← Erewash (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Erewash 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 47 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 30,452 | 43.6% | 28 | 59.6% | 21 | 44.7% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 28,459 | 40.7% | 16 | 34.0% | 20 | 42.6% | -4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 4,776 | 6.8% | 1 | 2.1% | 3 | 6.4% | -2 |
| Independent | 4,001 | 5.7% | 1 | 2.1% | 2 | 4.3% | -1 |
| Green Party | 2,209 | 3.2% | 1 | 2.1% | 1 | 2.1% | 0 |
| Total | 69,897 | 100.0% | 47 | 100.0% | 47 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Ockbrook and Borrowash · 3 seats · won at 34.6% · above quota
- Breaston · 2 seats · won at 44.7% · above quota
- Wilsthorpe · 3 seats · won at 38.9% · above quota
- Little Eaton and Stanley · 2 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- West Hallam and Dale Abbey · 3 seats · won at 40.1% · above quota
- Little Hallam · 2 seats · won at 48.8% · above quota
- Draycott and Risley · 2 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Nottingham Road · 2 seats · won at 52.5% · above quota
- Sandiacre · 3 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Sawley · 3 seats · won at 44.3% · above quota
- Shipley View · 2 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Derby Road West · 3 seats · won at 48.6% · above quota
- Cotmanhay · 2 seats · won at 58.0% · above quota
- Hallam Fields · 2 seats · won at 60.8% · above quota
- Derby Road East · 2 seats · won at 62.0% · above quota
- Awsworth Road · 2 seats · won at 66.3% · above quota
- Long Eaton Central · 3 seats · won at 60.3% · above quota
- Kirk Hallam and Stanton-by-Dale · 3 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Larklands · 3 seats · won at 62.4% · above quota
Race results
Ockbrook and Borrowash · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,182
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Locke, R. | Conservative Party | 767 | 11.7% | 35.2% | +10.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White, J. | Conservative Party | 756 | 11.5% | 34.6% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Maskalick, G. | Independent | 756 | 11.5% | 34.6% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | White, M. | Conservative Party | 718 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 5 | Markwell, G. | Independent | 578 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 6 | Stevenson, T. | Independent | 572 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 7 | Barnes, N. | Labour Party | 482 | 7.4% | 22.1% | — | |
| 8 | Knight, B. | Labour Party | 478 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 9 | Pasley, R. | Labour Party | 426 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 10 | Warren, S. | Independent | 341 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 11 | Holbrook, T. | Independent | 341 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 12 | Wallis, M. | Independent | 331 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — |
Breaston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,624
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miller, K. | Conservative Party | 740 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mills, A. | Green Party | 725 | 22.3% | 44.7% | +11.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Parkinson, R. | Conservative Party | 669 | 20.6% | 41.2% | — | |
| 4 | Poland, J. | Green Party | 656 | 20.2% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Beardmore, V. | Labour Party | 239 | 7.4% | 14.7% | — | |
| 6 | Carless, N. | Labour Party | 218 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — |
Wilsthorpe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,970
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Athwal, K. | Conservative Party | 869 | 14.7% | 44.1% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Corbett, C. | Conservative Party | 833 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hall-Evans, B. | Conservative Party | 767 | 13.0% | 38.9% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jackson, R. | Labour Party | 673 | 11.4% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Barrett, R. | Labour Party | 661 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 6 | Archer, J. | Liberal Democrats | 651 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 7 | Tamber-Wolf, A. | Labour Party | 573 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 8 | Dawson, M. | Liberal Democrats | 447 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 9 | Smith, J. | Liberal Democrats | 437 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — |
Little Eaton and Stanley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,256
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revill, S. | Conservative Party | 605 | 24.1% | 48.2% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Eddy, B. | Conservative Party | 600 | 23.9% | 47.8% | +14.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scott, H. | Labour Party | 547 | 21.8% | 43.6% | — | |
| 4 | Scott, D. | Labour Party | 466 | 18.6% | 37.1% | — | |
| 5 | Carr, M. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — |
West Hallam and Dale Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,913
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mee, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,030 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hart, C. | Conservative Party | 1,000 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Flatley, R. | Conservative Party | 768 | 13.4% | 40.1% | +15.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cox, D. | Conservative Party | 726 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 5 | Richards, A. | Liberal Democrats | 705 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 6 | Togni, A. | Liberal Democrats | 696 | 12.1% | 36.4% | — | |
| 7 | Beale, T. | Labour Party | 286 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 8 | Niblett, S. | Labour Party | 277 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Carr-Williamson, G. | Labour Party | 252 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — |
Little Hallam · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,165
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broadhurst, H. | Labour Party | 624 | 26.8% | 53.6% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Snaith, D. | Labour Party | 569 | 24.4% | 48.8% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hopkinson, M. | Conservative Party | 516 | 22.1% | 44.3% | — | |
| 4 | Beardsley, S. | Conservative Party | 505 | 21.7% | 43.3% | — | |
| 5 | Mee, J. | Liberal Democrats | 116 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Draycott and Risley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,088
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clare, V. | Conservative Party | 565 | 26.0% | 52.0% | +18.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Scott, T. | Conservative Party | 534 | 24.6% | 49.1% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Boud, R. | Labour Party | 390 | 17.9% | 35.9% | — | |
| 4 | Ward, J. | Labour Party | 379 | 17.4% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Draycott, D. | Green Party | 178 | 8.2% | 16.4% | — | |
| 6 | Tavener, G. | Green Party | 129 | 5.9% | 11.9% | — |
Nottingham Road · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,146
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plummer, E. | Labour Party | 649 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thomas, G. | Labour Party | 602 | 26.3% | 52.5% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lewis, B. | Conservative Party | 461 | 20.1% | 40.2% | — | |
| 4 | Swinscoe, A. | Conservative Party | 409 | 17.8% | 35.7% | — | |
| 5 | Dewis, M. | Independent | 171 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — |
Sandiacre · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,826
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bilbie, S. | Conservative Party | 927 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Major, W. | Conservative Party | 919 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sanghera, T. | Conservative Party | 808 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Peck, A. | Labour Party | 800 | 14.6% | 43.8% | — | |
| 5 | Pollard, R. | Labour Party | 762 | 13.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 6 | Wilds, G. | Labour Party | 742 | 13.5% | 40.6% | — | |
| 7 | Pitts, S. | Green Party | 271 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 8 | Pitts, K. | Green Party | 250 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — |
Sawley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,772
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doyle, D. | Labour Party | 857 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Maginnis, P. | Conservative Party | 798 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Atkinson, H. | Labour Party | 784 | 14.8% | 44.3% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Sewell, J. | Conservative Party | 778 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 5 | Simmons, D. | Conservative Party | 747 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 6 | Peat, R. | Labour Party | 726 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 7 | Chewings, D. | Independent | 625 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — |
Shipley View · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,327
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer, C. | Labour Party | 741 | 27.9% | 55.9% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roberts, N. | Labour Party | 725 | 27.3% | 54.7% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Custance, V. | Conservative Party | 614 | 23.1% | 46.3% | — | |
| 4 | Crick, C. | Conservative Party | 573 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — |
Derby Road West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,008
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poole, C. | Labour Party | 1,039 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Newton, L. | Labour Party | 1,016 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pace, M. | Labour Party | 976 | 16.2% | 48.6% | +23.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pitt, D. | Conservative Party | 881 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hickton, G. | Conservative Party | 864 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hickton, G. | Conservative Party | 848 | 14.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 7 | Oseman, J. | Liberal Democrats | 400 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — |
Cotmanhay · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 803
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burns, L. | Labour Party | 469 | 29.2% | 58.4% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Breene, A. | Labour Party | 466 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fowkes, C. | Conservative Party | 343 | 21.4% | 42.7% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Conservative Party | 328 | 20.4% | 40.8% | — |
Hallam Fields · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,075
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fennelly, K. | Labour Party | 689 | 32.0% | 64.1% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alfrey, M. | Labour Party | 654 | 30.4% | 60.8% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wright, J. | Conservative Party | 407 | 18.9% | 37.9% | — | |
| 4 | Tribbensee, K. | Conservative Party | 400 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — |
Derby Road East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,023
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffiths, M. | Labour Party | 650 | 31.8% | 63.6% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffiths, H. | Labour Party | 634 | 31.0% | 62.0% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thwaites, K. | Independent | 286 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 4 | Page, C. | Conservative Party | 264 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 5 | Hickton, T. | Conservative Party | 211 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — |
Awsworth Road · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 738
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dawson, J. | Labour Party | 551 | 37.3% | 74.7% | +41.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hare, J. | Labour Party | 489 | 33.1% | 66.3% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pound, R. | Conservative Party | 222 | 15.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Wrigglesworth, H. | Conservative Party | 214 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — |
Long Eaton Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,623
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Everett, B. | Labour Party | 1,051 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bryan, J. | Labour Party | 1,037 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howard, C. | Labour Party | 979 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Burton, S. | Conservative Party | 631 | 13.0% | 38.9% | — | |
| 5 | Makin, K. | Conservative Party | 602 | 12.4% | 37.1% | — | |
| 6 | Coulson, P. | Conservative Party | 569 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — |
Kirk Hallam and Stanton-by-Dale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,125
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moore, E. | Labour Party | 755 | 22.4% | 67.1% | +42.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Green, S. | Labour Party | 747 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stratford, G. | Labour Party | 694 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Prince, A. | Conservative Party | 414 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Beeching, R. | Conservative Party | 389 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Gibson, A. | Conservative Party | 376 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — |
Larklands · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,384
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lambert, A. | Labour Party | 897 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Phillips, P. | Labour Party | 867 | 20.9% | 62.6% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Phillips, F. | Labour Party | 864 | 20.8% | 62.4% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wright, H. | Conservative Party | 523 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 5 | Greene, J. | Conservative Party | 510 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 6 | Clarke, M. | Conservative Party | 491 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — |