← Gosport (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Gosport 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 14 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 28 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 16,706 | 42.7% | 10 | 35.7% | 12 | 42.9% | -2 |
| Liberal Democrats | 16,043 | 41.0% | 16 | 57.1% | 12 | 42.9% | +4 |
| Labour Party | 4,586 | 11.7% | 2 | 7.1% | 3 | 10.7% | -1 |
| Green Party | 1,621 | 4.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.6% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 93 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 75 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 39,124 | 100.0% | 28 | 100.0% | 28 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Grange and Alver Valley · 2 seats · won at 43.8% · above quota
- Alverstoke · 2 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Harbourside and Town · 2 seats · won at 50.8% · above quota
- Rowner and Holbrook · 2 seats · won at 51.8% · above quota
- Bridgemary · 2 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Brockhurst and Privett · 2 seats · won at 56.7% · above quota
- Leesland and Newtown · 2 seats · won at 57.9% · above quota
- Hardway · 2 seats · won at 58.7% · above quota
- Lee East · 2 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Elson · 2 seats · won at 60.7% · above quota
- Anglesey · 2 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Forton · 2 seats · won at 62.4% · above quota
- Peel Common · 2 seats · won at 65.1% · above quota
- Lee West · 2 seats · won at 69.0% · above quota
Race results
Grange and Alver Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 43.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 838
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morgan M. | Conservative Party | 378 | 22.6% | 45.1% | +11.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jessop T. | Conservative Party | 367 | 21.9% | 43.8% | +10.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown J. | Labour Party | 351 | 20.9% | 41.9% | — | |
| 4 | Foster-Reed C. | Liberal Democrats | 295 | 17.6% | 35.2% | — | |
| 5 | Percival H. | Labour Party | 285 | 17.0% | 34.0% | — |
Alverstoke · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,120
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Casey K. | Conservative Party | 950 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Huggins Z. | Conservative Party | 937 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Earle A. | Liberal Democrats | 885 | 20.9% | 41.7% | — | |
| 4 | Charlton W. | Liberal Democrats | 821 | 19.4% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Pollard S. | Green Party | 446 | 10.5% | 21.0% | — | |
| 6 | Eaton J. | Labour Party | 201 | 4.7% | 9.5% | — |
Harbourside and Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,233
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cully J. | Labour Party | 751 | 30.5% | 60.9% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Durrant A. | Labour Party | 626 | 25.4% | 50.8% | +17.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Meenaghan L. | Conservative Party | 474 | 19.2% | 38.4% | — | |
| 4 | Thompson R. | Conservative Party | 374 | 15.2% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Ely S. | Liberal Democrats | 166 | 6.7% | 13.5% | — | |
| 6 | Fletcher D. | ND | 75 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — |
Rowner and Holbrook · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,123
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herridge D. | Liberal Democrats | 600 | 26.7% | 53.5% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Johnston M. | Liberal Democrats | 582 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Murphy M. | Conservative Party | 467 | 20.8% | 41.6% | — | |
| 4 | Bergin P. | Conservative Party | 457 | 20.4% | 40.7% | — | |
| 5 | Noakes P. | Labour Party | 139 | 6.2% | 12.4% | — |
Bridgemary · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,314
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hammond S. | Liberal Democrats | 874 | 33.3% | 66.5% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Maynard B. | Liberal Democrats | 719 | 27.4% | 54.7% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jones K. | Conservative Party | 480 | 18.3% | 36.5% | — | |
| 4 | Namdeo S. | Conservative Party | 403 | 15.3% | 30.7% | — | |
| 5 | Davis M. | Labour Party | 151 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — |
Brockhurst and Privett · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,232
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hylands R. | Liberal Democrats | 798 | 32.4% | 64.8% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marshall S. | Liberal Democrats | 698 | 28.3% | 56.7% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blackman S. | Conservative Party | 429 | 17.4% | 34.8% | — | |
| 4 | Batty L. | Conservative Party | 383 | 15.5% | 31.1% | — | |
| 5 | Mandrill A. | Labour Party | 156 | 6.3% | 12.7% | — |
Leesland and Newtown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,754
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelly D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,074 | 30.6% | 61.2% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Westerby J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,015 | 28.9% | 57.9% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Best C. | Conservative Party | 476 | 13.6% | 27.1% | — | |
| 4 | Gary D. | Conservative Party | 426 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Noakes C. | Labour Party | 230 | 6.6% | 13.1% | — | |
| 6 | Fletcher M. | Green Party | 193 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — | |
| 7 | Pinder A. | Reform UK | 93 | 2.7% | 5.3% | — |
Hardway · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,448
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hutchison J. | Liberal Democrats | 882 | 30.5% | 60.9% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cox K. | Liberal Democrats | 850 | 29.4% | 58.7% | +25.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Furlong D. | Conservative Party | 544 | 18.8% | 37.6% | — | |
| 4 | Hallsworth K. | Conservative Party | 473 | 16.3% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Davis S. | Labour Party | 146 | 5.0% | 10.1% | — |
Lee East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,555
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burgess G. | Conservative Party | 968 | 31.1% | 62.3% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bradley K. | Liberal Democrats | 927 | 29.8% | 59.6% | +26.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Orr I. | Conservative Party | 683 | 22.0% | 43.9% | — | |
| 4 | Suter M. | Green Party | 331 | 10.6% | 21.3% | — | |
| 5 | Cully J. | Labour Party | 201 | 6.5% | 12.9% | — |
Elson · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,431
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ballard S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,020 | 35.7% | 71.3% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Earle R. | Liberal Democrats | 869 | 30.4% | 60.7% | +27.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hook N. | Conservative Party | 350 | 12.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 4 | Neville A. | Conservative Party | 347 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Smith E. | Labour Party | 156 | 5.5% | 10.9% | — | |
| 6 | Kelly K. | Green Party | 119 | 4.2% | 8.3% | — |
Anglesey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,399
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raffaelli P. | Conservative Party | 904 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Scard A. | Conservative Party | 866 | 31.0% | 61.9% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Charlton A. | Liberal Democrats | 453 | 16.2% | 32.4% | — | |
| 4 | Salter R. | Liberal Democrats | 306 | 10.9% | 21.9% | — | |
| 5 | Green A. | Labour Party | 268 | 9.6% | 19.2% | — |
Forton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,067
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradley M. | Liberal Democrats | 706 | 33.1% | 66.2% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chegwyn P. | Liberal Democrats | 666 | 31.2% | 62.4% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Desbois S. | Conservative Party | 294 | 13.8% | 27.6% | — | |
| 4 | Walker G. | Conservative Party | 259 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Percival C. | Labour Party | 208 | 9.8% | 19.5% | — |
Peel Common · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,286
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philpott S. | Conservative Party | 848 | 33.0% | 65.9% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pepper M. | Liberal Democrats | 837 | 32.5% | 65.1% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hook L. | Conservative Party | 610 | 23.7% | 47.4% | — | |
| 4 | Stratton D. | Labour Party | 277 | 10.8% | 21.5% | — |
Lee West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,766
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beavis J. | Conservative Party | 1,340 | 37.9% | 75.9% | +42.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gledhill J. | Conservative Party | 1,219 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Aspinall Z. | Green Party | 532 | 15.1% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Cruddas A. | Labour Party | 440 | 12.5% | 24.9% | — |