← All councils

Chorley

Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.

8 cycles in our data
20.0% all-time seats elected below the quota (29 of 145)
22.1% all-time seats unfairly awarded (32 of 145 across 8 cycles)

Cycles

Council composition as of 2026

42 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2026 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.

Most recent election (2026)

In 2026, 14 seats were up across 14 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 14 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Reform UK13,04835.9%750.0%535.7%+2
Labour Party12,10333.3%535.7%535.7%0
Conservative Party5,81416.0%17.1%214.3%-1
Green Party4,66212.8%17.1%214.3%-1
Liberal Democrats6121.7%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition540.1%00.0%00.0%0
Independent210.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total36,314100.0%14100.0%14100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Full ward-by-ward results for 2026 →

Composition history

One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016

Ward by ward

Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.

Ward20162018201920212022202320242026
Adlington and Anderton61%58%53%65%62%71%72%46%
Astley and Buckshaw51%48%
Brindle and Hoghton44%
Buckshaw and Whittle52%54%60%48%32%
Chisnall58%46%
Chorley East67%74%79%71%71%83%63%40%
Chorley North and Astley55%59%59%61%39%
Chorley North East64%69%70%61%61%70%71%51%
Chorley North West64%62%49%60%59%65%64%42%
Chorley South East63%64%55%
Chorley South East and Heath Charnock63%58%61%63%43%
Chorley South West74%67%55%58%51%51%57%40%
Clayton East, Brindle and Hoghton44%46%52%49%40%
Clayton West and Cuerden57%59%57%63%39%
Clayton-le-Woods and Whittle-le-Woods46%50%48%
Clayton-le-Woods North62%61%52%
Clayton-le-Woods West and Cuerden48%45%
Coppull49%74%70%67%70%71%71%47%
Croston, Mawdesley and Euxton South65%46%52%45%39%
Eccleston and Mawdesley46%54%54%
Eccleston, Heskin and Charnock Richard62%51%51%63%37%
Euxton53%62%55%66%37%
Euxton North72%59%
Euxton South50%53%
Heath Charnock and Rivington71%
Lostock45%51%
Pennine53%
Wheelton and Withnell56%55%