← Dacorum (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Dacorum 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 25 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 51 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 32,870 | 42.0% | 28 | 54.9% | 22 | 43.1% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 27,174 | 34.7% | 18 | 35.3% | 19 | 37.3% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 13,943 | 17.8% | 3 | 5.9% | 9 | 17.6% | -6 |
| Green Party | 2,832 | 3.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.0% | -1 |
| Independent | 1,061 | 1.4% | 2 | 3.9% | 0 | 0.0% | +2 |
| Reform UK | 367 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 78,247 | 100.0% | 51 | 100.0% | 51 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Tring East · 1 seat · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Gadebridge · 2 seats · won at 38.1% · above quota
- Bennetts End · 2 seats · won at 39.2% · above quota
- Aldbury and Wigginton · 1 seat · won at 57.3% · above quota
- Adeyfield East · 2 seats · won at 41.8% · above quota
- Hemel Hempstead Town · 2 seats · won at 43.9% · above quota
- Watling · 2 seats · won at 44.5% · above quota
- Tring West and Rural · 2 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Nash Mills · 1 seat · won at 65.7% · above quota
- Leverstock Green · 3 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Ashridge · 1 seat · won at 67.5% · above quota
- Highfield · 2 seats · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Woodhall Farm · 2 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Kings Langley · 2 seats · won at 52.4% · above quota
- Northchurch · 1 seat · won at 70.2% · above quota
- Grovehill · 3 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Chaulden and Warners End · 3 seats · won at 46.3% · above quota
- Tring Central · 2 seats · won at 54.9% · above quota
- Apsley and Corner Hall · 3 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Berkhamsted East · 2 seats · won at 56.8% · above quota
- Bovingdon Flaunden and Chipperfield · 3 seats · won at 49.3% · above quota
- Adeyfield West · 2 seats · won at 59.3% · above quota
- Berkhamsted Castle · 2 seats · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Berkhamsted West · 2 seats · won at 64.2% · above quota
- Boxmoor · 3 seats · won at 61.0% · above quota
Race results
Tring East · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 51.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,138
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capozzi, M. | Liberal Democrats | 580 | 51.0% | +1.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hearn, P. | Conservative Party | 435 | 38.2% | — | |
| 3 | Curham, J. | Labour Party | 63 | 5.5% | — | |
| 4 | Burgar, W. | Green Party | 60 | 5.3% | — |
Gadebridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,104
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mitchell, A. | Labour Party | 451 | 20.4% | 40.9% | +7.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pound, H. | Conservative Party | 421 | 19.1% | 38.1% | +4.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bignell, M. | Conservative Party | 405 | 18.3% | 36.7% | — | |
| 4 | Ruff, G. | Labour Party | 370 | 16.8% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Ridley, C. | Green Party | 163 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 6 | Owen, S. | Liberal Democrats | 141 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — | |
| 7 | Angell, C. | Liberal Democrats | 132 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 8 | Watts, S. | Green Party | 125 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — |
Bennetts End · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,233
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hannell, P. | Labour Party | 500 | 20.3% | 40.6% | +7.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Birnie, J. | Independent | 483 | 19.6% | 39.2% | +5.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Greenfield, L. | Labour Party | 391 | 15.9% | 31.7% | — | |
| 4 | Rogers, M. | Conservative Party | 359 | 14.6% | 29.1% | — | |
| 5 | Khan, M. | Conservative Party | 313 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 6 | Lambert, A. | Green Party | 166 | 6.7% | 13.5% | — | |
| 7 | Lovell, P. | Liberal Democrats | 129 | 5.2% | 10.5% | — | |
| 8 | Roe, L. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 5.0% | 10.1% | — |
Aldbury and Wigginton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 57.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 822
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reynolds, P. | Liberal Democrats | 471 | 57.3% | +7.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Richardson, P. | Conservative Party | 307 | 37.3% | — | |
| 3 | Charlton, D. | Labour Party | 44 | 5.4% | — |
Adeyfield East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,013
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, A. | Conservative Party | 434 | 21.4% | 42.9% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pesch, B. | Labour Party | 423 | 20.9% | 41.8% | +8.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wyatt-Lowe, W. | Conservative Party | 417 | 20.6% | 41.2% | — | |
| 4 | Taylor, D. | Labour Party | 400 | 19.8% | 39.5% | — | |
| 5 | Thornhill, F. | Liberal Democrats | 190 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — | |
| 6 | Thornhill, S. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 8.0% | 15.9% | — |
Hemel Hempstead Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,265
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hobson, S. | Liberal Democrats | 621 | 24.6% | 49.1% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Santamaria, V. | Liberal Democrats | 555 | 21.9% | 43.9% | +10.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ijlal, M. | Labour Party | 358 | 14.2% | 28.3% | — | |
| 4 | Beauchamp, R. | Conservative Party | 351 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 5 | Ventiroso, J. | Labour Party | 337 | 13.3% | 26.7% | — | |
| 6 | Pound, M. | Conservative Party | 307 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — |
Watling · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,365
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Timmis, J. | Conservative Party | 686 | 25.1% | 50.3% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barradell, E. | Conservative Party | 608 | 22.3% | 44.5% | +11.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Symington, T. | Liberal Democrats | 489 | 17.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 4 | Harris, L. | Liberal Democrats | 478 | 17.5% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Reed, E. | Labour Party | 253 | 9.3% | 18.5% | — | |
| 6 | Olive, A. | Labour Party | 216 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — |
Tring West and Rural · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,768
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patterson, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,035 | 29.3% | 58.6% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mottershead, J. | Liberal Democrats | 844 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hicks, M. | Conservative Party | 501 | 14.2% | 28.3% | — | |
| 4 | Charlton-Jones, J. | Conservative Party | 462 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Stopps, J. | Green Party | 376 | 10.6% | 21.3% | — | |
| 6 | Phillips, C. | Labour Party | 164 | 4.6% | 9.3% | — | |
| 7 | Rutherford, M. | Labour Party | 153 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — |
Nash Mills · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 65.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 880
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maddern, J. | Independent | 578 | 65.7% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jamuar, S. | Conservative Party | 149 | 16.9% | — | |
| 3 | Gibbons, J. | Labour Party | 107 | 12.2% | — | |
| 4 | Bell, A. | Liberal Democrats | 46 | 5.2% | — |
Leverstock Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,335
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bromham, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,098 | 15.7% | 47.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gale, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,060 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McArevey, C. | Liberal Democrats | 966 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Griffiths, M. | Conservative Party | 937 | 13.4% | 40.1% | — | |
| 5 | Sutton, R. | Conservative Party | 928 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 6 | Harden, N. | Conservative Party | 883 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 7 | Alexander, S. | Labour Party | 349 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 8 | Laidlaw-Dickson, I. | Labour Party | 320 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 9 | Tattershall, M. | Labour Party | 305 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 10 | De Hoest, P. | Green Party | 158 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — |
Ashridge · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 67.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 952
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Douris, T. | Conservative Party | 643 | 67.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jordan, S. | Liberal Democrats | 239 | 25.1% | — | |
| 3 | Whitehill, J. | Labour Party | 70 | 7.4% | — |
Highfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 865
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Link, B. | Liberal Democrats | 464 | 26.8% | 53.6% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barry-Mears, S. | Liberal Democrats | 450 | 26.0% | 52.0% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mitchell, V. | Labour Party | 228 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — | |
| 4 | Griffiths, C. | Conservative Party | 213 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | York, R. | Labour Party | 207 | 12.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 6 | Gupta, B. | Conservative Party | 168 | 9.7% | 19.4% | — |
Woodhall Farm · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,101
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wyatt-Lowe, C. | Conservative Party | 614 | 27.9% | 55.8% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, B. | Conservative Party | 576 | 26.2% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dickson, A. | Labour Party | 299 | 13.6% | 27.2% | — | |
| 4 | Pollard, A. | Labour Party | 288 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 5 | Egerton, D. | Liberal Democrats | 201 | 9.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 6 | Curtis-England, D. | Liberal Democrats | 163 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 7 | Poursaeedi, S. | Reform UK | 61 | 2.8% | 5.5% | — |
Kings Langley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,234
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, A. | Conservative Party | 673 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Anderson, A. | Conservative Party | 646 | 26.2% | 52.4% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lawrence, A. | Green Party | 308 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 4 | Coleman, J. | Labour Party | 270 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 5 | Parkins, F. | Liberal Democrats | 201 | 8.1% | 16.3% | — | |
| 6 | Hook, D. | Labour Party | 185 | 7.5% | 15.0% | — | |
| 7 | Pandit, H. | Liberal Democrats | 184 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — |
Northchurch · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,007
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pringle, L. | Liberal Democrats | 707 | 70.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, J. | Conservative Party | 214 | 21.3% | — | |
| 3 | Sheridan, R. | Green Party | 47 | 4.7% | — | |
| 4 | Ritchie, S. | Labour Party | 39 | 3.9% | — |
Grovehill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,340
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banks, J. | Conservative Party | 708 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bhinder, A. | Conservative Party | 689 | 17.1% | 51.4% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Silwal, G. | Conservative Party | 606 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dickson, J. | Labour Party | 498 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Fisher, S. | Labour Party | 446 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 6 | Dartnell, P. | Labour Party | 413 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 7 | Macey, E. | Liberal Democrats | 246 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Keay, N. | Liberal Democrats | 175 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 9 | Short, R. | Liberal Democrats | 148 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 10 | Willcox, N. | Reform UK | 91 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — |
Chaulden and Warners End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,790
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guest, F. | Conservative Party | 923 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Elliot, G. | Conservative Party | 835 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Durrant, N. | Conservative Party | 828 | 15.4% | 46.3% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wales, K. | Labour Party | 602 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 5 | Harradine, A. | Labour Party | 594 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wilson, D. | Liberal Democrats | 527 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 7 | McKenzie, A. | Liberal Democrats | 516 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 8 | Kennedy, N. | Liberal Democrats | 387 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 9 | Potts, M. | Reform UK | 158 | 2.9% | 8.8% | — |
Tring Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,421
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilkie, S. | Liberal Democrats | 902 | 31.7% | 63.5% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Weston, C. | Liberal Democrats | 780 | 27.4% | 54.9% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Baker, K. | Conservative Party | 317 | 11.2% | 22.3% | — | |
| 4 | Hills, P. | Conservative Party | 305 | 10.7% | 21.5% | — | |
| 5 | Lawler, J. | Labour Party | 153 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — | |
| 6 | Oliver, R. | Green Party | 140 | 4.9% | 9.9% | — | |
| 7 | Rutherford, M. | Green Party | 130 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — | |
| 8 | Ellett, J. | Labour Party | 115 | 4.0% | 8.1% | — |
Apsley and Corner Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,038
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deacon, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,053 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox, T. | Liberal Democrats | 990 | 16.2% | 48.6% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Link, C. | Liberal Democrats | 978 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Collier, B. | Conservative Party | 711 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Palmer, C. | Conservative Party | 647 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 6 | Sinha, B. | Conservative Party | 589 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 7 | Garg, S. | Labour Party | 404 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 8 | Worker, D. | Labour Party | 375 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 9 | Jagatharan, S. | Labour Party | 367 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — |
Berkhamsted East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,874
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stevens, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,300 | 34.7% | 69.4% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,065 | 28.4% | 56.8% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reay, I. | Conservative Party | 415 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — | |
| 4 | Fielding, K. | Green Party | 298 | 8.0% | 15.9% | — | |
| 5 | De Silva, R. | Conservative Party | 290 | 7.7% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Bromberg, M. | Labour Party | 218 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 7 | Gladdy, J. | Labour Party | 161 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — |
Bovingdon Flaunden and Chipperfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,080
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Riddick, S. | Conservative Party | 1,116 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Adeleke, G. | Conservative Party | 1,070 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walker, P. | Conservative Party | 1,026 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bell, S. | Liberal Democrats | 630 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Carr, W. | Green Party | 493 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hawkswood, A. | Liberal Democrats | 462 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 7 | Buttleman, M. | Labour Party | 420 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hollinghurst, N. | Liberal Democrats | 400 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 9 | Fitzgerald, A. | Labour Party | 331 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 10 | Wignall, J. | Labour Party | 291 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — |
Adeyfield West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,033
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | England, A. | Liberal Democrats | 654 | 31.7% | 63.3% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tindall, R. | Liberal Democrats | 612 | 29.6% | 59.3% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cook, G. | Labour Party | 220 | 10.7% | 21.3% | — | |
| 4 | Wyatt-Lowe, A. | Conservative Party | 206 | 10.0% | 20.0% | — | |
| 5 | Heenan, H. | Labour Party | 187 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 6 | Ibrahim, B. | Conservative Party | 186 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — |
Berkhamsted Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,971
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bristow, I. | Liberal Democrats | 1,287 | 32.6% | 65.3% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Freedman, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,205 | 30.6% | 61.1% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Beardshaw, S. | Conservative Party | 477 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 4 | Armytage, A. | Conservative Party | 460 | 11.7% | 23.3% | — | |
| 5 | Tate, L. | Green Party | 189 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — | |
| 6 | Meeks, K. | Labour Party | 155 | 3.9% | 7.9% | — | |
| 7 | Dunford, K. | Labour Party | 112 | 2.8% | 5.7% | — | |
| 8 | Taylor, L. | Reform UK | 57 | 1.4% | 2.9% | — |
Berkhamsted West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,538
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Symington, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,155 | 37.5% | 75.1% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stewart, R. | Liberal Democrats | 987 | 32.1% | 64.2% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Green, C. | Conservative Party | 451 | 14.7% | 29.3% | — | |
| 4 | Mackenzie, R. | Labour Party | 192 | 6.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hurley, B. | Green Party | 179 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 6 | Roberts, C. | Labour Party | 112 | 3.6% | 7.3% | — |
Boxmoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,379
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen, W. | Liberal Democrats | 1,668 | 23.4% | 70.1% | +45.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hobson, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,563 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dhyani, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,451 | 20.3% | 61.0% | +36.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Allen, P. | Conservative Party | 620 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Froggatt, G. | Conservative Party | 551 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 6 | Levene, C. | Conservative Party | 498 | 7.0% | 20.9% | — | |
| 7 | Suzmeyan, A. | Labour Party | 273 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 8 | Whitehill, L. | Labour Party | 262 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 9 | Terry, H. | Labour Party | 252 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |