← Great Yarmouth (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Great Yarmouth 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 17 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 39 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 20,174 | 45.7% | 18 | 46.2% | 19 | 48.7% | -1 |
| Conservative Party | 19,247 | 43.6% | 19 | 48.7% | 18 | 46.2% | +1 |
| Independent | 3,018 | 6.8% | 2 | 5.1% | 2 | 5.1% | 0 |
| Green Party | 889 | 2.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Liberal Democrats | 660 | 1.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 192 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 44,180 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 39 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Yarmouth North · 2 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Lothingland · 2 seats · won at 46.5% · above quota
- Ormesby · 2 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- East Flegg · 2 seats · won at 49.7% · above quota
- Gorleston · 2 seats · won at 50.5% · above quota
- Bradwell South and Hopton · 3 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Caister North · 2 seats · won at 55.9% · above quota
- Caister South · 2 seats · won at 56.5% · above quota
- Bradwell North · 3 seats · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Southtown and Cobholm · 2 seats · won at 62.1% · above quota
- West Flegg · 2 seats · won at 63.0% · above quota
- Magdalen · 3 seats · won at 55.8% · above quota
- St. Andrews · 2 seats · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Central and Northgate · 3 seats · won at 57.4% · above quota
- Nelson · 3 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- Claydon · 3 seats · won at 66.1% · above quota
- Fleggburgh · 1 seat · won at 94.6% · above quota
Race results
Yarmouth North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,026
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hammond, D. | Conservative Party | 470 | 22.9% | 45.8% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sharp, A. | Labour Party | 453 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hammond, P. | Conservative Party | 452 | 22.0% | 44.1% | — | |
| 4 | Dwyer-McCluskey, J. | Labour Party | 444 | 21.6% | 43.3% | — | |
| 5 | Harris, A. | Liberal Democrats | 88 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 6 | Andrews, A. | Reform UK | 74 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 7 | Toplass, P. | Independent | 70 | 3.4% | 6.8% | — |
Lothingland · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,094
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carpenter, G. | Conservative Party | 518 | 23.7% | 47.4% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murray-Smith, I. | Conservative Party | 508 | 23.2% | 46.5% | +13.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Myers, A. | Independent | 469 | 21.4% | 42.9% | — | |
| 4 | Williamson, C. | Labour Party | 388 | 17.7% | 35.5% | — | |
| 5 | Duffield, E. | Labour Party | 304 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — |
Ormesby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,070
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rundle, J. | Independent | 548 | 25.6% | 51.2% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Freeman, G. | Conservative Party | 514 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hanton, R. | Conservative Party | 511 | 23.9% | 47.8% | — | |
| 4 | Boocock, M. | Labour Party | 366 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Walker, B. | Labour Party | 201 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — |
East Flegg · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,153
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bensly, J. | Conservative Party | 755 | 32.7% | 65.5% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Galer, N. | Conservative Party | 573 | 24.8% | 49.7% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Punchard, E. | Green Party | 297 | 12.9% | 25.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hendry, P. | Labour Party | 245 | 10.6% | 21.2% | — | |
| 5 | Walker, C. | Labour Party | 230 | 10.0% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Petersen, K. | Green Party | 206 | 8.9% | 17.9% | — |
Gorleston · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,335
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flaxman-Taylor, E. | Conservative Party | 685 | 25.7% | 51.3% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wells, P. | Conservative Party | 674 | 25.2% | 50.5% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, S. | Labour Party | 508 | 19.0% | 38.1% | — | |
| 4 | Wemyss, M. | Labour Party | 457 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Durant, R. | Green Party | 111 | 4.2% | 8.3% | — | |
| 6 | Albon, N. | Green Party | 101 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — | |
| 7 | Rouse, G. | Liberal Democrats | 69 | 2.6% | 5.2% | — | |
| 8 | Smith, G. | Liberal Democrats | 65 | 2.4% | 4.9% | — |
Bradwell South and Hopton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,639
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Annison, C. | Conservative Party | 995 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stenhouse, K. | Conservative Party | 740 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Capewell, A. | Labour Party | 738 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Price, R. | Conservative Party | 690 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 5 | Rodin, L. | Labour Party | 680 | 13.8% | 41.5% | — | |
| 6 | Greggs, D. | Labour Party | 660 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 7 | Hacon, S. | Independent | 207 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 8 | Godfrey, M. | Liberal Democrats | 119 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 9 | Shreeve, J. | Liberal Democrats | 89 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Caister North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,042
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carpenter, P. | Conservative Party | 606 | 29.1% | 58.2% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boyd, G. | Conservative Party | 582 | 27.9% | 55.9% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Winterburn, M. | Labour Party | 402 | 19.3% | 38.6% | — | |
| 4 | Williamson-Aldous, R. | Labour Party | 320 | 15.4% | 30.7% | — | |
| 5 | Killett, A. | Green Party | 174 | 8.3% | 16.7% | — |
Caister South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,008
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawn, B. | Conservative Party | 604 | 30.0% | 59.9% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bird, M. | Conservative Party | 570 | 28.3% | 56.5% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Griffiths, S. | Labour Party | 468 | 23.2% | 46.4% | — | |
| 4 | Moore, M. | Labour Party | 374 | 18.6% | 37.1% | — |
Bradwell North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,597
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, C. | Conservative Party | 888 | 18.5% | 55.6% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Candon, D. | Conservative Party | 839 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Plant, G. | Conservative Party | 815 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Craig, Y. | Labour Party | 765 | 16.0% | 47.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wesson, S. | Labour Party | 756 | 15.8% | 47.3% | — | |
| 6 | Borg, J. | Labour Party | 728 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — |
Southtown and Cobholm · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 648
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waters-Bunn, P. | Labour Party | 405 | 31.3% | 62.5% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Newcombe, J. | Labour Party | 402 | 31.0% | 62.1% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Candon, L. | Conservative Party | 220 | 17.0% | 34.0% | — | |
| 4 | Murray, A. | Conservative Party | 191 | 14.7% | 29.5% | — | |
| 5 | Dyer, N. | Liberal Democrats | 77 | 5.9% | 11.9% | — |
West Flegg · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,266
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grant, A. | Conservative Party | 809 | 32.0% | 63.9% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mogford, L. | Conservative Party | 798 | 31.5% | 63.0% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Borg, M. | Labour Party | 467 | 18.4% | 36.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jeal, D. | Labour Party | 458 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — |
Magdalen · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,151
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wainwright, T. | Labour Party | 786 | 22.8% | 68.3% | +43.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Green, A. | Labour Party | 691 | 20.0% | 60.0% | +35.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pilkington, B. | Labour Party | 642 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith, M. | Independent | 386 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Whitaker, R. | Conservative Party | 349 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 6 | O'Dell, S. | Conservative Party | 323 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Cameron, T. | Conservative Party | 277 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — |
St. Andrews · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 858
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright, B. | Labour Party | 575 | 33.5% | 67.0% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Upton, R. | Labour Party | 555 | 32.3% | 64.7% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Popham, A. | Conservative Party | 310 | 18.1% | 36.1% | — | |
| 4 | O'Dell, L. | Conservative Party | 276 | 16.1% | 32.2% | — |
Central and Northgate · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,000
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith-Clare, M. | Labour Party | 596 | 19.9% | 59.6% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Martin, J. | Labour Party | 578 | 19.3% | 57.8% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cordiner-Achenbach, C. | Labour Party | 574 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lodge, T. | Conservative Party | 318 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — | |
| 5 | Houseago, O. | Conservative Party | 295 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 6 | Spinola, A. | Conservative Party | 258 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 7 | Talbot, C. | Independent | 228 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 8 | Ashton-Barnes, C. | Liberal Democrats | 153 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — |
Nelson · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 789
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeal, M. | Labour Party | 552 | 23.3% | 70.0% | +45.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wright, T. | Labour Party | 515 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson-Payne, K. | Labour Party | 513 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bensly, O. | Conservative Party | 248 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Lawn, A. | Conservative Party | 221 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 6 | Stafferton, R. | Conservative Party | 200 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 7 | Riley, M. | Reform UK | 118 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Claydon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,160
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Borg, C. | Labour Party | 810 | 23.3% | 69.8% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McMullen, J. | Labour Party | 775 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williamson, B. | Labour Party | 767 | 22.0% | 66.1% | +41.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Phillips, L. | Conservative Party | 403 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Hirst, J. | Conservative Party | 363 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 6 | Bensly, L. | Conservative Party | 362 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — |
Fleggburgh · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 94.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,173
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thompson, A. | Independent | 1,110 | 94.6% | +44.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Garrod, T. | Conservative Party | 37 | 3.2% | — | |
| 3 | Wardley, C. | Labour Party | 26 | 2.2% | — |