← Hillingdon (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Hillingdon 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 53 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 85,819 | 48.2% | 30 | 56.6% | 26 | 49.1% | +4 |
| Labour Party | 73,926 | 41.6% | 23 | 43.4% | 23 | 43.4% | 0 |
| Green Party | 13,507 | 7.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 7.5% | -4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 2,963 | 1.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 492 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 298 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 239 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| NHAP | 219 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| LLL | 212 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 199 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 177,874 | 100.0% | 53 | 100.0% | 53 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Harefield Village · 1 seat · won at 56.9% · above quota
- Yiewsley · 2 seats · won at 49.1% · above quota
- Charville · 2 seats · won at 50.6% · above quota
- Hillingdon West · 2 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Heathrow Villages · 2 seats · won at 53.0% · above quota
- Uxbridge · 3 seats · won at 45.1% · above quota
- Cotham and Cowley · 3 seats · won at 46.2% · above quota
- Northwood Hills · 2 seats · won at 57.1% · above quota
- Northwood · 2 seats · won at 60.5% · above quota
- West Drayton · 3 seats · won at 52.2% · above quota
- Ruislip Manor · 2 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Ickenham and South Harefield · 3 seats · won at 53.9% · above quota
- South Ruislip · 3 seats · won at 59.4% · above quota
- Yeading · 2 seats · won at 68.6% · above quota
- Hillingdon East · 3 seats · won at 60.5% · above quota
- Eastcote · 3 seats · won at 62.3% · above quota
- Wood End · 3 seats · won at 64.3% · above quota
- Ruislip · 3 seats · won at 66.0% · above quota
- Belmore · 3 seats · won at 69.2% · above quota
- Pinkwell · 3 seats · won at 74.5% · above quota
- Hayes Town · 3 seats · won at 74.6% · above quota
Race results
Harefield Village · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,632
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palmer J. | Conservative Party | 929 | 56.9% | +6.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Samuel N. | Green Party | 524 | 32.1% | — | |
| 3 | Birah M. | Labour Party | 179 | 11.0% | — |
Yiewsley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,280
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abby N. | Labour Party | 1,361 | 29.9% | 59.7% | +26.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Punga S. | Labour Party | 1,120 | 24.6% | 49.1% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cantwell J. | Conservative Party | 861 | 18.9% | 37.8% | — | |
| 4 | Deville A. | Conservative Party | 842 | 18.5% | 36.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bowman J. | Green Party | 205 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 6 | Goss S. | Green Party | 170 | 3.7% | 7.5% | — |
Charville · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,861
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson-West B. | Labour Party | 1,481 | 25.9% | 51.8% | +18.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Davies D. | Conservative Party | 1,447 | 25.3% | 50.6% | +17.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Starr S. | Labour Party | 1,398 | 24.4% | 48.9% | — | |
| 4 | Barnes T. | Conservative Party | 1,396 | 24.4% | 48.8% | — |
Hillingdon West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,964
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennett A. | Conservative Party | 1,124 | 28.6% | 57.2% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chamdal R. | Conservative Party | 1,014 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McDonald M. | Labour Party | 704 | 17.9% | 35.9% | — | |
| 4 | Meen R. | Labour Party | 688 | 17.5% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Pratt C. | Green Party | 213 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — | |
| 6 | Allam D. | Green Party | 184 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Heathrow Villages · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,406
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson J. | Labour Party | 1,336 | 27.8% | 55.5% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Money P. | Labour Party | 1,274 | 26.5% | 53.0% | +19.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor C. | Conservative Party | 943 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Sydenham D. | Conservative Party | 886 | 18.4% | 36.8% | — | |
| 5 | Greenham A. | Green Party | 227 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — | |
| 6 | Khan Z. | Green Party | 146 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — |
Uxbridge · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,857
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burrows K. | Conservative Party | 1,971 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burles T. | Labour Party | 1,764 | 15.2% | 45.7% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Choubedar F. | Conservative Party | 1,740 | 15.0% | 45.1% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rathore R. | Conservative Party | 1,719 | 14.9% | 44.6% | — | |
| 5 | Gill J. | Labour Party | 1,575 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 6 | Thurgur J. | Labour Party | 1,572 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 7 | West C. | Green Party | 452 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 8 | Panayiotou A. | Green Party | 342 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 9 | Ray-Howett M. | Green Party | 306 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 10 | Harbord G. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 129 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — |
Cotham and Cowley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,689
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmad-Wallana S. | Conservative Party | 1,851 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chamdal R. | Conservative Party | 1,822 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gohil E. | Conservative Party | 1,703 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Eginton T. | Labour Party | 1,572 | 14.2% | 42.6% | — | |
| 5 | Garelick S. | Labour Party | 1,455 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 6 | Marqvardt Jorgart K. | Labour Party | 1,394 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 7 | Crook N. | Green Party | 296 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — | |
| 8 | McDonnell V. | Green Party | 289 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 9 | West L. | Green Party | 266 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 10 | Fischer A. | NHAP | 219 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 11 | Courtenay G. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 199 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Northwood Hills · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,848
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bianco J. | Conservative Party | 1,686 | 29.6% | 59.2% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bhatt K. | Conservative Party | 1,627 | 28.6% | 57.1% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Prince K. | Labour Party | 754 | 13.2% | 26.5% | — | |
| 4 | Sachedina S. | Labour Party | 640 | 11.2% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Dollimore P. | Liberal Democrats | 359 | 6.3% | 12.6% | — | |
| 6 | Edmeades S. | Green Party | 319 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 7 | Ross A. | Green Party | 310 | 5.4% | 10.9% | — |
Northwood · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,946
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higgins H. | Conservative Party | 1,823 | 30.9% | 61.9% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lewis R. | Conservative Party | 1,783 | 30.3% | 60.5% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hutchins J. | Labour Party | 630 | 10.7% | 21.4% | — | |
| 4 | Banks J. | Liberal Democrats | 557 | 9.5% | 18.9% | — | |
| 5 | Miller D. | Liberal Democrats | 455 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — | |
| 6 | Holding F. | Green Party | 288 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 7 | Oswell J. | Labour Party | 186 | 3.2% | 6.3% | — | |
| 8 | Miles S. | Green Party | 170 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
West Drayton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,659
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sweeting J. | Labour Party | 2,111 | 19.2% | 57.7% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Farley S. | Labour Party | 1,968 | 17.9% | 53.8% | +28.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Islam M. | Labour Party | 1,911 | 17.4% | 52.2% | +27.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Martin K. | Conservative Party | 1,428 | 13.0% | 39.0% | — | |
| 5 | Bisnauthsing S. | Conservative Party | 1,312 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 6 | Ali H. | Conservative Party | 1,296 | 11.8% | 35.4% | — | |
| 7 | West S. | Green Party | 315 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 8 | Bruce I. | Green Party | 272 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 9 | Smith M. | Green Party | 209 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — | |
| 10 | Barros C. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 154 | 1.4% | 4.2% | — |
Ruislip Manor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,151
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Brien S. | Conservative Party | 1,976 | 31.4% | 62.7% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mills D. | Conservative Party | 1,951 | 31.0% | 61.9% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Moore N. | Labour Party | 806 | 12.8% | 25.6% | — | |
| 4 | Ghei R. | Labour Party | 782 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 5 | Lee G. | Green Party | 291 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — | |
| 6 | Winterbotham M. | Liberal Democrats | 268 | 4.3% | 8.5% | — | |
| 7 | Wilkinson G. | Green Party | 228 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Ickenham and South Harefield · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,707
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goddard M. | Conservative Party | 2,734 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lavery E. | Conservative Party | 2,681 | 19.0% | 57.0% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Banerjee K. | Conservative Party | 2,537 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Green S. | Green Party | 1,246 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — | |
| 5 | Campbell J. | Labour Party | 1,111 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 6 | Marie Adams R. | Green Party | 1,061 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 7 | Espley P. | Labour Party | 997 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 8 | McDonald K. | Labour Party | 938 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 9 | Wigram Z. | Green Party | 817 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — |
South Ruislip · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,946
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills R. | Conservative Party | 2,373 | 20.0% | 60.1% | +35.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tuckwell S. | Conservative Party | 2,356 | 19.9% | 59.7% | +34.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Makwana H. | Conservative Party | 2,343 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Liberty C. | Labour Party | 1,195 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 5 | Sim A. | Labour Party | 1,176 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 6 | Sharma M. | Labour Party | 1,077 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Baynton S. | Green Party | 385 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Howes D. | Green Party | 365 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 9 | Rytter T. | Independent | 298 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — | |
| 10 | Crook P. | Green Party | 271 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Yeading · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,204
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhot J. | Labour Party | 1,553 | 35.2% | 70.5% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Judge Dhot R. | Labour Party | 1,511 | 34.3% | 68.6% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bridges K. | Conservative Party | 711 | 16.1% | 32.3% | — | |
| 4 | Smallwood C. | Conservative Party | 633 | 14.4% | 28.7% | — |
Hillingdon East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,414
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sullivan C. | Conservative Party | 2,104 | 20.5% | 61.6% | +36.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bridges W. | Conservative Party | 2,097 | 20.5% | 61.4% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chapman A. | Conservative Party | 2,066 | 20.2% | 60.5% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brar J. | Labour Party | 1,311 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Goonesekera G. | Labour Party | 1,231 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 6 | Virk G. | Labour Party | 1,194 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 7 | Gardner S. | Social Democratic Party | 239 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — |
Eastcote · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,180
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denys N. | Conservative Party | 3,369 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Haggar B. | Conservative Party | 3,272 | 21.1% | 63.2% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Edwards I. | Conservative Party | 3,227 | 20.8% | 62.3% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Keys D. | Labour Party | 1,256 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 5 | Cowlin R. | Labour Party | 1,201 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 6 | Tapper J. | Labour Party | 1,190 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 7 | Ross R. | Green Party | 611 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 8 | Cottew T. | Liberal Democrats | 542 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 9 | Kennedy A. | Green Party | 495 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | Stephens D. | Green Party | 304 | 2.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 11 | Henry T. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 72 | 0.5% | 1.4% | — |
Wood End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,078
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garelick E. | Labour Party | 2,133 | 23.1% | 69.3% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kaur K. | Labour Party | 2,073 | 22.4% | 67.3% | +42.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mathers S. | Labour Party | 1,978 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brightman N. | Conservative Party | 969 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gudi R. | Conservative Party | 886 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | Yarrow D. | Conservative Party | 823 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hooper C. | Liberal Democrats | 236 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 8 | Buck J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 137 | 1.5% | 4.5% | — |
Ruislip · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,701
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corthorne P. | Conservative Party | 3,242 | 23.0% | 69.0% | +44.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Riley J. | Conservative Party | 3,115 | 22.1% | 66.3% | +41.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smallwood P. | Conservative Party | 3,103 | 22.0% | 66.0% | +41.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Morse J. | Labour Party | 986 | 7.0% | 21.0% | — | |
| 5 | Smith J. | Labour Party | 892 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 6 | Smith A. | Labour Party | 808 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 7 | Blakie A. | Green Party | 625 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 8 | Cunliffe A. | Liberal Democrats | 546 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | Patel S. | Green Party | 411 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — | |
| 10 | Virdee J. | Green Party | 374 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — |
Belmore · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,424
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singh J. | Labour Party | 2,421 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Basit L. | Labour Party | 2,421 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Garg N. | Labour Party | 2,368 | 23.1% | 69.2% | +44.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bell C. | Conservative Party | 923 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 5 | Morgan J. | Conservative Party | 824 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 6 | Rodrigues I. | Conservative Party | 795 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 7 | Lee K. | Green Party | 268 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 8 | Gibbs A. | Green Party | 252 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
Pinkwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,893
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gill T. | Labour Party | 2,314 | 26.7% | 80.0% | +55.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lakhmana K. | Labour Party | 2,214 | 25.5% | 76.5% | +51.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mand G. | Labour Party | 2,154 | 24.8% | 74.5% | +49.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Giddings R. | Conservative Party | 692 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 5 | Upjohn D. | Conservative Party | 669 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 6 | Kauffman A. | Conservative Party | 635 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — |
Hayes Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,428
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curling P. | Labour Party | 1,906 | 26.2% | 78.5% | +53.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gardner J. | Labour Party | 1,844 | 25.3% | 75.9% | +50.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sansarpuri R. | Labour Party | 1,812 | 24.9% | 74.6% | +49.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davies L. | Conservative Party | 593 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — | |
| 5 | Sowe T. | Conservative Party | 463 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 6 | Pahl T. | Conservative Party | 454 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 7 | Gillender H. | LLL | 212 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |