← Chesterfield (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Chesterfield 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 40 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 27,904 | 46.8% | 28 | 70.0% | 20 | 50.0% | +8 |
| Liberal Democrats | 19,440 | 32.6% | 12 | 30.0% | 13 | 32.5% | -1 |
| Conservative Party | 5,677 | 9.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 10.0% | -4 |
| Green Party | 2,704 | 4.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.5% | -1 |
| Independent | 2,516 | 4.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.5% | -1 |
| C & ND IND | 1,392 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.5% | -1 |
| Total | 59,633 | 100.0% | 40 | 100.0% | 40 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Linacre · 2 seats · won at 39.0% · above quota
- Brampton East and Boythorpe · 2 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Brimington South · 2 seats · won at 48.6% · above quota
- Hasland · 3 seats · won at 40.7% · above quota
- Staveley North · 2 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Brockwell · 2 seats · won at 50.7% · above quota
- Staveley Central · 2 seats · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Brampton West and Loundsley Green · 3 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Whittington Moor · 2 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Dunston · 3 seats · won at 50.3% · above quota
- Spire · 3 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Walton · 3 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Whittington · 3 seats · won at 53.6% · above quota
- Staveley South · 3 seats · won at 54.9% · above quota
- Brimington North · 2 seats · won at 65.6% · above quota
- Rother · 3 seats · won at 69.1% · above quota
Race results
Linacre · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,651
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baldauf-Good, G. | Labour Party | 710 | 21.5% | 43.0% | +9.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Staton, J. | Labour Party | 644 | 19.5% | 39.0% | +5.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lynch, S. | Conservative Party | 553 | 16.7% | 33.5% | — | |
| 4 | Jerram, I. | Conservative Party | 549 | 16.6% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | Dunks, B. | Liberal Democrats | 426 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 6 | Gately, P. | Liberal Democrats | 420 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — |
Brampton East and Boythorpe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,148
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davies, J. | Labour Party | 566 | 24.7% | 49.3% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Falconer, G. | Liberal Democrats | 528 | 23.0% | 46.0% | +12.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Falconer, K. | Liberal Democrats | 522 | 22.7% | 45.5% | — | |
| 4 | Marriott, J. | Labour Party | 496 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 5 | Clarke, A. | Green Party | 132 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — | |
| 6 | Portas, D. | C & ND IND | 52 | 2.3% | 4.5% | — |
Brimington South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,312
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilby, T. | Labour Party | 667 | 25.4% | 50.9% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Callan, I. | Labour Party | 638 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hartley, S. | Liberal Democrats | 566 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Collins, J. | Liberal Democrats | 524 | 20.0% | 40.0% | — | |
| 5 | Rowley, M. | Conservative Party | 228 | 8.7% | 17.4% | — |
Hasland · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,204
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brady, M. | Labour Party | 1,066 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Serjeant, A. | Labour Party | 904 | 13.7% | 41.0% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brittain, S. | Labour Party | 896 | 13.6% | 40.7% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Yates, D. | Green Party | 661 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 5 | Gibbons, P. | Conservative Party | 656 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 6 | Rodgers, J. | Conservative Party | 557 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 7 | Stanley, C. | Conservative Party | 540 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 8 | Geikie, S. | Green Party | 476 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 9 | Swift, S. | Green Party | 473 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 10 | Frear, E. | Liberal Democrats | 156 | 2.4% | 7.1% | — | |
| 11 | Shipley, L. | Liberal Democrats | 115 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — | |
| 12 | Hudson, T. | Liberal Democrats | 112 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — |
Staveley North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 927
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacobs, P. | Liberal Democrats | 506 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bingham, J. | Liberal Democrats | 465 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collins, L. | Labour Party | 346 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — | |
| 4 | Collins, D. | Labour Party | 344 | 18.6% | 37.1% | — | |
| 5 | Tagg, I. | Conservative Party | 113 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 6 | Robertshaw, D. | C & ND IND | 79 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — |
Brockwell · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,352
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davenport, M. | Liberal Democrats | 737 | 27.3% | 54.5% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hollingworth, K. | Liberal Democrats | 685 | 25.3% | 50.7% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goodall, R. | Labour Party | 472 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jordan, G. | Labour Party | 440 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bird, J. | Conservative Party | 153 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — | |
| 6 | Ratcliffe, J. | Green Party | 145 | 5.4% | 10.7% | — | |
| 7 | Downer, A. | C & ND IND | 71 | 2.6% | 5.3% | — |
Staveley Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 801
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dyke, B. | Labour Party | 458 | 28.6% | 57.2% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ridgway, J. | Labour Party | 410 | 25.6% | 51.2% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson, P. | Independent | 196 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 4 | Bannister, K. | Independent | 192 | 12.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 5 | Chambers, C. | Independent | 183 | 11.4% | 22.9% | — | |
| 6 | Tilson, C. | Conservative Party | 82 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — | |
| 7 | Horton, J. | Green Party | 80 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Brampton West and Loundsley Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,132
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brock, B. | Labour Party | 987 | 15.4% | 46.3% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stone, M. | Labour Party | 977 | 15.3% | 45.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Niblock, S. | Liberal Democrats | 971 | 15.2% | 45.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Niblock, P. | Liberal Democrats | 970 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Borrell, H. | Liberal Democrats | 968 | 15.1% | 45.4% | — | |
| 6 | Twigg, P. | Labour Party | 871 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 7 | Birkett, W. | Conservative Party | 420 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 8 | Jones, D. | C & ND IND | 233 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — |
Whittington Moor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,019
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caulfield, K. | Labour Party | 698 | 34.3% | 68.5% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, L. | Labour Party | 592 | 29.1% | 58.1% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gleadall, J. | Conservative Party | 189 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 4 | Hollingworth, M. | Liberal Democrats | 162 | 8.0% | 15.9% | — | |
| 5 | Ralph, L. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — | |
| 6 | Haworth, S. | Green Party | 154 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — | |
| 7 | Waterhouse, B. | C & ND IND | 81 | 4.0% | 8.0% | — |
Dunston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,379
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Innes, J. | Labour Party | 793 | 19.2% | 57.5% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McLaren, G. | Labour Party | 743 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Twigg, M. | Labour Party | 693 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bridge, S. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 5 | Cameron, E. | Liberal Democrats | 272 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 6 | Rowley, L. | Conservative Party | 265 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Thompson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 238 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 8 | Stone, P. | C & ND IND | 219 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 9 | Fox, D. | Green Party | 190 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 10 | Heathcote, A. | C & ND IND | 161 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 11 | Hartley, S. | C & ND IND | 155 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 12 | Simmons, G. | Independent | 133 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — |
Spire · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,781
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bagley, L. | Labour Party | 954 | 17.9% | 53.6% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sarvent, K. | Labour Party | 929 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Innes, P. | Labour Party | 902 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fordham, E. | Liberal Democrats | 743 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 5 | Mather, A. | Liberal Democrats | 720 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 6 | Campbell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 718 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 7 | Armenante, S. | C & ND IND | 191 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Woolley, J. | Conservative Party | 186 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — |
Walton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,202
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kellman, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,264 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redihough, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,205 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Snowdon, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,151 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McManus, L. | Labour Party | 814 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 5 | Brunt, S. | Labour Party | 735 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 6 | Rice, D. | Labour Party | 602 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Hounslow, A. | Conservative Party | 443 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 8 | Wandsworth, D. | Green Party | 393 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Whittington · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,673
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bingham, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,239 | 24.7% | 74.1% | +49.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holmes, P. | Liberal Democrats | 931 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thornton, K. | Liberal Democrats | 896 | 17.9% | 53.6% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lismore, S. | Labour Party | 625 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 5 | Nicholls, C. | Labour Party | 515 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 6 | Thorpe, M. | Labour Party | 472 | 9.4% | 28.2% | — | |
| 7 | Gibbons, S. | Conservative Party | 190 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — | |
| 8 | Clark, R. | C & ND IND | 150 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Staveley South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,391
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheeldon, D. | Labour Party | 844 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ogle, A. | Labour Party | 770 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yates, S. | Labour Party | 763 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mann, P. | Independent | 564 | 13.5% | 40.6% | — | |
| 5 | Rhodes, D. | Independent | 512 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 6 | Perry, R. | Independent | 480 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 7 | Hobson, J. | Conservative Party | 239 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — |
Brimington North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 801
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Culley, D. | Labour Party | 604 | 37.7% | 75.5% | +42.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Perkins, S. | Labour Party | 525 | 32.8% | 65.6% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Challands, G. | Independent | 133 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 4 | Jackson, C. | Independent | 123 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — | |
| 5 | Harrison, R. | Conservative Party | 103 | 6.4% | 12.9% | — | |
| 6 | Jacobs, M. | Liberal Democrats | 65 | 4.1% | 8.1% | — | |
| 7 | Jakins, A. | Liberal Democrats | 48 | 3.0% | 6.0% | — |
Rother · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,110
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flood, J. | Labour Party | 841 | 25.2% | 75.7% | +50.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Blakemore, L. | Labour Party | 831 | 24.9% | 74.8% | +49.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Miles, K. | Labour Party | 767 | 23.0% | 69.1% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holloway, H. | Liberal Democrats | 236 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 5 | King, P. | Liberal Democrats | 234 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 6 | Potts, J. | Conservative Party | 211 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 7 | Maher, K. | Liberal Democrats | 211 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — |