← East Riding Of Yorkshire (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
East Riding Of Yorkshire 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 26 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 67 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 69,544 | 35.7% | 29 | 43.3% | 25 | 37.3% | +4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 57,637 | 29.6% | 22 | 32.8% | 20 | 29.9% | +2 |
| Labour Party | 41,282 | 21.2% | 4 | 6.0% | 15 | 22.4% | -11 |
| Independent | 15,907 | 8.2% | 9 | 13.4% | 5 | 7.5% | +4 |
| Yorkshire Party | 4,126 | 2.1% | 3 | 4.5% | 1 | 1.5% | +2 |
| Green Party | 3,868 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.5% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 1,259 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 398 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 276 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 182 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| FFS-FA | 98 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 194,577 | 100.0% | 67 | 100.0% | 67 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Cottingham North · 2 seats · won at 34.8% · above quota
- Bridlington Central and Old Town · 2 seats · won at 39.5% · above quota
- Bridlington South · 3 seats · won at 34.3% · above quota
- South Hunsley · 2 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Driffield and Rural · 3 seats · won at 35.1% · above quota
- Howden · 1 seat · won at 61.0% · above quota
- Wolds Weighton · 3 seats · won at 36.3% · above quota
- Pocklington Provincial · 3 seats · won at 36.5% · above quota
- South East Holderness · 3 seats · won at 38.0% · above quota
- Minster and Woodmansey · 3 seats · won at 40.2% · above quota
- Cottingham South · 2 seats · won at 48.6% · above quota
- Mid Holderness · 3 seats · won at 42.8% · above quota
- South West Holderness · 3 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- North Holderness · 2 seats · won at 52.2% · above quota
- Willerby and Kirk Ella · 3 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Goole North · 2 seats · won at 54.0% · above quota
- Hessle · 3 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Beverley Rural · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Tranby · 2 seats · won at 57.0% · above quota
- Howdenshire · 3 seats · won at 49.6% · above quota
- Snaith/Airmyn and Rawcliffe and Marshland · 2 seats · won at 58.6% · above quota
- East Wolds and Coastal · 3 seats · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Bridlington North · 3 seats · won at 51.5% · above quota
- Dale · 3 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Goole South · 2 seats · won at 61.8% · above quota
- St. Marys · 3 seats · won at 60.3% · above quota
Race results
Cottingham North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,229
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redshaw, P. | Liberal Democrats | 877 | 19.7% | 39.3% | +6.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Duke, A. | Labour Party | 776 | 17.4% | 34.8% | +1.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson, G. | Liberal Democrats | 763 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 4 | Marten, D. | Labour Party | 722 | 16.2% | 32.4% | — | |
| 5 | Bennett, G. | Conservative Party | 572 | 12.8% | 25.7% | — | |
| 6 | McConaghy, O. | Conservative Party | 516 | 11.6% | 23.1% | — | |
| 7 | Hoe, R. | Reform UK | 232 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — |
Bridlington Central and Old Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,575
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dealtry, L. | Independent | 830 | 26.3% | 52.7% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ibbotson, M. | Conservative Party | 622 | 19.7% | 39.5% | +6.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pollard, R. | Liberal Democrats | 619 | 19.7% | 39.3% | — | |
| 4 | Arthur, J. | Liberal Democrats | 501 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 5 | Sweet, D. | Labour Party | 350 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — | |
| 6 | Verda, C. | Social Democratic Party | 228 | 7.2% | 14.5% | — |
Bridlington South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,677
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, A. | Yorkshire Party | 762 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norman, T. | Yorkshire Party | 699 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Arrand, R. | Yorkshire Party | 576 | 11.4% | 34.3% | +9.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Anderson, J. | Labour Party | 550 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 5 | Authunuri, J. | Conservative Party | 481 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 6 | Thomas, K. | Conservative Party | 472 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Devanney, H. | Labour Party | 435 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 8 | Milns, T. | Independent | 261 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 9 | Walker, A. | Liberal Democrats | 209 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 10 | Haywood, I. | Liberal Democrats | 172 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 11 | Cooper, S. | Reform UK | 157 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 12 | King, E. | Liberal Democrats | 108 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 13 | Thompson, A. | FFS-FA | 98 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — | |
| 14 | Daniels, C. | Social Democratic Party | 52 | 1.0% | 3.1% | — |
South Hunsley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,938
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corless, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,449 | 24.7% | 49.3% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hopton, P. | Conservative Party | 1,274 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mills, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,172 | 19.9% | 39.9% | — | |
| 4 | Hutchinson, S. | Conservative Party | 1,045 | 17.8% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ross, D. | Green Party | 292 | 5.0% | 9.9% | — | |
| 6 | Arnold, S. | Green Party | 238 | 4.1% | 8.1% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor, D. | Labour Party | 230 | 3.9% | 7.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ward, M. | Labour Party | 175 | 3.0% | 6.0% | — |
Driffield and Rural · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,956
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blakeston, M. | Independent | 1,718 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rogers, M. | Conservative Party | 1,202 | 13.6% | 40.7% | +15.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lee, M. | Conservative Party | 1,038 | 11.7% | 35.1% | +10.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Frost, A. | Conservative Party | 949 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 5 | Phillips, W. | Labour Party | 873 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 6 | Watson, T. | Labour Party | 767 | 8.6% | 25.9% | — | |
| 7 | Phillips, R. | Labour Party | 764 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 8 | Thorley, D. | Independent | 680 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 9 | Aspden, J. | Liberal Democrats | 330 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 10 | Haeney, H. | Liberal Democrats | 324 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 11 | Hawkins, R. | Liberal Democrats | 224 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Howden · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,529
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard, D. | Independent | 933 | 61.0% | +11.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bayram, C. | Liberal Democrats | 245 | 16.0% | — | |
| 3 | Hakes, J. | Conservative Party | 227 | 14.8% | — | |
| 4 | Marten, J. | Labour Party | 124 | 8.1% | — |
Wolds Weighton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,813
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hammond, L. | Conservative Party | 2,019 | 17.7% | 53.0% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cary, D. | Conservative Party | 1,612 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | West, P. | Conservative Party | 1,385 | 12.1% | 36.3% | +11.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hemmerman, P. | Yorkshire Party | 1,033 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Cooper, B. | Labour Party | 825 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 6 | Stathers, M. | Independent | 801 | 7.0% | 21.0% | — | |
| 7 | Leek, G. | Green Party | 757 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 8 | Cooper, M. | Labour Party | 757 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 9 | Simpson, C. | Independent | 725 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 10 | Healy, G. | Liberal Democrats | 586 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 11 | Healy, C. | Liberal Democrats | 521 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 12 | Morgan, B. | Liberal Democrats | 418 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — |
Pocklington Provincial · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,525
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shephard, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,991 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cousins, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,864 | 13.7% | 41.2% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Needham, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,653 | 12.2% | 36.5% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Burton, A. | Conservative Party | 1,552 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | West, K. | Conservative Party | 1,424 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 6 | Bryon, R. | Labour Party | 1,185 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 7 | Ap-Williams, D. | Labour Party | 1,108 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 8 | Draycott, L. | Labour Party | 965 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 9 | Strangeway, A. | Independent | 710 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 10 | Leach, G. | Green Party | 658 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 11 | McClymont, P. | Green Party | 347 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 12 | Scott, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 117 | 0.9% | 2.6% | — |
South East Holderness · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,377
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Healing, L. | Conservative Party | 1,312 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holmes, C. | Conservative Party | 1,215 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McMaster, S. | Conservative Party | 903 | 12.7% | 38.0% | +13.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Blackburn, I. | Labour Party | 796 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Devanney, M. | Labour Party | 731 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 6 | Dimberline, J. | Reform UK | 631 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 7 | Hoggard, R. | Yorkshire Party | 605 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Giles, C. | Liberal Democrats | 406 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 9 | Whitaker, D. | Liberal Democrats | 283 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 10 | Luckraft, A. | Liberal Democrats | 248 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — |
Minster and Woodmansey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,985
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Astell, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,783 | 14.9% | 44.7% | +19.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Astell, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,764 | 14.8% | 44.3% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whitaker, E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,603 | 13.4% | 40.2% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Laden, R. | Labour Party | 1,137 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | Elvidge, D. | Conservative Party | 1,137 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 6 | Pinder, M. | Labour Party | 1,131 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 7 | Harold, K. | Conservative Party | 1,117 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 8 | Bulmer, H. | Conservative Party | 1,104 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 9 | Maione, T. | Labour Party | 996 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 10 | Ottaway, J. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 182 | 1.5% | 4.6% | — |
Cottingham South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,548
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cantrell, C. | Labour Party | 1,263 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Casson, K. | Labour Party | 1,239 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Medini, M. | Conservative Party | 955 | 18.7% | 37.5% | — | |
| 4 | Green, H. | Conservative Party | 948 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Stubbs, K. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 7.8% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hessen, F. | Liberal Democrats | 296 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — |
Mid Holderness · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,790
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holtby, J. | Conservative Party | 1,481 | 17.7% | 53.1% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Talbot, A. | Conservative Party | 1,222 | 14.6% | 43.8% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whyte, S. | Conservative Party | 1,194 | 14.3% | 42.8% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Grove, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,161 | 13.9% | 41.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hoskins, D. | Liberal Democrats | 965 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Williams, P. | Liberal Democrats | 958 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 7 | Tomlinson, R. | Labour Party | 757 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 8 | Welch, P. | Labour Party | 632 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — |
South West Holderness · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,528
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dennis, J. | Conservative Party | 1,263 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gallant, S. | Labour Party | 1,125 | 14.8% | 44.5% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Steel, S. | Conservative Party | 1,096 | 14.5% | 43.4% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Billany, C. | Labour Party | 1,069 | 14.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 5 | Winter, D. | Conservative Party | 1,057 | 13.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 6 | Heslop, E. | Labour Party | 1,023 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 7 | Bell, A. | Liberal Democrats | 363 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Willie, S. | Liberal Democrats | 319 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 9 | Tucker, D. | Liberal Democrats | 268 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
North Holderness · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,368
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jefferson, B. | Independent | 1,680 | 35.5% | 70.9% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whittle, J. | Independent | 1,235 | 26.1% | 52.2% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Greensmith, J. | Conservative Party | 818 | 17.3% | 34.5% | — | |
| 4 | Stockdale, B. | Labour Party | 274 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 5 | Coombes, T. | Green Party | 240 | 5.1% | 10.1% | — | |
| 6 | Thornton, N. | Labour Party | 219 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, C. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — | |
| 8 | Rebecchi, J. | Liberal Democrats | 70 | 1.5% | 3.0% | — |
Willerby and Kirk Ella · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,974
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McMaster, G. | Conservative Party | 1,606 | 18.0% | 54.0% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Saribal, Z. | Conservative Party | 1,432 | 16.1% | 48.2% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tucker, D. | Conservative Party | 1,346 | 15.1% | 45.3% | +20.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Coates, R. | Labour Party | 823 | 9.2% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Ellis, P. | Liberal Democrats | 775 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 6 | Redpath, J. | Labour Party | 761 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 7 | Stather, M. | Labour Party | 732 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 8 | McCobb, T. | Liberal Democrats | 724 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 9 | McCobb, L. | Liberal Democrats | 722 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — |
Goole North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,494
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Handley, A. | Conservative Party | 830 | 27.8% | 55.6% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coultish, N. | Conservative Party | 807 | 27.0% | 54.0% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Frost, J. | Labour Party | 426 | 14.3% | 28.5% | — | |
| 4 | Ball, I. | Labour Party | 387 | 13.0% | 25.9% | — | |
| 5 | Kilcoyne, R. | Liberal Democrats | 208 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — | |
| 6 | Moiser, L. | Liberal Democrats | 168 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 7 | Fisher, T. | Independent | 161 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
Hessle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,981
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nolan, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,414 | 15.8% | 47.4% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pickering, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,376 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bovill, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,373 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Toogood, P. | Labour Party | 1,207 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Waters, S. | Labour Party | 1,196 | 13.4% | 40.1% | — | |
| 6 | Worrell, J. | Labour Party | 1,156 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 7 | MacKay, C. | Conservative Party | 462 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 8 | Bond, D. | Conservative Party | 396 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 9 | Whitehead, M. | Conservative Party | 364 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |
Beverley Rural · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,756
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stewart, D. | Liberal Democrats | 2,131 | 18.9% | 56.7% | +31.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,870 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilcock, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,786 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Horton, M. | Conservative Party | 1,494 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 5 | Warren, R. | Conservative Party | 1,412 | 12.5% | 37.6% | — | |
| 6 | Royal, R. | Conservative Party | 1,314 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 7 | Cross, W. | Labour Party | 464 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Wildey, C. | Labour Party | 400 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 9 | Fawcett, J. | Labour Party | 397 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
Tranby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,955
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padden, V. | Liberal Democrats | 1,207 | 30.9% | 61.8% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sutton, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,115 | 28.5% | 57.0% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bell, C. | Labour Party | 496 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — | |
| 4 | Khan, W. | Conservative Party | 467 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Green, B. | Labour Party | 423 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 6 | Robinson, J. | Green Party | 201 | 5.1% | 10.3% | — |
Howdenshire · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,899
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aitken, V. | Conservative Party | 1,856 | 21.3% | 64.0% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bayram, L. | Conservative Party | 1,593 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilkinson, N. | Conservative Party | 1,438 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clarke, S. | Labour Party | 913 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Booth, N. | Labour Party | 833 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — | |
| 6 | Singleton, B. | Labour Party | 687 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 7 | Nolan, M. | Liberal Democrats | 488 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Dolman, E. | Liberal Democrats | 469 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | Weighill, R. | Liberal Democrats | 421 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — |
Snaith/Airmyn and Rawcliffe and Marshland · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,843
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fox, C. | Conservative Party | 1,185 | 32.1% | 64.3% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sargeantson, L. | Conservative Party | 1,080 | 29.3% | 58.6% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gilbert, A. | Labour Party | 527 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 4 | Wade, S. | Independent | 425 | 11.5% | 23.1% | — | |
| 5 | Hiles, A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 159 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 6 | Codling, T. | Liberal Democrats | 158 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 7 | Chaplin, S. | Liberal Democrats | 152 | 4.1% | 8.2% | — |
East Wolds and Coastal · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,254
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dewhirst, C. | Conservative Party | 1,941 | 19.9% | 59.7% | +34.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Owen, J. | Conservative Party | 1,802 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howard, D. | Conservative Party | 1,653 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dickinson, J. | Labour Party | 862 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Meadows, B. | Labour Party | 769 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 6 | Jackson, M. | Green Party | 650 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | Scullion, J. | Green Party | 485 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 8 | Garforth, P. | Yorkshire Party | 451 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 9 | Butt, D. | Liberal Democrats | 407 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 10 | Ripton, E. | Liberal Democrats | 402 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 11 | Hoskins, D. | Liberal Democrats | 339 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — |
Bridlington North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,323
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phoenix, J. | Liberal Democrats | 2,055 | 20.6% | 61.8% | +36.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Heslop-Mullens, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,994 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robson, T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,710 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Copsey, J. | Conservative Party | 1,130 | 11.3% | 34.0% | — | |
| 5 | Bibb, J. | Conservative Party | 1,089 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 6 | Taylor, B. | Conservative Party | 990 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 7 | Williams, C. | Labour Party | 394 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 8 | Milns, M. | Independent | 250 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — | |
| 9 | Cawkwell, T. | Reform UK | 239 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 10 | Verda, J. | Social Democratic Party | 118 | 1.2% | 3.6% | — |
Dale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,003
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gill, T. | Independent | 2,179 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Meredith, R. | Conservative Party | 2,153 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gill, C. | Independent | 2,065 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith, P. | Conservative Party | 1,680 | 14.0% | 42.0% | — | |
| 5 | Loizides, M. | Conservative Party | 1,157 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 6 | Cantrell, P. | Labour Party | 767 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 7 | Haywood, S. | Labour Party | 752 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 8 | Wordingham, A. | Labour Party | 663 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 9 | Tirkoti, M. | Liberal Democrats | 592 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — |
Goole South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,004
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffreys, B. | Independent | 634 | 31.6% | 63.1% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jeffreys, D. | Independent | 620 | 30.9% | 61.8% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Armitage, J. | Labour Party | 362 | 18.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 4 | Huntington, J. | Labour Party | 309 | 15.4% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Nolan, A. | Liberal Democrats | 47 | 2.3% | 4.7% | — | |
| 6 | Nolan, T. | Liberal Democrats | 36 | 1.8% | 3.6% | — |
St. Marys · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,541
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, L. | Liberal Democrats | 2,832 | 20.8% | 62.4% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Healy, D. | Liberal Democrats | 2,819 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boynton, D. | Liberal Democrats | 2,739 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Aird, E. | Conservative Party | 1,309 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 5 | Needham, B. | Conservative Party | 1,184 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 6 | Stevens, P. | Conservative Party | 1,162 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 7 | Whitfield, J. | Labour Party | 803 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 8 | Willis, A. | Labour Party | 775 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — |