← Halton (all cycles) · 6 May 2021 cohort
Halton 2021
Local elections held 6 May 2021.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 54 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 34,808 | 64.3% | 48 | 88.9% | 37 | 68.5% | +11 |
| Conservative Party | 10,186 | 18.8% | 2 | 3.7% | 10 | 18.5% | -8 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,333 | 11.7% | 3 | 5.6% | 6 | 11.1% | -3 |
| Green Party | 1,693 | 3.1% | 1 | 1.9% | 1 | 1.9% | 0 |
| Independent | 525 | 1.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 482 | 0.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| FBM | 92 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 54,119 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 54 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2021 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2021 election (current) and on the eve of it (2020), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Beechwood and Heath · 3 seats · won at 39.6% · above quota
- Daresbury, Moore and Sandymoor · 3 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Mersey and Weston · 3 seats · won at 47.3% · above quota
- Norton North · 3 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Birchfield · 3 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Farnworth · 3 seats · won at 58.5% · above quota
- Grange · 3 seats · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Hough Green · 3 seats · won at 65.9% · above quota
- Norton South and Preston Brook · 3 seats · won at 67.0% · above quota
- Halton Castle · 3 seats · won at 68.0% · above quota
- Central and West Bank · 3 seats · won at 71.3% · above quota
- Halton View · 3 seats · won at 73.1% · above quota
- Bridgewater · 3 seats · won at 74.6% · above quota
- Halton Lea · 3 seats · won at 79.2% · above quota
- Ditton, Hale Village and Halebank · 3 seats · won at 79.9% · above quota
- Appleton · 3 seats · won at 81.0% · above quota
- Bankfield · 3 seats · won at 83.9% · above quota
- Highfield · 3 seats · won at 87.1% · above quota
Race results
Beechwood and Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,864
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ratcliffe M.A. | Liberal Democrats | 925 | 16.5% | 49.6% | +24.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowe C. | Liberal Democrats | 825 | 14.8% | 44.3% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stockton G.C. | Liberal Democrats | 739 | 13.2% | 39.6% | +14.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dennett A. | Labour Party | 640 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Loftus C. | Labour Party | 594 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 6 | Clarke D.D. | Conservative Party | 532 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 7 | Lea-Wood S.A. | Labour Party | 499 | 8.9% | 26.8% | — | |
| 8 | Moss T.P. | Conservative Party | 446 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 9 | Heath D. | Green Party | 285 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — | |
| 10 | Bentley R.M. | Independent | 108 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — |
Daresbury, Moore and Sandymoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,073
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bradshaw J.C. | Conservative Party | 553 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bradshaw M. | Conservative Party | 496 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dyer A. | Green Party | 485 | 15.1% | 45.2% | +20.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davidson S.F.A. | Conservative Party | 465 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — | |
| 5 | Horton P.J. | Labour Party | 322 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hughes C.W. | Labour Party | 319 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Secker J.S. | Liberal Democrats | 304 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 8 | Secker L. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 8.5% | 25.6% | — |
Mersey and Weston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,086
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Begg V. | Labour Party | 602 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Leck R. | Labour Party | 515 | 15.8% | 47.4% | +22.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Plumpton-Walsh N.L. | Labour Party | 514 | 15.8% | 47.3% | +22.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Redhead L. | Liberal Democrats | 308 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Ratcliffe E. | Liberal Democrats | 308 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 6 | Baker D.J. | Conservative Party | 280 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 7 | Rowe J.A. | Liberal Democrats | 274 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 8 | Cargill G.P. | Green Party | 255 | 7.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 9 | Spencer G. | Conservative Party | 203 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — |
Norton North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,178
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bramwell I. | Labour Party | 733 | 20.7% | 62.2% | +37.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lloyd Jones P. | Labour Party | 587 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Logan G.M. | Labour Party | 578 | 16.4% | 49.1% | +24.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Inch D.M. | Liberal Democrats | 474 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 5 | Burnett A.R. | Conservative Party | 449 | 12.7% | 38.1% | — | |
| 6 | Hodge M.L. | Liberal Democrats | 416 | 11.8% | 35.3% | — | |
| 7 | Miller T.C. | Green Party | 297 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — |
Birchfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,610
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ball A.H. | Labour Party | 937 | 19.4% | 58.2% | +33.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Woolfall B. | Labour Party | 826 | 17.1% | 51.3% | +26.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fry M. | Labour Party | 815 | 16.9% | 50.6% | +25.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Powell J.R. | Conservative Party | 775 | 16.0% | 48.1% | — | |
| 5 | Harper C.M. | Conservative Party | 658 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 6 | Soley D.S.J. | Conservative Party | 591 | 12.2% | 36.7% | — | |
| 7 | Teebay A.P. | Liberal Democrats | 228 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — |
Farnworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,304
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McInerney A. | Labour Party | 916 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Teeling A. | Labour Party | 798 | 20.4% | 61.2% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hill V. | Labour Party | 763 | 19.5% | 58.5% | +33.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harper P. | Conservative Party | 630 | 16.1% | 48.3% | — | |
| 5 | Dawson A.E. | Conservative Party | 622 | 15.9% | 47.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hicks Caddick S. | Reform UK | 183 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — |
Grange · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 928
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lowe J.M. | Labour Party | 636 | 22.8% | 68.5% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Abbott J.B. | Labour Party | 634 | 22.8% | 68.3% | +43.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dennett M.D. | Labour Party | 567 | 20.4% | 61.1% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harper D.J.R. | Conservative Party | 201 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 5 | Rowan R.E. | Conservative Party | 193 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 6 | Westman R.S. | Green Party | 189 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 7 | Dalton T. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Howard J.N. | Liberal Democrats | 108 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | Urquhart L. | FBM | 92 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — |
Hough Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 821
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baker S.M. | Labour Party | 670 | 27.2% | 81.6% | +56.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wainwright K.P. | Labour Party | 627 | 25.5% | 76.4% | +51.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harris P. | Labour Party | 541 | 22.0% | 65.9% | +40.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Nguzo L.R. | Conservative Party | 320 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 5 | Codling D. | Green Party | 182 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 6 | Smith L.A. | Reform UK | 123 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Norton South and Preston Brook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 849
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cargill D. | Labour Party | 611 | 24.0% | 72.0% | +47.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stretch T. | Labour Party | 592 | 23.2% | 69.7% | +44.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lloyd Jones M. | Labour Party | 569 | 22.3% | 67.0% | +42.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davidson P. | Conservative Party | 268 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Marlow M.P. | Liberal Democrats | 191 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 6 | Wyna C.M. | Independent | 183 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 7 | Barnes P.L. | Liberal Democrats | 133 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — |
Halton Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 824
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard H.N. | Labour Party | 669 | 27.1% | 81.2% | +56.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cargill E. | Labour Party | 635 | 25.7% | 77.1% | +52.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Carlin C.M. | Labour Party | 560 | 22.7% | 68.0% | +43.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Whyte D.D. | Independent | 234 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 5 | Powell J. | Conservative Party | 229 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 6 | Borne L. | Liberal Democrats | 144 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — |
Central and West Bank · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 602
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wallace P. | Labour Party | 535 | 29.6% | 88.9% | +63.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hill S. | Labour Party | 478 | 26.5% | 79.4% | +54.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hutchinson N. | Labour Party | 429 | 23.8% | 71.3% | +46.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McLean J.L. | Conservative Party | 140 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 5 | Coveney R.A. | Liberal Democrats | 113 | 6.3% | 18.8% | — | |
| 6 | Fifield J.G. | Conservative Party | 111 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — |
Halton View · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 73.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +48.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 861
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polhill R. | Labour Party | 764 | 29.6% | 88.8% | +63.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McInerney T. | Labour Party | 688 | 26.6% | 79.9% | +54.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whitley L.J. | Labour Party | 629 | 24.4% | 73.1% | +48.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clarke T.J. | Conservative Party | 325 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 5 | Fraser J.P. | Reform UK | 176 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — |
Bridgewater · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 869
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson S.M.J. | Labour Party | 745 | 28.6% | 85.7% | +60.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stockton J.R. | Labour Party | 648 | 24.9% | 74.6% | +49.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Plumpton Walsh C.P. | Labour Party | 648 | 24.9% | 74.6% | +49.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dorian D.J. | Conservative Party | 317 | 12.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 5 | Howard S.N. | Liberal Democrats | 249 | 9.6% | 28.7% | — |
Halton Lea · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 79.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +54.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 745
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loftus K. | Labour Party | 654 | 29.2% | 87.7% | +62.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson D. | Labour Party | 627 | 28.0% | 84.1% | +59.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lowe A.A. | Labour Party | 590 | 26.4% | 79.2% | +54.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davidson S.M. | Conservative Party | 211 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 5 | Woods D.J. | Liberal Democrats | 154 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — |
Ditton, Hale Village and Halebank · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 79.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +54.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 932
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wharton M. | Labour Party | 903 | 32.3% | 96.9% | +71.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dourley E. | Labour Party | 795 | 28.4% | 85.3% | +60.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wright M. | Labour Party | 745 | 26.6% | 79.9% | +54.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jones N.A. | Conservative Party | 354 | 12.7% | 38.0% | — |
Appleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 81.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +56.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 732
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones E. | Labour Party | 760 | 34.6% | 103.9% | +78.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Philbin G. | Labour Party | 630 | 28.7% | 86.1% | +61.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Teeling A. | Labour Party | 593 | 27.0% | 81.0% | +56.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Molyneux C.L.J. | Conservative Party | 212 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — |
Bankfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 83.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +58.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 778
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDermott T. | Labour Party | 722 | 30.9% | 92.8% | +67.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Goodall L.M. | Labour Party | 662 | 28.4% | 85.1% | +60.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Becan L.J. | Labour Party | 653 | 28.0% | 83.9% | +58.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hodnett J.N. | Conservative Party | 298 | 12.8% | 38.3% | — |
Highfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 87.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +62.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 983
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wall A.M. | Labour Party | 929 | 31.5% | 94.5% | +69.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nolan P.C. | Labour Party | 856 | 29.0% | 87.1% | +62.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gilligan B. | Labour Party | 856 | 29.0% | 87.1% | +62.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Griffiths P.D. | Conservative Party | 307 | 10.4% | 31.2% | — |