038.8%
3Relf, V.Conservative Party12512.8%
4Dutton, R.Liberal Democrats333.4%

Electorate 3,209 · Back to ward index

Winsford Dene · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,086

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Clare, M.Independent49945.9%−4.1 ptsElected
2Bingham, D.Labour Party39336.2%
3Barton, B.Liberal Democrats999.1%
4Roochove, F.Conservative Party958.7%

Electorate 3,778 · Back to ward index

Tarporley · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,871

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hardy, C.Conservative Party86146.0%−4.0 ptsElected
2Moore Dutton, E.Independent81043.3%
3Reynolds, C.Labour Party1367.3%
4Crowder, A.Green Party643.4%

Electorate 4,043 · Back to ward index

Tattenhall · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,711

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Jones, M.Conservative Party79746.6%−3.4 ptsElected
2Foster, M.Labour Party60535.4%
3Cooke, C.Green Party19411.3%
4Roberts, V.Liberal Democrats1156.7%

Electorate 3,896 · Back to ward index

Winsford Wharton · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 946

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pardoe, N.Labour Party44446.9%−3.1 ptsElected
2Newton, G.Independent28229.8%
3Theron, B.Liberal Democrats869.1%
4Hardy, S.Conservative Party727.6%
5Charlton, W.Independent626.6%

Electorate 3,569 · Back to ward index

Farndon · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 47.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,796

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Waddelove, A.Conservative Party85247.4%−2.6 ptsElected
2Roberts, P.Liberal Democrats82846.1%
3Tickle, C.Labour Party895.0%
4Owen, D.Green Party271.5%

Electorate 3,700 · Back to ward index

Rudheath · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 48.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,151

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dean, O.Labour Party55348.0%−2.0 ptsElected
2Treeby, H.Conservative Party52345.4%
3Griffiths, G.Liberal Democrats756.5%

Electorate 4,184 · Back to ward index

Shakerley · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,222

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stocks, M.Conservative Party60549.5%−0.5 ptsElected
2Stott, A.Labour Party33527.4%
3Harding, J.Liberal Democrats21017.2%
4Stutfield, J.Green Party725.9%

Electorate 3,972 · Back to ward index

Sandstone · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,699

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Deynem, H.Conservative Party86450.9%+0.9 ptsElected
2Dilworth, J.Labour Party45326.7%
3Griffiths, A.Liberal Democrats21412.6%
4Dedman, A.Green Party1689.9%

Electorate 4,024 · Back to ward index

Whitby Park · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 52.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,645

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Roach, J.Green Party86452.5%+2.5 ptsElected
2Rooney, P.Labour Party61337.3%
3Sharples, L.Conservative Party1307.9%
4Jewkes, K.Liberal Democrats382.3%

Electorate 3,959 · Back to ward index

Parkgate · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 53.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,792

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barker, M.Independent95553.3%+3.3 ptsElected
2Turnbull, L.Conservative Party37220.8%
3Doughty, P.Labour Party34719.4%
4Bellis, D.Green Party724.0%
5Edwards, J.Liberal Democrats462.6%

Electorate 3,945 · Back to ward index

Helsby · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,672

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Copeman, C.Green Party90854.3%+4.3 ptsElected
2Lowrie, P.Labour Party38222.8%
3Garrity, S.Conservative Party35521.2%
4Heath, D.Liberal Democrats271.6%

Electorate 4,154 · Back to ward index

Malpas · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 57.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,473

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Williams, R.Conservative Party83957.0%+7.0 ptsElected
2Higgie, C.Liberal Democrats53436.3%
3Burns, S.Labour Party1006.8%

Electorate 3,846 · Back to ward index

Winsford Over and Verdin · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,965

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Blackmore, T.Labour Party1,06111.9%35.8%+10.8 ptsElected
2Bingham, S.Labour Party1,03711.7%35.0%+10.0 ptsElected
3Lewis, G.Labour Party99611.2%33.6%+8.6 ptsElected
4Ford, D.Independent89710.1%30.3%
5Fletcher, W.Independent8779.9%29.6%
6Broughton, C.Independent8489.5%28.6%
7Parkinson, C.Liberal Democrats5516.2%18.6%
8Boulton-Rawlinson, A.Conservative Party5426.1%18.3%
9Cozier, C.Conservative Party5396.1%18.2%
10Conlon, H.Liberal Democrats5376.0%18.1%
11Spencer, G.Conservative Party5215.9%17.6%
12Bond, D.Liberal Democrats4895.5%16.5%

Electorate 10,790 · Back to ward index

Northwich Leftwich · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,017

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cooper, A.Labour Party60259.2%+9.2 ptsElected
2Sharrock, H.Conservative Party30429.9%
3Guy, E.Reform UK565.5%
4Hampson, T.Liberal Democrats555.4%

Electorate 3,582 · Back to ward index

Saughall and Mollington · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,751

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eardley, S.Conservative Party1,04859.9%+9.9 ptsElected
2Jennings, H.Labour Party56732.4%
3Barker, J.Green Party764.3%
4Hall, S.Liberal Democrats603.4%

Electorate 4,164 · Back to ward index

Willaston and Thornton · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,810

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hogg, M.Conservative Party1,10260.9%+10.9 ptsElected
2Bracken, M.Labour Party47926.5%
3Hetherington, R.Green Party1448.0%
4Braithwaite, C.Liberal Democrats854.7%

Electorate 4,139 · Back to ward index

Little Neston · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,070

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gittins, L.Labour Party1,27161.4%+11.4 ptsElected
2Wastell, S.Conservative Party65131.4%
3Swaffer, G.Liberal Democrats743.6%
4Oldham, D.Green Party743.6%

Electorate 4,092 · Back to ward index

Tarvin and Kelsall · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,700

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lush, T.Liberal Democrats1,33224.7%49.3%+16.0 ptsElected
2Cooper, T.Conservative Party1,22622.7%45.4%+12.1 ptsElected
3Carey, T.Conservative Party1,08520.1%40.2%
4Mobbs, T.Liberal Democrats94417.5%35.0%
5Tate, P.Labour Party4207.8%15.6%
6Bowers, P.Green Party3937.3%14.6%

Electorate 7,338 · Back to ward index

Great Boughton · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,819

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Collings, S.Labour Party1,86624.4%48.9%+15.5 ptsElected
2MacGlashan, E.Labour Party1,73622.7%45.5%+12.1 ptsElected
3Avery-Bennett, A.Conservative Party1,21415.9%31.8%
4Barter, D.Conservative Party1,20015.7%31.4%
5Herd, R.Liberal Democrats7329.6%19.2%
6Salt, J.Liberal Democrats4586.0%12.0%
7Brown, K.Green Party2182.9%5.7%
8Brown, B.Green Party1682.2%4.4%
9Pearson, M.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition450.6%1.2%

Electorate 8,503 · Back to ward index

Lache · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 62.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,294

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tate, A.Labour Party80762.4%+12.4 ptsElected
2Lawrence, G.Conservative Party36828.4%
3Davies, C.Green Party765.9%
4Hall, J.Liberal Democrats433.3%

Electorate 3,860 · Back to ward index

Handbridge Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,701

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Carter, M.Labour Party1,81124.5%48.9%+15.6 ptsElected
2Daniels, R.Conservative Party1,71223.1%46.3%+12.9 ptsElected
3Mitchell, M.Labour Party1,69122.8%45.7%
4Sullivan, N.Conservative Party1,53620.8%41.5%
5Barker, T.Green Party3084.2%8.3%
6Roberts, S.Liberal Democrats1992.7%5.4%
7Rule, J.Liberal Democrats1452.0%3.9%

Electorate 7,482 · Back to ward index

Northwich Winnington and Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,808

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Neil, A.Labour Party94726.2%52.4%+19.0 ptsElected
2Davies, F.Labour Party85323.6%47.2%+13.8 ptsElected
3Siddall, L.Liberal Democrats82422.8%45.6%
4Hinde, K.Liberal Democrats39410.9%21.8%
5Hills, M.Conservative Party3309.1%18.3%
6Newey, O.Conservative Party2687.4%14.8%

Electorate 6,859 · Back to ward index

Frodsham · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,002

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Garvey, M.Labour Party1,53725.6%51.2%+17.9 ptsElected
2Sumner, L.Labour Party1,42223.7%47.4%+14.0 ptsElected
3Riley, L.Conservative Party1,16219.4%38.7%
4Wakefield, S.Conservative Party1,02417.1%34.1%
5Webber, C.Green Party3125.2%10.4%
6Eakin, P.Liberal Democrats2353.9%7.8%
7Moorcroft, J.Reform UK1622.7%5.4%
8Sibson, R.Liberal Democrats1502.5%5.0%

Electorate 7,292 · Back to ward index

Weaver and Cuddington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,675

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Edwards, G.Independent2,93126.6%79.8%+54.8 ptsElected
2Stocks, L.Conservative Party1,51513.7%41.2%+16.2 ptsElected
3Rimmer, P.Conservative Party1,49813.6%40.8%+15.8 ptsElected
4Cernik, K.Labour Party1,43413.0%39.0%
5Wordsworth, A.Conservative Party1,32712.0%36.1%
6Cernik, B.Labour Party1,22811.1%33.4%
7Donhue, S.Liberal Democrats1,0919.9%29.7%

Electorate 11,440 · Back to ward index

Hartford and Greenbank · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,436

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Loftus, M.Conservative Party1,22325.1%50.2%+16.9 ptsElected
2Parkes, P.Conservative Party1,20324.7%49.4%+16.1 ptsElected
3Emmett, G.Labour Party80516.5%33.1%
4Thomas, J.Labour Party76415.7%31.4%
5Godfrey, V.Liberal Democrats3286.7%13.5%
6Beesley, S.Green Party3126.4%12.8%
7Dawson, R.Liberal Democrats2364.8%9.7%

Electorate 6,914 · Back to ward index

Davenham, Moulton and Kingsmead · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,432

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Marr, D.Conservative Party1,28926.5%53.0%+19.7 ptsElected
2Sinar, G.Conservative Party1,22025.1%50.2%+16.8 ptsElected
3Dolan, P.Labour Party98820.3%40.6%
4McDonald, S.Independent52710.8%21.7%
5Moran, V.Liberal Democrats4459.2%18.3%
6Price-Harbach, J.Liberal Democrats3948.1%16.2%

Electorate 8,309 · Back to ward index

Neston · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 67.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,327

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Millar, K.Labour Party89467.4%+17.4 ptsElected
2Turnbull, J.Conservative Party32824.7%
3Crook, M.Liberal Democrats1057.9%

Electorate 4,031 · Back to ward index

Upton · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,130

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bryan, M.Labour Party1,64726.3%52.6%+19.3 ptsElected
2Akhtar, S.Labour Party1,59825.5%51.1%+17.7 ptsElected
3Houlbrook, J.Conservative Party1,31921.1%42.1%
4Hesketh, S.Conservative Party1,05716.9%33.8%
5Wilman, H.Green Party3044.9%9.7%
6Mcglinchey, N.Liberal Democrats2013.2%6.4%
7Hopkinson, I.Liberal Democrats1342.1%4.3%

Electorate 7,460 · Back to ward index

Northwich Witton · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 68.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 864

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Naylor, S.Labour Party59268.5%+18.5 ptsElected
2Smith, D.Conservative Party19422.5%
3Chapman, A.Liberal Democrats789.0%

Electorate 3,642 · Back to ward index

Gowy Rural · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,161

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Parker, M.Conservative Party1,12226.0%51.9%+18.6 ptsElected
2Heatley, G.Conservative Party1,12125.9%51.9%+18.5 ptsElected
3Stockton, J.Labour Party1,04824.2%48.5%
4Tait, J.Green Party56313.0%26.1%
5Hyde, A.Liberal Democrats2756.4%12.7%
6Jones, T.Liberal Democrats1934.5%8.9%

Electorate 7,154 · Back to ward index

Strawberry · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 68.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,416

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gould, G.Labour Party97268.6%+18.6 ptsElected
2Merrill, A.Conservative Party34924.6%
3Hall-Jones, R.Liberal Democrats956.7%

Electorate 4,071 · Back to ward index

Marbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,989

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wright, N.Conservative Party1,37915.4%46.1%+21.1 ptsElected
2Gibbon, L.Conservative Party1,32814.8%44.4%+19.4 ptsElected
3Marshall, P.Conservative Party1,30614.6%43.7%+18.7 ptsElected
4Garton, R.Liberal Democrats1,29714.5%43.4%
5Dodgshon, S.Liberal Democrats1,29614.5%43.4%
6Makepeace, A.Liberal Democrats1,13512.7%38.0%
7Stewart, C.Labour Party91810.2%30.7%
8Nicholls, A.Alliance for Democracy and Freedom3083.4%10.3%

Electorate 9,994 · Back to ward index

Netherpool · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 69.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,284

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kendrick, K.Labour Party89569.7%+19.7 ptsElected
2Soper, R.Conservative Party30323.6%
3Quinn, R.Liberal Democrats866.7%

Electorate 4,016 · Back to ward index

Ledsham and Manor · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,779

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wheeler, P.Labour Party1,67330.1%60.2%+26.9 ptsElected
2Warner, C.Labour Party1,54427.8%55.6%+22.2 ptsElected
3Hebson, N.Conservative Party82114.8%29.5%
4Efobi, I.Conservative Party80914.6%29.1%
5Hartley, M.Independent4407.9%15.8%
6Handley, G.Liberal Democrats2714.9%9.8%

Electorate 7,827 · Back to ward index

Westminster · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 79.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 792

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Denson, L.Labour Party63079.5%+29.5 ptsElected
2Jones, L.Conservative Party7910.0%
3Lythgoe, D.Reform UK486.1%
4Cole, J.Liberal Democrats354.4%

Electorate 3,576 · Back to ward index

Wolverham · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 79.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 838

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Edwardson, M.Labour Party66879.7%+29.7 ptsElected
2Corner, S.Conservative Party9511.3%
3Jones, A.Liberal Democrats758.9%

Electorate 3,656 · Back to ward index

Chester City and the Garden Quarter · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,443

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chamberlain, P.Labour Party2,22921.6%64.7%+39.7 ptsElected
2Kerr, K.Labour Party2,17621.1%63.2%+38.2 ptsElected
3Walker, B.Labour Party2,13620.7%62.0%+37.0 ptsElected
4Gerrard, M.Conservative Party7487.2%21.7%
5Vaughan, K.Conservative Party7257.0%21.1%
6Morgan, M.Conservative Party6786.6%19.7%
7Taylor-Brown, K.Green Party5205.0%15.1%
8Delaney, M.Independent4023.9%11.7%
9Longman, T.Liberal Democrats3533.4%10.3%
10Tolani, A.Liberal Democrats1811.8%5.3%
11Rusak, P.Liberal Democrats1811.8%5.3%

Electorate 11,895 · Back to ward index

Newton and Hoole · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,173

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Beacham, R.Labour Party2,95623.6%70.8%+45.8 ptsElected
2Watson, G.Labour Party2,71821.7%65.1%+40.1 ptsElected
3Langan, A.Labour Party2,67221.3%64.0%+39.0 ptsElected
4Booth, S.Conservative Party8596.9%20.6%
5Wilderspin-Jones, M.Green Party7806.2%18.7%
6Jones, R.Conservative Party6645.3%15.9%
7Wimpey, R.Conservative Party6475.2%15.5%
8Price, R.Liberal Democrats3392.7%8.1%
9Christian, N.Liberal Democrats3162.5%7.6%
10Fraser, B.Liberal Democrats3002.4%7.2%
11Cunningham, K.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1351.1%3.2%
12Aberdeen, C.FFS-FA1341.1%3.2%

Electorate 10,897 · Back to ward index

Sutton Villages · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 73.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,971

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Donovan, P.Labour Party1,62441.2%82.4%+49.1 ptsElected
2Ellis, C.Labour Party1,44436.6%73.3%+39.9 ptsElected
3Kelly, H.Conservative Party3749.5%19.0%
4Dickson, D.Conservative Party3528.9%17.9%
5Litwin, L.Liberal Democrats1473.7%7.5%

Electorate 7,835 · Back to ward index

Central and Grange · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 77.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,398

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shore, K.Labour Party1,16941.8%83.6%+50.3 ptsElected
2Bisset, R.Labour Party1,08538.8%77.6%+44.3 ptsElected
3Jewkes, E.Liberal Democrats2087.4%14.9%
4Lacey, N.Conservative Party1716.1%12.2%
5Rowlands, D.Conservative Party1635.8%11.7%

Electorate 8,033 · Back to ward index

Blacon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,184

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Little, S.Labour Party1,68925.8%77.3%+52.3 ptsElected
2Gahan, C.Labour Party1,68725.7%77.2%+52.2 ptsElected
3Smith, A.Labour Party1,56123.8%71.5%+46.5 ptsElected
4Hughes, C.Conservative Party3926.0%17.9%
5Fletcher, B.Conservative Party3825.8%17.5%
6Jombikova, M.Conservative Party3475.3%15.9%
7Brown, S.Green Party3014.6%13.8%
8Patterson, K.Liberal Democrats1943.0%8.9%

Electorate 9,707 · Back to ward index