← Guildford (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Guildford 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 28,277 | 30.7% | 25 | 52.1% | 15 | 31.3% | +10 |
| Conservative Party | 27,138 | 29.5% | 10 | 20.8% | 15 | 31.3% | -5 |
| RES | 21,456 | 23.3% | 7 | 14.6% | 12 | 25.0% | -5 |
| Labour Party | 9,666 | 10.5% | 3 | 6.3% | 5 | 10.4% | -2 |
| GGG | 3,535 | 3.8% | 3 | 6.3% | 1 | 2.1% | +2 |
| Green Party | 1,056 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 830 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| PEACE | 92 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 71 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 92,121 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- St Nicolas · 1 seat · won at 46.2% · −3.8 pts below quota
- Bellfields and Slyfield · 2 seats · won at 34.7% · above quota
- Burpham · 2 seats · won at 37.8% · above quota
- Ash South · 2 seats · won at 39.5% · above quota
- Stoke · 3 seats · won at 31.4% · above quota
- Stoughton South · 2 seats · won at 41.9% · above quota
- Merrow · 3 seats · won at 34.0% · above quota
- Shalford · 2 seats · won at 42.5% · above quota
- Castle · 3 seats · won at 35.0% · above quota
- Stoughton North · 2 seats · won at 44.8% · above quota
- Ash Wharf · 2 seats · won at 45.8% · above quota
- Tillingbourne · 2 seats · won at 45.9% · above quota
- Effingham · 1 seat · won at 64.8% · above quota
- Worplesdon · 3 seats · won at 42.3% · above quota
- Send and Lovelace · 3 seats · won at 42.5% · above quota
- Onslow · 3 seats · won at 43.0% · above quota
- Pilgrims · 2 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Westborough · 3 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Normandy and Pirbright · 2 seats · won at 55.7% · above quota
- Ash Vale · 2 seats · won at 64.4% · above quota
- Clandon and Horsley · 3 seats · won at 60.7% · above quota
Race results
St Nicolas · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,121
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunt, T. | Liberal Democrats | 518 | 46.2% | −3.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Goldsborough, M. | Conservative Party | 252 | 22.5% | — | |
| 3 | Ackerley, N. | RES | 250 | 22.3% | — | |
| 4 | Pegman, C. | Labour Party | 101 | 9.0% | — |
Bellfields and Slyfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,208
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Creese, A. | Labour Party | 453 | 18.8% | 37.5% | +4.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walsh, J. | Labour Party | 419 | 17.3% | 34.7% | +1.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hooper, P. | Conservative Party | 336 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 4 | Wakeling, W. | Liberal Democrats | 327 | 13.5% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Miah, S. | Conservative Party | 288 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 6 | Strugnell, N. | Liberal Democrats | 257 | 10.6% | 21.3% | — | |
| 7 | Isaacs, S. | RES | 172 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 8 | Tillett, L. | RES | 163 | 6.7% | 13.5% | — |
Burpham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,221
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potter, G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,065 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tyson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 839 | 18.9% | 37.8% | +4.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Holliday, C. | Conservative Party | 669 | 15.1% | 30.1% | — | |
| 4 | Heilbron, A. | Conservative Party | 668 | 15.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 5 | Hyland, L. | RES | 465 | 10.5% | 20.9% | — | |
| 6 | Creese, I. | Labour Party | 378 | 8.5% | 17.0% | — | |
| 7 | Wilce, C. | RES | 358 | 8.1% | 16.1% | — |
Ash South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,356
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wyeth-Price, S. | RES | 737 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shaw, D. | RES | 535 | 19.7% | 39.5% | +6.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Elburn, M. | Liberal Democrats | 534 | 19.7% | 39.4% | — | |
| 4 | Buckley, P. | Liberal Democrats | 387 | 14.3% | 28.6% | — | |
| 5 | Flynn, C. | Conservative Party | 274 | 10.1% | 20.2% | — | |
| 6 | Wrycroft, G. | Conservative Party | 244 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — |
Stoke · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 31.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,840
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, C. | Liberal Democrats | 634 | 11.5% | 34.5% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | King, V. | Liberal Democrats | 629 | 11.4% | 34.2% | +9.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hives, S. | Liberal Democrats | 578 | 10.5% | 31.4% | +6.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Peters, S. | Green Party | 516 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | Kittermaster, H. | Labour Party | 467 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 6 | Hackman, S. | Labour Party | 460 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 7 | Creese, B. | Labour Party | 431 | 7.8% | 23.4% | — | |
| 8 | Lakhani, A. | RES | 340 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 9 | Tough, S. | Conservative Party | 319 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 10 | Kidd, A. | RES | 318 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 11 | Vorley, B. | Conservative Party | 290 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 12 | Zissman, S. | Conservative Party | 283 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 13 | Lyon, J. | RES | 256 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — |
Stoughton South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,557
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steel, K. | Liberal Democrats | 660 | 21.2% | 42.4% | +9.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miah, M. | Liberal Democrats | 653 | 21.0% | 41.9% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rouse, A. | Labour Party | 420 | 13.5% | 27.0% | — | |
| 4 | Dokimakis, G. | Labour Party | 407 | 13.1% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Dinc, A. | Conservative Party | 294 | 9.4% | 18.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hester, A. | Conservative Party | 243 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 7 | Nash-Williams, Z. | RES | 190 | 6.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 8 | Johnston, T. | RES | 155 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — | |
| 9 | Morris, J. | PEACE | 92 | 3.0% | 5.9% | — |
Merrow · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,924
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shaw, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,315 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | De Contades, Y. | Liberal Democrats | 1,094 | 12.5% | 37.4% | +12.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bigmore, J. | RES | 995 | 11.3% | 34.0% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Humphries, D. | Conservative Party | 954 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Booth, D. | RES | 866 | 9.9% | 29.6% | — | |
| 6 | Lam, K. | Conservative Party | 861 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 7 | Jay, C. | Conservative Party | 815 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 8 | Brown, S. | RES | 736 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 9 | Cassidy, N. | Labour Party | 648 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 10 | Ellwood, G. | Independent | 487 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — |
Shalford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,788
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston, C. | Liberal Democrats | 947 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williams, D. | Liberal Democrats | 760 | 21.3% | 42.5% | +9.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fremaux, J. | Conservative Party | 476 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 4 | Watts, N. | Conservative Party | 470 | 13.1% | 26.3% | — | |
| 5 | Nagaty, R. | GGG | 407 | 11.4% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Keane, N. | GGG | 333 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 7 | Lockhart, P. | Labour Party | 182 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — |
Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,115
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redpath, M. | RES | 1,159 | 12.4% | 37.2% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mills, R. | Conservative Party | 1,128 | 12.1% | 36.2% | +11.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davis, G. | Conservative Party | 1,091 | 11.7% | 35.0% | +10.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Redpath, J. | RES | 1,074 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Perestaj De Gusmao Fiuza, A. | Conservative Party | 964 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 6 | Doran, C. | Liberal Democrats | 910 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 7 | Rigg, J. | RES | 909 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 8 | Gillingham, S. | Liberal Democrats | 779 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 9 | O'Byrne, J. | Labour Party | 439 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 10 | Sussex, S. | Labour Party | 325 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 11 | Smith, M. | Labour Party | 303 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 12 | Canning, P. | Independent | 263 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — |
Stoughton North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,528
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harwood, G. | Liberal Democrats | 750 | 24.5% | 49.1% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffiths, L. | Liberal Democrats | 684 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Quelch, D. | Conservative Party | 423 | 13.8% | 27.7% | — | |
| 4 | Rowden, S. | Conservative Party | 336 | 11.0% | 22.0% | — | |
| 5 | Giess, A. | Labour Party | 284 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — | |
| 6 | Grainger, S. | Labour Party | 252 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — | |
| 7 | Moghaddam, N. | RES | 164 | 5.4% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Stokoe, B. | RES | 162 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — |
Ash Wharf · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,348
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White, F. | Liberal Democrats | 699 | 25.9% | 51.9% | +18.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bellamy, P. | Liberal Democrats | 617 | 22.9% | 45.8% | +12.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tonks, J. | Conservative Party | 475 | 17.6% | 35.2% | — | |
| 4 | Pritchard, W. | Conservative Party | 379 | 14.1% | 28.1% | — | |
| 5 | Gallagher, M. | Labour Party | 280 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 6 | Whitehouse, C. | Green Party | 246 | 9.1% | 18.2% | — |
Tillingbourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,701
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newson, D. | Liberal Democrats | 801 | 23.5% | 47.1% | +13.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hughes, B. | Conservative Party | 781 | 23.0% | 45.9% | +12.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nusbacher, L. | Conservative Party | 667 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Abbey, P. | Liberal Democrats | 630 | 18.5% | 37.0% | — | |
| 5 | Howard, L. | Green Party | 294 | 8.6% | 17.3% | — | |
| 6 | Wynn, J. | Labour Party | 118 | 3.5% | 6.9% | — | |
| 7 | Marsh, J. | Labour Party | 111 | 3.3% | 6.5% | — |
Effingham · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 804
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rehorst-Smith, M. | Liberal Democrats | 521 | 64.8% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boder, L. | Conservative Party | 240 | 29.9% | — | |
| 3 | Rahman, S. | Labour Party | 43 | 5.3% | — |
Worplesdon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,487
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brooker, H. | Conservative Party | 1,087 | 14.6% | 43.7% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Akhtar, B. | Conservative Party | 1,071 | 14.4% | 43.1% | +18.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brooker, P. | Conservative Party | 1,052 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McShee, B. | RES | 855 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 5 | Ahier, B. | RES | 721 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 6 | Pidgeon, R. | RES | 630 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 7 | Edwards, J. | Liberal Democrats | 463 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 8 | Merryweather, M. | Liberal Democrats | 462 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 9 | Hawthorne, J. | Labour Party | 385 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 10 | Trier, N. | Labour Party | 382 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 11 | Webster, S. | Liberal Democrats | 352 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — |
Send and Lovelace · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,010
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oven, P. | GGG | 980 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brooker, J. | GGG | 960 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fenwick, J. | GGG | 855 | 14.2% | 42.5% | +17.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bennett, P. | RES | 515 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Powell, G. | RES | 506 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 6 | Griffiths, A. | Conservative Party | 473 | 7.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 7 | Stewart-Clark, A. | Conservative Party | 425 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 8 | Offord, J. | Conservative Party | 379 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 9 | Bahrani, B. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | McMillan, D. | Liberal Democrats | 189 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 11 | Baker, J. | Labour Party | 188 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 12 | Woof, R. | Labour Party | 186 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 13 | Miller Dale, M. | Liberal Democrats | 181 | 3.0% | 9.0% | — |
Onslow · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,112
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodwin, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,272 | 20.1% | 60.2% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, J. | Liberal Democrats | 933 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lee, S. | Liberal Democrats | 908 | 14.3% | 43.0% | +18.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chandler, A. | Conservative Party | 479 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 5 | Alam, S. | Conservative Party | 425 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 6 | Moss, H. | RES | 395 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 7 | Ekinci, A. | Conservative Party | 391 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 8 | Heaphy, J. | RES | 389 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 9 | Brown, L. | RES | 317 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 10 | Rich, H. | Labour Party | 289 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 11 | Bragger, N. | Labour Party | 273 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 12 | Stoiana-Mois, V. | Labour Party | 193 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 13 | Church, S. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 36 | 0.6% | 1.7% | — | |
| 14 | Lewis, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 35 | 0.6% | 1.7% | — |
Pilgrims · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,380
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furniss, M. | Conservative Party | 835 | 30.3% | 60.5% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barker, S. | Conservative Party | 749 | 27.1% | 54.3% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Belcher, T. | RES | 358 | 13.0% | 25.9% | — | |
| 4 | Price, J. | RES | 238 | 8.6% | 17.2% | — | |
| 5 | Mallet, S. | Liberal Democrats | 234 | 8.5% | 17.0% | — | |
| 6 | Rogers, A. | Liberal Democrats | 196 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 7 | Hill, M. | Labour Party | 150 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — |
Westborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,103
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McShane, J. | Liberal Democrats | 599 | 18.1% | 54.3% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lowry, S. | Liberal Democrats | 570 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, H. | Labour Party | 508 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Steel, J. | Liberal Democrats | 450 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | Selim, S. | Conservative Party | 290 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 6 | Parsons, M. | Conservative Party | 263 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 7 | Spooner, P. | Conservative Party | 249 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 8 | Lal, S. | RES | 199 | 6.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 9 | Lal, S. | RES | 180 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — |
Normandy and Pirbright · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 55.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,509
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Witham, K. | Conservative Party | 938 | 31.1% | 62.2% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bilbe, D. | Conservative Party | 840 | 27.8% | 55.7% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howard, K. | Liberal Democrats | 341 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — | |
| 4 | Doven, G. | RES | 324 | 10.7% | 21.5% | — | |
| 5 | Schofield, S. | Labour Party | 282 | 9.3% | 18.7% | — | |
| 6 | Redpath, G. | RES | 213 | 7.1% | 14.1% | — | |
| 7 | Hill, J. | Independent | 80 | 2.7% | 5.3% | — |
Ash Vale · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 64.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,661
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morson, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,183 | 35.6% | 71.2% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lucas, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,070 | 32.2% | 64.4% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Manning, N. | Conservative Party | 571 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 4 | Moseley, M. | Conservative Party | 498 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — |
Clandon and Horsley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,973
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Young, C. | RES | 1,949 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bennett, D. | RES | 1,859 | 20.8% | 62.5% | +37.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brothwell, R. | RES | 1,804 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cullens, S. | Conservative Party | 667 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 5 | Bond, I. | Conservative Party | 641 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 6 | Hourahane, T. | Conservative Party | 595 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | Ross, W. | Liberal Democrats | 400 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 8 | Roe, D. | Liberal Democrats | 360 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 9 | O'Keeffe, L. | Liberal Democrats | 334 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 10 | Symonds, D. | Labour Party | 309 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — |