← Fareham (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Fareham 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 32 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 26,487 | 45.9% | 22 | 68.8% | 16 | 50.0% | +6 |
| Liberal Democrats | 16,202 | 28.1% | 8 | 25.0% | 9 | 28.1% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 8,782 | 15.2% | 1 | 3.1% | 5 | 15.6% | -4 |
| Independent | 3,078 | 5.3% | 1 | 3.1% | 1 | 3.1% | 0 |
| Green Party | 2,261 | 3.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.1% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 925 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 57,735 | 100.0% | 32 | 100.0% | 32 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Fort Fareham · 2 seats · won at 36.6% · above quota
- Uplands and Funtley · 2 seats · won at 42.6% · above quota
- Fareham Park · 2 seats · won at 42.7% · above quota
- Stubbington · 2 seats · won at 45.7% · above quota
- Wallington and Downend · 2 seats · won at 46.7% · above quota
- Portchester Castle · 2 seats · won at 48.8% · above quota
- Park Gate · 2 seats · won at 49.8% · above quota
- Locks Heath · 2 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Portchester Wicor · 2 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Fareham Town · 2 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Sarisbury and Whiteley · 2 seats · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Hill Head · 2 seats · won at 51.3% · above quota
- Titchfield · 2 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Avenue · 2 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Titchfield Common · 2 seats · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Hook-with-Warsash · 2 seats · won at 62.0% · above quota
Race results
Fort Fareham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,742
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furnivall, G. | Labour Party | 751 | 21.6% | 43.1% | +9.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ingram, S. | Conservative Party | 637 | 18.3% | 36.6% | +3.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fellows, J. | Labour Party | 632 | 18.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 4 | North, F. | Conservative Party | 601 | 17.3% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Lyle, N. | Green Party | 230 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 6 | Gregory, N. | Independent | 214 | 6.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 7 | Tilley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 213 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hughes, S. | Independent | 205 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
Uplands and Funtley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,453
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bryant, P. | Conservative Party | 657 | 22.6% | 45.2% | +11.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clubley, L. | Conservative Party | 619 | 21.3% | 42.6% | +9.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wigmore, J. | Liberal Democrats | 584 | 20.1% | 40.2% | — | |
| 4 | Croft-Phillips, H. | Liberal Democrats | 540 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — | |
| 5 | Kettle, T. | Labour Party | 192 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 6 | Harrison, D. | Green Party | 159 | 5.5% | 10.9% | — | |
| 7 | Harrison, D. | Green Party | 154 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — |
Fareham Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,566
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birkett, F. | Conservative Party | 689 | 22.0% | 44.0% | +10.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Birkett, L. | Conservative Party | 669 | 21.4% | 42.7% | +9.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, C. | Labour Party | 474 | 15.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 4 | Mooney, A. | Labour Party | 461 | 14.7% | 29.4% | — | |
| 5 | Stubbs, K. | Liberal Democrats | 440 | 14.1% | 28.1% | — | |
| 6 | Foster, B. | Liberal Democrats | 398 | 12.7% | 25.4% | — |
Stubbington · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,881
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayre, P. | Conservative Party | 1,140 | 30.3% | 60.6% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Needham, J. | Conservative Party | 860 | 22.9% | 45.7% | +12.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brims, A. | Liberal Democrats | 462 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 4 | Adamson, J. | Labour Party | 424 | 11.3% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gray, I. | Labour Party | 379 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 6 | Roberts, J. | Reform UK | 270 | 7.2% | 14.4% | — | |
| 7 | Barton, K. | Reform UK | 226 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — |
Wallington and Downend · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,011
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hamilton, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,024 | 25.5% | 50.9% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | West, A. | Liberal Democrats | 939 | 23.3% | 46.7% | +13.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davis, H. | Conservative Party | 815 | 20.3% | 40.5% | — | |
| 4 | Martins, M. | Conservative Party | 772 | 19.2% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Ricketts, L. | Labour Party | 208 | 5.2% | 10.3% | — | |
| 6 | Rowlatt, D. | Green Party | 136 | 3.4% | 6.8% | — | |
| 7 | Brown, L. | Green Party | 128 | 3.2% | 6.4% | — |
Portchester Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,065
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bainbridge, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,117 | 27.0% | 54.1% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wiltshire, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,007 | 24.4% | 48.8% | +15.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walker, S. | Conservative Party | 694 | 16.8% | 33.6% | — | |
| 4 | Walker, N. | Conservative Party | 684 | 16.6% | 33.1% | — | |
| 5 | Almond, T. | Labour Party | 320 | 7.7% | 15.5% | — | |
| 6 | Ryan, R. | Labour Party | 308 | 7.5% | 14.9% | — |
Park Gate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,902
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bastable, I. | Conservative Party | 957 | 25.2% | 50.3% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Martin, S. | Conservative Party | 948 | 24.9% | 49.8% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Everdell, G. | Liberal Democrats | 921 | 24.2% | 48.4% | — | |
| 4 | Sathyanath, G. | Liberal Democrats | 635 | 16.7% | 33.4% | — | |
| 5 | Meldrum, V. | Labour Party | 343 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — |
Locks Heath · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,940
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayford, S. | Conservative Party | 1,150 | 29.6% | 59.3% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Daniells, M. | Conservative Party | 981 | 25.3% | 50.6% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardie, S. | Liberal Democrats | 587 | 15.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 4 | Reed, A. | Labour Party | 442 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 5 | Leonard, D. | Liberal Democrats | 419 | 10.8% | 21.6% | — | |
| 6 | Burdfield, A. | Green Party | 301 | 7.8% | 15.5% | — |
Portchester Wicor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,650
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nother, P. | Liberal Democrats | 926 | 28.1% | 56.1% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whittle, P. | Liberal Democrats | 835 | 25.3% | 50.6% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davies, T. | Conservative Party | 553 | 16.8% | 33.5% | — | |
| 4 | Turner, C. | Conservative Party | 548 | 16.6% | 33.2% | — | |
| 5 | Martin, D. | Labour Party | 251 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — | |
| 6 | Maluf, A. | Labour Party | 187 | 5.7% | 11.3% | — |
Fareham Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,499
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whittle, L. | Liberal Democrats | 810 | 27.0% | 54.1% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wiltshire, K. | Liberal Democrats | 763 | 25.5% | 50.9% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Herbert, M. | Conservative Party | 384 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | Bird, J. | Conservative Party | 367 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Eales, A. | Labour Party | 278 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 6 | Wood, L. | Labour Party | 229 | 7.6% | 15.3% | — | |
| 7 | Vivian, J. | Green Party | 166 | 5.5% | 11.1% | — |
Sarisbury and Whiteley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,030
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burton, J. | Conservative Party | 1,178 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Foot, D. | Conservative Party | 1,036 | 25.5% | 51.0% | +17.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hughes, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,002 | 24.7% | 49.4% | — | |
| 4 | Targ, M. | Liberal Democrats | 843 | 20.8% | 41.5% | — |
Hill Head · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,193
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mandry, K. | Conservative Party | 1,167 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dugan, S. | Conservative Party | 1,124 | 25.6% | 51.3% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murray, L. | Labour Party | 743 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 4 | Rodgers, D. | Labour Party | 569 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Zambo, M. | Liberal Democrats | 353 | 8.1% | 16.1% | — | |
| 6 | Drabble, G. | Reform UK | 227 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 7 | Drabble, O. | Reform UK | 202 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — |
Titchfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,606
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hockley, C. | Conservative Party | 878 | 27.3% | 54.7% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harper, T. | Conservative Party | 828 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Prior, M. | Labour Party | 442 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — | |
| 4 | Milburn, C. | Independent | 425 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Longley, R. | Green Party | 336 | 10.5% | 20.9% | — | |
| 6 | Fraser, K. | Independent | 302 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
Avenue · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,990
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ellis, T. | Conservative Party | 1,310 | 32.9% | 65.8% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bird, R. | Conservative Party | 1,114 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webb, J. | Labour Party | 451 | 11.3% | 22.7% | — | |
| 4 | Davies, P. | Liberal Democrats | 418 | 10.5% | 21.0% | — | |
| 5 | Flewitt, S. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 9.9% | 19.8% | — | |
| 6 | Marie, B. | Green Party | 292 | 7.3% | 14.7% | — |
Titchfield Common · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,606
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Englefield, J. | Independent | 1,255 | 39.1% | 78.1% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murphy, A. | Conservative Party | 904 | 28.1% | 56.3% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pankhurst, S. | Independent | 677 | 21.1% | 42.2% | — | |
| 4 | Carr, J. | Labour Party | 376 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — |
Hook-with-Warsash · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,738
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ford, M. | Conservative Party | 1,146 | 33.0% | 66.0% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burgess, F. | Conservative Party | 1,077 | 31.0% | 62.0% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sacker, J. | Liberal Democrats | 400 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 4 | Ferraro, A. | Labour Party | 322 | 9.3% | 18.5% | — | |
| 5 | Hall, L. | Green Party | 277 | 8.0% | 15.9% | — | |
| 6 | Wong, D. | Liberal Democrats | 171 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 7 | Newman, T. | Green Party | 82 | 2.4% | 4.7% | — |