← Dover (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Dover 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 17 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 32 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 22,011 | 40.7% | 17 | 53.1% | 13 | 40.6% | +4 |
| Conservative Party | 20,449 | 37.8% | 14 | 43.8% | 13 | 40.6% | +1 |
| Green Party | 4,929 | 9.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 9.4% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 3,474 | 6.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 6.3% | -2 |
| Independent | 2,746 | 5.1% | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | 3.1% | 0 |
| Heritage Party | 230 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 205 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 54,044 | 100.0% | 32 | 100.0% | 32 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Maxton and Elms Vale · 1 seat · won at 40.7% · −9.3 pts below quota
- Alkham and Capel-le-Ferne · 1 seat · won at 49.7% · −0.3 pts below quota
- Eastry Rural · 2 seats · won at 38.9% · above quota
- Dover Downs and River · 2 seats · won at 40.9% · above quota
- Guston, Kingsdown and St Margaret's-at-Cliffe · 2 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Town and Castle · 2 seats · won at 44.4% · above quota
- Walmer · 2 seats · won at 44.4% · above quota
- Little Stour and Ashstone · 2 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Sandwich · 2 seats · won at 46.0% · above quota
- Whitfield · 2 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- St Radigunds · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Middle Deal · 2 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- Mill Hill · 2 seats · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Tower Hamlets · 1 seat · won at 75.1% · above quota
- Buckland · 2 seats · won at 60.6% · above quota
- Aylesham, Eythorne and Shepherdswell · 3 seats · won at 53.6% · above quota
- North Deal · 2 seats · won at 62.5% · above quota
Race results
Maxton and Elms Vale · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 979
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nee, M. | Labour Party | 398 | 40.7% | −9.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wanstall, G. | Independent | 288 | 29.4% | — | |
| 3 | Warriner, C. | Conservative Party | 193 | 19.7% | — | |
| 4 | Shread, N. | Green Party | 100 | 10.2% | — |
Alkham and Capel-le-Ferne · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 862
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hibbert, M. | Conservative Party | 428 | 49.7% | −0.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walters, B. | Labour Party | 274 | 31.8% | — | |
| 3 | Evans, H. | Liberal Democrats | 160 | 18.6% | — |
Eastry Rural · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,793
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenton, N. | Conservative Party | 776 | 21.6% | 43.3% | +9.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Manion, S. | Conservative Party | 698 | 19.5% | 38.9% | +5.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Waite-Gleave, S. | Green Party | 645 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 4 | Findley, P. | Green Party | 615 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Pestell, D. | Labour Party | 380 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — | |
| 6 | Hack, G. | Labour Party | 369 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — | |
| 7 | Pennington, C. | Liberal Democrats | 103 | 2.9% | 5.7% | — |
Dover Downs and River · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,860
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beaney, D. | Conservative Party | 845 | 22.7% | 45.4% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rose, M. | Conservative Party | 761 | 20.5% | 40.9% | +7.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cosin, B. | Labour Party | 680 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — | |
| 4 | Tanton, A. | Green Party | 526 | 14.1% | 28.3% | — | |
| 5 | James, P. | Liberal Democrats | 525 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 6 | Walker-Smith, A. | Liberal Democrats | 383 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — |
Guston, Kingsdown and St Margaret's-at-Cliffe · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,223
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bates, M. | Conservative Party | 960 | 21.6% | 43.2% | +9.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Richardson, O. | Conservative Party | 941 | 21.2% | 42.3% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lonsdale, J. | Green Party | 758 | 17.1% | 34.1% | — | |
| 4 | Cosin, M. | Labour Party | 690 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Hawkins, B. | Labour Party | 604 | 13.6% | 27.2% | — | |
| 6 | Gosling, J. | Liberal Democrats | 262 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 7 | Laidlow-Petersen, S. | Heritage Party | 230 | 5.2% | 10.3% | — |
Town and Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,353
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hill, S. | Labour Party | 616 | 22.8% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Biggs, E. | Labour Party | 600 | 22.2% | 44.4% | +11.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jeacock, R. | Conservative Party | 423 | 15.6% | 31.3% | — | |
| 4 | Reynolds, S. | Conservative Party | 390 | 14.4% | 28.8% | — | |
| 5 | Sawbridge, B. | Green Party | 238 | 8.8% | 17.6% | — | |
| 6 | Marsh, K. | Independent | 207 | 7.7% | 15.3% | — | |
| 7 | Payne, A. | Independent | 122 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 8 | O'Donoghue, L. | Liberal Democrats | 83 | 3.1% | 6.1% | — | |
| 9 | Philp, B. | Independent | 26 | 1.0% | 1.9% | — |
Walmer · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,248
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vinson, C. | Conservative Party | 1,023 | 22.8% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murphy, D. | Conservative Party | 999 | 22.2% | 44.4% | +11.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Eddy, M. | Green Party | 726 | 16.2% | 32.3% | — | |
| 4 | Holloway, A. | Labour Party | 685 | 15.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bano, B. | Labour Party | 656 | 14.6% | 29.2% | — | |
| 6 | Blackwell, R. | Liberal Democrats | 406 | 9.0% | 18.1% | — |
Little Stour and Ashstone · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,899
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bartlett, T. | Conservative Party | 1,103 | 29.0% | 58.1% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Porter, M. | Conservative Party | 864 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Featherstone, J. | Labour Party | 428 | 11.3% | 22.5% | — | |
| 4 | Timpson, R. | Liberal Democrats | 401 | 10.6% | 21.1% | — | |
| 5 | Weaver, G. | Labour Party | 360 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 6 | Mathlin, J. | Green Party | 353 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 7 | Sharpe, J. | Green Party | 289 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — |
Sandwich · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,790
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moorhouse, M. | Independent | 945 | 26.4% | 52.8% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Friend, D. | Conservative Party | 823 | 23.0% | 46.0% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sampson, H. | Conservative Party | 701 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Pennington, M. | Liberal Democrats | 442 | 12.3% | 24.7% | — | |
| 5 | Louis, P. | Labour Party | 336 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — | |
| 6 | Garside, M. | Labour Party | 333 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — |
Whitfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,431
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knight, R. | Conservative Party | 748 | 26.1% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Back, J. | Conservative Party | 718 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hill, C. | Labour Party | 462 | 16.1% | 32.3% | — | |
| 4 | Harris-Small, R. | Labour Party | 407 | 14.2% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | McGillivray, M. | Reform UK | 205 | 7.2% | 14.3% | — | |
| 6 | O'Connor, S. | Green Party | 183 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — | |
| 7 | Hope, B. | Liberal Democrats | 138 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — |
St Radigunds · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 852
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, L. | Labour Party | 464 | 27.2% | 54.5% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cowans, G. | Labour Party | 433 | 25.4% | 50.9% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Defriend, J. | Independent | 339 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 4 | Calder, A. | Conservative Party | 234 | 13.7% | 27.5% | — | |
| 5 | Collins, B. | Conservative Party | 233 | 13.7% | 27.4% | — |
Middle Deal · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,844
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blair, S. | Labour Party | 1,128 | 30.6% | 61.2% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cronk, D. | Labour Party | 1,035 | 28.1% | 56.1% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bond, T. | Conservative Party | 710 | 19.3% | 38.5% | — | |
| 4 | Davenport, S. | Conservative Party | 563 | 15.3% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Headley, C. | Liberal Democrats | 252 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — |
Mill Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,790
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, H. | Labour Party | 1,074 | 30.0% | 60.0% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Loffman, J. | Labour Party | 1,018 | 28.4% | 56.9% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hawkes, D. | Conservative Party | 519 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — | |
| 4 | Oliver, C. | Green Party | 496 | 13.9% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Burwash, C. | Conservative Party | 472 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — |
Tower Hamlets · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 75.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 619
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brivio, P. | Labour Party | 465 | 75.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jenner, A. | Conservative Party | 154 | 24.9% | — |
Buckland · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,015
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills, K. | Labour Party | 692 | 34.1% | 68.2% | +34.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Zosseder, C. | Labour Party | 615 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carrole, J. | Conservative Party | 373 | 18.4% | 36.7% | — | |
| 4 | Reynolds, P. | Conservative Party | 350 | 17.2% | 34.5% | — |
Aylesham, Eythorne and Shepherdswell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,351
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodgate, C. | Labour Party | 1,423 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pout, J. | Labour Party | 1,410 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mamjan, M. | Labour Party | 1,260 | 17.9% | 53.6% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Richardson, M. | Conservative Party | 630 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 5 | Livesey, R. | Conservative Party | 599 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 6 | Matthew, A. | Conservative Party | 593 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 7 | Garrity, D. | Independent | 531 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 8 | Sim, B. | Liberal Democrats | 319 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 9 | Armstrong, G. | Independent | 288 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — |
North Deal · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,171
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parks, D. | Labour Party | 1,359 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Beer, S. | Labour Party | 1,357 | 31.3% | 62.5% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jull, P. | Conservative Party | 896 | 20.6% | 41.3% | — | |
| 4 | Morgan, J. | Conservative Party | 729 | 16.8% | 33.6% | — |