← Fylde (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Fylde 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 17 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 37 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 19,441 | 44.6% | 19 | 51.4% | 17 | 45.9% | +2 |
| Independent | 13,281 | 30.5% | 14 | 37.8% | 12 | 32.4% | +2 |
| Labour Party | 6,202 | 14.2% | 2 | 5.4% | 5 | 13.5% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 3,372 | 7.7% | 2 | 5.4% | 3 | 8.1% | -1 |
| Green Party | 898 | 2.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 225 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 157 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 43,576 | 100.0% | 37 | 100.0% | 37 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Medlar-with-Wesham · 2 seats · won at 35.9% · above quota
- Rural East Fylde · 2 seats · won at 43.4% · above quota
- Staining · 1 seat · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Warton · 2 seats · won at 47.9% · above quota
- Ansdell and Fairhaven · 2 seats · won at 49.9% · above quota
- Ashton · 3 seats · won at 41.7% · above quota
- Lytham East · 2 seats · won at 50.4% · above quota
- Lytham West · 2 seats · won at 51.3% · above quota
- Park · 2 seats · won at 51.9% · above quota
- Freckleton Village · 2 seats · won at 52.4% · above quota
- Carnegie · 2 seats · won at 52.9% · above quota
- Rural North Fylde · 2 seats · won at 53.4% · above quota
- Kilgrimol · 2 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Wrea Green with Westby · 2 seats · won at 58.7% · above quota
- Heyhouses · 3 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Kilnhouse · 3 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Kirkham · 3 seats · won at 55.7% · above quota
Race results
Medlar-with-Wesham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 755
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bickerstaffe, E. | Independent | 377 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ledger, J. | Labour Party | 271 | 18.0% | 35.9% | +2.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Goodlad, D. | Independent | 241 | 16.0% | 31.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, K. | Conservative Party | 219 | 14.5% | 29.0% | — | |
| 5 | Preston, D. | Conservative Party | 213 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 6 | Devany, M. | Independent | 188 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — |
Rural East Fylde · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,139
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins, P. | Independent | 680 | 29.9% | 59.7% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Evans, M. | Conservative Party | 494 | 21.7% | 43.4% | +10.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Morgan, P. | Liberal Democrats | 459 | 20.1% | 40.3% | — | |
| 4 | Salisbury, W. | Conservative Party | 413 | 18.1% | 36.3% | — | |
| 5 | Shaw, L. | Labour Party | 232 | 10.2% | 20.4% | — |
Staining · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 63.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 564
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nixon, J. | Conservative Party | 360 | 63.8% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | French, S. | Labour Party | 204 | 36.2% | — |
Warton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 817
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brickles, J. | Independent | 518 | 31.7% | 63.4% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pitman, S. | Conservative Party | 391 | 23.9% | 47.9% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rigby, R. | Conservative Party | 370 | 22.6% | 45.3% | — | |
| 4 | Glaysher, P. | Labour Party | 355 | 21.7% | 43.5% | — |
Ansdell and Fairhaven · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,352
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dixon, C. | Conservative Party | 699 | 25.9% | 51.7% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redcliffe, R. | Conservative Party | 675 | 25.0% | 49.9% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shaw, J. | Independent | 424 | 15.7% | 31.4% | — | |
| 4 | Gradwell, C. | Labour Party | 375 | 13.9% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Fielding, P. | Green Party | 324 | 12.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hirst, D. | Independent | 206 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — |
Ashton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,194
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodman, G. | Independent | 538 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, W. | Labour Party | 513 | 14.3% | 43.0% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nash, E. | Independent | 498 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harrison, K. | Conservative Party | 496 | 13.8% | 41.5% | — | |
| 5 | Harrison, B. | Liberal Democrats | 495 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 6 | Harris, W. | Conservative Party | 473 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 7 | Hembury, C. | Conservative Party | 413 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 8 | Challinor, D. | Reform UK | 157 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — |
Lytham East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,268
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bamforth, M. | Independent | 996 | 39.3% | 78.6% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farrington, K. | Independent | 639 | 25.2% | 50.4% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Watson, E. | Conservative Party | 336 | 13.3% | 26.5% | — | |
| 4 | Hart, T. | Conservative Party | 316 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — | |
| 5 | Sherwood, M. | Labour Party | 248 | 9.8% | 19.6% | — |
Lytham West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,399
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthony, P. | Conservative Party | 828 | 29.6% | 59.2% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redfearn, A. | Conservative Party | 718 | 25.7% | 51.3% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blackshaw, B. | Independent | 506 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 4 | O'Brien, P. | Independent | 266 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 5 | Oliver, G. | Labour Party | 245 | 8.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 6 | Black, R. | Green Party | 235 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — |
Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,385
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Withers, M. | Conservative Party | 745 | 26.9% | 53.8% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Morris, M. | Conservative Party | 719 | 26.0% | 51.9% | +18.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gill, B. | Independent | 646 | 23.3% | 46.7% | — | |
| 4 | Wood, T. | Independent | 359 | 13.0% | 25.9% | — | |
| 5 | Stephenson, P. | Labour Party | 300 | 10.8% | 21.7% | — |
Freckleton Village · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,135
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griffiths, N. | Independent | 701 | 30.9% | 61.8% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Threlfall, T. | Conservative Party | 594 | 26.2% | 52.4% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fiddler, T. | Conservative Party | 531 | 23.4% | 46.8% | — | |
| 4 | Thompson, J. | Labour Party | 443 | 19.5% | 39.0% | — |
Carnegie · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,228
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Little, C. | Conservative Party | 712 | 29.0% | 58.0% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fazackerley, S. | Conservative Party | 649 | 26.4% | 52.9% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Derizzio, A. | Labour Party | 369 | 15.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Marshall, C. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 12.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 5 | Webb, C. | Independent | 218 | 8.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 6 | Robertson, D. | Independent | 190 | 7.7% | 15.5% | — | |
| 7 | Mugridge, J. | Independent | 23 | 0.9% | 1.9% | — |
Rural North Fylde · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 950
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hayhurst, P. | Independent | 682 | 35.9% | 71.8% | +38.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lee, M. | Independent | 507 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Butler, S. | Conservative Party | 329 | 17.3% | 34.6% | — | |
| 4 | Elger, K. | Labour Party | 192 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, D. | Conservative Party | 189 | 10.0% | 19.9% | — |
Kilgrimol · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 904
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armit, T. | Independent | 573 | 31.7% | 63.4% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harrison, G. | Conservative Party | 525 | 29.0% | 58.1% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mcmillan, B. | Conservative Party | 377 | 20.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 4 | Marshall, O. | Labour Party | 333 | 18.4% | 36.8% | — |
Wrea Green with Westby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,038
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrews, F. | Conservative Party | 655 | 31.6% | 63.1% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kirkham, J. | Conservative Party | 609 | 29.3% | 58.7% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Walsh, J. | Green Party | 339 | 16.3% | 32.7% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 278 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 5 | Brickles, M. | Independent | 195 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
Heyhouses · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,309
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willder, V. | Conservative Party | 752 | 19.2% | 57.5% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gaunt, E. | Conservative Party | 664 | 16.9% | 50.7% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Settle, V. | Conservative Party | 662 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Phillips, S. | Liberal Democrats | 565 | 14.4% | 43.2% | — | |
| 5 | Miller, V. | Labour Party | 532 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Goodwin, L. | Labour Party | 469 | 11.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 7 | Flowers, J. | Independent | 282 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — |
Kilnhouse · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,458
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henshaw, K. | Liberal Democrats | 817 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Buckley, K. | Conservative Party | 801 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Garner, J. | Liberal Democrats | 742 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Small, R. | Conservative Party | 739 | 16.9% | 50.7% | — | |
| 5 | O'Rourke, D. | Conservative Party | 593 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Timms, J. | Labour Party | 456 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 7 | Morrison, C. | Alliance for Democracy and Freedom | 225 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — |
Kirkham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,466
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins, E. | Independent | 1,006 | 22.9% | 68.6% | +43.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Buckley, D. | Independent | 1,005 | 22.9% | 68.6% | +43.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hodgson, P. | Independent | 817 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wellings, A. | Conservative Party | 507 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Sullivan, J. | Labour Party | 387 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 6 | Jones, S. | Conservative Party | 373 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Ashraf, M. | Conservative Party | 302 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — |