← Leicester (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort

Leicester 2023

Local elections held 4 May 2023.

21 ward races
54 seats
8 unfairly awarded seats
14.8% of seats unfairly awarded

Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →

If votes were counted by party

Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 54 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Labour Party89,42540.4%3157.4%2342.6%+8
Conservative Party76,86734.8%1731.5%1935.2%-2
Liberal Democrats21,3989.7%35.6%59.3%-2
Independent17,7578.0%00.0%47.4%-4
Green Party13,8306.3%35.6%35.6%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1,5400.7%00.0%00.0%0
Alliance for Democracy and Freedom1380.1%00.0%00.0%0
Reform UK800.0%00.0%00.0%0
CPB420.0%00.0%00.0%0
BDP340.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total221,111100.0%54100.0%54100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Council composition: what this election replaced

The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.

Current (2023)
Previous (2022)

Wards in this council

Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.

Race results

Fosse · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 36.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,194

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Waddington, S.Labour Party99922.8%45.5%+12.2 ptsElected
2Zaman, S.Labour Party79218.0%36.1%+2.8 ptsElected
3Feist, B.Liberal Democrats58013.2%26.4%
4Lang, F.Conservative Party53512.2%24.4%
5Pamsi, R.Conservative Party53112.1%24.2%
6Forse, G.Green Party3778.6%17.2%
7Pold, M.Liberal Democrats3558.1%16.2%
8Scott, B.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1292.9%5.9%
9Ezeru, C.Independent902.1%4.1%

Electorate 9,356 · Back to ward index

Aylestone · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,327

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Porter, N.Liberal Democrats1,09623.6%47.1%+13.8 ptsElected
2Kennedy-Lount, S.Liberal Democrats92719.9%39.8%+6.5 ptsElected
3Griffiths, R.Labour Party83918.0%36.1%
4Pawley, R.Labour Party60513.0%26.0%
5Philip, D.Conservative Party3607.7%15.5%
6Singh, I.Conservative Party3016.5%12.9%
7Ball, B.Green Party3006.4%12.9%
8Score, S.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1573.4%6.7%
9Brown, G.Independent681.5%2.9%

Electorate 8,722 · Back to ward index

Troon · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,544

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cank, D.Labour Party1,48921.0%42.0%+8.7 ptsElected
2Sangha, M.Labour Party1,43220.2%40.4%+7.1 ptsElected
3Fernandes, A.Conservative Party1,32918.8%37.5%
4Tejura, H.Conservative Party1,24417.6%35.1%
5Singh, S.Independent5678.0%16.0%
6Kumari, K.Independent4396.2%12.4%
7Modha, K.Independent3074.3%8.7%
8Smith, P.Liberal Democrats2814.0%7.9%

Electorate 10,433 · Back to ward index

Evington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,931

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Haq, Z.Liberal Democrats1,84112.4%37.3%+12.3 ptsElected
2Bajaj, D.Conservative Party1,79412.1%36.4%+11.4 ptsElected
3Joannou, J.Conservative Party1,65711.2%33.6%+8.6 ptsElected
4Hassan, N.Labour Party1,60310.8%32.5%
5Joshi, R.Conservative Party1,59010.7%32.2%
6Patel, F.Liberal Democrats1,49010.1%30.2%
7Hunter, S.Labour Party1,3679.2%27.7%
8Matharu, J.Labour Party1,2928.7%26.2%
9Dave, N.Liberal Democrats1,2008.1%24.3%
10Singh, B.Independent3772.5%7.6%
11Fisher, J.Green Party3492.4%7.1%
12Ali, R.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2341.6%4.7%

Electorate 12,905 · Back to ward index

Westcotes · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,945

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Russell, S.Labour Party98625.3%50.7%+17.4 ptsElected
2Clarke, A.Labour Party81821.0%42.1%+8.7 ptsElected
3Gill, P.Liberal Democrats48212.4%24.8%
4Gill, J.Liberal Democrats3579.2%18.4%
5Southworth, J.Green Party3539.1%18.1%
6Dholakia, D.Conservative Party2837.3%14.6%
7Ali, S.Conservative Party2436.2%12.5%
8Nangreave, J.Independent2315.9%11.9%
9Shenton, M.Independent1373.5%7.0%

Electorate 8,578 · Back to ward index

Stoneygate · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,733

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Mohammed, R.Labour Party2,89816.8%50.5%+25.5 ptsElected
2Surti, Y.Labour Party2,77716.1%48.4%+23.4 ptsElected
3Sood, M.Labour Party2,10712.3%36.8%+11.8 ptsElected
4Giash, A.Conservative Party1,6889.8%29.4%
5Thalukdar, A.Independent1,5048.7%26.2%
6Master, K.Independent1,5038.7%26.2%
7Rahman, S.Independent1,1536.7%20.1%
8Khilji, S.Conservative Party1,0175.9%17.7%
9Shahid, S.Conservative Party9545.5%16.6%
10Ghafar, A.Liberal Democrats5353.1%9.3%
11Hughes, C.Green Party5343.1%9.3%
12Fox, A.Liberal Democrats5293.1%9.2%

Electorate 13,738 · Back to ward index

Thurncourt · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,448

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Aldred, T.Labour Party1,20224.6%49.1%+15.8 ptsElected
2Osman, A.Conservative Party1,12222.9%45.8%+12.5 ptsElected
3Joannou, M.Conservative Party1,02420.9%41.8%
4Gulati, B.Labour Party99820.4%40.8%
5Wildin, K.Green Party2936.0%12.0%
6Sullivan, K.Liberal Democrats2575.2%10.5%

Electorate 8,238 · Back to ward index

Saffron · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,661

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Cassidy, T.Labour Party78323.6%47.1%+13.8 ptsElected
2Cutkelvin, E.Labour Party77423.3%46.6%+13.3 ptsElected
3Bilson, U.Green Party43813.2%26.4%
4Lewis, M.Green Party42812.9%25.8%
5Jillett, G.Conservative Party2868.6%17.2%
6Simons, J.Conservative Party2848.5%17.1%
7Buchan, D.Liberal Democrats952.9%5.7%
8Bisson, P.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition802.4%4.8%
9Smith, M.Liberal Democrats782.3%4.7%
10Green, A.CPB421.3%2.5%
11Haslett, D.BDP341.0%2.0%

Electorate 7,798 · Back to ward index

Humberstone and Hamilton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,836

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Bonham, S.Labour Party1,67314.5%43.6%+18.6 ptsElected
2Saini, M.Labour Party1,64214.3%42.8%+17.8 ptsElected
3Joel, A.Labour Party1,53113.3%39.9%+14.9 ptsElected
4Sonigra, R.Conservative Party1,34211.7%35.0%
5Thanki, S.Conservative Party1,28611.2%33.5%
6Gulzar, R.Conservative Party1,27511.1%33.2%
7Bellinger, P.Green Party4924.3%12.8%
8Lunat, S.Independent4784.2%12.5%
9Athwal, B.Liberal Democrats4163.6%10.8%
10Ghadiali, V.Independent3453.0%9.0%
11Hunnings, T.Liberal Democrats3372.9%8.8%
12Vyas, K.Liberal Democrats2992.6%7.8%
13Powar, R.Independent1961.7%5.1%
14Potter, B.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1961.7%5.1%

Electorate 14,471 · Back to ward index

Eyres Monsell · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,330

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Pantling, E.Labour Party79129.7%59.5%+26.2 ptsElected
2Pickering, K.Labour Party64424.2%48.4%+15.1 ptsElected
3Ahmadi, M.Conservative Party38914.6%29.3%
4Vijayan, V.Conservative Party37314.0%28.1%
5Broszkiewicz, A.Green Party1746.5%13.1%
6Webb, J.Liberal Democrats1475.5%11.1%
7Rubinstein, Z.Liberal Democrats1415.3%10.6%

Electorate 8,052 · Back to ward index

Knighton · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,689

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1March, M.Labour Party2,20315.7%47.0%+22.0 ptsElected
2Moore, L.Labour Party2,07114.7%44.2%+19.2 ptsElected
3Whittle, G.Labour Party2,06714.7%44.1%+19.1 ptsElected
4Willmott, C.Liberal Democrats1,1988.5%25.5%
5King, S.Green Party1,0537.5%22.5%
6Bhoot, J.Liberal Democrats1,0007.1%21.3%
7Lall, R.Conservative Party9817.0%20.9%
8Mistry, L.Conservative Party8866.3%18.9%
9Tanna, A.Conservative Party8666.2%18.5%
10Shah, R.Liberal Democrats8436.0%18.0%
11Walker, B.Green Party6924.9%14.8%
12Gillham, A.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2081.5%4.4%

Electorate 12,538 · Back to ward index

Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,930

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barnes, C.Conservative Party1,82915.5%46.5%+21.5 ptsElected
2Agath, N.Conservative Party1,79315.2%45.6%+20.6 ptsElected
3Byrne, A.Labour Party1,77615.1%45.2%+20.2 ptsElected
4Singh, K.Conservative Party1,74814.8%44.5%
5Riyait, V.Labour Party1,65214.0%42.0%
6Saunders-Sinclair, E.Labour Party1,53613.0%39.1%
7McCallum, J.Green Party5834.9%14.8%
8Chohan, H.Independent4824.1%12.3%
9Salisbury, Y.Liberal Democrats3913.3%9.9%

Electorate 15,473 · Back to ward index

Rushey Mead · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 6,264

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dave, B.Conservative Party3,03616.2%48.5%+23.5 ptsElected
2Karavadra, G.Conservative Party2,99015.9%47.7%+22.7 ptsElected
3Patel, D.Conservative Party2,84415.1%45.4%+20.4 ptsElected
4Clair, P.Labour Party2,00810.7%32.1%
5Sandhu, G.Labour Party1,7619.4%28.1%
6Mendes, P.Labour Party1,7519.3%28.0%
7Patel, R.Independent1,3287.1%21.2%
8Lakhani, D.Independent9415.0%15.0%
9Tejura, R.Independent7614.0%12.1%
10Chandarana, H.Liberal Democrats4752.5%7.6%
11Willmott, R.Independent3842.0%6.1%
12Gocal, P.Liberal Democrats3011.6%4.8%
13Sodha, A.Liberal Democrats2131.1%3.4%

Electorate 13,209 · Back to ward index

Western · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,165

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Dempster, V.Labour Party1,53616.2%48.5%+23.5 ptsElected
2O'Neill, M.Labour Party1,46515.4%46.3%+21.3 ptsElected
3Cole, G.Labour Party1,44115.2%45.5%+20.5 ptsElected
4Tutt, R.Conservative Party99810.5%31.5%
5Choudhary, K.Conservative Party99310.5%31.4%
6Thobhani, J.Conservative Party96710.2%30.6%
7O'Donnell, G.Independent8408.8%26.5%
8Juhlert, T.Green Party7077.4%22.3%
9Sidwell-Smith, C.Liberal Democrats5485.8%17.3%

Electorate 14,187 · Back to ward index

Beaumont Leys · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,105

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Orton, H.Conservative Party1,47015.8%47.3%+22.3 ptsElected
2Bhatia, H.Conservative Party1,45615.6%46.9%+21.9 ptsElected
3Westley, P.Conservative Party1,42015.2%45.7%+20.7 ptsElected
4Tanfa, D.Labour Party1,27813.7%41.2%
5Peberdy, M.Labour Party1,23513.3%39.8%
6Towers, D.Labour Party1,23413.2%39.7%
7Reeves, A.Green Party3704.0%11.9%
8Barnes, A.Independent3213.4%10.3%
9Irungu, D.Liberal Democrats2993.2%9.6%
10Ceesay, A.Liberal Democrats2332.5%7.5%

Electorate 12,791 · Back to ward index

Castle · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,962

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Kitterick, P.Green Party1,56417.6%52.8%+27.8 ptsElected
2Gregg, M.Green Party1,45316.4%49.1%+24.1 ptsElected
3Sahu, L.Green Party1,41916.0%47.9%+22.9 ptsElected
4Myers, D.Labour Party1,21913.7%41.2%
5Holmes, L.Labour Party1,12812.7%38.1%
6Onwuegbute, C.Labour Party1,10112.4%37.2%
7Shastri, J.Conservative Party3093.5%10.4%
8Gubbins, N.Liberal Democrats2883.2%9.7%
9Smith, P.Liberal Democrats2092.4%7.1%
10Orszulik, H.Liberal Democrats1962.2%6.6%

Electorate 10,718 · Back to ward index

North Evington · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 7,980

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Joshi, D.Conservative Party3,94316.5%49.4%+24.4 ptsElected
2Modhwadia, S.Conservative Party3,91016.3%49.0%+24.0 ptsElected
3Mahesh, R.Conservative Party3,86316.1%48.4%+23.4 ptsElected
4Taher, M.Labour Party3,15413.2%39.5%
5Shaikh, Z.Labour Party3,13613.1%39.3%
6Aggarwal, A.Labour Party2,77611.6%34.8%
7Bica, N.Liberal Democrats7323.1%9.2%
8Bhutiya, H.Liberal Democrats7283.0%9.1%
9Akgoz, H.Liberal Democrats6362.7%8.0%
10Wakley, H.Green Party3851.6%4.8%
11Gage, M.Green Party3021.3%3.8%
12Keegan, B.Green Party2961.2%3.7%
13Solanki, R.Reform UK800.3%1.0%

Electorate 15,740 · Back to ward index

Spinney Hills · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,309

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Batool, M.Labour Party2,51329.2%58.3%+25.0 ptsElected
2Malik, M.Labour Party2,45528.5%57.0%+23.6 ptsElected
3Fozdar, M.Conservative Party1,12113.0%26.0%
4Durrani, S.Conservative Party7138.3%16.5%
5Khan, S.Independent6717.8%15.6%
6Desai, I.Independent5105.9%11.8%
7Garner, C.Liberal Democrats2773.2%6.4%
8Grothusen, J.Green Party2192.5%5.1%
9Vali, A.Alliance for Democracy and Freedom1381.6%3.2%

Electorate 9,198 · Back to ward index

Braunstone Park and Rowley Fields · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,847

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Barton, S.Labour Party1,48917.4%52.3%+27.3 ptsElected
2Halford, E.Labour Party1,41916.6%49.8%+24.8 ptsElected
3Johal, K.Labour Party1,39516.3%49.0%+24.0 ptsElected
4Popat, J.Conservative Party8059.4%28.3%
5Ali, A.Conservative Party7608.9%26.7%
6Stanton-Wright, I.Conservative Party7058.3%24.8%
7McDermott, N.Green Party4895.7%17.2%
8Bradwell, I.Liberal Democrats3704.3%13.0%
9Gill, J.Independent3694.3%13.0%
10Panchmatia, K.Liberal Democrats2593.0%9.1%
11Singh, A.Liberal Democrats2452.9%8.6%
12Naylor, W.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition2372.8%8.3%

Electorate 13,974 · Back to ward index

Belgrave · 3-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 7,633

This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Chauhan, Y.Conservative Party4,42419.3%58.0%+33.0 ptsElected
2Adatia, S.Conservative Party4,40919.3%57.8%+32.8 ptsElected
3Gopal, J.Conservative Party4,33518.9%56.8%+31.8 ptsElected
4Athwal, G.Labour Party1,8187.9%23.8%
5Mistry, K.Labour Party1,7597.7%23.0%
6Thaker, H.Labour Party1,6367.1%21.4%
7Solanki, N.Independent1,3565.9%17.8%
8Chamund, P.Independent1,2965.7%17.0%
9Valand, M.Independent1,1034.8%14.5%
10Howes, D.Green Party3411.5%4.5%
11Raja, P.Liberal Democrats2391.0%3.1%
12Rollins, D.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1830.8%2.4%

Electorate 14,360 · Back to ward index

Wycliffe · 2-seat (bloc vote)

Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 71.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 5,184

This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →

RankCandidatePartyVotesShare of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes.Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota.Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it.Elected
1Aqbany, H.Labour Party3,69035.6%71.2%+37.9 ptsElected
2Dawood, M.Labour Party3,68135.5%71.0%+37.7 ptsElected
3Ahmed, Z.Conservative Party1,21811.7%23.5%
4Abdi, S.Conservative Party1,16811.3%22.5%
5Akramul, H.Liberal Democrats2752.7%5.3%
6Read, S.Green Party2192.1%4.2%
7Warrington, T.Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition1161.1%2.2%

Electorate 9,717 · Back to ward index