← Lancaster (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Lancaster 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 27 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 61 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 24,280 | 31.8% | 24 | 39.3% | 20 | 32.8% | +4 |
| Green Party | 22,670 | 29.7% | 21 | 34.4% | 18 | 29.5% | +3 |
| Conservative Party | 14,820 | 19.4% | 5 | 8.2% | 12 | 19.7% | -7 |
| Liberal Democrats | 7,691 | 10.1% | 7 | 11.5% | 6 | 9.8% | +1 |
| MBIND | 6,169 | 8.1% | 3 | 4.9% | 5 | 8.2% | -2 |
| Independent | 821 | 1.1% | 1 | 1.6% | 0 | 0.0% | +1 |
| Total | 76,451 | 100.0% | 61 | 100.0% | 61 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Silverdale · 1 seat · won at 40.5% · −9.5 pts below quota
- Overton · 1 seat · won at 40.6% · −9.4 pts below quota
- Bare · 3 seats · won at 26.5% · above quota
- Heysham North · 2 seats · won at 35.0% · above quota
- Warton · 1 seat · won at 52.7% · above quota
- Torrisholme · 2 seats · won at 37.2% · above quota
- Poulton · 2 seats · won at 37.3% · above quota
- Scotforth East · 2 seats · won at 39.1% · above quota
- Heysham Central · 2 seats · won at 39.7% · above quota
- University · 2 seats · won at 41.1% · above quota
- Lower Lune Valley · 2 seats · won at 41.4% · above quota
- Upper Lune Valley · 1 seat · won at 59.3% · above quota
- Westgate · 3 seats · won at 35.5% · above quota
- Halton-with-Aughton and Kellet · 2 seats · won at 45.6% · above quota
- Ellel · 2 seats · won at 47.0% · above quota
- Bowerham · 2 seats · won at 48.7% · above quota
- John O'Gaunt · 2 seats · won at 48.9% · above quota
- West End · 3 seats · won at 42.0% · above quota
- Carnforth and Millhead · 3 seats · won at 45.8% · above quota
- Heysham South · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Bolton and Slyne · 3 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Scotforth West · 2 seats · won at 61.9% · above quota
- Bulk · 3 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Castle · 3 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- Skerton · 3 seats · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Marsh · 3 seats · won at 62.9% · above quota
- Scale Hall · 3 seats · won at 68.1% · above quota
Race results
Silverdale · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 896
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenwell, W. | Liberal Democrats | 363 | 40.5% | −9.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williamson, P. | Conservative Party | 321 | 35.8% | — | |
| 3 | Rockall, B. | Labour Party | 115 | 12.8% | — | |
| 4 | McCoy, A. | Green Party | 97 | 10.8% | — |
Overton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 40.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −9.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 593
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gardiner, A. | Conservative Party | 241 | 40.6% | −9.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Yates, J. | Labour Party | 185 | 31.2% | — | |
| 3 | Slater, J. | MBIND | 130 | 21.9% | — | |
| 4 | Maddocks, D. | Green Party | 37 | 6.2% | — |
Bare · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 26.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,733
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blaikie, G. | Liberal Democrats | 486 | 9.3% | 28.0% | +3.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Knight, K. | Conservative Party | 466 | 9.0% | 26.9% | +1.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bottoms, D. | MBIND | 459 | 8.8% | 26.5% | +1.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bateson, S. | Conservative Party | 447 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 5 | Knight, S. | MBIND | 445 | 8.6% | 25.7% | — | |
| 6 | Jakeman, M. | Conservative Party | 430 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 7 | Ainscough, C. | Labour Party | 399 | 7.7% | 23.0% | — | |
| 8 | Walsh, R. | MBIND | 358 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 9 | Dagdeviren, L. | Liberal Democrats | 349 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 10 | Kenrick, F. | Labour Party | 328 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 11 | Balsamini, D. | Liberal Democrats | 309 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — | |
| 12 | Dugan, M. | Independent | 288 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 13 | Carrington, L. | Green Party | 191 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 14 | Hughes, S. | Green Party | 131 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — | |
| 15 | Lee, A. | Green Party | 113 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — |
Heysham North · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 632
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cozler, C. | Labour Party | 270 | 21.4% | 42.7% | +9.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cleet, R. | Independent | 221 | 17.5% | 35.0% | +1.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jarnell, M. | Labour Party | 201 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 4 | Kent, C. | MBIND | 174 | 13.8% | 27.5% | — | |
| 5 | Padgett, A. | MBIND | 130 | 10.3% | 20.6% | — | |
| 6 | Mall, S. | Conservative Party | 104 | 8.2% | 16.5% | — | |
| 7 | Chapple, E. | Liberal Democrats | 68 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — | |
| 8 | Stansfield, L. | Liberal Democrats | 44 | 3.5% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Maskell, J. | Green Party | 32 | 2.5% | 5.1% | — | |
| 10 | McMurray, P. | Green Party | 20 | 1.6% | 3.2% | — |
Warton · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 52.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 787
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tyldesley, S. | Green Party | 415 | 52.7% | +2.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harvey, T. | Conservative Party | 232 | 29.5% | — | |
| 3 | Ainsworth, D. | Labour Party | 74 | 9.4% | — | |
| 4 | Parsons, J. | Liberal Democrats | 66 | 8.4% | — |
Torrisholme · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +3.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,011
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dennison, R. | MBIND | 443 | 21.9% | 43.8% | +10.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cooper, B. | MBIND | 376 | 18.6% | 37.2% | +3.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hewitt, C. | Conservative Party | 321 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 4 | Penney, T. | Labour Party | 292 | 14.4% | 28.9% | — | |
| 5 | Matthews, C. | Independent | 153 | 7.6% | 15.1% | — | |
| 6 | Livesey, R. | Green Party | 144 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 7 | Cowley, W. | Independent | 133 | 6.6% | 13.2% | — | |
| 8 | Willmott, R. | Green Party | 87 | 4.3% | 8.6% | — | |
| 9 | Wilson, T. | Liberal Democrats | 73 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — |
Poulton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 37.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 814
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hart, P. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 24.3% | 48.5% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Livermore, J. | Liberal Democrats | 304 | 18.7% | 37.3% | +4.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Metcalfe, T. | Labour Party | 227 | 13.9% | 27.9% | — | |
| 4 | Panesh, M. | Labour Party | 198 | 12.2% | 24.3% | — | |
| 5 | Heath, T. | MBIND | 167 | 10.3% | 20.5% | — | |
| 6 | Heath, J. | MBIND | 154 | 9.5% | 18.9% | — | |
| 7 | Moser, P. | Green Party | 60 | 3.7% | 7.4% | — | |
| 8 | Yates, J. | Conservative Party | 59 | 3.6% | 7.2% | — | |
| 9 | McMurray, J. | Green Party | 38 | 2.3% | 4.7% | — | |
| 10 | Boyd-Power, V. | Independent | 26 | 1.6% | 3.2% | — |
Scotforth East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +5.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,355
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maddocks, S. | Labour Party | 607 | 22.4% | 44.8% | +11.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wood, J. | Labour Party | 529 | 19.5% | 39.1% | +5.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mills, N. | Green Party | 526 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 4 | Robertson, C. | Green Party | 473 | 17.5% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hoggarth, S. | Conservative Party | 278 | 10.3% | 20.5% | — | |
| 6 | Quinn, G. | Conservative Party | 209 | 7.7% | 15.4% | — | |
| 7 | Long, R. | Liberal Democrats | 87 | 3.2% | 6.4% | — |
Heysham Central · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 972
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Armistead, C. | Labour Party | 430 | 22.1% | 44.2% | +10.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Penney, S. | Labour Party | 386 | 19.9% | 39.7% | +6.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Knight, G. | MBIND | 370 | 19.0% | 38.1% | — | |
| 4 | Thistlethwaite, G. | MBIND | 363 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Taylor-Craddock, L. | Conservative Party | 214 | 11.0% | 22.0% | — | |
| 6 | Young, J. | Green Party | 111 | 5.7% | 11.4% | — | |
| 7 | Wingfield, C. | Green Party | 49 | 2.5% | 5.0% | — | |
| 8 | Foulsham, B. | Liberal Democrats | 21 | 1.1% | 2.2% | — |
University · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 479
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall, E. | Labour Party | 217 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fish, T. | Green Party | 197 | 20.6% | 41.1% | +7.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Metcalf-Riener, I. | Green Party | 190 | 19.8% | 39.7% | — | |
| 4 | Hurst, L. | Labour Party | 172 | 18.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hassan, B. | Conservative Party | 64 | 6.7% | 13.4% | — | |
| 6 | Helmy, K. | Conservative Party | 55 | 5.7% | 11.5% | — | |
| 7 | Evans, C. | Liberal Democrats | 34 | 3.5% | 7.1% | — | |
| 8 | Cross, T. | Liberal Democrats | 29 | 3.0% | 6.1% | — |
Lower Lune Valley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,466
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pritchard, J. | Liberal Democrats | 733 | 25.0% | 50.0% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jackson, P. | Liberal Democrats | 606 | 20.7% | 41.4% | +8.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jackson, J. | Conservative Party | 570 | 19.4% | 38.9% | — | |
| 4 | Scott, M. | Conservative Party | 435 | 14.8% | 29.7% | — | |
| 5 | King, M. | Labour Party | 169 | 5.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 6 | Kay, A. | Labour Party | 161 | 5.5% | 11.0% | — | |
| 7 | Wright, M. | Green Party | 144 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Mills, R. | Green Party | 113 | 3.9% | 7.7% | — |
Upper Lune Valley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 814
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hunter, R. | Liberal Democrats | 483 | 59.3% | +9.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parkinson, J. | Conservative Party | 257 | 31.6% | — | |
| 3 | Payne, J. | Green Party | 74 | 9.1% | — |
Westgate · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 35.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,166
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hanson, J. | Labour Party | 491 | 14.0% | 42.1% | +17.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Black, M. | Labour Party | 437 | 12.5% | 37.5% | +12.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harris, C. | Labour Party | 414 | 11.8% | 35.5% | +10.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Blacow, D. | MBIND | 408 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Knight, D. | MBIND | 393 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 6 | Dixon, W. | MBIND | 382 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 7 | Jackson, B. | Liberal Democrats | 225 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — | |
| 8 | Johnston, C. | Conservative Party | 182 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 9 | Staig, S. | Conservative Party | 180 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 10 | Stenneken, M. | Liberal Democrats | 120 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — | |
| 11 | Sutton, T. | Liberal Democrats | 82 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 12 | Bashford, K. | Green Party | 71 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — | |
| 13 | Gordon, A. | Green Party | 62 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 14 | Westaway, J. | Green Party | 50 | 1.4% | 4.3% | — |
Halton-with-Aughton and Kellet · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,422
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McGowan, S. | Green Party | 716 | 25.2% | 50.4% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sommerville, J. | Green Party | 648 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gibbins, D. | Conservative Party | 582 | 20.5% | 40.9% | — | |
| 4 | Morris, S. | Conservative Party | 464 | 16.3% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Hyde, K. | Labour Party | 280 | 9.8% | 19.7% | — | |
| 6 | White, T. | Liberal Democrats | 153 | 5.4% | 10.8% | — |
Ellel · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 47.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,558
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maddocks, S. | Green Party | 951 | 30.5% | 61.0% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tynan, P. | Green Party | 733 | 23.5% | 47.0% | +13.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Park, J. | Conservative Party | 426 | 13.7% | 27.3% | — | |
| 4 | Austen-Baker, R. | Conservative Party | 412 | 13.2% | 26.4% | — | |
| 5 | Corkerry, S. | Labour Party | 295 | 9.5% | 18.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hopkins, A. | Labour Party | 245 | 7.9% | 15.7% | — | |
| 7 | Fildes, R. | Liberal Democrats | 54 | 1.7% | 3.5% | — |
Bowerham · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,429
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills, H. | Green Party | 736 | 25.8% | 51.5% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Punshon, S. | Green Party | 696 | 24.4% | 48.7% | +15.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lewis, E. | Labour Party | 604 | 21.1% | 42.3% | — | |
| 4 | Curphey, P. | Labour Party | 541 | 18.9% | 37.9% | — | |
| 5 | Edwards, C. | Conservative Party | 131 | 4.6% | 9.2% | — | |
| 6 | Whitehouse, C. | Conservative Party | 120 | 4.2% | 8.4% | — | |
| 7 | Sue-Too, L. | Liberal Democrats | 30 | 1.0% | 2.1% | — |
John O'Gaunt · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,019
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abuhajar, S. | Green Party | 551 | 27.0% | 54.1% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Russell, G. | Green Party | 498 | 24.4% | 48.9% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Corkerry, L. | Labour Party | 441 | 21.6% | 43.3% | — | |
| 4 | Prue, L. | Labour Party | 395 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 5 | Gray, M. | Conservative Party | 66 | 3.2% | 6.5% | — | |
| 6 | Kitchen, P. | Conservative Party | 60 | 2.9% | 5.9% | — | |
| 7 | Harvey, J. | Liberal Democrats | 26 | 1.3% | 2.6% | — |
West End · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,136
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pattison, M. | Labour Party | 543 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ainscough, J. | Labour Party | 497 | 14.6% | 43.8% | +18.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Whitaker, D. | Labour Party | 477 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pilling, C. | Liberal Democrats | 393 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Perkins, J. | Liberal Democrats | 382 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 6 | Pilling, J. | Liberal Democrats | 365 | 10.7% | 32.1% | — | |
| 7 | Duncan, T. | MBIND | 177 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 8 | Aspinall, K. | MBIND | 157 | 4.6% | 13.8% | — | |
| 9 | Fletcher, A. | MBIND | 155 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 10 | Ennis, M. | Conservative Party | 104 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 11 | Bandszus, C. | Green Party | 60 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 12 | Hester, S. | Green Party | 56 | 1.6% | 4.9% | — | |
| 13 | Westcombe, M. | Green Party | 42 | 1.2% | 3.7% | — |
Carnforth and Millhead · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,248
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gardner, P. | Labour Party | 633 | 16.9% | 50.7% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Belcher, L. | Labour Party | 586 | 15.7% | 47.0% | +22.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hanna, C. | Labour Party | 571 | 15.3% | 45.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bromilow, K. | Conservative Party | 536 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 5 | Yates, P. | Conservative Party | 534 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 6 | Guilding, M. | Conservative Party | 490 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 7 | Jones, A. | Green Party | 141 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 8 | Chandisingh, D. | Green Party | 127 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — | |
| 9 | Sear, J. | Green Party | 125 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — |
Heysham South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,341
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartley, C. | Labour Party | 737 | 18.3% | 54.9% | +29.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bradley, P. | Labour Party | 707 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Potter, C. | Labour Party | 651 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Riley, B. | Conservative Party | 425 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | Greenall, M. | MBIND | 390 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 6 | Freeman, P. | Conservative Party | 341 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Knight, E. | MBIND | 272 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 8 | Fulton, J. | MBIND | 266 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 9 | Deery, M. | Green Party | 74 | 1.8% | 5.5% | — | |
| 10 | Renolds, G. | Green Party | 68 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — | |
| 11 | Wild, H. | Green Party | 50 | 1.2% | 3.7% | — | |
| 12 | Kent, S. | Liberal Democrats | 43 | 1.1% | 3.2% | — |
Bolton and Slyne · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,963
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Budden, K. | Conservative Party | 1,050 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Newton, P. | Conservative Party | 1,010 | 17.2% | 51.5% | +26.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wild, J. | Conservative Party | 985 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mossop, C. | Labour Party | 618 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Mossop, K. | Labour Party | 572 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 6 | Wheatley, I. | Liberal Democrats | 421 | 7.2% | 21.5% | — | |
| 7 | Saville, T. | Liberal Democrats | 405 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 8 | Mumford, L. | Green Party | 342 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 9 | Swan, J. | Green Party | 269 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 10 | Flemming, G. | Green Party | 216 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — |
Scotforth West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,654
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills, A. | Green Party | 1,083 | 32.7% | 65.5% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hamilton-Cox, T. | Green Party | 1,023 | 30.9% | 61.9% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Askari, S. | Labour Party | 387 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — | |
| 4 | Miller, D. | Labour Party | 373 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — | |
| 5 | Dexter, L. | Conservative Party | 207 | 6.3% | 12.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hayes, H. | Conservative Party | 162 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 7 | Martin, M. | Liberal Democrats | 73 | 2.2% | 4.4% | — |
Bulk · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,743
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson, C. | Green Party | 1,140 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lenox, J. | Green Party | 1,061 | 20.3% | 60.9% | +35.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Riches, S. | Green Party | 964 | 18.4% | 55.3% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Doebler, S. | Labour Party | 610 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Johnson, R. | Labour Party | 546 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 6 | Fletcher, D. | Labour Party | 516 | 9.9% | 29.6% | — | |
| 7 | Banthorpe, C. | Conservative Party | 109 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — | |
| 8 | Gaskill, N. | Conservative Party | 107 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — | |
| 9 | Hall, K. | Conservative Party | 104 | 2.0% | 6.0% | — | |
| 10 | Dunster, P. | Liberal Democrats | 71 | 1.4% | 4.1% | — |
Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,172
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookes, D. | Green Party | 767 | 21.8% | 65.4% | +40.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McGregor, S. | Green Party | 711 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stubbins, P. | Green Party | 657 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bateman, J. | Labour Party | 383 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Corless, E. | Labour Party | 362 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Snow, B. | Labour Party | 320 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Walton, K. | Conservative Party | 93 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — | |
| 8 | Farmer, S. | Conservative Party | 82 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Stuchlik, J. | Conservative Party | 75 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 10 | Beesley, H. | Liberal Democrats | 66 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Skerton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,092
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Redfern, R. | Labour Party | 696 | 21.2% | 63.7% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thornberry, A. | Labour Party | 659 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gawith, G. | Labour Party | 615 | 18.8% | 56.3% | +31.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Busby, E. | Green Party | 271 | 8.3% | 24.8% | — | |
| 5 | Bain, K. | Green Party | 239 | 7.3% | 21.9% | — | |
| 6 | Heath, E. | Green Party | 232 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 7 | Webb, J. | Conservative Party | 168 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 8 | Hailey, A. | Conservative Party | 153 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 9 | Wilkinson, M. | Conservative Party | 148 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 10 | Kaye, D. | Liberal Democrats | 95 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Marsh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,717
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dowding, G. | Green Party | 1,241 | 24.1% | 72.3% | +47.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bannon, M. | Green Party | 1,223 | 23.7% | 71.2% | +46.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilkinson, N. | Green Party | 1,079 | 21.0% | 62.9% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rafferty, J. | Labour Party | 408 | 7.9% | 23.8% | — | |
| 5 | Cozler, M. | Labour Party | 399 | 7.7% | 23.2% | — | |
| 6 | Soffa, B. | Labour Party | 354 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 7 | Wrennall, J. | Conservative Party | 125 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 8 | Harmey, A. | Conservative Party | 113 | 2.2% | 6.6% | — | |
| 9 | Timmings, R. | Conservative Party | 110 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 10 | Stanning, A. | Liberal Democrats | 98 | 1.9% | 5.7% | — |
Scale Hall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 938
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colbridge, R. | Labour Party | 663 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parr, H. | Labour Party | 655 | 23.3% | 69.8% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Black, P. | Labour Party | 639 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lowther-Edwards, J. | Conservative Party | 263 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | Turner, C. | Green Party | 164 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 6 | Hardy, D. | Green Party | 164 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 7 | Long, J. | Liberal Democrats | 139 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — | |
| 8 | Pogson, G. | Green Party | 127 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — |