← Derby (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort

Derby 2023

Local elections held 4 May 2023.

18 ward races
51 seats
5 unfairly awarded seats
9.8% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 51 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party64,98241.2%2345.1%2243.1%+1
Conservative Party41,62226.4%1529.4%1427.5%+1
Liberal Democrats23,27414.7%47.8%815.7%-4
RD & R11,2687.1%35.9%35.9%0
RD7,2044.6%35.9%23.9%+1
Independent5,3223.4%35.9%12.0%+2
Green Party4,2282.7%00.0%12.0%-1
Total157,900100.0%51100.0%51100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2023)
Previous (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Chellaston and Shelton Lock · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 26.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,708

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ingall, P.Independent1,62014.6%43.7%+18.7 ptsElected
2Ingall, C.Independent1,52713.7%41.2%+16.2 ptsElected
3Lakin, S.Independent9678.7%26.1%+1.1 ptsElected
4McCristal, R.Conservative Party9058.1%24.4%
5Jennings, H.Conservative Party8878.0%23.9%
6Dissanayake, C.Labour Party7506.7%20.2%
7Armstrong, R.RD7356.6%19.8%
8Brentnall, M.Conservative Party7226.5%19.5%
9Thakar, J.Labour Party7106.4%19.1%
10Thaker, N.Labour Party6595.9%17.8%
11Randle, P.RD5855.3%15.8%
12Muyncke, A.RD4514.1%12.2%
13Ghei, R.Green Party2472.2%6.7%
14French, V.Liberal Democrats1461.3%3.9%
15Holland, C.Liberal Democrats1161.0%3.1%
16Parnall, A.Liberal Democrats960.9%2.6%

Electorate 11,713 · Back to ward index

Chaddesden North · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,570

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hudson, R.Liberal Democrats60519.3%38.5%+5.2 ptsElected
2Wilson, N.Labour Party58218.5%37.1%+3.7 ptsElected
3Bayliss, J.Labour Party56718.1%36.1%
4Testro, J.Liberal Democrats51816.5%33.0%
5Marshall, J.Conservative Party35911.4%22.9%
6Harrison, E.Conservative Party31610.1%20.1%
7Evans, C.RD & R1013.2%6.4%
8Crompton, I.RD & R912.9%5.8%

Electorate 6,827 · Back to ward index

Chaddesden East · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,867

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pearce, J.Conservative Party96625.9%51.7%+18.4 ptsElected
2Wright, J.Conservative Party80621.6%43.2%+9.8 ptsElected
3Everett, B.Labour Party73919.8%39.6%
4Spray, T.Labour Party56615.2%30.3%
5Bysh, P.RD & R2396.4%12.8%
6Evans, S.RD & R2115.7%11.3%
7Christodoulou, A.Green Party1203.2%6.4%
8Williams, J.Liberal Democrats471.3%2.5%
9Smith, M.Liberal Democrats401.1%2.1%

Electorate 6,492 · Back to ward index

Chaddesden West · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,429

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Rawson, M.Labour Party73225.6%51.2%+17.9 ptsElected
2Kozlowski, K.Labour Party68023.8%47.6%+14.3 ptsElected
3Pearce, T.Conservative Party54018.9%37.8%
4Clarke, A.Conservative Party52618.4%36.8%
5Bettany, P.RD & R1134.0%7.9%
6Graves, A.RD & R913.2%6.4%
7Holyoake, T.Liberal Democrats903.1%6.3%
8Stirland, A.Liberal Democrats863.0%6.0%

Electorate 6,869 · Back to ward index

Mackworth and New Zealand · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,804

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pandey, G.Conservative Party1,23114.6%43.9%+18.9 ptsElected
2Whitby, J.Labour Party1,19014.1%42.4%+17.4 ptsElected
3Onuoha, N.Labour Party1,16813.9%41.7%+16.7 ptsElected
4Pegg, A.Conservative Party1,11413.2%39.7%
5Umeh, N.Labour Party1,08412.9%38.7%
6Walsh, M.Conservative Party1,04412.4%37.2%
7Froggatt, D.Independent3814.5%13.6%
8Carr, J.Green Party3053.6%10.9%
9Sage, B.RD & R1792.1%6.4%
10Caulton, N.RD & R1742.1%6.2%
11Tillett, S.Liberal Democrats1672.0%6.0%
12Bamford, D.RD & R1621.9%5.8%
13Branco, C.Liberal Democrats1291.5%4.6%
14Handley, S.Liberal Democrats841.0%3.0%

Electorate 10,186 · Back to ward index

Mickleover · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,711

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Holmes, A.Conservative Party2,27416.1%48.3%+23.3 ptsElected
2Holmes, M.Conservative Party2,25015.9%47.8%+22.8 ptsElected
3Pattison, M.Conservative Party2,03914.4%43.3%+18.3 ptsElected
4Hird, M.Liberal Democrats1,61011.4%34.2%
5Northover, N.Labour Party1,1558.2%24.5%
6McAllister, E.Liberal Democrats1,1388.1%24.2%
7Webb, G.Liberal Democrats1,0717.6%22.7%
8Kinsey, A.Labour Party9686.8%20.5%
9Sharratt, P.Labour Party8546.0%18.1%
10Rushbrooke, H.Green Party3302.3%7.0%
11Banton, J.RD & R1581.1%3.4%
12Hayden, A.RD & R1511.1%3.2%
13Hodgon, L.RD & R1361.0%2.9%

Electorate 11,710 · Back to ward index

Allestree · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,473

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Potter, G.Conservative Party2,41318.0%53.9%+28.9 ptsElected
2Hassall, S.Conservative Party2,28317.0%51.0%+26.0 ptsElected
3Morgan-McGeehan, K.Conservative Party1,99214.8%44.5%+19.5 ptsElected
4Green, S.Labour Party1,3129.8%29.3%
5Green, P.Labour Party1,2579.4%28.1%
6Hounslow-Eyre, A.Labour Party1,1538.6%25.8%
7Hitchcock, H.Green Party5964.4%13.3%
8Mott, T.Green Party5283.9%11.8%
9Ward, S.Green Party4553.4%10.2%
10Leeming, G.RD & R3042.3%6.8%
11Lumley, E.RD & R2732.0%6.1%
12Berry, W.Liberal Democrats2501.9%5.6%
13Lind, P.Liberal Democrats2191.6%4.9%
14Ahmed, H.Liberal Democrats1971.5%4.4%
15Adams, D.RD & R1881.4%4.2%

Electorate 10,864 · Back to ward index

Blagreaves · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,046

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bolton, S.Labour Party1,93115.9%47.7%+22.7 ptsElected
2Amin, S.Labour Party1,89815.6%46.9%+21.9 ptsElected
3Dhindsa, H.Labour Party1,89615.6%46.9%+21.9 ptsElected
4Lind, D.Liberal Democrats1,83615.1%45.4%
5Naitta, J.Liberal Democrats1,73614.3%42.9%
6Khan, F.Liberal Democrats1,50512.4%37.2%
7Berry, P.Conservative Party4153.4%10.3%
8Naitta, H.RD & R3903.2%9.6%
9Russell, J.RD & R2742.3%6.8%
10Garnett, O.RD & R2562.1%6.3%

Electorate 10,954 · Back to ward index

Littleover · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,044

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Care, L.Liberal Democrats2,37319.6%58.7%+33.7 ptsElected
2Atwal, A.Liberal Democrats1,95016.1%48.2%+23.2 ptsElected
3Lonsdale, E.Liberal Democrats1,92915.9%47.7%+22.7 ptsElected
4Dhillon, G.Labour Party1,42611.8%35.3%
5Brown, S.Labour Party1,29310.7%32.0%
6Parkes, S.Labour Party1,1909.8%29.4%
7Samra, B.Conservative Party5694.7%14.1%
8Packham, E.Conservative Party5204.3%12.9%
9Osborne, M.Conservative Party5174.3%12.8%
10Jowitt, D.RD & R1461.2%3.6%
11Blaney, J.RD & R1120.9%2.8%
12Banton, D.RD & R1080.9%2.7%

Electorate 10,438 · Back to ward index

Alvaston South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,723

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lindsey, A.RD1,51318.5%55.6%+30.6 ptsElected
2Fowke, S.RD1,43517.6%52.7%+27.7 ptsElected
3Prosser, T.RD1,38016.9%50.7%+25.7 ptsElected
4Madden, B.Labour Party1,12613.8%41.4%
5Dale, R.Labour Party1,10813.6%40.7%
6Shaw, E.Labour Party1,04812.8%38.5%
7Wayman, Z.Conservative Party3043.7%11.2%
8Allen, S.Liberal Democrats1021.2%3.7%
9Care, I.Liberal Democrats881.1%3.2%
10Slowinski, M.Liberal Democrats640.8%2.4%

Electorate 9,965 · Back to ward index

Spondon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,047

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Poulter, C.Conservative Party1,61117.6%52.9%+27.9 ptsElected
2Smale, J.Conservative Party1,58917.4%52.1%+27.1 ptsElected
3Roulstone, N.Conservative Party1,58917.4%52.1%+27.1 ptsElected
4Coates, R.Labour Party1,04911.5%34.4%
5Axtell, A.Labour Party98710.8%32.4%
6Inwood, P.Labour Party97310.6%31.9%
7Hardy, S.Green Party2632.9%8.6%
8Harrison, H.Liberal Democrats2512.7%8.2%
9Wray, P.Liberal Democrats2172.4%7.1%
10Cox, C.RD & R1862.0%6.1%
11Wills, K.RD & R1681.8%5.5%
12Walker, S.RD & R1651.8%5.4%
13Jabbar, A.Liberal Democrats931.0%3.1%

Electorate 9,757 · Back to ward index

Alvaston North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,829

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Graves, A.RD & R1,72020.3%60.8%+35.8 ptsElected
2Evans, J.RD & R1,53318.1%54.2%+29.2 ptsElected
3Kus, K.RD & R1,51017.8%53.4%+28.4 ptsElected
4Pointon, V.Labour Party1,04212.3%36.8%
5Banks, J.Labour Party99711.7%35.2%
6Rehman, H.Labour Party85810.1%30.3%
7Kelly, C.Conservative Party2943.5%10.4%
8Butter, P.Liberal Democrats1561.8%5.5%
9Gale, D.Independent1421.7%5.0%
10Howcroft, G.Liberal Democrats1301.5%4.6%
11Neiland, M.Liberal Democrats1041.2%3.7%

Electorate 11,357 · Back to ward index

Arboretum · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,409

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Khan, S.Labour Party1,89026.2%78.5%+53.5 ptsElected
2Nawaz, G.Labour Party1,73824.1%72.2%+47.2 ptsElected
3Wright, C.Labour Party1,37219.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
4Hussain, M.Conservative Party1,07314.8%44.5%
5Stark, S.Independent2333.2%9.7%
6Holmes, D.Liberal Democrats2303.2%9.5%
7Pickersgill, A.Liberal Democrats1882.6%7.8%
8Marrero, J.Liberal Democrats1772.4%7.3%
9Blaney, T.RD & R1281.8%5.3%
10Delaney, P.RD & R1211.7%5.0%
11Muyncke, J.RD & R761.1%3.2%

Electorate 9,764 · Back to ward index

Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,054

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ashby, C.Labour Party1,35922.1%66.2%+41.2 ptsElected
2Bonser, S.Labour Party1,34721.9%65.6%+40.6 ptsElected
3Hezelgrave, P.Labour Party1,17119.0%57.0%+32.0 ptsElected
4Burke, A.Liberal Democrats3535.7%17.2%
5Chaudhary, M.Conservative Party3415.5%16.6%
6Hurt, A.Conservative Party3085.0%15.0%
7Christodoulou, M.Green Party2774.5%13.5%
8Crosby, A.Liberal Democrats2764.5%13.4%
9Paxton, J.RD & R1953.2%9.5%
10Ferrigno, S.Liberal Democrats1913.1%9.3%
11Cokayne, A.RD & R1342.2%6.5%
12Peach, S.RD & R1141.9%5.6%
13Toone, I.Independent961.6%4.7%

Electorate 9,150 · Back to ward index

Darley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,655

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Repton, M.Labour Party2,51022.9%68.7%+43.7 ptsElected
2Martin, A.Labour Party2,38721.8%65.3%+40.3 ptsElected
3Swan, C.Labour Party2,10119.2%57.5%+32.5 ptsElected
4Giuliano, L.Green Party9328.5%25.5%
5Grimadell, A.Conservative Party8647.9%23.6%
6Abraham, J.Conservative Party8057.3%22.0%
7Bull, C.Liberal Democrats3993.6%10.9%
8Hall, M.Liberal Democrats2392.2%6.5%
9Jackman, A.Liberal Democrats2312.1%6.3%
10Boole, L.RD & R1821.7%5.0%
11Handley, S.RD & R1601.5%4.4%
12Saxton, S.RD & R1561.4%4.3%

Electorate 10,797 · Back to ward index

Oakwood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,260

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eyre, M.Conservative Party2,28723.4%70.1%+45.1 ptsElected
2Trewhella, F.Conservative Party2,07521.2%63.6%+38.6 ptsElected
3Mulhall, J.Conservative Party1,91919.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
4Stevenson, A.Labour Party7317.5%22.4%
5Johnson-Lawal, K.Labour Party7107.3%21.8%
6Seehra, R.Labour Party6817.0%20.9%
7Harwood, F.Liberal Democrats3553.6%10.9%
8Wright, C.Liberal Democrats3493.6%10.7%
9Wise, J.RD & R1982.0%6.1%
10Bird, A.Liberal Democrats1851.9%5.7%
11Adams, T.RD & R1521.6%4.7%
12Lindsey, M.RD & R1391.4%4.3%

Electorate 10,000 · Back to ward index

Normanton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,419

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Khan, J.Labour Party2,65425.9%77.6%+52.6 ptsElected
2Sandhu, B.Labour Party2,46824.1%72.2%+47.2 ptsElected
3Thandi, G.Labour Party2,23621.8%65.4%+40.4 ptsElected
4Tafseer, H.Conservative Party1,27812.5%37.4%
5Bacon, S.Independent3563.5%10.4%
6Smith, L.Liberal Democrats2952.9%8.6%
7Gould, D.RD2202.1%6.4%
8Troup, B.Liberal Democrats2001.9%5.8%
9Thomas, K.RD & R1941.9%5.7%
10Cooper, L.RD & R1801.8%5.3%
11O'Farrell, G.Liberal Democrats1771.7%5.2%

Electorate 11,965 · Back to ward index

Sinfin and Osmaston · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,207

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Shanker, B.Labour Party1,58924.0%72.0%+47.0 ptsElected
2Chambers, S.Labour Party1,55323.5%70.4%+45.4 ptsElected
3Peatfield, N.Labour Party1,53723.2%69.6%+44.6 ptsElected
4Joshi, J.Conservative Party5979.0%27.0%
5May, B.RD3194.8%14.5%
6Adeseun, M.RD3044.6%13.8%
7Szemraj, G.RD2624.0%11.9%
8Brown, K.Green Party1752.6%7.9%
9Arguile, J.Liberal Democrats1241.9%5.6%
10Carr, M.Liberal Democrats911.4%4.1%
11Thomas, L.Liberal Democrats711.1%3.2%

Electorate 10,580 · Back to ward index