← Darlington (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Darlington 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 50 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 26,324 | 37.0% | 15 | 30.0% | 19 | 38.0% | -4 |
| Labour Party | 24,895 | 35.0% | 24 | 48.0% | 18 | 36.0% | +6 |
| Green Party | 13,271 | 18.7% | 7 | 14.0% | 9 | 18.0% | -2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 3,347 | 4.7% | 3 | 6.0% | 2 | 4.0% | +1 |
| Independent | 3,273 | 4.6% | 1 | 2.0% | 2 | 4.0% | -1 |
| Total | 71,110 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Park West · 2 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- North Road · 3 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- Whinfield · 2 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Heighington and Coniscliffe · 2 seats · won at 46.3% · above quota
- Stephenson · 2 seats · won at 47.4% · above quota
- Harrowgate Hill · 3 seats · won at 39.3% · above quota
- Eastbourne · 3 seats · won at 40.8% · above quota
- Hurworth · 2 seats · won at 50.4% · above quota
- Sadberge and Middleton St George · 3 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Red Hall and Lingfield · 2 seats · won at 52.9% · above quota
- Hummersknott · 2 seats · won at 53.2% · above quota
- Brinkburn and Faverdale · 3 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Northgate · 2 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Cockerton · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Mowden · 2 seats · won at 56.4% · above quota
- Haughton and Springfield · 3 seats · won at 51.5% · above quota
- Pierremont · 3 seats · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Park East · 3 seats · won at 52.5% · above quota
- Bank Top and Lascelles · 3 seats · won at 55.0% · above quota
- College · 2 seats · won at 66.4% · above quota
Race results
Park West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,789
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scott, H. | Conservative Party | 789 | 22.1% | 44.1% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Donoghue, B. | Conservative Party | 757 | 21.2% | 42.3% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sams, S. | Liberal Democrats | 399 | 11.2% | 22.3% | — | |
| 4 | McEvoy, M. | Labour Party | 399 | 11.2% | 22.3% | — | |
| 5 | Thorley, S. | Liberal Democrats | 364 | 10.2% | 20.4% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, M. | Green Party | 324 | 9.1% | 18.1% | — | |
| 7 | Sloss, J. | Labour Party | 319 | 8.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Rowell, W. | Green Party | 226 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — |
North Road · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,061
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curry, A. | Liberal Democrats | 465 | 14.6% | 43.8% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Allen, H. | Liberal Democrats | 438 | 13.8% | 41.3% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Coe, J. | Liberal Democrats | 394 | 12.4% | 37.1% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bowles, J. | Labour Party | 353 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | Vasey, J. | Labour Party | 323 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 6 | Haque, S. | Labour Party | 293 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 7 | Kendrew, N. | Conservative Party | 226 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 8 | Booth, R. | Conservative Party | 197 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 9 | Pratish, T. | Conservative Party | 179 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 10 | Barley, J. | Green Party | 111 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 11 | Barley, K. | Green Party | 104 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 12 | Lawley, F. | Green Party | 100 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — |
Whinfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,329
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bartch, J. | Conservative Party | 615 | 23.1% | 46.3% | +13.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Keir, A. | Conservative Party | 612 | 23.0% | 46.1% | +12.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McTimoney, M. | Green Party | 474 | 17.8% | 35.7% | — | |
| 4 | Hankinson, T. | Green Party | 456 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | McEwan, A. | Labour Party | 266 | 10.0% | 20.0% | — | |
| 6 | Spears, J. | Labour Party | 234 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — |
Heighington and Coniscliffe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,437
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lee, G. | Conservative Party | 869 | 30.2% | 60.5% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crudass, P. | Conservative Party | 665 | 23.1% | 46.3% | +12.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | White, H. | Independent | 425 | 14.8% | 29.6% | — | |
| 4 | Harman, P. | Labour Party | 275 | 9.6% | 19.1% | — | |
| 5 | Roberts, T. | Labour Party | 273 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 6 | Cooke, M. | Green Party | 178 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — | |
| 7 | Fearneyhough, M. | Green Party | 122 | 4.2% | 8.5% | — | |
| 8 | Oliver, B. | Liberal Democrats | 67 | 2.3% | 4.7% | — |
Stephenson · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 911
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haszeldine, I. | Labour Party | 483 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mahmud, M. | Labour Party | 432 | 23.7% | 47.4% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Renton, M. | Conservative Party | 403 | 22.1% | 44.3% | — | |
| 4 | Walker, M. | Conservative Party | 331 | 18.2% | 36.4% | — | |
| 5 | Chapman, L. | Green Party | 79 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — | |
| 6 | Greenwood, P. | Green Party | 48 | 2.6% | 5.3% | — | |
| 7 | Brack, M. | Independent | 23 | 1.3% | 2.5% | — | |
| 8 | Spence, F. | Independent | 22 | 1.2% | 2.4% | — |
Harrowgate Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,832
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henderson, R. | Green Party | 846 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Toms, A. | Green Party | 765 | 13.9% | 41.8% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lawley, R. | Green Party | 720 | 13.1% | 39.3% | +14.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Landers, M. | Labour Party | 586 | 10.7% | 32.0% | — | |
| 5 | Passman, J. | Labour Party | 563 | 10.2% | 30.7% | — | |
| 6 | Landers, S. | Labour Party | 561 | 10.2% | 30.6% | — | |
| 7 | Clarke, J. | Conservative Party | 489 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 8 | Bedingfield-Weller, S. | Conservative Party | 475 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 9 | Vasey, M. | Conservative Party | 421 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 10 | Ferguson, I. | Independent | 70 | 1.3% | 3.8% | — |
Eastbourne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,298
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nicholson, K. | Independent | 629 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dulston, J. | Conservative Party | 622 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dillon, J. | Labour Party | 529 | 13.6% | 40.8% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Taylor, C. | Labour Party | 476 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 5 | Taylor, J. | Labour Party | 466 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 6 | Martin, M. | Independent | 368 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 7 | Reynolds, A. | Conservative Party | 276 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 8 | Tait, S. | Independent | 268 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 9 | Morley, S. | Green Party | 100 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 10 | Bramley, S. | Green Party | 90 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 11 | Wise, R. | Green Party | 69 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — |
Hurworth · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,277
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tostevin, L. | Conservative Party | 716 | 28.0% | 56.1% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walters, P. | Conservative Party | 644 | 25.2% | 50.4% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kelley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 325 | 12.7% | 25.5% | — | |
| 4 | Boddy, N. | Liberal Democrats | 278 | 10.9% | 21.8% | — | |
| 5 | Guy, H. | Labour Party | 190 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Commane, P. | Green Party | 169 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 7 | Muggleton, E. | Labour Party | 157 | 6.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 8 | Fishwick, C. | Green Party | 75 | 2.9% | 5.9% | — |
Sadberge and Middleton St George · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,760
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laing, D. | Conservative Party | 909 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Renton, Y. | Conservative Party | 750 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pease, C. | Conservative Party | 744 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Darling, M. | Independent | 645 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 5 | Darling, D. | Independent | 596 | 11.3% | 33.9% | — | |
| 6 | Thorne-Wallis, S. | Labour Party | 363 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 7 | Vasey, L. | Labour Party | 283 | 5.4% | 16.1% | — | |
| 8 | Webster, P. | Labour Party | 259 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 9 | Lucas, S. | Green Party | 227 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 10 | Foster, P. | Green Party | 224 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 11 | Greenhow, F. | Green Party | 182 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 12 | Marlowe, C. | Liberal Democrats | 99 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Red Hall and Lingfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,009
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porter, M. | Labour Party | 551 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Riley, A. | Labour Party | 534 | 26.5% | 52.9% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hawkins, K. | Conservative Party | 408 | 20.2% | 40.4% | — | |
| 4 | Willis, D. | Conservative Party | 400 | 19.8% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ashwood, J. | Green Party | 64 | 3.2% | 6.3% | — | |
| 6 | Gravenor, M. | Green Party | 61 | 3.0% | 6.0% | — |
Hummersknott · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,851
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robinson, T. | Green Party | 1,009 | 27.3% | 54.5% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mammolotti, K. | Green Party | 985 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Galbraith, B. | Conservative Party | 798 | 21.6% | 43.1% | — | |
| 4 | Sowerby, J. | Conservative Party | 732 | 19.8% | 39.5% | — | |
| 5 | McAdam, C. | Labour Party | 93 | 2.5% | 5.0% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, R. | Labour Party | 85 | 2.3% | 4.6% | — |
Brinkburn and Faverdale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,982
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker, R. | Labour Party | 987 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Beckett, D. | Labour Party | 949 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Durham, S. | Conservative Party | 891 | 15.0% | 44.9% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holt, S. | Labour Party | 880 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 5 | Clarke, S. | Conservative Party | 877 | 14.7% | 44.2% | — | |
| 6 | Raw, A. | Conservative Party | 843 | 14.2% | 42.5% | — | |
| 7 | Siddle, S. | Green Party | 166 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hankinson, T. | Green Party | 139 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Wilson, N. | Green Party | 129 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — | |
| 10 | Bennett, P. | Liberal Democrats | 86 | 1.4% | 4.3% | — |
Northgate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 675
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kane, S. | Labour Party | 380 | 28.1% | 56.3% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ali, S. | Labour Party | 373 | 27.6% | 55.3% | +21.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Richardson, Y. | Conservative Party | 207 | 15.3% | 30.7% | — | |
| 4 | Saju, E. | Conservative Party | 188 | 13.9% | 27.9% | — | |
| 5 | Collinge, D. | Liberal Democrats | 80 | 5.9% | 11.9% | — | |
| 6 | Maddison, L. | Green Party | 72 | 5.3% | 10.7% | — | |
| 7 | Kang-Scarth, N. | Green Party | 50 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — |
Cockerton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,331
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cossins, J. | Labour Party | 738 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Garner, J. | Labour Party | 652 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson, N. | Labour Party | 634 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bartch, V. | Conservative Party | 486 | 12.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bell, S. | Conservative Party | 485 | 12.1% | 36.4% | — | |
| 6 | Hodgson, J. | Conservative Party | 473 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 7 | Atkinson, V. | Green Party | 184 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 8 | Broughton, S. | Green Party | 143 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 9 | Ullyart, T. | Green Party | 128 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | Dunstone, M. | Liberal Democrats | 71 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — |
Mowden · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,493
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Culley, P. | Conservative Party | 871 | 29.2% | 58.3% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marshall, A. | Conservative Party | 842 | 28.2% | 56.4% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carson, B. | Labour Party | 441 | 14.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 4 | Paver, T. | Labour Party | 426 | 14.3% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hilton, V. | Green Party | 187 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hilton, P. | Green Party | 159 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 7 | Wilson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 60 | 2.0% | 4.0% | — |
Haughton and Springfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,576
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McEwan, C. | Labour Party | 904 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wallis, N. | Labour Party | 846 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Storr, D. | Labour Party | 811 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Culley, P. | Conservative Party | 627 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Mills, R. | Conservative Party | 587 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 6 | Dunn, J. | Conservative Party | 548 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — | |
| 7 | Bramfitt, A. | Green Party | 151 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 8 | Stuart, B. | Green Party | 130 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 9 | Swainston, A. | Green Party | 124 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
Pierremont · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,454
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harker, S. | Labour Party | 872 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Layton, M. | Labour Party | 809 | 18.5% | 55.6% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGill, J. | Labour Party | 756 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clark, R. | Conservative Party | 488 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 5 | Donoghue, M. | Conservative Party | 461 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hart, C. | Conservative Party | 374 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 7 | McConnachie, C. | Green Party | 194 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 8 | Hemsley, M. | Green Party | 162 | 3.7% | 11.1% | — | |
| 9 | Mycock, A. | Green Party | 150 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 10 | Potter, G. | Liberal Democrats | 97 | 2.2% | 6.7% | — |
Park East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,264
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCollom, L. | Labour Party | 704 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nicholson, M. | Labour Party | 680 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Roche, M. | Labour Party | 663 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bell, M. | Conservative Party | 413 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lowery, C. | Conservative Party | 385 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 6 | Rose, S. | Conservative Party | 342 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 7 | Hunter, A. | Green Party | 172 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Mitchell, J. | Green Party | 137 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 9 | Kaur, K. | Green Party | 133 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 10 | Wood, S. | Liberal Democrats | 92 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 11 | Gandy, J. | Independent | 70 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — |
Bank Top and Lascelles · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,049
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crumbie, H. | Labour Party | 593 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ray, D. | Labour Party | 579 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Anderson, A. | Labour Party | 577 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barker, J. | Conservative Party | 354 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 5 | Chamberlain, E. | Conservative Party | 322 | 10.2% | 30.7% | — | |
| 6 | Tobin, P. | Conservative Party | 312 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Wright, D. | Independent | 157 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Whittington, H. | Green Party | 95 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 9 | Hill, G. | Green Party | 84 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — | |
| 10 | MacMurray, I. | Green Party | 74 | 2.4% | 7.1% | — |
College · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,874
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Snedker, M. | Green Party | 1,255 | 33.5% | 67.0% | +33.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holroyd, B. | Green Party | 1,245 | 33.2% | 66.4% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardy, M. | Conservative Party | 479 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | Maughan, A. | Conservative Party | 442 | 11.8% | 23.6% | — | |
| 5 | Watson, E. | Labour Party | 152 | 4.1% | 8.1% | — | |
| 6 | Hutchings, L. | Labour Party | 143 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — | |
| 7 | Curry, C. | Liberal Democrats | 32 | 0.9% | 1.7% | — |