← Hammersmith and Fulham (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Hammersmith and Fulham 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 50 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 55,996 | 57.1% | 40 | 80.0% | 29 | 58.0% | +11 |
| Conservative Party | 28,562 | 29.1% | 10 | 20.0% | 15 | 30.0% | -5 |
| Liberal Democrats | 10,399 | 10.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 10.0% | -5 |
| Green Party | 2,919 | 3.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.0% | -1 |
| Independent | 183 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 49 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 98,108 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 50 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Fulham Town · 2 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Munster · 3 seats · won at 41.0% · above quota
- Ravenscourt · 2 seats · won at 52.9% · above quota
- Walham Green · 2 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Parsons Green and Sandford · 2 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Brook Green · 2 seats · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Sands End · 3 seats · won at 49.0% · above quota
- Lillie · 2 seats · won at 61.5% · above quota
- Avonmore · 2 seats · won at 63.0% · above quota
- Wendell Park · 2 seats · won at 63.6% · above quota
- Palace and Hurlingham · 3 seats · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Coningham · 3 seats · won at 56.5% · above quota
- Wormholt · 2 seats · won at 68.4% · above quota
- Hammersmith Broadway · 2 seats · won at 69.8% · above quota
- Fulham Reach · 3 seats · won at 62.2% · above quota
- Grove · 2 seats · won at 71.5% · above quota
- West Kensington · 3 seats · won at 63.4% · above quota
- Addison · 2 seats · won at 73.1% · above quota
- Shepherd's Bush Green · 2 seats · won at 76.2% · above quota
- White City · 3 seats · won at 72.1% · above quota
- College Park and Old Oak · 3 seats · won at 76.3% · above quota
Race results
Fulham Town · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,718
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brocklebank-Fowler V. | Conservative Party | 817 | 23.8% | 47.6% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dinsmore A. | Conservative Party | 759 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hancock A. | Liberal Democrats | 502 | 14.6% | 29.2% | — | |
| 4 | Fennimore S. | Labour Party | 497 | 14.5% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Thorpe J. | Labour Party | 450 | 13.1% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Pounsford R. | Liberal Democrats | 411 | 12.0% | 23.9% | — |
Munster · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,711
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karmel A. | Conservative Party | 1,169 | 14.4% | 43.1% | +18.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alford A. | Conservative Party | 1,164 | 14.3% | 42.9% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stanton D. | Conservative Party | 1,113 | 13.7% | 41.0% | +16.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cupit S. | Labour Party | 899 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 5 | Paynter L. | Labour Party | 863 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — | |
| 6 | Kamaran R. | Labour Party | 831 | 10.2% | 30.6% | — | |
| 7 | Horlick N. | Liberal Democrats | 734 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 8 | Townsend T. | Liberal Democrats | 706 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 9 | Burden J. | Liberal Democrats | 655 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — |
Ravenscourt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,057
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins L. | Labour Party | 1,262 | 30.7% | 61.4% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Walsh P. | Labour Party | 1,088 | 26.4% | 52.9% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fitzgerald H. | Conservative Party | 515 | 12.5% | 25.0% | — | |
| 4 | Higton M. | Conservative Party | 497 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 5 | Ann Gonsalves A. | Green Party | 277 | 6.7% | 13.5% | — | |
| 6 | Bewley H. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — | |
| 7 | Cook M. | Liberal Democrats | 200 | 4.9% | 9.7% | — |
Walham Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,584
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell-Simon T. | Labour Party | 907 | 28.6% | 57.3% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Nwaogbe G. | Labour Party | 860 | 27.2% | 54.3% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cubitt R. | Conservative Party | 458 | 14.5% | 28.9% | — | |
| 4 | Monteith-Mann J. | Conservative Party | 429 | 13.5% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | McDonagh R. | Liberal Democrats | 185 | 5.8% | 11.7% | — | |
| 6 | Owen R. | Green Party | 172 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — | |
| 7 | Bagwell W. | Liberal Democrats | 156 | 4.9% | 9.9% | — |
Parsons Green and Sandford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,689
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Afonso J. | Conservative Party | 935 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pascu-Tulbure A. | Conservative Party | 922 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cooper C. | Labour Party | 522 | 15.5% | 30.9% | — | |
| 4 | Grigg J. | Labour Party | 468 | 13.9% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Muir G. | Liberal Democrats | 267 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — | |
| 6 | Nightingale B. | Liberal Democrats | 263 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — |
Brook Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,085
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antonaides S. | Labour Party | 1,237 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lang A. | Labour Party | 1,141 | 27.4% | 54.7% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Duthie C. | Conservative Party | 639 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 4 | Hewitt S. | Conservative Party | 625 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 5 | Brooks D. | Liberal Democrats | 275 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 6 | McCarthy N. | Liberal Democrats | 253 | 6.1% | 12.1% | — |
Sands End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,242
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexander P. | Labour Party | 1,199 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rosenberg A. | Labour Party | 1,177 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel A. | Labour Party | 1,098 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Campbell C. | Conservative Party | 970 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — | |
| 5 | Downer-Sanderson L. | Conservative Party | 912 | 13.6% | 40.7% | — | |
| 6 | Waine S. | Conservative Party | 869 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 7 | Burnet R. | Liberal Democrats | 297 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 8 | Milch G. | Liberal Democrats | 203 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
Lillie · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,379
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman B. | Labour Party | 903 | 32.7% | 65.5% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holder S. | Labour Party | 848 | 30.7% | 61.5% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Maister E. | Conservative Party | 368 | 13.3% | 26.7% | — | |
| 4 | Tate J. | Conservative Party | 329 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Brooke-Edwards E. | Liberal Democrats | 165 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | Bicknell A. | Liberal Democrats | 145 | 5.3% | 10.5% | — |
Avonmore · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,680
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Janes L. | Labour Party | 1,176 | 35.0% | 70.0% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Morton D. | Labour Party | 1,059 | 31.5% | 63.0% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lovering H. | Conservative Party | 430 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | Ahmed H. | Conservative Party | 412 | 12.3% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Buchanan-Barrow E. | Liberal Democrats | 283 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — |
Wendell Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,052
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey R. | Labour Party | 1,511 | 36.8% | 73.7% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Siddique A. | Labour Party | 1,305 | 31.8% | 63.6% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Milmore A. | Conservative Party | 462 | 11.3% | 22.5% | — | |
| 4 | Perschke J. | Conservative Party | 429 | 10.5% | 20.9% | — | |
| 5 | Gaughan A. | Liberal Democrats | 396 | 9.7% | 19.3% | — |
Palace and Hurlingham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,986
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lloyd-Harris A. | Conservative Party | 1,774 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Borland J. | Conservative Party | 1,711 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Afzal-Khan A. | Conservative Party | 1,682 | 18.8% | 56.3% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Needham C. | Labour Party | 952 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Caleb-Landy J. | Labour Party | 812 | 9.1% | 27.2% | — | |
| 6 | Vincent G. | Labour Party | 729 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — | |
| 7 | Dragadze T. | Liberal Democrats | 574 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 8 | Al-Fulaij N. | Green Party | 540 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 9 | Horn A. | Independent | 183 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Coningham · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,207
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homan L. | Labour Party | 1,529 | 23.1% | 69.3% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ree R. | Labour Party | 1,305 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Vaughan R. | Labour Party | 1,247 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Murphy C. | Green Party | 531 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 5 | Walker A. | Green Party | 459 | 6.9% | 20.8% | — | |
| 6 | Simms B. | Green Party | 347 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — | |
| 7 | Iggulden R. | Conservative Party | 302 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Kiss L. | Conservative Party | 291 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ransom B. | Conservative Party | 281 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 10 | Remy C. | Liberal Democrats | 175 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 11 | Miller D. | Liberal Democrats | 153 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Wormholt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,447
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schmid M. | Labour Party | 1,010 | 34.9% | 69.8% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Trehy N. | Labour Party | 990 | 34.2% | 68.4% | +35.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lyons S. | Conservative Party | 250 | 8.6% | 17.3% | — | |
| 4 | Byrne E. | Green Party | 247 | 8.5% | 17.1% | — | |
| 5 | Bajwa F. | Conservative Party | 240 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 6 | Illingworth M. | Liberal Democrats | 156 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
Hammersmith Broadway · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,587
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apthorp E. | Labour Party | 1,198 | 37.8% | 75.5% | +42.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Quigley P. | Labour Party | 1,108 | 34.9% | 69.8% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mason N. | Conservative Party | 314 | 9.9% | 19.8% | — | |
| 4 | Rogers D. | Conservative Party | 258 | 8.1% | 16.3% | — | |
| 5 | Martin D. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 5.1% | 10.1% | — | |
| 6 | Oliaji M. | Liberal Democrats | 134 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — |
Fulham Reach · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,760
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richardson L. | Labour Party | 1,983 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miri O. | Labour Party | 1,756 | 21.2% | 63.6% | +38.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Souslous N. | Labour Party | 1,717 | 20.7% | 62.2% | +37.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Beloten E. | Conservative Party | 756 | 9.1% | 27.4% | — | |
| 5 | Windsor-Clive J. | Conservative Party | 728 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 6 | Lone S. | Conservative Party | 653 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 7 | Sarmo J. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 8 | Wip R. | Liberal Democrats | 292 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
Grove · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,919
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cowan S. | Labour Party | 1,412 | 36.8% | 73.6% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rowbottom H. | Labour Party | 1,372 | 35.8% | 71.5% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Briscoe O. | Conservative Party | 360 | 9.4% | 18.8% | — | |
| 4 | Roper M. | Liberal Democrats | 353 | 9.2% | 18.4% | — | |
| 5 | Johnson D. | Conservative Party | 340 | 8.9% | 17.7% | — |
West Kensington · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,914
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown D. | Labour Party | 1,280 | 22.3% | 66.9% | +41.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor S. | Labour Party | 1,270 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chevoppe-Verdier F. | Labour Party | 1,213 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Richards S. | Conservative Party | 439 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 5 | Monerawela Y. | Conservative Party | 380 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Temkov D. | Conservative Party | 364 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 7 | Barnes G. | Liberal Democrats | 289 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 8 | Taylor S. | Liberal Democrats | 261 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 9 | Barton P. | Liberal Democrats | 197 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 10 | Marshall S. | Social Democratic Party | 49 | 0.9% | 2.6% | — |
Addison · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 73.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,635
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daly J. | Labour Party | 1,291 | 39.5% | 79.0% | +45.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Melton R. | Labour Party | 1,195 | 36.5% | 73.1% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davies L. | Conservative Party | 276 | 8.4% | 16.9% | — | |
| 4 | Burden J. | Liberal Democrats | 259 | 7.9% | 15.8% | — | |
| 5 | Loveday M. | Conservative Party | 249 | 7.6% | 15.2% | — |
Shepherd's Bush Green · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 76.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,026
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Umeh M. | Labour Party | 784 | 38.2% | 76.5% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Qayyum Z. | Labour Party | 781 | 38.1% | 76.2% | +42.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Buchanan-Barrow P. | Liberal Democrats | 170 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — | |
| 4 | Lewis A. | Conservative Party | 165 | 8.0% | 16.1% | — | |
| 5 | Vinante C. | Conservative Party | 151 | 7.4% | 14.7% | — |
White City · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,750
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones A. | Labour Party | 1,396 | 26.6% | 79.8% | +54.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Perez N. | Labour Party | 1,388 | 26.4% | 79.3% | +54.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Umeh F. | Labour Party | 1,262 | 24.0% | 72.1% | +47.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kelly D. | Green Party | 346 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 5 | Farah S. | Conservative Party | 239 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 6 | Brett F. | Liberal Democrats | 224 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — | |
| 7 | Mahmood Z. | Conservative Party | 197 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 8 | Jamal N. | Conservative Party | 197 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — |
College Park and Old Oak · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 76.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +51.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,564
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harcourt W. | Labour Party | 1,284 | 27.4% | 82.1% | +57.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sanderson A. | Labour Party | 1,237 | 26.4% | 79.1% | +54.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kwon B. | Labour Party | 1,194 | 25.4% | 76.3% | +51.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith J. | Conservative Party | 248 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 5 | Nicholson A. | Conservative Party | 247 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 6 | Bergholcs K. | Conservative Party | 247 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 7 | McLoughlin M. | Liberal Democrats | 235 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |