← Lichfield (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Lichfield 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 21 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 46 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 23,652 | 44.6% | 22 | 47.8% | 21 | 45.7% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 20,344 | 38.3% | 17 | 37.0% | 18 | 39.1% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,476 | 12.2% | 7 | 15.2% | 5 | 10.9% | +2 |
| Green Party | 1,341 | 2.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.2% | -1 |
| Independent | 1,242 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.2% | -1 |
| Total | 53,055 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 46 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Colton and the Ridwares · 1 seat · won at 52.6% · above quota
- Mease Valley · 1 seat · won at 56.3% · above quota
- Chadsmead · 2 seats · won at 45.3% · above quota
- Leomansley · 3 seats · won at 38.3% · above quota
- Boley Park · 2 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Shenstone · 1 seat · won at 69.1% · above quota
- St John's · 3 seats · won at 44.3% · above quota
- Whittington and Streethay · 3 seats · won at 45.4% · above quota
- Hammerwich with Wall · 2 seats · won at 53.8% · above quota
- Longdon · 1 seat · won at 70.5% · above quota
- Stowe · 3 seats · won at 46.1% · above quota
- Highfield · 2 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Alrewas and Fradley · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Armitage with Handsacre · 3 seats · won at 50.9% · above quota
- Summerfield and All Saints · 3 seats · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Fazeley · 2 seats · won at 61.4% · above quota
- Little Aston and Stonnall · 2 seats · won at 62.4% · above quota
- Curborough · 2 seats · won at 65.0% · above quota
- Boney Hay and Central · 3 seats · won at 59.3% · above quota
- Chasetown · 2 seats · won at 70.8% · above quota
- Chase Terrace · 2 seats · won at 72.0% · above quota
Race results
Colton and the Ridwares · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 52.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 603
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vernon, K. | Conservative Party | 317 | 52.6% | +2.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Golder, P. | Labour Party | 161 | 26.7% | — | |
| 3 | Cullen, D. | Green Party | 125 | 20.7% | — |
Mease Valley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 56.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +6.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 565
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennion, P. | Liberal Democrats | 318 | 56.3% | +6.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Yeates, A. | Conservative Party | 247 | 43.7% | — |
Chadsmead · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 953
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ray, P. | Liberal Democrats | 545 | 28.6% | 57.2% | +23.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Trent, M. | Liberal Democrats | 432 | 22.7% | 45.3% | +12.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Grange, J. | Independent | 384 | 20.1% | 40.3% | — | |
| 4 | Hutchings, E. | Conservative Party | 327 | 17.2% | 34.3% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, P. | Conservative Party | 218 | 11.4% | 22.9% | — |
Leomansley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 38.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,872
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henshaw, R. | Liberal Democrats | 734 | 13.1% | 39.2% | +14.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Checkland, J. | Conservative Party | 731 | 13.0% | 39.0% | +14.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, A. | Conservative Party | 718 | 12.8% | 38.3% | +13.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Blackman, J. | Labour Party | 716 | 12.7% | 38.2% | — | |
| 5 | Christie, J. | Liberal Democrats | 711 | 12.7% | 38.0% | — | |
| 6 | Gilbert, S. | Conservative Party | 696 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 7 | Watkins, B. | Labour Party | 669 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 8 | Ecclestone-Brown, P. | Green Party | 642 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — |
Boley Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,360
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pullen, D. | Conservative Party | 678 | 24.9% | 49.9% | +16.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Warfield, M. | Conservative Party | 660 | 24.3% | 48.5% | +15.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fox, A. | Labour Party | 528 | 19.4% | 38.8% | — | |
| 4 | Hollingsworth, S. | Liberal Democrats | 428 | 15.7% | 31.5% | — | |
| 5 | Kulkarni, R. | Labour Party | 425 | 15.6% | 31.3% | — |
Shenstone · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 69.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 641
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salter, D. | Conservative Party | 443 | 69.1% | +19.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Field, M. | Labour Party | 198 | 30.9% | — |
St John's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,532
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harvey-Coggins, R. | Labour Party | 781 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Anketell, J. | Labour Party | 747 | 16.3% | 48.8% | +23.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, J. | Liberal Democrats | 678 | 14.8% | 44.3% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Baker, D. | Conservative Party | 617 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Greatorex, C. | Conservative Party | 575 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 6 | Partridge, S. | Green Party | 574 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 7 | Matthews, T. | Conservative Party | 545 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 8 | Madden, J. | Independent | 79 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Whittington and Streethay · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,603
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holland, R. | Conservative Party | 741 | 15.4% | 46.2% | +21.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Booker, C. | Labour Party | 733 | 15.2% | 45.7% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rushton, A. | Liberal Democrats | 727 | 15.1% | 45.4% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | White, A. | Conservative Party | 724 | 15.1% | 45.2% | — | |
| 5 | Warburton, H. | Conservative Party | 694 | 14.4% | 43.3% | — | |
| 6 | Mackintosh, J. | Labour Party | 643 | 13.4% | 40.1% | — | |
| 7 | Pritchard, M. | Labour Party | 546 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — |
Hammerwich with Wall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 910
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silvester-Hall, J. | Conservative Party | 509 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Leung, W. | Conservative Party | 489 | 26.9% | 53.8% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gittings, C. | Labour Party | 447 | 24.6% | 49.1% | — | |
| 4 | McGinty, L. | Labour Party | 374 | 20.6% | 41.1% | — |
Longdon · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 70.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 545
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strachan, R. | Conservative Party | 384 | 70.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wood, C. | Labour Party | 161 | 29.5% | — |
Stowe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,484
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hughes, A. | Labour Party | 758 | 17.0% | 51.1% | +26.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bragger, R. | Labour Party | 740 | 16.6% | 49.9% | +24.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ashton, H. | Liberal Democrats | 684 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McDermott, P. | Liberal Democrats | 667 | 15.0% | 44.9% | — | |
| 5 | Lax, A. | Conservative Party | 605 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 6 | Simmons, M. | Conservative Party | 527 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 7 | O'Hagan, J. | Conservative Party | 472 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — |
Highfield · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 961
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ho, W. | Conservative Party | 602 | 31.3% | 62.7% | +29.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mears, S. | Conservative Party | 538 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ennis, R. | Labour Party | 428 | 22.3% | 44.6% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, J. | Labour Party | 353 | 18.4% | 36.8% | — |
Alrewas and Fradley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,407
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilcox, M. | Conservative Party | 748 | 17.7% | 53.2% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wilcox, S. | Conservative Party | 695 | 16.5% | 49.4% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cross, D. | Conservative Party | 682 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ryder, T. | Labour Party | 640 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Whatton, D. | Labour Party | 621 | 14.7% | 44.1% | — | |
| 6 | Coxon, I. | Labour Party | 502 | 11.9% | 35.7% | — | |
| 7 | Brooks, A. | Liberal Democrats | 332 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — |
Armitage with Handsacre · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,305
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox, R. | Conservative Party | 823 | 21.0% | 63.0% | +38.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Marshall, T. | Conservative Party | 749 | 19.1% | 57.4% | +32.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hawkins, N. | Conservative Party | 665 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Marshall, J. | Labour Party | 512 | 13.1% | 39.2% | — | |
| 5 | Shortman, M. | Labour Party | 478 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 6 | Willis, C. | Labour Party | 469 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 7 | Rae, M. | Liberal Democrats | 220 | 5.6% | 16.9% | — |
Summerfield and All Saints · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,022
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coe, K. | Labour Party | 574 | 18.7% | 56.2% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Galvin, M. | Labour Party | 528 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Banevicius, S. | Labour Party | 528 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tranter, H. | Conservative Party | 477 | 15.6% | 46.7% | — | |
| 5 | Stephenson, R. | Conservative Party | 392 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 6 | Greensill, N. | Conservative Party | 380 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 7 | Goody, S. | Independent | 187 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — |
Fazeley · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 845
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farrell, A. | Conservative Party | 526 | 31.1% | 62.2% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hill, J. | Conservative Party | 519 | 30.7% | 61.4% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thompson, A. | Labour Party | 336 | 19.9% | 39.8% | — | |
| 4 | Thompson, D. | Labour Party | 309 | 18.3% | 36.6% | — |
Little Aston and Stonnall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,124
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whitehouse, P. | Conservative Party | 705 | 31.4% | 62.7% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Powell, J. | Conservative Party | 701 | 31.2% | 62.4% | +29.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Graham, R. | Independent | 315 | 14.0% | 28.0% | — | |
| 4 | Little, E. | Independent | 277 | 12.3% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | Harrison, S. | Labour Party | 250 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — |
Curborough · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 783
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robertson, D. | Labour Party | 516 | 33.0% | 65.9% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ball, C. | Labour Party | 509 | 32.5% | 65.0% | +31.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Floyd, D. | Conservative Party | 282 | 18.0% | 36.0% | — | |
| 4 | Sheasby, E. | Conservative Party | 258 | 16.5% | 33.0% | — |
Boney Hay and Central · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,120
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, D. | Labour Party | 731 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Taylor, P. | Labour Party | 686 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Taylor, S. | Labour Party | 664 | 19.8% | 59.3% | +34.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Craik, J. | Conservative Party | 452 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Swain, S. | Conservative Party | 414 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 6 | Willis-Croft, K. | Conservative Party | 413 | 12.3% | 36.9% | — |
Chasetown · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 70.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 660
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ennis, D. | Labour Party | 507 | 38.4% | 76.8% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ennis, L. | Labour Party | 467 | 35.4% | 70.8% | +37.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bacon, N. | Conservative Party | 197 | 14.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, A. | Conservative Party | 149 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — |
Chase Terrace · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 739
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woodward, S. | Labour Party | 577 | 39.1% | 78.1% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Norman, S. | Labour Party | 532 | 36.0% | 72.0% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cross, R. | Conservative Party | 192 | 13.0% | 26.0% | — | |
| 4 | Warburton, M. | Conservative Party | 176 | 11.9% | 23.8% | — |