← All councils

Crawley

Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.

9 cycles in our data
32.0% all-time seats elected below the quota (40 of 125)
14.4% all-time seats unfairly awarded (18 of 125 across 9 cycles)

Cycles

Council composition as of 2026

37 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2026 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.

Most recent election (2026)

In 2026, 13 seats were up across 12 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 13 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Reform UK12,09433.4%1076.9%538.5%+5
Labour Party8,95124.7%323.1%323.1%0
Conservative Party7,50820.8%00.0%323.1%-3
Green Party5,49215.2%00.0%215.4%-2
Liberal Democrats1,6774.6%00.0%00.0%0
Independent3200.9%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1410.4%00.0%00.0%0
Total36,183100.0%13100.0%13100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Full ward-by-ward results for 2026 →

Composition history

One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.

2026
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016

Ward by ward

Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.

Ward201620172018201920212022202320242026
Bewbush53%58%
Bewbush and North Broadfield66%48%50%56%51%33%
Broadfield68%50%52%55%55%36%
Broadfield North77%67%
Broadfield South51%54%
Furnace Green48%57%50%48%34%
Gossops Green50%
Gossops Green and North East Broadfield48%51%53%52%
Ifield44%47%57%50%51%46%51%39%
Langley Green58%61%
Langley Green and Tushmore69%48%51%64%45%33%
Maidenbower71%65%69%72%63%48%52%44%36%
Northgate51%
Northgate and West Green55%43%48%55%54%34%
Pound Hill North64%66%
Pound Hill North and Forge Wood69%66%54%54%49%32%
Pound Hill South and Worth60%60%61%58%55%48%52%31%
Southgate54%46%56%45%47%49%46%34%
Three Bridges52%54%44%48%46%51%32%
Tilgate43%54%57%51%49%43%
West Green50%49%