← Hinckley & Bosworth (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Hinckley & Bosworth 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 16 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 34 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 28,195 | 48.0% | 22 | 64.7% | 18 | 52.9% | +4 |
| Conservative Party | 21,617 | 36.8% | 10 | 29.4% | 13 | 38.2% | -3 |
| Labour Party | 5,940 | 10.1% | 2 | 5.9% | 3 | 8.8% | -1 |
| Green Party | 1,076 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Independent | 1,059 | 1.8% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 680 | 1.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 144 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 58,711 | 100.0% | 34 | 100.0% | 34 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Cadeby Carlton and Market Bosworth with Shackerstone · 1 seat · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Twycross and Witherley with Sheepy · 1 seat · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Earl Shilton · 3 seats · won at 38.9% · above quota
- Barwell · 3 seats · won at 41.1% · above quota
- Ambien · 1 seat · won at 66.4% · above quota
- Markfield Stanton and Fieldhead · 2 seats · won at 50.0% · above quota
- Groby · 2 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Burbage St. Catherines and Lash Hill · 2 seats · won at 54.6% · above quota
- Hinckley Castle · 2 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Ratby Bagworth and Thornton · 2 seats · won at 62.3% · above quota
- Hinckley Trinity · 2 seats · won at 63.2% · above quota
- Hinckley de Montfort · 3 seats · won at 57.2% · above quota
- Newbold Verdon with Desford and Peckleton · 3 seats · won at 58.1% · above quota
- Barlestone Nailstone and Osbaston · 1 seat · won at 84.0% · above quota
- Burbage Sketchley and Stretton · 3 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Hinckley Clarendon · 3 seats · won at 66.4% · above quota
Race results
Cadeby Carlton and Market Bosworth with Shackerstone · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 50.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +0.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,215
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cook, M. | Conservative Party | 610 | 50.2% | +0.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tessier, A. | Liberal Democrats | 480 | 39.5% | — | |
| 3 | Dams, G. | Labour Party | 125 | 10.3% | — |
Twycross and Witherley with Sheepy · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 61.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,035
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sutton, B. | Conservative Party | 639 | 61.7% | +11.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mayne, R. | Liberal Democrats | 396 | 38.3% | — |
Earl Shilton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,015
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weightman, A. | Liberal Democrats | 789 | 13.1% | 39.2% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Allen, C. | Conservative Party | 785 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allen, R. | Conservative Party | 783 | 13.0% | 38.9% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Paczek, B. | Liberal Democrats | 781 | 12.9% | 38.8% | — | |
| 5 | Ladkin, C. | Conservative Party | 763 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 6 | Weightman, P. | Liberal Democrats | 688 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 7 | Faver, I. | Labour Party | 358 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Sharma, C. | Labour Party | 351 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 9 | Wheeler, A. | Labour Party | 324 | 5.4% | 16.1% | — | |
| 10 | Carter, R. | Green Party | 249 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 11 | Chesire, P. | Reform UK | 173 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — |
Barwell · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,441
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simmons, M. | Conservative Party | 606 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Green, C. | Labour Party | 597 | 13.8% | 41.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, H. | Conservative Party | 593 | 13.7% | 41.1% | +16.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Buck, J. | Labour Party | 537 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Parkinson, R. | Labour Party | 532 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — | |
| 6 | Daldry, C. | Conservative Party | 513 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 7 | Nash, M. | Independent | 375 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 8 | Roberts, R. | Independent | 308 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 9 | Wells, C. | Green Party | 263 | 6.1% | 18.2% | — |
Ambien · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 66.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 951
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Surtees, M. | Conservative Party | 631 | 66.4% | +16.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cope, G. | Liberal Democrats | 320 | 33.6% | — |
Markfield Stanton and Fieldhead · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,560
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lambert, C. | Labour Party | 797 | 25.6% | 51.1% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harris, C. | Conservative Party | 779 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Quilter, L. | Conservative Party | 674 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Martin, R. | Labour Party | 674 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 5 | Wren, L. | Green Party | 195 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — |
Groby · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,609
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cartwright, M. | Liberal Democrats | 947 | 29.4% | 58.9% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hollick, T. | Liberal Democrats | 876 | 27.2% | 54.4% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Richardson, G. | Conservative Party | 617 | 19.2% | 38.3% | — | |
| 4 | Hyde, D. | Conservative Party | 524 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hagan, J. | Independent | 161 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — | |
| 6 | Robinson, K. | Reform UK | 93 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
Burbage St. Catherines and Lash Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,428
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glenville, D. | Liberal Democrats | 847 | 29.7% | 59.3% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stead-Davis, P. | Liberal Democrats | 779 | 27.3% | 54.6% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thomas, M. | Conservative Party | 621 | 21.7% | 43.5% | — | |
| 4 | Nickerson, N. | Conservative Party | 609 | 21.3% | 42.6% | — |
Hinckley Castle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,362
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bray, S. | Liberal Democrats | 861 | 31.6% | 63.2% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mullaney, L. | Liberal Democrats | 812 | 29.8% | 59.6% | +26.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown, J. | Conservative Party | 329 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 4 | Leman, M. | Conservative Party | 279 | 10.2% | 20.5% | — | |
| 5 | Ross, J. | Labour Party | 223 | 8.2% | 16.4% | — | |
| 6 | Macgregor-Devin, G. | Labour Party | 219 | 8.0% | 16.1% | — |
Ratby Bagworth and Thornton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,524
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Shea, O. | Conservative Party | 1,062 | 34.8% | 69.7% | +36.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boothby, C. | Conservative Party | 950 | 31.2% | 62.3% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Martin, A. | Labour Party | 378 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — | |
| 4 | Wren, M. | Green Party | 369 | 12.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 5 | Mullaney, D. | Liberal Democrats | 163 | 5.3% | 10.7% | — | |
| 6 | Robinson, N. | Liberal Democrats | 126 | 4.1% | 8.3% | — |
Hinckley Trinity · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,162
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cope, D. | Liberal Democrats | 874 | 37.6% | 75.2% | +41.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Moore, J. | Liberal Democrats | 734 | 31.6% | 63.2% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hills, A. | Conservative Party | 282 | 12.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 4 | Walker, R. | Conservative Party | 241 | 10.4% | 20.7% | — | |
| 5 | Lythgoe-Cheetham, R. | Labour Party | 192 | 8.3% | 16.5% | — |
Hinckley de Montfort · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,500
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mullaney, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,597 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hodgkins, L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,478 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibbens, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,429 | 19.1% | 57.2% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kirby, J. | Conservative Party | 839 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bray, J. | Conservative Party | 730 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 6 | Roulston, D. | Conservative Party | 703 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Davis, J. | Labour Party | 309 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Egginton, A. | Reform UK | 213 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — | |
| 9 | Silcock, K. | Reform UK | 201 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — |
Newbold Verdon with Desford and Peckleton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,437
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crooks, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,593 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bools, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,525 | 20.9% | 62.6% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Webber-Jones, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,415 | 19.4% | 58.1% | +33.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bedford, P. | Conservative Party | 1,034 | 14.1% | 42.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hills, R. | Conservative Party | 913 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 6 | Paterson, J. | Conservative Party | 831 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — |
Barlestone Nailstone and Osbaston · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 84.0% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 932
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crooks, B. | Liberal Democrats | 783 | 84.0% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lee, M. | Conservative Party | 149 | 16.0% | — |
Burbage Sketchley and Stretton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,417
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walker, B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,534 | 21.2% | 63.5% | +38.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Flemming, R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,530 | 21.1% | 63.3% | +38.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,496 | 20.6% | 61.9% | +36.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Iliffe, S. | Conservative Party | 885 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 5 | Sherwin, M. | Conservative Party | 862 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 6 | Wallace, P. | Conservative Party | 801 | 11.0% | 33.1% | — | |
| 7 | Robinson, W. | UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 144 | 2.0% | 6.0% | — |
Hinckley Clarendon · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,620
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gibbens, C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,146 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pendlebury, A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,120 | 23.0% | 69.1% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lynch, K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,076 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Howard, L. | Conservative Party | 341 | 7.0% | 21.0% | — | |
| 5 | Stapleton, V. | Conservative Party | 330 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 6 | Baddeley, P. | Labour Party | 324 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 7 | Young, D. | Conservative Party | 309 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 8 | Moore, B. | Independent | 215 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — |