← Dudley (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort

Dudley 2024

Local elections held 2 May 2024.

24 ward races
72 seats
6 unfairly awarded seats
8.3% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 72 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party82,02642.0%3447.2%3143.1%+3
Labour Party81,78741.8%3447.2%3143.1%+3
Liberal Democrats11,0755.7%34.2%45.6%-1
Independent10,6305.4%11.4%45.6%-3
Green Party7,8354.0%00.0%22.8%-2
Reform UK1,5150.8%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition4120.2%00.0%00.0%0
FREE1600.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total195,440100.0%72100.0%72100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2024)
Previous (2023)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Gornal · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,474

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Stanley, D.Conservative Party1,27117.1%51.4%+26.4 ptsElected
2Challenor, B.Conservative Party1,11415.0%45.0%+20.0 ptsElected
3Turner, S.Labour Party89812.1%36.3%+11.3 ptsElected
4Millward, A.Independent85211.5%34.4%
5Sullivan, C.Conservative Party81010.9%32.7%
6Morgan, J.Labour Party76410.3%30.9%
7Westwood, M.Independent5907.9%23.8%
8Singh, H.Labour Party5697.7%23.0%
9Hunt, N.Reform UK5547.5%22.4%

Electorate 10,023 · EC ward code E05015910 · Back to ward index

Kingswinford South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,120

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Harley, P.Conservative Party1,51616.2%48.6%+23.6 ptsElected
2Greenaway, S.Conservative Party1,43515.3%46.0%+21.0 ptsElected
3Johnson, L.Conservative Party1,17012.5%37.5%+12.5 ptsElected
4Daniel, S.Labour Party1,10211.8%35.3%
5Woolley, D.Labour Party8519.1%27.3%
6Palermo, D.Labour Party7127.6%22.8%
7Hammond, M.Independent6326.8%20.3%
8Bassingthwaighte, B.Independent6176.6%19.8%
9Miller, P.Independent5215.6%16.7%
10Waldron, A.Independent4564.9%14.6%
11Walker, C.Green Party2312.5%7.4%
12Holmes, R.Liberal Democrats1171.3%3.8%

Electorate 9,921 · EC ward code E05015915 · Back to ward index

Sedgley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,954

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Corfield, D.Conservative Party1,62518.3%55.0%+30.0 ptsElected
2Sandall, I.Conservative Party1,46816.6%49.7%+24.7 ptsElected
3Keasey, S.Independent1,11012.5%37.6%+12.6 ptsElected
4Khan, S.Conservative Party1,04311.8%35.3%
5Middleton, T.Labour Party92110.4%31.2%
6Ahmed, H.Labour Party7128.0%24.1%
7Simms, B.Independent6657.5%22.5%
8Ndlovu, J.Labour Party6387.2%21.6%
9Drewery, C.Green Party4174.7%14.1%
10Oakley, S.Green Party2633.0%8.9%

Electorate 10,657 · EC ward code E05015921 · Back to ward index

Cradley North and Wollescote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,708

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Priest, R.Liberal Democrats1,62720.0%60.1%+35.1 ptsElected
2Khan, K.Liberal Democrats1,12013.8%41.4%+16.4 ptsElected
3Stafford, E.Liberal Democrats1,04912.9%38.7%+13.7 ptsElected
4Crumpton, T.Labour Party1,02012.6%37.7%
5Gardener, R.Labour Party86110.6%31.8%
6Mutahar, M.Labour Party6738.3%24.8%
7Neale, N.Conservative Party5817.2%21.5%
8Hadley, S.Conservative Party5757.1%21.2%
9Sturman-Sprigg, C.Conservative Party5306.5%19.6%
10Halloran, S.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition891.1%3.3%

Electorate 9,150 · EC ward code E05015909 · Back to ward index

Upper Gornal and Woodsetton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,257

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Aston, A.Labour Party1,53422.7%68.0%+43.0 ptsElected
2Littler, C.Labour Party1,22018.0%54.0%+29.0 ptsElected
3Hussain, M.Labour Party95014.0%42.1%+17.1 ptsElected
4Watton, K.Conservative Party82812.2%36.7%
5Watton, L.Conservative Party77411.4%34.3%
6Watton, W.Conservative Party75411.1%33.4%
7Farrow, S.Reform UK5297.8%23.4%
8Benton, C.Liberal Democrats1832.7%8.1%

Electorate 9,837 · EC ward code E05015924 · Back to ward index

Pedmore and Stourbridge East · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,554

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kettle, I.Conservative Party1,92418.0%54.1%+29.1 ptsElected
2Clinton, J.Conservative Party1,83617.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
3Thorne, J.Conservative Party1,52214.3%42.8%+17.8 ptsElected
4Kent, M.Labour Party1,21211.4%34.1%
5Owens, C.Labour Party1,13810.7%32.0%
6Hebron, P.Labour Party1,0589.9%29.8%
7Kirkham, N.Liberal Democrats6626.2%18.6%
8Sheppard, D.Liberal Democrats4474.2%12.6%
9Wood, V.Liberal Democrats4464.2%12.6%
10Scrimshaw, B.Green Party4163.9%11.7%

Electorate 9,310 · EC ward code E05015919 · Back to ward index

Lye and Stourbridge North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,788

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lowe, P.Labour Party1,31815.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
2Hanif, M.Labour Party1,31415.7%47.1%+22.1 ptsElected
3Cobb, E.Labour Party1,20014.3%43.0%+18.0 ptsElected
4Borley, D.Conservative Party1,00812.1%36.2%
5Ali, M.Conservative Party89210.7%32.0%
6Mahmood, S.Conservative Party8079.6%28.9%
7Farmer, G.Liberal Democrats6257.5%22.4%
8Ahmed, N.Liberal Democrats5696.8%20.4%
9Parish, S.Liberal Democrats3344.0%12.0%
10Binnersley, M.Green Party2963.5%10.6%

Electorate 9,465 · EC ward code E05015916 · Back to ward index

Wollaston and Stourbridge Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,784

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Eccles, C.Labour Party2,40121.1%63.4%+38.4 ptsElected
2Tromans, A.Labour Party1,76915.6%46.7%+21.7 ptsElected
3Griffin, J.Labour Party1,64714.5%43.5%+18.5 ptsElected
4Barlow, N.Conservative Party1,61914.3%42.8%
5Clinton, L.Conservative Party1,35812.0%35.9%
6Dudley, M.Conservative Party1,19910.6%31.7%
7Bramall, C.Liberal Democrats4243.7%11.2%
8Foster, L.Green Party3893.4%10.3%
9Mohr, A.Green Party3873.4%10.2%
10Moore, K.FREE1601.4%4.2%

Electorate 10,144 · EC ward code E05015925 · Back to ward index

Norton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,482

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Creed, T.Conservative Party1,92218.4%55.2%+30.2 ptsElected
2Clark, S.Conservative Party1,74716.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
3Hopwood, A.Conservative Party1,52414.6%43.8%+18.8 ptsElected
4Broad, M.Labour Party1,11110.6%31.9%
5McGloskey, B.Labour Party9258.9%26.6%
6Quarrie-Jones, A.Labour Party8648.3%24.8%
7Dugmore, A.Green Party7397.1%21.2%
8Price, S.Green Party6956.7%20.0%
9Lee, O.Green Party6496.2%18.6%
10Sheppard, E.Liberal Democrats2702.6%7.8%

Electorate 9,147 · EC ward code E05015918 · Back to ward index

Brierley Hill and Wordsley South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,338

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Davies, A.Conservative Party1,16016.5%49.6%+24.6 ptsElected
2Little, W.Conservative Party1,07515.3%46.0%+21.0 ptsElected
3Cook, M.Labour Party1,04814.9%44.8%+19.8 ptsElected
4Shaw, D.Conservative Party1,02014.5%43.6%
5Martin, J.Labour Party1,01814.5%43.5%
6Inniss, M.Labour Party90512.9%38.7%
7Bennett, A.Green Party3304.7%14.1%
8Nawaz, A.Liberal Democrats1672.4%7.1%
9Carnall, K.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1552.2%6.6%
10Qadus, A.Liberal Democrats1372.0%5.9%

Electorate 10,141 · EC ward code E05015905 · Back to ward index

Wordsley North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,647

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lewis, K.Conservative Party1,66220.9%62.8%+37.8 ptsElected
2Harley, D.Conservative Party1,25715.8%47.5%+22.5 ptsElected
3Archer, K.Labour Party1,18915.0%44.9%+19.9 ptsElected
4Rogers, M.Conservative Party1,18414.9%44.7%
5Daniel, S.Labour Party1,12014.1%42.3%
6Billingham, K.Labour Party1,11314.0%42.0%
7Archer, P.Green Party2773.5%10.5%
8Bramall, J.Liberal Democrats1401.8%5.3%

Electorate 9,730 · EC ward code E05015926 · Back to ward index

St Thomas's · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,092

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ali, S.Labour Party1,76419.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
2Azad, S.Labour Party1,44115.5%46.6%+21.6 ptsElected
3Qayyum, A.Labour Party1,41015.2%45.6%+20.6 ptsElected
4Bibi, S.Independent7428.0%24.0%
5Noor-Hussain, C.Independent6797.3%22.0%
6Najeeb, M.Independent6797.3%22.0%
7Blackmore, C.Conservative Party6757.3%21.8%
8Lewis, M.Conservative Party6406.9%20.7%
9Hanif, S.Conservative Party6366.9%20.6%
10Slim, J.Liberal Democrats2212.4%7.1%
11Qari, Z.Green Party2212.4%7.1%
12Reynolds, D.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1681.8%5.4%

Electorate 10,651 · EC ward code E05015923 · Back to ward index

Kingswinford North and Wall Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,265

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Atkins, P.Conservative Party1,77518.1%54.4%+29.4 ptsElected
2Lawrence, E.Conservative Party1,62916.6%49.9%+24.9 ptsElected
3Webb, M.Conservative Party1,49715.3%45.9%+20.9 ptsElected
4Saleem, S.Independent1,38814.2%42.5%
5Gray, C.Independent9689.9%29.7%
6Jordan, K.Labour Party7998.2%24.5%
7Herbert, T.Labour Party7397.5%22.6%
8Nelson, R.Labour Party7077.2%21.7%
9Hanson, S.Liberal Democrats1731.8%5.3%
10Holmes, S.Liberal Democrats1191.2%3.6%

Electorate 9,570 · EC ward code E05015914 · Back to ward index

Amblecote · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,825

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bradley, P.Conservative Party1,75420.7%62.1%+37.1 ptsElected
2Lee, P.Conservative Party1,57018.5%55.6%+30.6 ptsElected
3Razzaq, K.Conservative Party1,30715.4%46.3%+21.3 ptsElected
4Billingham, E.Labour Party1,04012.3%36.8%
5Foster, H.Labour Party98511.6%34.9%
6Savage, M.Labour Party92410.9%32.7%
7Mabe, A.Green Party2623.1%9.3%
8Wlson, G.Independent2332.7%8.2%
9Lowe, M.Independent2192.6%7.8%
10Priest, M.Liberal Democrats1802.1%6.4%

Electorate 10,033 · EC ward code E05015903 · Back to ward index

St James's · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,370

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bayton, C.Labour Party1,41019.8%59.5%+34.5 ptsElected
2Ahmed, A.Labour Party1,18516.7%50.0%+25.0 ptsElected
3Reid, C.Labour Party1,11315.7%47.0%+22.0 ptsElected
4Bothul, S.Conservative Party99614.0%42.0%
5Ibrahim, C.Conservative Party75910.7%32.0%
6Chapman, R.Conservative Party75710.6%31.9%
7Tasker, R.Reform UK4326.1%18.2%
8Jereminovics, T.Green Party2563.6%10.8%
9Wanklin, R.Liberal Democrats2032.9%8.6%

Electorate 10,171 · EC ward code E05015922 · Back to ward index

Halesowen North · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,924

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bills, H.Labour Party1,74419.9%59.7%+34.7 ptsElected
2Sahota, P.Labour Party1,47716.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
3Henley, S.Conservative Party1,42916.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
4Betts-Patel, H.Labour Party1,28614.7%44.0%
5Taylor-Childs, L.Conservative Party91810.5%31.4%
6Small, J.Conservative Party90810.4%31.1%
7Hewlett, R.Green Party2923.3%10.0%
8Razzaq, A.Independent2793.2%9.5%
9Flavin, A.Green Party2783.2%9.5%
10Gregg, T.Liberal Democrats1601.8%5.5%

Electorate 9,673 · EC ward code E05015911 · Back to ward index

Belle Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,859

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Phipps, S.Conservative Party1,67919.6%58.7%+33.7 ptsElected
2Bevan, D.Conservative Party1,48217.3%51.8%+26.8 ptsElected
3Dobb, P.Conservative Party1,42516.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
4Murray, F.Labour Party1,28915.0%45.1%
5Russell, D.Labour Party1,24714.5%43.6%
6Eulogio, J.Labour Party1,21114.1%42.4%
7Furhuraire, S.Liberal Democrats2432.8%8.5%

Electorate 9,804 · EC ward code E05015904 · Back to ward index

Halesowen South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,121

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor, A.Conservative Party1,87620.0%60.1%+35.1 ptsElected
2Hill, J.Conservative Party1,81619.4%58.2%+33.2 ptsElected
3Russon, T.Conservative Party1,56616.7%50.2%+25.2 ptsElected
4Hilton, S.Labour Party1,22213.1%39.2%
5Plant, J.Labour Party1,05911.3%33.9%
6Jadayel, F.Labour Party1,01810.9%32.6%
7Windridge, J.Green Party5696.1%18.2%
8Furhuraire, S.Liberal Democrats2362.5%7.6%

Electorate 9,447 · EC ward code E05015912 · Back to ward index

Castle and Priory · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,975

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Casey, K.Labour Party1,12919.1%57.2%+32.2 ptsElected
2Barras, F.Conservative Party1,05617.8%53.5%+28.5 ptsElected
3Denning, K.Labour Party1,01417.1%51.3%+26.3 ptsElected
4Flurry-Haddock, D.Labour Party93015.7%47.1%
5Khan, S.Conservative Party78713.3%39.8%
6Khan, W.Conservative Party73912.5%37.4%
7Bramall, D.Liberal Democrats2714.6%13.7%

Electorate 9,604 · EC ward code E05015907 · Back to ward index

Quarry Bank and Dudley Wood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,002

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cowell, J.Labour Party1,19019.8%59.4%+34.4 ptsElected
2Hamblett, L.Labour Party1,06217.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
3Smith, A.Labour Party1,03917.3%51.9%+26.9 ptsElected
4Clinton, R.Conservative Party97516.2%48.7%
5Dunn, J.Conservative Party82513.7%41.2%
6Jones, L.Conservative Party65510.9%32.7%
7Priest, R.Liberal Democrats2614.3%13.0%

Electorate 9,768 · EC ward code E05015920 · Back to ward index

Hayley Green and Cradley South · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,799

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Goddard, A.Conservative Party1,63819.5%58.5%+33.5 ptsElected
2Bevan, I.Conservative Party1,59919.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
3Collins, B.Conservative Party1,48317.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
4Barnsley, T.Labour Party1,17113.9%41.8%
5Hanley, M.Labour Party1,14213.6%40.8%
6Barnsley, Z.Labour Party1,10913.2%39.6%
7Furhuraire, R.Liberal Democrats2553.0%9.1%

Electorate 9,096 · EC ward code E05015913 · Back to ward index

Netherton and Holly Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,007

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor, E.Labour Party1,43323.8%71.4%+46.4 ptsElected
2Mughal, Q.Labour Party1,18219.6%58.9%+33.9 ptsElected
3Mughal, S.Labour Party1,09418.2%54.5%+29.5 ptsElected
4Berrington, M.Conservative Party73312.2%36.5%
5Faraji, V.Conservative Party5008.3%24.9%
6Smith, J.Green Party4227.0%21.0%
7Tye, J.Conservative Party3936.5%19.6%
8Johns, R.Liberal Democrats2634.4%13.1%

Electorate 10,202 · EC ward code E05015917 · Back to ward index

Coseley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,848

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Drake, P.Labour Party1,27222.9%68.8%+43.8 ptsElected
2Ridney, S.Labour Party1,18121.3%63.9%+38.9 ptsElected
3Roberts, D.Labour Party1,05619.0%57.1%+32.1 ptsElected
4Fountain, J.Conservative Party58210.5%31.5%
5Phipps, D.Conservative Party5119.2%27.7%
6Oche, H.Conservative Party4968.9%26.8%
7Beech, C.Green Party2775.0%15.0%
8Bokarevs, K.Green Party1693.0%9.1%

Electorate 9,378 · EC ward code E05015908 · Back to ward index

Brockmoor and Pensnett · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,954

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Foster, J.Labour Party1,38223.6%70.7%+45.7 ptsElected
2Edwards, S.Labour Party1,31022.4%67.1%+42.1 ptsElected
3Westwood, K.Labour Party1,24621.3%63.8%+38.8 ptsElected
4Dale, A.Conservative Party61710.5%31.6%
5Barras, D.Conservative Party5739.8%29.3%
6Perry, E.Conservative Party5609.6%28.7%
7Flynn, I.Liberal Democrats1733.0%8.9%

Electorate 9,980 · EC ward code E05015906 · Back to ward index