← Kingston upon Thames (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Kingston upon Thames 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 19 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 64,315 | 47.6% | 44 | 91.7% | 24 | 50.0% | +20 |
| Conservative Party | 33,345 | 24.7% | 3 | 6.3% | 12 | 25.0% | -9 |
| Labour Party | 18,222 | 13.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 12.5% | -6 |
| Green Party | 10,888 | 8.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 4 | 8.3% | -4 |
| KIRG | 7,221 | 5.3% | 1 | 2.1% | 2 | 4.2% | -1 |
| OMRL | 474 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 213 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| WEP | 212 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| The Liberal Party | 97 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 134,987 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Green Lane and St James · 2 seats · won at 39.3% · above quota
- Tudor · 2 seats · won at 41.9% · above quota
- Motspur Park and Old Malden East · 2 seats · won at 42.9% · above quota
- Alexandra · 2 seats · won at 44.9% · above quota
- Coombe Hill · 2 seats · won at 45.7% · above quota
- Kingston Gate · 3 seats · won at 38.7% · above quota
- Canbury Gardens · 2 seats · won at 47.3% · above quota
- Old Malden · 2 seats · won at 47.3% · above quota
- Kingston Town · 3 seats · won at 39.5% · above quota
- King George's and Sunray · 2 seats · won at 48.4% · above quota
- Berrylands · 2 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Coombe Vale · 3 seats · won at 41.9% · above quota
- New Malden Village · 3 seats · won at 42.8% · above quota
- St Mark's and Seething Wells · 3 seats · won at 43.3% · above quota
- Norbiton · 3 seats · won at 44.2% · above quota
- Chessington South and Malden Rushett · 3 seats · won at 48.0% · above quota
- Surbiton Hill · 3 seats · won at 49.8% · above quota
- Hook and Chessington North · 3 seats · won at 51.1% · above quota
- Tolworth · 3 seats · won at 62.1% · above quota
Race results
Green Lane and St James · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,170
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cobbett T. | Liberal Democrats | 888 | 20.5% | 40.9% | +7.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Giles J. | KIRG | 853 | 19.7% | 39.3% | +6.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Edwards S. | Liberal Democrats | 845 | 19.5% | 38.9% | — | |
| 4 | Tracey Y. | KIRG | 757 | 17.4% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Condry D. | Conservative Party | 288 | 6.6% | 13.3% | — | |
| 6 | Jones G. | Labour Party | 253 | 5.8% | 11.7% | — | |
| 7 | Qureshi S. | Conservative Party | 240 | 5.5% | 11.1% | — | |
| 8 | See G. | Labour Party | 216 | 5.0% | 10.0% | — |
Tudor · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,783
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,321 | 23.7% | 47.5% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chohan J. | Conservative Party | 1,167 | 21.0% | 41.9% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mallett B. | Conservative Party | 1,153 | 20.7% | 41.4% | — | |
| 4 | Smith J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,098 | 19.7% | 39.5% | — | |
| 5 | Horgan D. | Green Party | 387 | 7.0% | 13.9% | — | |
| 6 | Garland M. | Labour Party | 234 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — | |
| 7 | Wingate F. | Labour Party | 206 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — |
Motspur Park and Old Malden East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,351
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henderson L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,132 | 24.1% | 48.1% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thorpe R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,009 | 21.5% | 42.9% | +9.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Paton T. | Conservative Party | 906 | 19.3% | 38.5% | — | |
| 4 | Smith R. | Conservative Party | 822 | 17.5% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Campbell A. | Labour Party | 352 | 7.5% | 15.0% | — | |
| 6 | Rasool A. | Labour Party | 259 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — | |
| 7 | Newton S. | Green Party | 222 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Alexandra · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 44.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,175
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Herlinger P. | Liberal Democrats | 991 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Manders I. | Liberal Democrats | 976 | 22.4% | 44.9% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rowe A. | Conservative Party | 754 | 17.3% | 34.7% | — | |
| 4 | Illsley S. | Conservative Party | 735 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 5 | Hensman L. | Labour Party | 255 | 5.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 6 | Worley K. | Green Party | 231 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 7 | Kay D. | Green Party | 213 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Lock A. | Labour Party | 195 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — |
Coombe Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,916
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bass R. | Conservative Party | 960 | 25.1% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | George I. | Conservative Party | 875 | 22.8% | 45.7% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bailey K. | Liberal Democrats | 678 | 17.7% | 35.4% | — | |
| 4 | Pethers J. | Liberal Democrats | 587 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 5 | Cooper D. | Labour Party | 240 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — | |
| 6 | Murray A. | Labour Party | 199 | 5.2% | 10.4% | — | |
| 7 | Giles K. | KIRG | 154 | 4.0% | 8.0% | — | |
| 8 | King A. | KIRG | 139 | 3.6% | 7.3% | — |
Kingston Gate · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,400
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,614 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hamed S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,504 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sadr-Hashemi F. | Liberal Democrats | 1,315 | 12.9% | 38.7% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bickerstaff A. | Conservative Party | 771 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — | |
| 5 | Callaghan G. | Conservative Party | 723 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 6 | Bibi J. | Conservative Party | 650 | 6.4% | 19.1% | — | |
| 7 | Child J. | Green Party | 606 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 8 | Hinton H. | KIRG | 596 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 9 | Veneik D. | KIRG | 442 | 4.3% | 13.0% | — | |
| 10 | Richardson S. | Labour Party | 412 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 11 | Leather J. | Labour Party | 381 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 12 | Gomez-Russell A. | Green Party | 373 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 13 | Wright P. | Green Party | 309 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 14 | Zhang-Borges A. | Labour Party | 290 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — | |
| 15 | Shah C. | ND | 213 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — |
Canbury Gardens · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,480
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manthel J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,191 | 24.0% | 48.0% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hadjimichael N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,173 | 23.7% | 47.3% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Netley M. | Conservative Party | 767 | 15.5% | 30.9% | — | |
| 4 | Pike M. | Conservative Party | 692 | 14.0% | 27.9% | — | |
| 5 | Campbell F. | Green Party | 395 | 8.0% | 15.9% | — | |
| 6 | Sawyer L. | Green Party | 262 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 7 | Priest C. | Labour Party | 243 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Chohan B. | Labour Party | 236 | 4.8% | 9.5% | — |
Old Malden · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,310
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Park E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,162 | 25.2% | 50.3% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Massimi M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,093 | 23.7% | 47.3% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Davis K. | Conservative Party | 880 | 19.1% | 38.1% | — | |
| 4 | Hughes J. | Conservative Party | 802 | 17.4% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Bollins G. | Labour Party | 263 | 5.7% | 11.4% | — | |
| 6 | Francis E. | Labour Party | 244 | 5.3% | 10.6% | — | |
| 7 | Howard P. | Green Party | 175 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Kingston Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,793
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nardelli N. | Liberal Democrats | 1,243 | 14.8% | 44.5% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hayes R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,243 | 14.8% | 44.5% | +19.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sweeney J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,104 | 13.2% | 39.5% | +14.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Coleman K. | Labour Party | 625 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 5 | Bamford C. | Labour Party | 556 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Kent S. | Conservative Party | 501 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 7 | Paton R. | Conservative Party | 485 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 8 | Ellis M. | Labour Party | 480 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 9 | Suckling C. | Conservative Party | 436 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 10 | Johnson F. | Green Party | 370 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 11 | Hinton G. | KIRG | 294 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 12 | Brilley J. | Green Party | 293 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 13 | Tyler B. | KIRG | 284 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 14 | Doyle P. | KIRG | 281 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 15 | Johnson J. | Green Party | 185 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — |
King George's and Sunray · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,620
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beynon M. | Liberal Democrats | 813 | 25.1% | 50.2% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Grocott H. | Liberal Democrats | 784 | 24.2% | 48.4% | +15.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cherry S. | Conservative Party | 566 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 4 | McKendrick M. | Conservative Party | 536 | 16.5% | 33.1% | — | |
| 5 | Draper N. | Labour Party | 272 | 8.4% | 16.8% | — | |
| 6 | Johns-Perring C. | Labour Party | 269 | 8.3% | 16.6% | — |
Berrylands · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,542
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davies J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,340 | 26.4% | 52.7% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Schaper A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,232 | 24.2% | 48.5% | +15.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harding C. | Conservative Party | 752 | 14.8% | 29.6% | — | |
| 4 | Rai J. | Conservative Party | 679 | 13.4% | 26.7% | — | |
| 5 | Byrne J. | Labour Party | 279 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — | |
| 6 | Smith P. | Green Party | 271 | 5.3% | 10.7% | — | |
| 7 | Green L. | Labour Party | 245 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — | |
| 8 | Whitworth P. | Green Party | 188 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — | |
| 9 | Ann C. | The Liberal Party | 97 | 1.9% | 3.8% | — |
Coombe Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,521
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolton A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,624 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kugan K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,612 | 15.3% | 45.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sillett A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,475 | 14.0% | 41.9% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Adams C. | Conservative Party | 1,213 | 11.5% | 34.5% | — | |
| 5 | Arora R. | Conservative Party | 1,163 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Latif I. | Conservative Party | 955 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 7 | Grant J. | Green Party | 675 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 8 | Meerabeau L. | Labour Party | 532 | 5.0% | 15.1% | — | |
| 9 | Giles D. | KIRG | 504 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 10 | Parker I. | Labour Party | 431 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 11 | Thomas G. | Labour Party | 379 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — |
New Malden Village · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,761
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Durrant M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,217 | 14.7% | 44.1% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kim D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,184 | 14.3% | 42.9% | +17.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Heap L. | Liberal Democrats | 1,182 | 14.3% | 42.8% | +17.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Howard L. | Green Party | 867 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hebborn R. | KIRG | 724 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Tracey M. | KIRG | 703 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 7 | Bedforth P. | Conservative Party | 467 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — | |
| 8 | Casey S. | Labour Party | 436 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 9 | Dobson P. | Labour Party | 429 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 10 | Dunkling S. | Labour Party | 374 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 11 | Cockle P. | Conservative Party | 372 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 12 | Hindosh S. | Conservative Party | 327 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
St Mark's and Seething Wells · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 43.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,851
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,830 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | White D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,726 | 14.9% | 44.8% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yoganathan Y. | Liberal Democrats | 1,669 | 14.4% | 43.3% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Sumner S. | Green Party | 1,351 | 11.7% | 35.1% | — | |
| 5 | Shabbeer T. | Green Party | 992 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 6 | Kwisthout H. | Green Party | 925 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 7 | Davis C. | Conservative Party | 526 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 8 | Paton C. | Conservative Party | 472 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 9 | Wilson I. | Conservative Party | 467 | 4.0% | 12.1% | — | |
| 10 | Bamford-Hurrell N. | Labour Party | 463 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 11 | Deacon C. | Labour Party | 360 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 12 | Bollins C. | Labour Party | 349 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 13 | Olszewski D. | WEP | 212 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — | |
| 14 | Jones L. | KIRG | 210 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — |
Norbiton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,847
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davey E. | Liberal Democrats | 1,541 | 18.0% | 54.1% | +29.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wehring O. | Liberal Democrats | 1,495 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Skipwith S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,258 | 14.7% | 44.2% | +19.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Benedetti M. | Labour Party | 904 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | Benn-Amir A. | Labour Party | 719 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — | |
| 6 | South L. | Labour Party | 712 | 8.3% | 25.0% | — | |
| 7 | Gray C. | Conservative Party | 375 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 8 | Williams A. | Conservative Party | 366 | 4.3% | 12.9% | — | |
| 9 | Beekoo S. | Conservative Party | 348 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 10 | Hall M. | Green Party | 239 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — | |
| 11 | Redman C. | Green Party | 225 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 12 | Jenner V. | KIRG | 197 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 13 | Robinson T. | Green Party | 163 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Chessington South and Malden Rushett · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,779
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kirsch A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,453 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mirza S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,353 | 16.2% | 48.7% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kirsch G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,335 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Towner S. | Conservative Party | 1,087 | 13.0% | 39.1% | — | |
| 5 | Woods H. | Conservative Party | 997 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 6 | Aziz B. | Conservative Party | 869 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 7 | Keogh C. | Labour Party | 349 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — | |
| 8 | Freedman M. | Labour Party | 339 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 9 | Nelson A. | Labour Party | 292 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 10 | Brunskill D. | OMRL | 90 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — | |
| 11 | Lucky Guv J. | OMRL | 65 | 0.8% | 2.3% | — | |
| 12 | Chinners A. | OMRL | 61 | 0.7% | 2.2% | — | |
| 13 | Coiley C. | OMRL | 47 | 0.6% | 1.7% | — |
Surbiton Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,202
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holt A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,810 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reeve T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,629 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khan A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,596 | 16.6% | 49.8% | +24.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bowis C. | Conservative Party | 679 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 5 | Innes A. | Conservative Party | 642 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 6 | Hudson R. | Conservative Party | 535 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 7 | Ayre S. | Labour Party | 382 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 8 | Burlingsby A. | Green Party | 370 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | Farian G. | Labour Party | 338 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 10 | Way R. | Labour Party | 333 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 11 | Burlingsby C. | Green Party | 310 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 12 | Goodacre P. | Green Party | 291 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 13 | Colegate G. | KIRG | 285 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 14 | Smithers H. | KIRG | 225 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 15 | Rajput M. | KIRG | 181 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Hook and Chessington North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,062
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,750 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ansari S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,627 | 17.7% | 53.1% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Afilaka A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,566 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Stannard A. | Conservative Party | 909 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 5 | Borg-Darvy G. | Conservative Party | 908 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 6 | Chohan R. | Conservative Party | 874 | 9.5% | 28.5% | — | |
| 7 | Thompson C. | Labour Party | 472 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 8 | Mitchell P. | Labour Party | 447 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 9 | Simmons C. | Labour Party | 423 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 10 | Dave L. | OMRL | 121 | 1.3% | 4.0% | — | |
| 11 | Cramps C. | OMRL | 90 | 1.0% | 2.9% | — |
Tolworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,216
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goncalves M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,047 | 21.2% | 63.7% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wooldridge A. | Liberal Democrats | 2,002 | 20.8% | 62.3% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thayalan T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,998 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Davis J. | Conservative Party | 608 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 5 | Banks A. | Labour Party | 592 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 6 | Bedale J. | Conservative Party | 571 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 7 | Kolluguri P. | Labour Party | 484 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — | |
| 8 | Kerkham B. | Labour Party | 479 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 9 | Tania A. | Conservative Party | 475 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 10 | Foote K. | KIRG | 392 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |