← Medway (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Medway 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 24 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 59 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 63,062 | 45.0% | 33 | 55.9% | 27 | 45.8% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 53,841 | 38.4% | 22 | 37.3% | 23 | 39.0% | -1 |
| Independent | 7,921 | 5.6% | 4 | 6.8% | 3 | 5.1% | +1 |
| Green Party | 7,741 | 5.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.1% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 6,978 | 5.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.1% | -3 |
| Heritage Party | 217 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Christian Peoples Alliance | 208 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 143 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Social Democratic Party | 132 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 140,243 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 59 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- All Saints · 1 seat · won at 30.7% · −19.3 pts below quota
- St Mary's Island · 1 seat · won at 44.6% · −5.4 pts below quota
- Fort Horsted · 1 seat · won at 45.2% · −4.8 pts below quota
- Cuxton, Halling and Riverside · 2 seats · won at 38.0% · above quota
- Rainham South West · 2 seats · won at 46.9% · above quota
- Rainham North · 3 seats · won at 41.2% · above quota
- Wayfield and Weeds Wood · 2 seats · won at 49.6% · above quota
- Luton · 2 seats · won at 51.7% · above quota
- Twydall · 2 seats · won at 54.3% · above quota
- Strood West · 3 seats · won at 50.3% · above quota
- Rochester West and Borstal · 3 seats · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Princes Park · 2 seats · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Strood North and Frindsbury · 3 seats · won at 53.6% · above quota
- Strood Rural · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Fort Pitt · 3 seats · won at 55.1% · above quota
- Rainham South East · 3 seats · won at 55.2% · above quota
- Rochester East and Warren Wood · 3 seats · won at 55.3% · above quota
- Hempstead and Wigmore · 2 seats · won at 65.4% · above quota
- Chatham Central and Brompton · 3 seats · won at 57.7% · above quota
- Lordswood and Walderslade · 3 seats · won at 59.1% · above quota
- Watling · 3 seats · won at 60.2% · above quota
- Gillingham North · 3 seats · won at 66.0% · above quota
- Gillingham South · 3 seats · won at 66.9% · above quota
- Hoo St Werburgh and High Halstow · 3 seats · won at 70.7% · above quota
Race results
All Saints · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 30.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −19.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 960
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spalding, C. | Independent | 295 | 30.7% | −19.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wallace, J. | Independent | 252 | 26.3% | — | |
| 3 | Ogunfemi, H. | Conservative Party | 190 | 19.8% | — | |
| 4 | Kemp, K. | Labour Party | 118 | 12.3% | — | |
| 5 | Khatkar, B. | Reform UK | 49 | 5.1% | — | |
| 6 | Hyde, B. | Green Party | 34 | 3.5% | — | |
| 7 | Simpson, E. | Liberal Democrats | 22 | 2.3% | — |
St Mary's Island · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 44.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −5.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,073
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tejan, H. | Conservative Party | 479 | 44.6% | −5.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Castle, J. | Liberal Democrats | 323 | 30.1% | — | |
| 3 | Hodges, D. | Labour Party | 224 | 20.9% | — | |
| 4 | Bowes, C. | Green Party | 47 | 4.4% | — |
Fort Horsted · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 45.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −4.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,082
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clarke, T. | Conservative Party | 489 | 45.2% | −4.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Parker, V. | Liberal Democrats | 344 | 31.8% | — | |
| 3 | Murray, J. | Labour Party | 212 | 19.6% | — | |
| 4 | Knott, M. | Green Party | 37 | 3.4% | — |
Cuxton, Halling and Riverside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 38.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,803
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fearn, M. | Conservative Party | 880 | 24.4% | 48.8% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Filmer, P. | Conservative Party | 685 | 19.0% | 38.0% | +4.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nightingale, M. | Green Party | 641 | 17.8% | 35.6% | — | |
| 4 | Jamieson, C. | Green Party | 502 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 5 | McCormack, S. | Labour Party | 414 | 11.5% | 23.0% | — | |
| 6 | Morris, V. | Labour Party | 408 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — | |
| 7 | Gillett, R. | Liberal Democrats | 76 | 2.1% | 4.2% | — |
Rainham South West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 46.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +13.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,192
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kemp, B. | Conservative Party | 1,177 | 26.8% | 53.7% | +20.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Joy, M. | Conservative Party | 1,027 | 23.4% | 46.9% | +13.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brown, C. | Labour Party | 750 | 17.1% | 34.2% | — | |
| 4 | Shah, A. | Labour Party | 498 | 11.4% | 22.7% | — | |
| 5 | O'Hanlon, L. | Green Party | 341 | 7.8% | 15.6% | — | |
| 6 | Jefferies, A. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 6.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 7 | Durcan, M. | Independent | 226 | 5.2% | 10.3% | — | |
| 8 | Evans, C. | Independent | 96 | 2.2% | 4.4% | — |
Rainham North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 41.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,731
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perfect, G. | Conservative Party | 1,210 | 14.8% | 44.3% | +19.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Spring, W. | Conservative Party | 1,138 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Anang, K. | Conservative Party | 1,124 | 13.7% | 41.2% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harrison, M. | Labour Party | 1,025 | 12.5% | 37.5% | — | |
| 5 | Morris, N. | Labour Party | 946 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Khan, M. | Labour Party | 907 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 7 | Bourne, S. | Liberal Democrats | 675 | 8.2% | 24.7% | — | |
| 8 | Marchant, T. | Green Party | 442 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 9 | Rosell, A. | Liberal Democrats | 402 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 10 | Chan, N. | Liberal Democrats | 323 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Wayfield and Weeds Wood · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,846
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cook, E. | Labour Party | 986 | 26.7% | 53.4% | +20.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Peake, E. | Labour Party | 915 | 24.8% | 49.6% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Burns, C. | Conservative Party | 799 | 21.6% | 43.3% | — | |
| 4 | Rai, N. | Conservative Party | 689 | 18.7% | 37.3% | — | |
| 5 | Northwood-Boorman, J. | Green Party | 121 | 3.3% | 6.6% | — | |
| 6 | Crack, H. | Liberal Democrats | 108 | 2.9% | 5.9% | — | |
| 7 | Tanner, S. | Social Democratic Party | 74 | 2.0% | 4.0% | — |
Luton · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,454
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Curry, S. | Labour Party | 796 | 27.4% | 54.7% | +21.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Howcroft-Scott, J. | Labour Party | 751 | 25.8% | 51.7% | +18.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Lammas, L. | Conservative Party | 541 | 18.6% | 37.2% | — | |
| 4 | Igani, M. | Conservative Party | 510 | 17.5% | 35.1% | — | |
| 5 | Sutton, D. | Green Party | 174 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | O'Neill, P. | Liberal Democrats | 136 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Twydall · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,600
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Browne, H. | Labour Party | 967 | 30.2% | 60.4% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Prenter, M. | Labour Party | 869 | 27.2% | 54.3% | +21.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Brewer, M. | Conservative Party | 502 | 15.7% | 31.4% | — | |
| 4 | Smith, L. | Conservative Party | 489 | 15.3% | 30.6% | — | |
| 5 | Belmonte, K. | Green Party | 222 | 6.9% | 13.9% | — | |
| 6 | Ruparel, M. | Liberal Democrats | 151 | 4.7% | 9.4% | — |
Strood West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,458
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jackson, S. | Labour Party | 1,338 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jones, M. | Labour Party | 1,291 | 17.5% | 52.5% | +27.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Shokar, S. | Labour Party | 1,236 | 16.8% | 50.3% | +25.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Igwe, I. | Conservative Party | 991 | 13.4% | 40.3% | — | |
| 5 | Iles, J. | Conservative Party | 972 | 13.2% | 39.5% | — | |
| 6 | Buckwell, C. | Conservative Party | 970 | 13.2% | 39.5% | — | |
| 7 | Griffiths, S. | Green Party | 262 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Wild, M. | Liberal Democrats | 159 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — | |
| 9 | Heathfield, R. | Independent | 155 | 2.1% | 6.3% | — |
Rochester West and Borstal · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,122
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paterson, A. | Labour Party | 1,807 | 19.3% | 57.9% | +32.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bowen, L. | Labour Party | 1,670 | 17.8% | 53.5% | +28.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hamilton, P. | Labour Party | 1,624 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tranter, S. | Conservative Party | 1,336 | 14.3% | 42.8% | — | |
| 5 | Rivers, F. | Conservative Party | 1,080 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 6 | Joiner, T. | Conservative Party | 1,010 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 7 | Worsley, S. | Green Party | 536 | 5.7% | 17.2% | — | |
| 8 | Holloway, A. | Liberal Democrats | 303 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — |
Princes Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,527
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lammas, R. | Conservative Party | 938 | 30.7% | 61.4% | +28.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hyne, A. | Conservative Party | 933 | 30.6% | 61.1% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Strevens, J. | Labour Party | 486 | 15.9% | 31.8% | — | |
| 4 | Olodo, T. | Labour Party | 425 | 13.9% | 27.8% | — | |
| 5 | Marchant, S. | Green Party | 156 | 5.1% | 10.2% | — | |
| 6 | Sailes, I. | Liberal Democrats | 116 | 3.8% | 7.6% | — |
Strood North and Frindsbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,139
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dyke, Z. | Labour Party | 1,774 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hubbard, S. | Labour Party | 1,758 | 18.7% | 56.0% | +31.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Field, D. | Labour Party | 1,682 | 17.9% | 53.6% | +28.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Batts, G. | Conservative Party | 1,202 | 12.8% | 38.3% | — | |
| 5 | Liddell, C. | Conservative Party | 1,078 | 11.4% | 34.3% | — | |
| 6 | Edun, A. | Conservative Party | 1,069 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 7 | Stephen, A. | Green Party | 393 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 8 | Clark, A. | Liberal Democrats | 245 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 9 | Clark, P. | Heritage Party | 217 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — |
Strood Rural · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,625
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, J. | Conservative Party | 1,458 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Etheridge, G. | Conservative Party | 1,446 | 18.4% | 55.1% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turpin, E. | Conservative Party | 1,409 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wyatt, R. | Labour Party | 849 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 5 | Thomas, E. | Labour Party | 786 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 6 | Munton, D. | Labour Party | 742 | 9.4% | 28.3% | — | |
| 7 | Atkinson, N. | Green Party | 379 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — | |
| 8 | Clark, J. | Liberal Democrats | 304 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — | |
| 9 | Millsom, A. | Liberal Democrats | 282 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 10 | Wells, A. | Liberal Democrats | 219 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — |
Fort Pitt · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,864
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell, S. | Labour Party | 1,726 | 20.1% | 60.3% | +35.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mahil, H. | Labour Party | 1,634 | 19.0% | 57.0% | +32.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Myton, G. | Labour Party | 1,577 | 18.4% | 55.1% | +30.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Turpin, R. | Conservative Party | 1,028 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 5 | Thorne, R. | Conservative Party | 951 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 6 | Opara, G. | Conservative Party | 901 | 10.5% | 31.5% | — | |
| 7 | Scott, K. | Green Party | 527 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 8 | Sandhu, N. | Liberal Democrats | 249 | 2.9% | 8.7% | — |
Rainham South East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,591
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barrett, R. | Conservative Party | 1,455 | 18.7% | 56.2% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Doe, H. | Conservative Party | 1,448 | 18.6% | 55.9% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hackwell, G. | Conservative Party | 1,430 | 18.4% | 55.2% | +30.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Campbell, K. | Labour Party | 920 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 5 | Childs, I. | Labour Party | 835 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 6 | Mottram, C. | Labour Party | 759 | 9.8% | 29.3% | — | |
| 7 | Smith, M. | Green Party | 431 | 5.5% | 16.6% | — | |
| 8 | Moore, C. | Liberal Democrats | 337 | 4.3% | 13.0% | — | |
| 9 | Peacock, R. | Christian Peoples Alliance | 158 | 2.0% | 6.1% | — |
Rochester East and Warren Wood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,434
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murray, T. | Labour Party | 1,658 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Edwards, L. | Labour Party | 1,517 | 20.8% | 62.3% | +37.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Osborne, T. | Labour Party | 1,347 | 18.4% | 55.3% | +30.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Clarke, G. | Conservative Party | 784 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 5 | Griffin, S. | Conservative Party | 755 | 10.3% | 31.0% | — | |
| 6 | Sirlan, T. | Conservative Party | 665 | 9.1% | 27.3% | — | |
| 7 | Stone, M. | Green Party | 370 | 5.1% | 15.2% | — | |
| 8 | Manuel, S. | Liberal Democrats | 206 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Hempstead and Wigmore · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,473
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gilbourne, J. | Conservative Party | 1,709 | 34.6% | 69.1% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lawrence, A. | Conservative Party | 1,617 | 32.7% | 65.4% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bailey, L. | Labour Party | 603 | 12.2% | 24.4% | — | |
| 4 | Khan, H. | Labour Party | 450 | 9.1% | 18.2% | — | |
| 5 | Korff, K. | Green Party | 237 | 4.8% | 9.6% | — | |
| 6 | Cavaliere, D. | Liberal Democrats | 222 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 7 | Wheeler, P. | Social Democratic Party | 58 | 1.2% | 2.3% | — | |
| 8 | Gibson, J. | Christian Peoples Alliance | 50 | 1.0% | 2.0% | — |
Chatham Central and Brompton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,969
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maple, V. | Labour Party | 1,394 | 23.6% | 70.8% | +45.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gurung, N. | Labour Party | 1,211 | 20.5% | 61.5% | +36.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Animashaun, D. | Labour Party | 1,136 | 19.2% | 57.7% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Khera, P. | Conservative Party | 552 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 5 | King, C. | Conservative Party | 517 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 6 | Tejan, H. | Conservative Party | 467 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 7 | O'Hanlon, R. | Green Party | 336 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 8 | Juby, G. | Liberal Democrats | 295 | 5.0% | 15.0% | — |
Lordswood and Walderslade · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,740
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brake, D. | Conservative Party | 1,752 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wildey, D. | Conservative Party | 1,728 | 21.0% | 63.1% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gulvin, A. | Conservative Party | 1,618 | 19.7% | 59.1% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Godwin, C. | Labour Party | 917 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bowen, D. | Labour Party | 817 | 9.9% | 29.8% | — | |
| 6 | Cook, B. | Labour Party | 777 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 7 | Hyner, S. | Green Party | 339 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 8 | Vincent, M. | Liberal Democrats | 272 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — |
Watling · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,027
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stamp, C. | Labour Party | 1,998 | 22.0% | 66.0% | +41.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Coombs, T. | Labour Party | 1,977 | 21.8% | 65.3% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Nestorov, M. | Labour Party | 1,823 | 20.1% | 60.2% | +35.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Marsden, S. | Conservative Party | 985 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 5 | Venus-Coppard, T. | Conservative Party | 817 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 6 | Strudwick-Long, A. | Conservative Party | 808 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Munro, T. | Green Party | 361 | 4.0% | 11.9% | — | |
| 8 | Yale, D. | Liberal Democrats | 313 | 3.4% | 10.3% | — |
Gillingham North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,029
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Price, A. | Labour Party | 1,419 | 23.3% | 69.9% | +44.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hamandishe, D. | Labour Party | 1,355 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mandaracas, L. | Labour Party | 1,339 | 22.0% | 66.0% | +41.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barrett, C. | Conservative Party | 530 | 8.7% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Chishti, Z. | Conservative Party | 439 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 6 | Sidhu, H. | Conservative Party | 410 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 7 | Spyby-Steanson, J. | Green Party | 340 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Rist, B. | Liberal Democrats | 254 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — |
Gillingham South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,229
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDonald, D. | Labour Party | 1,617 | 24.2% | 72.5% | +47.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan, N. | Labour Party | 1,531 | 22.9% | 68.7% | +43.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Prenter, L. | Labour Party | 1,491 | 22.3% | 66.9% | +41.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith, A. | Conservative Party | 509 | 7.6% | 22.8% | — | |
| 5 | Adeoye, S. | Conservative Party | 471 | 7.0% | 21.1% | — | |
| 6 | Georghiou, G. | Conservative Party | 373 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 7 | Belmonte, D. | Green Party | 373 | 5.6% | 16.7% | — | |
| 8 | Sams, C. | Liberal Democrats | 322 | 4.8% | 14.4% | — |
Hoo St Werburgh and High Halstow · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,154
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crozer, G. | Independent | 2,388 | 25.2% | 75.7% | +50.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sands, R. | Independent | 2,279 | 24.1% | 72.2% | +47.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pearce, M. | Independent | 2,230 | 23.6% | 70.7% | +45.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Tildesley, R. | Conservative Party | 465 | 4.9% | 14.7% | — | |
| 5 | Sparks, C. | Conservative Party | 427 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 6 | Mitchell, F. | Conservative Party | 409 | 4.3% | 13.0% | — | |
| 7 | Barwell, G. | Labour Party | 358 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 8 | Christmas, G. | Labour Party | 336 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 9 | Vickery, S. | Labour Party | 286 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 10 | Sutton, J. | Green Party | 140 | 1.5% | 4.4% | — | |
| 11 | Hudson, S. | Reform UK | 94 | 1.0% | 3.0% | — | |
| 12 | Sergejenkovs-Telford, A. | Liberal Democrats | 51 | 0.5% | 1.6% | — |