← Kensington and Chelsea (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort

Kensington and Chelsea 2022

Local elections held 5 May 2022.

18 ward races
50 seats
10 unfairly awarded seats
20.0% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 50 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Conservative Party40,35348.6%3570.0%2550.0%+10
Labour Party28,01133.7%1326.0%1734.0%-4
Liberal Democrats13,13415.8%24.0%816.0%-6
Green Party1,1401.4%00.0%00.0%0
Independent3110.4%00.0%00.0%0
ND770.1%00.0%00.0%0
Total83,026100.0%50100.0%50100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2022)
Previous (2021)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Earl's Court · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,966

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Wade L.Liberal Democrats1,04817.8%53.3%+28.3 ptsElected
2Verboven T.Liberal Democrats75712.8%38.5%+13.5 ptsElected
3Adourian H.Conservative Party70512.0%35.9%+10.9 ptsElected
4Noblet C.Liberal Democrats69911.8%35.5%
5Petit S.Conservative Party67411.4%34.3%
6Chauhan M.Conservative Party60810.3%30.9%
7Diantantou B.Labour Party4157.0%21.1%
8Rozena S.Labour Party3986.7%20.2%
9Winter J.Labour Party3866.5%19.6%
10Schaefer E.Green Party2093.5%10.6%

Electorate 6,002 · EC ward code E05009395 · Back to ward index

Pembridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,198

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Gardner J.Conservative Party60925.4%50.8%+17.5 ptsElected
2Schmetterling D.Conservative Party56023.4%46.7%+13.4 ptsElected
3Dodgshon S.Liberal Democrats44818.7%37.4%
4Kelly L.Labour Party39316.4%32.8%
5Daniels J.Labour Party38616.1%32.2%

Electorate 3,569 · EC ward code E05009400 · Back to ward index

Norland · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,563

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Lindsay D.Conservative Party78725.2%50.4%+17.0 ptsElected
2Graham S.Conservative Party73823.6%47.2%+13.9 ptsElected
3Parnell S.Labour Party35511.4%22.7%
4Frenzel F.Green Party33810.8%21.6%
5Georgievski A.Green Party2999.6%19.1%
6Shaw B.Labour Party2899.2%18.5%
7Fox T.Liberal Democrats1625.2%10.4%
8Girouard B.Liberal Democrats1575.0%10.0%

Electorate 3,841 · EC ward code E05009398 · Back to ward index

St Helen's · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,478

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dent Coad E.Labour Party81127.4%54.9%+21.6 ptsElected
2Thaxter P.Labour Party73925.0%50.0%+16.7 ptsElected
3Bouhaddou M.Conservative Party52217.7%35.3%
4Woodger M.Conservative Party52117.6%35.3%
5McLoughlin C.Liberal Democrats1675.7%11.3%
6Al-Nabahani J.Liberal Democrats1184.0%8.0%
7May Allison Y.ND772.6%5.2%

Electorate 4,296 · EC ward code E05009404 · Back to ward index

Chelsea Riverside · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,953

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Burns L.Conservative Party1,00717.2%51.6%+26.6 ptsElected
2Hargreaves G.Conservative Party94116.1%48.2%+23.2 ptsElected
3Zvedeniuk S.Conservative Party92315.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
4Thomas J.Labour Party81914.0%41.9%
5Coelho M.Labour Party80513.7%41.2%
6Cheron C.Labour Party72212.3%37.0%
7Schwartz M.Liberal Democrats64311.0%32.9%

Electorate 6,004 · EC ward code E05009391 · Back to ward index

Holland · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,922

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Knight L.Conservative Party1,04918.2%54.6%+29.6 ptsElected
2Thalassites J.Conservative Party1,01917.7%53.0%+28.0 ptsElected
3Areti A.Conservative Party99317.2%51.7%+26.7 ptsElected
4Batra S.Labour Party73112.7%38.0%
5McBride N.Labour Party65411.3%34.0%
6Landin A.Labour Party65011.3%33.8%
7McNamara N.Liberal Democrats2414.2%12.5%
8Lalor H.Liberal Democrats2414.2%12.5%
9Rupf L.Liberal Democrats1893.3%9.8%

Electorate 5,605 · EC ward code E05009397 · Back to ward index

Dalgarno · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,383

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Ali K.Labour Party86731.3%62.7%+29.4 ptsElected
2Jedut E.Labour Party83730.3%60.5%+27.2 ptsElected
3Karpinski T.Conservative Party31611.4%22.8%
4Vatish A.Conservative Party27610.0%20.0%
5Tatton-Brown A.Liberal Democrats1595.7%11.5%
6Patterson W.Independent1565.6%11.3%
7Williams P.Independent1555.6%11.2%

Electorate 4,547 · EC ward code E05009394 · Back to ward index

Campden · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,843

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Faulks C.Conservative Party1,12220.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
2Hudd P.Conservative Party1,02618.6%55.7%+30.7 ptsElected
3North L.Conservative Party99518.0%54.0%+29.0 ptsElected
4McDonald M.Labour Party4177.5%22.6%
5Ruthven H.Labour Party3656.6%19.8%
6Carrizosa J.Liberal Democrats3436.2%18.6%
7Wade E.Liberal Democrats3416.2%18.5%
8Vaughan T.Labour Party3336.0%18.1%
9Douglas-Home L.Green Party2945.3%16.0%
10Coplans C.Liberal Democrats2925.3%15.8%

Electorate 5,370 · EC ward code E05009390 · Back to ward index

Redcliffe · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,598

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bennett T.Conservative Party1,03821.7%65.0%+40.0 ptsElected
2Therese Rossi M.Conservative Party97320.3%60.9%+35.9 ptsElected
3Yankson S.Conservative Party88318.4%55.3%+30.3 ptsElected
4Francois Burford J.Liberal Democrats63413.2%39.7%
5Corbett M.Labour Party49410.3%30.9%
6Barrow O.Labour Party4078.5%25.5%
7Gee A.Labour Party3647.6%22.8%

Electorate 6,117 · EC ward code E05009402 · Back to ward index

Abingdon · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,631

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Addenbrooke S.Conservative Party1,01920.8%62.5%+37.5 ptsElected
2Cyron A.Conservative Party96419.7%59.1%+34.1 ptsElected
3Husband J.Conservative Party91518.7%56.1%+31.1 ptsElected
4Gregory M.Labour Party3747.6%22.9%
5Lari N.Labour Party3427.0%21.0%
6Ristic B.Labour Party3356.8%20.5%
7Good J.Liberal Democrats3356.8%20.5%
8Owen J.Liberal Democrats3306.7%20.2%
9Vardakis P.Liberal Democrats2795.7%17.1%

Electorate 5,309 · EC ward code E05009388 · Back to ward index

Stanley · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,771

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Taylor-Smith K.Conservative Party1,03119.4%58.2%+33.2 ptsElected
2Rendall J.Conservative Party1,02719.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
3Pascall W.Conservative Party1,00518.9%56.7%+31.7 ptsElected
4Garner L.Labour Party4658.8%26.3%
5Marconell H.Liberal Democrats4027.6%22.7%
6Bukhari P.Labour Party3917.4%22.1%
7Malin A.Labour Party3737.0%21.1%
8Jovellanos J.Liberal Democrats3125.9%17.6%
9Michel C.Liberal Democrats3075.8%17.3%

Electorate 6,114 · EC ward code E05009405 · Back to ward index

Colville · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,782

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Benton T.Labour Party1,10820.7%62.2%+37.2 ptsElected
2Bakhtiar M.Labour Party1,09120.4%61.2%+36.2 ptsElected
3Isse D.Labour Party1,01419.0%56.9%+31.9 ptsElected
4Lines E.Conservative Party4588.6%25.7%
5Greenfield R.Conservative Party4538.5%25.4%
6Walsh R.Conservative Party4418.2%24.7%
7Mayers J.Liberal Democrats2985.6%16.7%
8Lipton J.Liberal Democrats2574.8%14.4%
9Nowak A.Liberal Democrats2264.2%12.7%

Electorate 6,252 · EC ward code E05009392 · Back to ward index

Courtfield · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,538

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Evans J.Conservative Party1,06823.1%69.4%+44.4 ptsElected
2Hammond G.Conservative Party1,03722.5%67.4%+42.4 ptsElected
3Marshall Q.Conservative Party94720.5%61.6%+36.6 ptsElected
4Goldfinger M.Liberal Democrats74016.0%48.1%
5Kara F.Labour Party2826.1%18.3%
6Gimpel R.Labour Party2705.9%17.6%
7Brill M.Labour Party2705.9%17.6%

Electorate 5,472 · EC ward code E05009393 · Back to ward index

Royal Hospital · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,911

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Campbell E.Conservative Party1,38724.2%72.6%+47.6 ptsElected
2Will E.Conservative Party1,30922.8%68.5%+43.5 ptsElected
3Kemahli C.Conservative Party1,26122.0%66.0%+41.0 ptsElected
4Goodliffe J.Liberal Democrats3265.7%17.1%
5Pocock P.Liberal Democrats3155.5%16.5%
6Kear D.Labour Party3075.4%16.1%
7Mason P.Labour Party2834.9%14.8%
8Samadi S.Labour Party2814.9%14.7%
9Goodliffe T.Liberal Democrats2654.6%13.9%

Electorate 6,147 · EC ward code E05009403 · Back to ward index

Brompton and Hans Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,560

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Idris W.Conservative Party1,04422.3%66.9%+41.9 ptsElected
2McVeigh S.Conservative Party1,04022.2%66.7%+41.7 ptsElected
3Weale M.Conservative Party1,03222.1%66.2%+41.2 ptsElected
4Kearney M.Labour Party2796.0%17.9%
5Preston M.Labour Party2675.7%17.1%
6Cheron K.Labour Party2665.7%17.1%
7Campolo M.Liberal Democrats2665.7%17.1%
8Cameron E.Liberal Democrats2615.6%16.7%
9Woodthorpe Browne R.Liberal Democrats2254.8%14.4%

Electorate 5,627 · EC ward code E05009389 · Back to ward index

Queen's Gate · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,418

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Weeden-Sanz R.Conservative Party96622.7%68.1%+43.1 ptsElected
2Lane W.Conservative Party95522.4%67.3%+42.3 ptsElected
3Mackover S.Conservative Party94222.1%66.4%+41.4 ptsElected
4Baquiche B.Liberal Democrats54812.9%38.6%
5Robinson L.Labour Party3317.8%23.3%
6Thomas T.Labour Party2606.1%18.3%
7Muhamud H.Labour Party2525.9%17.8%

Electorate 4,714 · EC ward code E05009401 · Back to ward index

Golborne · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,373

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Adam M.Labour Party1,03625.2%75.5%+50.5 ptsElected
2Lari M.Labour Party1,00524.4%73.2%+48.2 ptsElected
3Nur A.Labour Party95023.1%69.2%+44.2 ptsElected
4Acka E.Conservative Party2977.2%21.6%
5Parker M.Conservative Party2786.8%20.3%
6Walsh G.Conservative Party2596.3%18.9%
7McGuirk S.Liberal Democrats1603.9%11.7%
8Somers W.Liberal Democrats1333.2%9.7%

Electorate 5,883 · EC ward code E05009396 · Back to ward index

Notting Dale · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,662

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Simmons C.Labour Party1,20024.1%72.2%+47.2 ptsElected
2Ahmed M.Labour Party1,18023.7%71.0%+46.0 ptsElected
3Elnaghi M.Labour Party1,16223.3%69.9%+44.9 ptsElected
4Salamone F.Conservative Party3196.4%19.2%
5Malik M.Conservative Party3146.3%18.9%
6Kamaladasan S.Conservative Party3006.0%18.1%
7Somers R.Liberal Democrats1943.9%11.7%
8Chenery P.Liberal Democrats1913.8%11.5%
9Kanavalau Y.Liberal Democrats1252.5%7.5%

Electorate 5,725 · EC ward code E05009399 · Back to ward index