← Harrow (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Harrow 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 22 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 55 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 83,261 | 47.1% | 31 | 56.4% | 27 | 49.1% | +4 |
| Labour Party | 71,893 | 40.7% | 24 | 43.6% | 23 | 41.8% | +1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 11,207 | 6.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.5% | -3 |
| Green Party | 5,800 | 3.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.8% | -1 |
| Independent | 4,058 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.8% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 411 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| INDN | 211 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 176,841 | 100.0% | 55 | 100.0% | 55 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Rayners Lane · 2 seats · won at 31.4% · −1.9 pts below quota
- North Harrow · 2 seats · won at 45.7% · above quota
- Harrow on the Hill · 2 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Headstone · 3 seats · won at 40.3% · above quota
- Greenhill · 3 seats · won at 43.9% · above quota
- Wealdstone South · 2 seats · won at 52.3% · above quota
- Hatch End · 2 seats · won at 52.6% · above quota
- Kenton West · 2 seats · won at 52.7% · above quota
- West Harrow · 2 seats · won at 52.9% · above quota
- Centenary · 3 seats · won at 46.6% · above quota
- Marlborough · 3 seats · won at 46.7% · above quota
- Pinner South · 3 seats · won at 48.1% · above quota
- Edgware · 3 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- Pinner · 3 seats · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Canons · 2 seats · won at 61.3% · above quota
- Roxbourne · 2 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Belmont · 2 seats · won at 62.0% · above quota
- Harrow Weald · 3 seats · won at 54.1% · above quota
- Kenton East · 3 seats · won at 54.2% · above quota
- Wealdstone North · 2 seats · won at 63.1% · above quota
- Roxeth · 3 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- Stanmore · 3 seats · won at 56.8% · above quota
Race results
Rayners Lane · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 31.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −1.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,111
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suresh K. | Labour Party | 1,399 | 22.5% | 45.0% | +11.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Idaikkadar T. | Conservative Party | 977 | 15.7% | 31.4% | −1.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sharif T. | Labour Party | 962 | 15.5% | 30.9% | — | |
| 4 | Morjaria M. | Conservative Party | 886 | 14.2% | 28.5% | — | |
| 5 | Noyce C. | Liberal Democrats | 665 | 10.7% | 21.4% | — | |
| 6 | Yogalingam S. | Independent | 559 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — | |
| 7 | Noyce G. | Liberal Democrats | 426 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Langley R. | Green Party | 182 | 2.9% | 5.9% | — | |
| 9 | Crossman H. | Independent | 166 | 2.7% | 5.3% | — |
North Harrow · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,257
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baxter C. | Conservative Party | 1,510 | 23.2% | 46.4% | +13.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mote J. | Conservative Party | 1,487 | 22.8% | 45.7% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown H. | Labour Party | 1,482 | 22.8% | 45.5% | — | |
| 4 | Weston G. | Labour Party | 1,448 | 22.2% | 44.5% | — | |
| 5 | Wallace E. | Green Party | 331 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — | |
| 6 | Amutharasan M. | Liberal Democrats | 255 | 3.9% | 7.8% | — |
Harrow on the Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,733
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kulih E. | Labour Party | 1,261 | 23.1% | 46.1% | +12.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hickman S. | Labour Party | 1,260 | 23.1% | 46.1% | +12.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fothergill K. | Conservative Party | 1,208 | 22.1% | 44.2% | — | |
| 4 | Jackson W. | Conservative Party | 1,116 | 20.4% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | Kim S. | Green Party | 325 | 5.9% | 11.9% | — | |
| 6 | Branch G. | Liberal Democrats | 296 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
Headstone · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,299
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown S. | Labour Party | 1,860 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Proctor N. | Labour Party | 1,820 | 14.1% | 42.3% | +17.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Suresh S. | Labour Party | 1,733 | 13.4% | 40.3% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lewinson L. | Conservative Party | 1,352 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Seymour A. | Conservative Party | 1,302 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 6 | Singh V. | Conservative Party | 1,278 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Shah H. | Independent | 796 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 8 | Eldridge G. | Independent | 782 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 9 | Turner M. | Independent | 742 | 5.8% | 17.3% | — | |
| 10 | Poskitt A. | Green Party | 499 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 11 | Levene T. | Liberal Democrats | 421 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 12 | Rescia P. | Liberal Democrats | 311 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — |
Greenhill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,300
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anderson D. | Labour Party | 1,115 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ali G. | Labour Party | 1,017 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shah-Levy A. | Labour Party | 1,009 | 14.6% | 43.9% | +18.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dunkerley S. | Conservative Party | 852 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 5 | Benjamin R. | Conservative Party | 841 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 6 | Kinnear E. | Conservative Party | 800 | 11.6% | 34.8% | — | |
| 7 | Moore S. | Green Party | 401 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 8 | Nandhra P. | Liberal Democrats | 337 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 9 | Boethe N. | Liberal Democrats | 265 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 10 | Tonge L. | Liberal Democrats | 263 | 3.8% | 11.4% | — |
Wealdstone South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,620
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dolor K. | Labour Party | 888 | 27.4% | 54.8% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gilligan D. | Labour Party | 847 | 26.2% | 52.3% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kara M. | Conservative Party | 661 | 20.4% | 40.8% | — | |
| 4 | Gothadiya N. | Conservative Party | 635 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 5 | Khatun H. | Green Party | 208 | 6.4% | 12.8% | — |
Hatch End · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,761
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall S. | Conservative Party | 1,629 | 29.5% | 59.0% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Goodwin-Freeman M. | Conservative Party | 1,452 | 26.3% | 52.6% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Patel N. | Labour Party | 725 | 13.1% | 26.3% | — | |
| 4 | Stephenson B. | Labour Party | 706 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 5 | Ismail S. | Liberal Democrats | 406 | 7.4% | 14.7% | — | |
| 6 | Roopram B. | Green Party | 395 | 7.2% | 14.3% | — | |
| 7 | Price I. | Reform UK | 208 | 3.8% | 7.5% | — |
Kenton West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,100
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mithani V. | Conservative Party | 1,701 | 27.4% | 54.9% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Rabadia K. | Conservative Party | 1,635 | 26.4% | 52.7% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Maru A. | Labour Party | 1,300 | 21.0% | 41.9% | — | |
| 4 | Maru M. | Labour Party | 1,295 | 20.9% | 41.8% | — | |
| 5 | Boethe C. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 4.3% | 8.7% | — |
West Harrow · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,757
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shah R. | Labour Party | 1,507 | 27.3% | 54.7% | +21.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hussain A. | Labour Party | 1,459 | 26.5% | 52.9% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilson L. | Conservative Party | 911 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — | |
| 4 | Ojo C. | Conservative Party | 849 | 15.4% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Sobiecki M. | Green Party | 437 | 7.9% | 15.9% | — | |
| 6 | Dean E. | Liberal Democrats | 351 | 6.4% | 12.7% | — |
Centenary · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,864
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bharadia G. | Conservative Party | 2,267 | 19.6% | 58.7% | +33.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ashton D. | Conservative Party | 2,165 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chowdhury S. | Conservative Party | 1,799 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mawkin P. | Labour Party | 1,523 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 5 | Mohanty B. | Labour Party | 1,484 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 6 | Yusuf Y. | Labour Party | 1,294 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 7 | Karia N. | Liberal Democrats | 549 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — | |
| 8 | Cox L. | Liberal Democrats | 511 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — |
Marlborough · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,345
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perry D. | Labour Party | 1,172 | 16.7% | 50.0% | +25.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parmar V. | Labour Party | 1,134 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Weiss A. | Labour Party | 1,095 | 15.6% | 46.7% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Prakash S. | Conservative Party | 563 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 5 | Patel J. | Conservative Party | 534 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 6 | Solanki D. | Conservative Party | 529 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 7 | Mathias L. | Green Party | 439 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 8 | Pali S. | Independent | 401 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 9 | Bicari E. | Independent | 356 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 10 | Arrigo P. | Liberal Democrats | 320 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 11 | Patel N. | Independent | 256 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 12 | Al-Basha D. | Liberal Democrats | 236 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — |
Pinner South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,363
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baxter J. | Conservative Party | 2,418 | 18.5% | 55.4% | +30.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Karia H. | Conservative Party | 2,305 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lammiman J. | Conservative Party | 2,097 | 16.0% | 48.1% | +23.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brook-Harnett F. | Labour Party | 1,728 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Phillips W. | Labour Party | 1,442 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Vakesan R. | Labour Party | 1,380 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 7 | Karia S. | Liberal Democrats | 865 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 8 | Lee A. | Green Party | 747 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 9 | Kowalczyk Z. | Reform UK | 108 | 0.8% | 2.5% | — |
Edgware · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,846
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackman N. | Conservative Party | 2,091 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Teli Y. | Conservative Party | 1,934 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Parekh N. | Labour Party | 1,880 | 16.3% | 48.9% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Voloseniuc S. | Conservative Party | 1,801 | 15.6% | 46.8% | — | |
| 5 | Lee J. | Labour Party | 1,752 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 6 | Murphy-Strachan A. | Labour Party | 1,687 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 7 | Kuo S. | Liberal Democrats | 394 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
Pinner · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,799
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stevenson N. | Conservative Party | 2,044 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kumaran K. | Conservative Party | 2,012 | 17.7% | 53.0% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Osborn P. | Conservative Party | 1,945 | 17.1% | 51.2% | +26.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Anderson J. | Labour Party | 1,271 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Lockie J. | Labour Party | 1,104 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 6 | Stackpoole L. | Labour Party | 1,077 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 7 | Chamberlain V. | Liberal Democrats | 775 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 8 | Lee K. | Green Party | 618 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 9 | Bunce-Linsell J. | Liberal Democrats | 552 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — |
Canons · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,432
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jogia A. | Conservative Party | 1,679 | 34.5% | 69.1% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moshenson A. | Conservative Party | 1,490 | 30.6% | 61.3% | +27.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dighe S. | Labour Party | 698 | 14.4% | 28.7% | — | |
| 4 | Lockie L. | Labour Party | 673 | 13.8% | 27.7% | — | |
| 5 | Bore J. | Liberal Democrats | 323 | 6.6% | 13.3% | — |
Roxbourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,218
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henson G. | Labour Party | 1,446 | 32.6% | 65.2% | +31.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Henson M. | Labour Party | 1,369 | 30.9% | 61.7% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rajalingam A. | Conservative Party | 764 | 17.2% | 34.4% | — | |
| 4 | Hinkley J. | Conservative Party | 687 | 15.5% | 31.0% | — | |
| 5 | Yasin T. | Liberal Democrats | 170 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — |
Belmont · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,753
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patel A. | Conservative Party | 1,720 | 31.2% | 62.5% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parmar M. | Conservative Party | 1,707 | 31.0% | 62.0% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Anderson S. | Labour Party | 843 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 4 | Mathur K. | Labour Party | 716 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | Mehta S. | Green Party | 309 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 6 | Kendall A. | INDN | 211 | 3.8% | 7.7% | — |
Harrow Weald · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,675
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chauhan R. | Conservative Party | 2,055 | 18.6% | 55.9% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Patel P. | Conservative Party | 2,017 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Greek S. | Conservative Party | 1,989 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Green S. | Labour Party | 1,318 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 5 | Sharma T. | Labour Party | 1,227 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 6 | Ali-Asghar A. | Labour Party | 1,221 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 7 | Taylor V. | Liberal Democrats | 437 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 8 | Diamond D. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 9 | Hill D. | Liberal Democrats | 366 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — |
Kenton East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,099
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hirani N. | Conservative Party | 2,695 | 21.9% | 65.7% | +40.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Halai C. | Conservative Party | 2,498 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sumaria S. | Conservative Party | 2,223 | 18.1% | 54.2% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dixit R. | Labour Party | 1,650 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Raghwani M. | Labour Party | 1,626 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 6 | Joshi R. | Labour Party | 1,605 | 13.1% | 39.2% | — |
Wealdstone North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,157
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choudhury S. | Labour Party | 1,405 | 32.6% | 65.2% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | O'Dell P. | Labour Party | 1,361 | 31.6% | 63.1% | +29.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tikoo V. | Conservative Party | 781 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 4 | Greek P. | Conservative Party | 766 | 17.8% | 35.5% | — |
Roxeth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,587
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miles J. | Labour Party | 2,180 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Assad P. | Labour Party | 2,009 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kalu R. | Labour Party | 1,991 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Deleepan R. | Conservative Party | 1,422 | 13.2% | 39.6% | — | |
| 5 | Karunalingam S. | Conservative Party | 1,364 | 12.7% | 38.0% | — | |
| 6 | Pratheepan S. | Conservative Party | 1,242 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 7 | Patel S. | Green Party | 553 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — |
Stanmore · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,505
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ashton M. | Conservative Party | 2,340 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Benjamin P. | Conservative Party | 2,244 | 21.3% | 64.0% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wagman Z. | Conservative Party | 1,992 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gibbons H. | Labour Party | 852 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Shah N. | Labour Party | 803 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 6 | Gallant J. | Labour Party | 784 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 7 | Kopelman N. | Liberal Democrats | 392 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 8 | Robinson L. | Green Party | 356 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 9 | Levy P. | Liberal Democrats | 330 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 10 | Levy S. | Liberal Democrats | 327 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 11 | Koch H. | Reform UK | 95 | 0.9% | 2.7% | — |