← Gloucester (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort

Gloucester 2021

Local elections held 6 May 2021.

18 ward races
39 seats
2 elected below the proportional quota
5.1% of seats below quota
6 unfairly awarded seats
15.4% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party31,55147.3%2666.7%2051.3%+6
Liberal Democrats18,50527.7%1025.6%1128.2%-1
Labour Party11,83917.7%37.7%717.9%-4
Independent2,9104.4%00.0%12.6%-1
Green Party1,5152.3%00.0%00.0%0
LIBER2040.3%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1570.2%00.0%00.0%0
Social Democratic Party320.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total66,713100.0%39100.0%39100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2021)
Previous (2020)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Coney Hill · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 38.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 705

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Durdey J.A.Conservative Party26938.2%−11.8 ptsElected
2Maynard S.L.Labour Party20729.4%
3Shervey L.S.Liberal Democrats15221.6%
4McCormick R.T.Independent507.1%
5Shearing A.D.Green Party273.8%

Electorate 2,479 · EC ward code E05010954 · Back to ward index

Podsmead · single-seat

Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 39.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −10.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 921

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Field S.R.Liberal Democrats36539.6%−10.4 ptsElected
2Davis B.C.Conservative Party33536.4%
3Jevins L.Labour Party16217.6%
4Byfield M.Green Party353.8%
5Nash P.A.W.Independent242.6%

Electorate 2,293 · EC ward code E05010963 · Back to ward index

Barnwood · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,939

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brown J.M.Liberal Democrats92823.9%47.9%+14.5 ptsElected
2Bowkett A.J.Liberal Democrats82121.2%42.3%+9.0 ptsElected
3Ramsey F.Conservative Party78220.2%40.3%
4Walker L.A.Conservative Party65416.9%33.7%
5Howard T.D.Labour Party2556.6%13.2%
6Griffiths F.J.Green Party1744.5%9.0%
7Barnes P.R.Independent1443.7%7.4%
8Woods J.Independent1203.1%6.2%

Electorate 4,997 · EC ward code E05010952 · Back to ward index

Quedgeley Severn Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,463

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hudson J.O.Conservative Party74225.4%50.7%+17.4 ptsElected
2Lewis A.S.Conservative Party65822.5%45.0%+11.7 ptsElected
3Harries L.J.Liberal Democrats63021.5%43.1%
4Bebbington D.Liberal Democrats54518.6%37.3%
5Mozol A.Independent35012.0%23.9%

Electorate 4,654 · EC ward code E05010965 · Back to ward index

Tuffley · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,441

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Organ C.Conservative Party76026.4%52.7%+19.4 ptsElected
2Dee P.L.Conservative Party67823.5%47.1%+13.7 ptsElected
3Millard T.S.Labour Party53418.5%37.1%
4Jones J.Labour Party49917.3%34.6%
5Rogers J.S.Independent1906.6%13.2%
6Clacher S.Independent1354.7%9.4%
7Taylor J.L.Liberal Democrats863.0%6.0%

Electorate 4,369 · EC ward code E05010966 · Back to ward index

Elmbridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,642

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Radley A.M.C.Liberal Democrats81524.8%49.6%+16.3 ptsElected
2Hyman H.Liberal Democrats77723.7%47.3%+14.0 ptsElected
3Bucknell D.I.Conservative Party59818.2%36.4%
4Locke S.D.Conservative Party53516.3%32.6%
5James K.L.Labour Party34210.4%20.8%
6Ingleby J.C.Green Party2176.6%13.2%

Electorate 4,766 · EC ward code E05010955 · Back to ward index

Moreland · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,875

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ackroyd L.Conservative Party94716.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
2Chambers-Dubus T.Labour Party87615.6%46.7%+21.7 ptsElected
3Pullen T.Labour Party74413.2%39.7%+14.7 ptsElected
4Stephens K.E.Labour Party73913.1%39.4%
5Gladstone V.J.Conservative Party71012.6%37.9%
6Miller A.G.Conservative Party69712.4%37.2%
7Byfield S.E.Green Party3035.4%16.2%
8Courtney C.C.Liberal Democrats2664.7%14.2%
9Woolf D.J.Independent2083.7%11.1%
10Hampson N.Independent1342.4%7.1%

Electorate 6,771 · EC ward code E05010962 · Back to ward index

Abbeymead · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,463

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brooker L.S.Conservative Party95832.7%65.5%+32.1 ptsElected
2Taylor G.Conservative Party70524.1%48.2%+14.9 ptsElected
3Brazil I.M.Liberal Democrats47816.3%32.7%
4Wiederhold A.F.Liberal Democrats47516.2%32.5%
5Rawlins C.J.Labour Party2789.5%19.0%
6Hameed S.Social Democratic Party321.1%2.2%

Electorate 4,609 · EC ward code E05010951 · Back to ward index

Westgate · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,980

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Tracey P.Conservative Party96916.3%48.9%+23.9 ptsElected
2Toleman P.G.Conservative Party81413.7%41.1%+16.1 ptsElected
3Melvin D.Conservative Party79313.4%40.1%+15.1 ptsElected
4Trimnell R.J.Liberal Democrats66611.2%33.6%
5Mota F.Liberal Democrats5018.4%25.3%
6Hoddy E.Labour Party4778.0%24.1%
7Barwood G.G.F.Liberal Democrats4657.8%23.5%
8Fayter J.Labour Party4417.4%22.3%
9Pier J.Labour Party4307.2%21.7%
10Langrock-Bircher E.C.Green Party2394.0%12.1%
11Ullrich P.Independent591.0%3.0%
12Rutherford G.D.Independent550.9%2.8%
13Kovacs E.Independent300.5%1.5%

Electorate 6,311 · EC ward code E05010967 · Back to ward index

Matson and Robinswood · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,682

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chambers A.Conservative Party95218.9%56.6%+31.6 ptsElected
2Padilla R.Conservative Party77715.4%46.2%+21.2 ptsElected
3O'Donnell B.S.Conservative Party72214.3%42.9%+17.9 ptsElected
4Cole J.Labour Party66213.1%39.4%
5Brammer S.L.Labour Party60812.1%36.2%
6Mills G.Labour Party55511.0%33.0%
7Bergonzi A.V.Green Party2284.5%13.6%
8Cleaver G.F.Independent2124.2%12.6%
9Collins S.Independent1312.6%7.8%
10Gayler D.R.Liberal Democrats1202.4%7.1%
11Love S.Independent781.5%4.6%

Electorate 6,467 · EC ward code E05010961 · Back to ward index

Grange · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,426

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Morgan S.Conservative Party85430.0%59.9%+26.6 ptsElected
2Evans S.Conservative Party74226.0%52.1%+18.7 ptsElected
3Hanman N.J.Independent55619.5%39.0%
4Woodman C.Labour Party36812.9%25.8%
5Hill D.Independent2217.8%15.5%
6Minchin K.V.Liberal Democrats1103.9%7.7%

Electorate 5,084 · EC ward code E05010956 · Back to ward index

Kingsholm and Wotton · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,499

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Hilton J.E.Liberal Democrats98833.0%65.9%+32.6 ptsElected
2Conder A.M.Liberal Democrats80626.9%53.8%+20.5 ptsElected
3Akinleye O.Labour Party36712.2%24.5%
4Sheehy P.L.Conservative Party36112.0%24.1%
5Strafford J.F.Conservative Party2628.7%17.5%
6McStay J.Independent1314.4%8.7%
7Bisset L.Independent822.7%5.5%

Electorate 4,695 · EC ward code E05010958 · Back to ward index

Barton and Tredworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,432

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Patel S.Conservative Party1,60722.0%66.1%+41.1 ptsElected
2Zaman S.L.Conservative Party1,21216.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
3Bhaimia U.G.Labour Party1,10815.2%45.6%+20.6 ptsElected
4Hansdot A.S.Labour Party1,01413.9%41.7%
5Pavelka J.G.Conservative Party92712.7%38.1%
6Simms V.Labour Party81411.2%33.5%
7Ingleby K.Green Party2924.0%12.0%
8Adams S.M.Liberal Democrats1662.3%6.8%
9Collett J.T.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition851.2%3.5%
10Hodges T.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition721.0%3.0%

Electorate 7,115 · EC ward code E05010953 · Back to ward index

Kingsway · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 795

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cook R.L.Conservative Party58236.6%73.3%+39.9 ptsElected
2Kubaszczyk J.Conservative Party43927.6%55.3%+21.9 ptsElected
3Hoddy J.A.Labour Party35922.6%45.2%
4Caiden P.M.Liberal Democrats20913.2%26.3%

Electorate 4,067 · EC ward code E05010959 · Back to ward index

Longlevens · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,737

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Williams K.Conservative Party1,64520.0%60.1%+35.1 ptsElected
2Castle L.S.Liberal Democrats1,52318.6%55.7%+30.7 ptsElected
3Walford C.Conservative Party1,31216.0%47.9%+22.9 ptsElected
4Sawyer S.D.Liberal Democrats1,25015.2%45.7%
5Emraz J.Liberal Democrats1,14714.0%41.9%
6Evans J.Conservative Party1,12913.8%41.3%
7Young M.J.LIBER2042.5%7.5%

Electorate 7,452 · EC ward code E05010960 · Back to ward index

Hucclecote · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,990

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Brown D.J.Liberal Democrats1,58639.8%79.7%+46.4 ptsElected
2Wilson D.M.H.Liberal Democrats1,16429.2%58.5%+25.2 ptsElected
3Nelmes S.E.Conservative Party63315.9%31.8%
4Young J.C.Conservative Party59715.0%30.0%

Electorate 5,034 · EC ward code E05010957 · Back to ward index

Abbeydale · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,630

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gravells A.Conservative Party1,35841.7%83.3%+50.0 ptsElected
2Finnegan C.J.Conservative Party99730.6%61.2%+27.9 ptsElected
3Wilson A.C.Liberal Democrats50115.4%30.7%
4Cargill J.Liberal Democrats40312.4%24.7%

Electorate 5,054 · EC ward code E05010950 · Back to ward index

Quedgeley Fieldcourt · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,201

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chambers S.L.Conservative Party1,00041.6%83.3%+50.0 ptsElected
2Norman H.Conservative Party83934.9%69.9%+36.6 ptsElected
3Houlihan T.J.Liberal Democrats56223.4%46.8%

Electorate 5,286 · EC ward code E05010964 · Back to ward index