← Malvern Hills (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Malvern Hills 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 31 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 11,538 | 28.3% | 7 | 22.6% | 9 | 29.0% | -2 |
| Independent | 10,469 | 25.7% | 11 | 35.5% | 8 | 25.8% | +3 |
| Green Party | 7,394 | 18.2% | 7 | 22.6% | 6 | 19.4% | +1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,635 | 16.3% | 3 | 9.7% | 5 | 16.1% | -2 |
| MH IND | 2,759 | 6.8% | 3 | 9.7% | 2 | 6.5% | +1 |
| Labour Party | 1,717 | 4.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.2% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 202 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 40,714 | 100.0% | 31 | 100.0% | 31 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Pickersleigh · 1 seat · won at 45.5% · −4.5 pts below quota
- Upper Howsell · 1 seat · won at 54.8% · above quota
- Link · 3 seats · won at 32.1% · above quota
- Upton and Ripple · 2 seats · won at 41.8% · above quota
- Martley · 1 seat · won at 58.7% · above quota
- Hallow and Holt · 1 seat · won at 59.4% · above quota
- Longdon · 1 seat · won at 60.3% · above quota
- Castlemorton, Welland and Wells · 2 seats · won at 45.2% · above quota
- Lindridge · 1 seat · won at 64.9% · above quota
- Barnards Green · 3 seats · won at 40.0% · above quota
- Great Malvern · 2 seats · won at 50.1% · above quota
- Kempsey · 2 seats · won at 56.6% · above quota
- Broadheath · 1 seat · won at 76.8% · above quota
- Tenbury · 2 seats · won at 60.9% · above quota
- Baldwin · 2 seats · won at 68.7% · above quota
- Powick and the Hanleys · 2 seats · won at 73.0% · above quota
- Alfrick, Leigh and Rushwick · 2 seats · won at 77.5% · above quota
- West · 2 seats · won at 80.2% · above quota
Race results
Pickersleigh · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.5% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 466
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bennett, P. | Liberal Democrats | 212 | 45.5% | −4.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Chambers, D. | Conservative Party | 104 | 22.3% | — | |
| 3 | Walters, O. | Labour Party | 84 | 18.0% | — | |
| 4 | Bovey, C. | Independent | 66 | 14.2% | — |
Upper Howsell · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 611
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood, J. | Green Party | 335 | 54.8% | +4.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brierley, S. | Conservative Party | 146 | 23.9% | — | |
| 3 | Blazak, J. | Labour Party | 91 | 14.9% | — | |
| 4 | Chaundy, W. | Liberal Democrats | 39 | 6.4% | — |
Link · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 32.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,752
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chan, K. | Independent | 589 | 11.2% | 33.6% | +8.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mills, N. | Liberal Democrats | 568 | 10.8% | 32.4% | +7.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Victory, F. | Green Party | 563 | 10.7% | 32.1% | +7.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Bennett, D. | Liberal Democrats | 527 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 5 | Watkins, D. | Conservative Party | 504 | 9.6% | 28.8% | — | |
| 6 | Hobbs, C. | Liberal Democrats | 467 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Hanks, K. | Conservative Party | 442 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 8 | Dalley, S. | Labour Party | 437 | 8.3% | 24.9% | — | |
| 9 | Burrows, C. | Labour Party | 429 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 10 | Hooper, C. | Independent | 305 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 11 | Cherry, A. | Independent | 285 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 12 | Case, R. | Reform UK | 141 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — |
Upton and Ripple · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,453
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allen, M. | Green Party | 1,172 | 40.3% | 80.7% | +47.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Owenson, J. | Conservative Party | 608 | 20.9% | 41.8% | +8.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Waddell, A. | Conservative Party | 463 | 15.9% | 31.9% | — | |
| 4 | Rollinson, R. | Green Party | 459 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Mills, L. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 6 | Guest, D. | Reform UK | 61 | 2.1% | 4.2% | — |
Martley · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 58.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 859
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones-Williams, B. | Conservative Party | 504 | 58.7% | +8.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bateman, J. | Liberal Democrats | 197 | 22.9% | — | |
| 3 | Wilesmith, G. | Independent | 105 | 12.2% | — | |
| 4 | Oliver, M. | MH IND | 53 | 6.2% | — |
Hallow and Holt · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 59.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 833
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke, D. | Independent | 495 | 59.4% | +9.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fordington, M. | Conservative Party | 264 | 31.7% | — | |
| 3 | Drage, E. | Liberal Democrats | 74 | 8.9% | — |
Longdon · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.3% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 765
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watkins, J. | Conservative Party | 461 | 60.3% | +10.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Kershaw, T. | Green Party | 161 | 21.0% | — | |
| 3 | Smith, L. | Liberal Democrats | 143 | 18.7% | — |
Castlemorton, Welland and Wells · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,609
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gallagher, J. | Independent | 864 | 26.9% | 53.7% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wild, C. | Independent | 727 | 22.6% | 45.2% | +11.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Campbell, J. | Conservative Party | 587 | 18.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 4 | Fielding, E. | Liberal Democrats | 550 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 5 | Bayliss, M. | Conservative Party | 489 | 15.2% | 30.4% | — |
Lindridge · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.9% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 738
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Godwin, D. | Conservative Party | 479 | 64.9% | +14.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Thompson, M. | Green Party | 159 | 21.5% | — | |
| 3 | O'Loghlen, J. | Liberal Democrats | 100 | 13.6% | — |
Barnards Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,888
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Driscoll, M. | Green Party | 786 | 13.9% | 41.6% | +16.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Victory, M. | Green Party | 772 | 13.6% | 40.9% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mead, D. | Liberal Democrats | 755 | 13.3% | 40.0% | +15.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Fletcher, C. | Liberal Democrats | 596 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Benkwitz, P. | Liberal Democrats | 521 | 9.2% | 27.6% | — | |
| 6 | Hopwood, I. | Conservative Party | 463 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 7 | MacLusky, J. | Conservative Party | 423 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 8 | Vines, A. | Independent | 376 | 6.6% | 19.9% | — | |
| 9 | Lowton, L. | Labour Party | 369 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 10 | Dawson, I. | Labour Party | 307 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — | |
| 11 | Houghton, N. | Independent | 296 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — |
Great Malvern · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 50.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,449
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nielsen, B. | Independent | 798 | 27.5% | 55.1% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Palmer, C. | Independent | 726 | 25.1% | 50.1% | +16.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Campbell, H. | Conservative Party | 491 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 4 | Marson, J. | Liberal Democrats | 458 | 15.8% | 31.6% | — | |
| 5 | Jarvis, J. | Conservative Party | 425 | 14.7% | 29.3% | — |
Kempsey · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,174
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harrison, D. | Independent | 917 | 39.1% | 78.1% | +44.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Michael, J. | Independent | 665 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Daly, I. | Conservative Party | 548 | 23.3% | 46.7% | — | |
| 4 | Drage, J. | Liberal Democrats | 218 | 9.3% | 18.6% | — |
Broadheath · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 76.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 665
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Walton, D. | Independent | 511 | 76.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fordington, C. | Conservative Party | 131 | 19.7% | — | |
| 3 | Sandys, C. | Liberal Democrats | 23 | 3.5% | — |
Tenbury · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 60.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 994
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bruton, L. | MH IND | 684 | 34.4% | 68.8% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Willmott, J. | Conservative Party | 605 | 30.4% | 60.9% | +27.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Owen, P. | Conservative Party | 367 | 18.5% | 36.9% | — | |
| 4 | Jones, P. | Green Party | 331 | 16.7% | 33.3% | — |
Baldwin · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 68.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,313
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cumming, P. | Conservative Party | 905 | 34.5% | 69.0% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Cumming, P. | Conservative Party | 902 | 34.4% | 68.7% | +35.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cramp, J. | Liberal Democrats | 436 | 16.6% | 33.2% | — | |
| 4 | Latunde-Dada, S. | Green Party | 382 | 14.6% | 29.1% | — |
Powick and the Hanleys · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 73.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,759
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wells, T. | Independent | 1,461 | 41.5% | 83.1% | +49.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wells, K. | Independent | 1,283 | 36.5% | 73.0% | +39.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Barbour, S. | Conservative Party | 365 | 10.4% | 20.8% | — | |
| 4 | Watkins, O. | Conservative Party | 250 | 7.1% | 14.2% | — | |
| 5 | Aksar, R. | Liberal Democrats | 158 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — |
Alfrick, Leigh and Rushwick · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 77.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,281
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rouse, S. | MH IND | 1,030 | 40.2% | 80.4% | +47.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whatley, P. | MH IND | 992 | 38.7% | 77.5% | +44.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Selway-Swift, P. | Conservative Party | 300 | 11.7% | 23.4% | — | |
| 4 | Hardwick, L. | Liberal Democrats | 239 | 9.3% | 18.7% | — |
West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 80.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,399
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McVey, N. | Green Party | 1,152 | 41.2% | 82.4% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Raine, J. | Green Party | 1,122 | 40.1% | 80.2% | +46.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kelly, J. | Conservative Party | 312 | 11.2% | 22.3% | — | |
| 4 | Whitehead, R. | Liberal Democrats | 211 | 7.5% | 15.1% | — |