← Gloucester (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Gloucester 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 19,963 | 32.8% | 17 | 43.6% | 13 | 33.3% | +4 |
| Conservative Party | 17,731 | 29.2% | 11 | 28.2% | 12 | 30.8% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 14,486 | 23.8% | 7 | 17.9% | 10 | 25.6% | -3 |
| Independent | 5,625 | 9.2% | 4 | 10.3% | 3 | 7.7% | +1 |
| Green Party | 2,223 | 3.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.6% | -1 |
| Socialist Labour Party | 572 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 199 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 20 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 60,819 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Coney Hill · 1 seat · won at 43.3% · −6.7 pts below quota
- Podsmead · 1 seat · won at 45.4% · −4.6 pts below quota
- Quedgeley Severn Vale · 2 seats · won at 30.6% · −2.8 pts below quota
- Grange · 2 seats · won at 34.9% · above quota
- Tuffley · 2 seats · won at 35.6% · above quota
- Barnwood · 2 seats · won at 36.7% · above quota
- Abbeymead · 2 seats · won at 38.5% · above quota
- Abbeydale · 2 seats · won at 38.5% · above quota
- Quedgeley Fieldcourt · 2 seats · won at 39.8% · above quota
- Westgate · 3 seats · won at 35.0% · above quota
- Barton and Tredworth · 3 seats · won at 37.1% · above quota
- Matson, Robinswood and White City · 3 seats · won at 42.6% · above quota
- Kingsway · 2 seats · won at 51.4% · above quota
- Longlevens · 3 seats · won at 48.3% · above quota
- Kingsholm and Wotton · 2 seats · won at 56.8% · above quota
- Moreland · 3 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Elmbridge · 2 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- Hucclecote · 2 seats · won at 66.6% · above quota
Race results
Coney Hill · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 43.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −6.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 582
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Millard, T. | Labour Party | 252 | 43.3% | −6.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davis, B. | Independent | 190 | 32.6% | — | |
| 3 | Price, M. | Conservative Party | 83 | 14.3% | — | |
| 4 | Gayler, D. | Liberal Democrats | 24 | 4.1% | — | |
| 5 | Shearing, A. | ND | 20 | 3.4% | — | |
| 6 | Islam, T. | Socialist Labour Party | 13 | 2.2% | — |
Podsmead · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 850
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Field, S. | Liberal Democrats | 386 | 45.4% | −4.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Blatchly-Lewis, N. | Labour Party | 260 | 30.6% | — | |
| 3 | Devaney, S. | Conservative Party | 154 | 18.1% | — | |
| 4 | Powell, L. | Independent | 50 | 5.9% | — |
Quedgeley Severn Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 30.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −2.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,365
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harries, L. | Liberal Democrats | 562 | 20.6% | 41.2% | +7.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lewis, A. | Conservative Party | 417 | 15.3% | 30.6% | −2.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howard, T. | Liberal Democrats | 391 | 14.3% | 28.7% | — | |
| 4 | Ranford, V. | Conservative Party | 390 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | Gregory, A. | Labour Party | 296 | 10.8% | 21.7% | — | |
| 6 | Gordon, G. | Labour Party | 282 | 10.3% | 20.7% | — | |
| 7 | Mozol, A. | Independent | 169 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Mantle, J. | Green Party | 69 | 2.5% | 5.1% | — | |
| 9 | Cook, H. | Independent | 66 | 2.4% | 4.8% | — | |
| 10 | Rowney, M. | Green Party | 50 | 1.8% | 3.7% | — | |
| 11 | Boyd, D. | Independent | 37 | 1.4% | 2.7% | — |
Grange · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,312
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, S. | Conservative Party | 552 | 21.0% | 42.1% | +8.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bell, A. | Independent | 458 | 17.5% | 34.9% | +1.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davis, G. | Labour Party | 455 | 17.3% | 34.7% | — | |
| 4 | Watkins, J. | Conservative Party | 445 | 17.0% | 33.9% | — | |
| 5 | Cozens, S. | Labour Party | 442 | 16.8% | 33.7% | — | |
| 6 | Moffatt, K. | Liberal Democrats | 136 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 7 | Minchin, K. | Liberal Democrats | 136 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — |
Tuffley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,439
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Courtney, C. | Liberal Democrats | 562 | 19.5% | 39.1% | +5.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Campbell, L. | Conservative Party | 512 | 17.8% | 35.6% | +2.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hanley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 477 | 16.6% | 33.2% | — | |
| 4 | Dee, P. | Conservative Party | 406 | 14.1% | 28.2% | — | |
| 5 | Groves, L. | Labour Party | 328 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Barron, L. | Labour Party | 325 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — | |
| 7 | Mahoney, B. | Independent | 267 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — |
Barnwood · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,630
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowkett, A. | Liberal Democrats | 752 | 23.1% | 46.1% | +12.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, J. | Liberal Democrats | 598 | 18.3% | 36.7% | +3.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pearsall, S. | Conservative Party | 373 | 11.4% | 22.9% | — | |
| 4 | Ramsey, F. | Independent | 329 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 5 | Cullum, D. | Labour Party | 318 | 9.8% | 19.5% | — | |
| 6 | Maguire, L. | Conservative Party | 310 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 7 | Ramsey, J. | Independent | 309 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — | |
| 8 | Pier, J. | Labour Party | 271 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — |
Abbeymead · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,360
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooker, L. | Conservative Party | 712 | 26.2% | 52.4% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hyland, K. | Conservative Party | 523 | 19.2% | 38.5% | +5.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gatier, A. | Liberal Democrats | 488 | 17.9% | 35.9% | — | |
| 4 | Emraz, J. | Liberal Democrats | 467 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Brewster-Lowry, R. | Labour Party | 285 | 10.5% | 21.0% | — | |
| 6 | Moakes, S. | Labour Party | 245 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — |
Abbeydale · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,487
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gravells, A. | Conservative Party | 806 | 27.1% | 54.2% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walker, L. | Conservative Party | 572 | 19.2% | 38.5% | +5.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Masters, A. | Labour Party | 418 | 14.1% | 28.1% | — | |
| 4 | Hewish, A. | Labour Party | 408 | 13.7% | 27.4% | — | |
| 5 | Finnegan, C. | Liberal Democrats | 330 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — | |
| 6 | Bromby, F. | Liberal Democrats | 249 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — | |
| 7 | Grant, T. | Independent | 190 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — |
Quedgeley Fieldcourt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,323
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers, S. | Conservative Party | 629 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miller, V. | Conservative Party | 527 | 19.9% | 39.8% | +6.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Low-Gameiro, J. | Labour Party | 419 | 15.8% | 31.7% | — | |
| 4 | Adaarewa, M. | Labour Party | 409 | 15.5% | 30.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bebbington, D. | Liberal Democrats | 330 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 6 | Houlihan, T. | Liberal Democrats | 302 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 7 | Metaly, F. | Socialist Labour Party | 29 | 1.1% | 2.2% | — |
Westgate · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,781
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trimnell, R. | Liberal Democrats | 809 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tracey, P. | Conservative Party | 649 | 12.1% | 36.4% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hyman, H. | Liberal Democrats | 623 | 11.7% | 35.0% | +10.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Critchley, P. | Conservative Party | 515 | 9.6% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Kareem, O. | Liberal Democrats | 492 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 6 | Flower, R. | Labour Party | 483 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 7 | Hudson, J. | Conservative Party | 478 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 8 | Kingston, R. | Labour Party | 448 | 8.4% | 25.1% | — | |
| 9 | Thangella, J. | Labour Party | 388 | 7.3% | 21.8% | — | |
| 10 | Purchase, D. | Independent | 269 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 11 | Oldham, D. | Green Party | 190 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — |
Barton and Tredworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,028
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patel, S. | Conservative Party | 846 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bhaimia, U. | Liberal Democrats | 763 | 12.5% | 37.6% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Marshall, R. | Labour Party | 753 | 12.4% | 37.1% | +12.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Litu, S. | Conservative Party | 628 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Fadra, M. | Conservative Party | 544 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 6 | Clifford, E. | Green Party | 383 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 7 | Oliver, A. | Liberal Democrats | 341 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Courtney, D. | Liberal Democrats | 328 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ahmed, A. | Socialist Labour Party | 296 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 10 | Phypers, M. | Green Party | 281 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 11 | Platt, A. | Independent | 213 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 12 | Baker, B. | Independent | 201 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 13 | Woolf, D. | Independent | 172 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — | |
| 14 | Sikder, S. | Socialist Labour Party | 164 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — | |
| 15 | Powell, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 106 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — | |
| 16 | Collett, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 64 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — |
Matson, Robinswood and White City · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,680
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers, A. | Independent | 826 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Graham, A. | Independent | 758 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | O'Donnell, B. | Independent | 716 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cole, J. | Labour Party | 657 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Beamish, R. | Labour Party | 629 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 6 | Maynad, S. | Labour Party | 578 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 7 | Tibbles, M. | Conservative Party | 239 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — | |
| 8 | Williams, J. | Conservative Party | 205 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Williams, D. | Conservative Party | 193 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 10 | Russell, B. | Green Party | 140 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — | |
| 11 | Ahmed, K. | Socialist Labour Party | 46 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — | |
| 12 | Price, R. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 29 | 0.6% | 1.7% | — | |
| 13 | Fardeen, A. | Socialist Labour Party | 24 | 0.5% | 1.4% | — |
Kingsway · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,032
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James, K. | Labour Party | 557 | 27.0% | 54.0% | +20.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, J. | Labour Party | 530 | 25.7% | 51.4% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kubaszczyk, J. | Conservative Party | 284 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — | |
| 4 | Williams, T. | Conservative Party | 260 | 12.6% | 25.2% | — | |
| 5 | White, G. | Independent | 146 | 7.1% | 14.1% | — | |
| 6 | Field, V. | Liberal Democrats | 135 | 6.5% | 13.1% | — | |
| 7 | Harvey, J. | Green Party | 94 | 4.6% | 9.1% | — | |
| 8 | Barwood, G. | Liberal Democrats | 58 | 2.8% | 5.6% | — |
Longlevens · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,295
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castle, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,482 | 21.5% | 64.6% | +39.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sawyer, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,367 | 19.9% | 59.6% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shervey, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,109 | 16.1% | 48.3% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williams, K. | Conservative Party | 944 | 13.7% | 41.1% | — | |
| 5 | Base, J. | Conservative Party | 755 | 11.0% | 32.9% | — | |
| 6 | Arava, S. | Conservative Party | 718 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 7 | Farrow, E. | Green Party | 275 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 8 | Stroud, P. | Green Party | 234 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
Kingsholm and Wotton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,344
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hilton, J. | Liberal Democrats | 840 | 31.3% | 62.5% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Conder, A. | Liberal Democrats | 764 | 28.4% | 56.8% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Clarke, K. | Labour Party | 330 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 4 | Bennett, A. | Labour Party | 326 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hall, D. | Conservative Party | 223 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 6 | Sheehy, P. | Conservative Party | 205 | 7.6% | 15.3% | — |
Moreland · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,769
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pullen, T. | Labour Party | 1,008 | 19.0% | 57.0% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chambers-Dubus, T. | Labour Party | 967 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Simms, V. | Labour Party | 926 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ackroyd, L. | Conservative Party | 630 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Moreland, R. | Conservative Party | 439 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 6 | De Medici, H. | Conservative Party | 393 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 7 | Langrock-Bircher, E. | Green Party | 272 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hiiemae, S. | Independent | 259 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Caiden, P. | Liberal Democrats | 152 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 10 | Wilson, A. | Liberal Democrats | 138 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 11 | Cargill, J. | Liberal Democrats | 124 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — |
Elmbridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,373
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Radley, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,065 | 38.8% | 77.6% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norledge, V. | Liberal Democrats | 875 | 31.9% | 63.8% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Locke, S. | Conservative Party | 319 | 11.6% | 23.2% | — | |
| 4 | Kubaszczyk, E. | Conservative Party | 251 | 9.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 5 | Griffiths, F. | Green Party | 235 | 8.6% | 17.1% | — |
Hucclecote · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 66.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,702
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson, D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,174 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wiederhold, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,134 | 33.3% | 66.6% | +33.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hawkins, J. | Conservative Party | 304 | 8.9% | 17.9% | — | |
| 4 | Darke, S. | Conservative Party | 298 | 8.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 5 | Walsh, N. | Labour Party | 250 | 7.3% | 14.7% | — | |
| 6 | Whitworth, A. | Labour Party | 243 | 7.1% | 14.3% | — |